Evaluating coverage of genome-wide association studies (original) (raw)

Nature Genetics volume 38, pages 659–662 (2006)Cite this article

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies involving hundreds of thousands of SNPs in thousands of cases and controls are now underway. The first of many analytical challenges in these studies involves the choice of SNPs to genotype. It is not practical to construct a different panel of tag SNPs for each study, so the first generation of genome-wide scans will use predefined, commercially available marker panels, which will in part dictate their success or failure. We compare different approaches in use today, and show that although many of them provide substantial coverage of common variation in non-African populations, the precise extent is strongly dependent on the frequencies of alleles of interest and on specific considerations of study design. Overall, despite substantial differences in genotyping technologies, marker selection strategies and number of markers assayed, the first-generation high-throughput platforms all offer similar levels of genome coverage.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Altshuler, D. et al. A haplotype map of the human genome. Nature 437, 1299–1320 (2005).
    Article Google Scholar
  2. Hinds, D.A. et al. Whole-genome patterns of common DNA variation in three human populations. Science 307, 1072–1079 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Wang, W.Y., Barratt, B.J., Clayton, D.G. & Todd, J.A. Genome-wide association studies: theoretical and practical concerns. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 109–118 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  4. Hirschhorn, J.N. & Daly, M.J. Genome-wide association studies for common diseases and complex traits. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 95–108 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Palmer, L.J. & Cardon, L.R. Shaking the tree: mapping complex disease genes with linkage disequilibrium. Lancet 366, 1223–1234 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  6. Botstein, D. & Risch, N. Discovering genotypes underlying human phenotypes: past successes for mendelian disease, future approaches for complex disease. Nat. Genet. 33 (Suppl.), 228–237 (2003).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Neale, B.M. & Sham, P.C. The future of association studies: gene-based analysis and replication. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 75, 353–362 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  8. Clayton, D.G. et al. Population structure, differential bias and genomic control in a large-scale, case-control association study. Nat. Genet. 37, 1243–1246 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  9. de Bakker, P.I. et al. Efficiency and power in genetic association studies. Nat. Genet. 37, 1217–1223 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  10. Dong, S. et al. Flexible use of high-density oligonucleotide arrays for single-nucleotide polymorphism discovery and validation. Genome Res. 11, 1418–1424 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  11. Carlson, C.S. et al. Selecting a maximally informative set of single-nucleotide polymorphisms for association analyses using linkage disequilibrium. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 74, 106–120 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  12. Ke, X. et al. A comparison of tagging methods and their tagging space. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14, 2757–2767 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. Pritchard, J.K. & Przeworski, M. Linkage disequilibrium in humans: models and data. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 69, 1–14 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Jorgenson, E. & Witte, J.S. Coverage and power in genomewide association studies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 78, 884–888 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  15. Daly, M. et al. Evaluating and improving power in whole-genome association studies using fixed marker sets. Nat. Genet. advance online publication 21 May 2006 (doi:10.1038/ng1816).
  16. Klein, R.J. et al. Complement factor H polymorphism in age-related macular degeneration. Science 308, 385–389 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  17. Rieder, M.J. et al. Effect of VKORC1 haplotypes on transcriptional regulation and warfarin dose. N. Engl. J. Med. 352, 2285–2293 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  18. Hardenbol, P. et al. Highly multiplexed molecular inversion probe genotyping: over 10,000 targeted SNPs genotyped in a single tube assay. Genome Res. 15, 269–275 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  19. Barrett, J.C., Fry, B., Maller, J. & Daly, M.J. Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 21, 263–265 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank M. Daly, I. Pe'er, L. Palmer, M. Barnes and the WTCCC analysis group, particularly D. Clayton and P. Donnelly, for discussions on many of these topics. We thank D. Evans for comments on the manuscript. We also thank the investigators and participants in the International HapMap project for generating the unique data set and making it available to the scientific community. The authors are supported by the Wellcome Trust, the US National Institutes of Health and a grant from the European Union (MolPAGE).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Roosevelt Drive, OX3 7BN, Oxford, UK
    Jeffrey C Barrett & Lon R Cardon

Authors

  1. Jeffrey C Barrett
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Lon R Cardon
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toLon R Cardon.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barrett, J., Cardon, L. Evaluating coverage of genome-wide association studies.Nat Genet 38, 659–662 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1801

Download citation

This article is cited by

Associated content