Lengsfeld, B.M., Berry, K.N., Ghosh, S., Takahashi, M. & Francis, N.J. A Polycomb complex remains bound through DNA replication in the absence of other eukaryotic proteins. Sci. Rep.2, 661 (2012). ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCAS Google Scholar
Lo, S.M. et al. A bridging model for persistence of a polycomb group protein complex through DNA replication in vitro. Mol. Cell46, 784–796 (2012). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Petruk, S. et al. TrxG and PcG proteins but not methylated histones remain associated with DNA through replication. Cell150, 922–933 (2012). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Fisher, A.G. & Brockdorff, N. Epigenetic memory and parliamentary privilege combine to evoke discussions on inheritance. Development139, 3891–3896 (2012). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Braun, R.E. Packaging paternal chromosomes with protamine. Nat. Genet.28, 10–12 (2001). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Adenot, P.G., Mercier, Y., Renard, J.P. & Thompson, E.M. Differential H4 acetylation of paternal and maternal chromatin precedes DNA replication and differential transcriptional activity in pronuclei of 1-cell mouse embryos. Development124, 4615–4625 (1997). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Santos, F., Peters, A.H., Otte, A.P., Reik, W. & Dean, W. Dynamic chromatin modifications characterise the first cell cycle in mouse embryos. Dev. Biol.280, 225–236 (2005). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Sobel, R.E., Cook, R.G., Perry, C.A., Annunziato, A.T. & Allis, C.D. Conservation of deposition-related acetylation sites in newly synthesized histones H3 and H4. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA92, 1237–1241 (1995). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Erhardt, S. et al. Consequences of the depletion of zygotic and embryonic enhancer of zeste 2 during preimplantation mouse development. Development130, 4235–4248 (2003). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Liu, H., Kim, J.M. & Aoki, F. Regulation of histone H3 lysine 9 methylation in oocytes and early pre-implantation embryos. Development131, 2269–2280 (2004). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Arney, K.L., Bao, S., Bannister, A.J., Kouzarides, T. & Surani, M.A. Histone methylation defines epigenetic asymmetry in the mouse zygote. Int. J. Dev. Biol.46, 317–320 (2002). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Puschendorf, M. et al. PRC1 and Suv39h specify parental asymmetry at constitutive heterochromatin in early mouse embryos. Nat. Genet.40, 411–420 (2008). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Kourmouli, N. et al. Heterochromatin and tri-methylated lysine 20 of histone H4 in animals. J. Cell Sci.117, 2491–2501 (2004). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Daujat, S. et al. H3K64 trimethylation marks heterochromatin and is dynamically remodeled during developmental reprogramming. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.16, 777–781 (2009). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Sarmento, O.F. et al. Dynamic alterations of specific histone modifications during early murine development. J. Cell Sci.117, 4449–4459 (2004). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Lepikhov, K. & Walter, J. Differential dynamics of histone H3 methylation at positions K4 and K9 in the mouse zygote. BMC Dev. Biol.4, 12 (2004). ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCAS Google Scholar
Mayer, W., Niveleau, A., Walter, J., Fundele, R. & Haaf, T. Embryogenesis: demethylation of the zygotic paternal genome. Nature403, 501–502 (2000). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Santos, F., Hendrich, B., Reik, W. & Dean, W. Dynamic reprogramming of DNA methylation in the early mouse embryo. Dev. Biol.241, 172–182 (2002). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Smith, Z.D. et al. A unique regulatory phase of DNA methylation in the early mammalian embryo. Nature484, 339–344 (2012).This is the first base-resolution, genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation during preimplantation development. ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Gill, M.E., Erkek, S. & Peters, A.H.F.M. Parental epigenetic control of embryogenesis: a balance between inheritance and reprogramming? Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.24, 387–396 (2012). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Bouniol, C., Nguyen, E. & Debey, P. Endogenous transcription occurs at the 1-cell stage in the mouse embryo. Exp. Cell Res.218, 57–62 (1995). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Aoki, F., Worrad, D.M. & Schultz, R.M. Regulation of transcriptional activity during the first and second cell cycles in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Dev. Biol.181, 296–307 (1997). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Henery, C.C., Miranda, M., Wiekowski, M., Wilmut, I. & DePamphilis, M.L. Repression of gene expression at the beginning of mouse development. Dev. Biol.169, 448–460 (1995). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Gu, T.P. et al. The role of Tet3 DNA dioxygenase in epigenetic reprogramming by oocytes. Nature477, 606–610 (2011).Work in refs. 29 and 36 demonstrates that the global replication-independent loss of 5mC in the paternal genome of the zygote is due to its oxidation into 5hmC by Tet3 enzyme. ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Oswald, J. et al. Active demethylation of the paternal genome in the mouse zygote. Curr. Biol.10, 475–478 (2000). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Tahiliani, M. et al. Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science324, 930–935 (2009).This work identifies TET proteins as mammalian homologs of trypanosome enzymes that are capable of oxidizing 5mC into 5hmC. ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Iqbal, K., Jin, S.G., Pfeifer, G.P. & Szabo, P.E. Reprogramming of the paternal genome upon fertilization involves genome-wide oxidation of 5-methylcytosine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA108, 3642–3647 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Wossidlo, M. et al. 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine in the mammalian zygote is linked with epigenetic reprogramming. Nat. Commun.2, 241 (2011). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Inoue, A., Shen, L., Dai, Q., He, C. & Zhang, Y. Generation and replication-dependent dilution of 5fC and 5caC during mouse preimplantation development. Cell Res.21, 1670–1676 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Teperek-Tkacz, M., Pasque, V., Gentsch, G. & Ferguson-Smith, A.C. Epigenetic reprogramming: is deamination key to active DNA demethylation? Reproduction142, 621–632 (2011). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Hajkova, P. et al. Genome-wide reprogramming in the mouse germ line entails the base excision repair pathway. Science329, 78–82 (2010). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Chan, M.M., Smith, Z.D., Egli, D., Regev, A. & Meissner, A. Mouse ooplasm confers context-specific reprogramming capacity. Nat. Genet.44, 978–980 (2012). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Booth, M.J. et al. Quantitative sequencing of 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine at single-base resolution. Science336, 934–937 (2012). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Branco, M.R., Oda, M. & Reik, W. Safeguarding parental identity: Dnmt1 maintains imprints during epigenetic reprogramming in early embryogenesis. Genes Dev.22, 1567–1571 (2008). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Hirasawa, R. et al. Maternal and zygotic Dnmt1 are necessary and sufficient for the maintenance of DNA methylation imprints during preimplantation development. Genes Dev.22, 1607–1616 (2008). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Payer, B. et al. Stella is a maternal effect gene required for normal early development in mice. Curr. Biol.13, 2110–2117 (2003). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Nakamura, T. et al. PGC7/Stella protects against DNA demethylation in early embryogenesis. Nat. Cell Biol.9, 64–71 (2007). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Nakamura, T. et al. PGC7 binds histone H3K9me2 to protect against conversion of 5mC to 5hmC in early embryos. Nature486, 415–419 (2012).This work shows that Dppa3 protects the maternal genome and genomic imprints from Tet3-mediate oxidation by binding H3K9me2. ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Lane, N. et al. Resistance of IAPs to methylation reprogramming may provide a mechanism for epigenetic inheritance in the mouse. Genesis35, 88–93 (2003). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Olek, A. & Walter, J. The pre-implantation ontogeny of the H19 methylation imprint. Nat. Genet.17, 275–276 (1997). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Tremblay, K.D., Duran, K.L. & Bartolomei, M.S. A 5′2-kilobase-pair region of the imprinted mouse H19 gene exhibits exclusive paternal methylation throughout development. Mol. Cell Biol.17, 4322–4329 (1997). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Pittoggi, C. et al. A fraction of mouse sperm chromatin is organized in nucleosomal hypersensitive domains enriched in retroposon DNA. J. Cell Sci.112, 3537–3548 (1999). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Wykes, S.M. & Krawetz, S.A. The structural organization of sperm chromatin. J. Biol. Chem.278, 29471–29477 (2003). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Li, X. et al. A maternal-zygotic effect gene, Zfp57, maintains both maternal and paternal imprints. Dev. Cell15, 547–557 (2008).Work described in refs. 54–57 demonstrates that sequence-specific DNA-binding factors Zfp57 and Trim28 can cooperate with the histone modification system to maintain DNA methylation marks at imprinted loci, thus preventing their loss during preimplantation development. ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Messerschmidt, D.M. et al. Trim28 is required for epigenetic stability during mouse oocyte to embryo transition. Science335, 1499–1502 (2012). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Quenneville, S. et al. The KRAB-ZFP/KAP1 system contributes to the early embryonic establishment of site-specific DNA methylation patterns maintained during development. Cell Rep.2, 766–773 (2012). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Quenneville, S. et al. In embryonic stem cells, ZFP57/KAP1 recognize a methylated hexanucleotide to affect chromatin and DNA methylation of imprinting control regions. Mol. Cell44, 361–372 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Zuo, X. et al. Zinc finger protein ZFP57 requires its co-factor to recruit DNA methyltransferases and maintains DNA methylation imprint in embryonic stem cells via its transcriptional repression domain. J. Biol. Chem.287, 2107–2118 (2012). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Schultz, D.C., Ayyanathan, K., Negorev, D., Maul, G.G. & Rauscher, F.J. SETDB1: a novel KAP-1-associated histone H3, lysine 9-specific methyltransferase that contributes to HP1-mediated silencing of euchromatic genes by KRAB zinc-finger proteins. Genes Dev.16, 919–932 (2002). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Lorthongpanich, C., Doris, T.P., Limviphuvadh, V., Knowles, B.B. & Solter, D. Developmental fate and lineage commitment of singled mouse blastomeres. Development139, 3722–3731 (2012). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Takaoka, K. & Hamada, H. Cell fate decisions and axis determination in the early mouse embryo. Development139, 3–14 (2012). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Guo, J.U., Su, Y., Zhong, C., Ming, G.L. & Song, H. Hydroxylation of 5-methylcytosine by TET1 promotes active DNA demethylation in the adult brain. Cell145, 423–434 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Johnson, M.H. & Ziomek, C.A. The foundation of two distinct cell lineages within the mouse morula. Cell24, 71–80 (1981). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Torres-Padilla, M.E., Parfitt, D.E., Kouzarides, T. & Zernicka-Goetz, M. Histone arginine methylation regulates pluripotency in the early mouse embryo. Nature445, 214–218 (2007).This work shows that increasing the levels of arginine methylation in individual blastomeres from 4-cell-stage embryos results in the dramatic upregulation of Oct4 and Sox2 and directs their progeny to the inner cell mass. ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Fisher, C.L. & Fisher, A.G. Chromatin states in pluripotent, differentiated, and reprogrammed cells. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.21, 140–146 (2011). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Azuara, V. et al. Chromatin signatures of pluripotent cell lines. Nat. Cell Biol.8, 532–538 (2006). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Bernstein, B.E. et al. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell125, 315–326 (2006). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Ballaré, C. et al. Phf19 links methylated Lys36 of histone H3 to regulation of Polycomb activity. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.19, 1257–1265 (2012).Work described in refs. 70 and 71 demonstrates that the PRC2 component Phf19 binds H3K36me2 and H3K36me3 and is required both for the deposition of H3K27me3 and the recruitment of H3K36 demethylase enzymes at Polycomb target genes. ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCAS Google Scholar
Brien, G.L. et al. Polycomb PHF19 binds H3K36me3 and recruits PRC2 and demethylase NO66 to embryonic stem cell genes during differentiation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.19, 1273–1281 (2012). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Ku, M. et al. Genomewide analysis of PRC1 and PRC2 occupancy identifies two classes of bivalent domains. PLoS Genet.4, e1000242 (2008). ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCAS Google Scholar
Ohinata, Y. et al. A signaling principle for the specification of the germ cell lineage in mice. Cell137, 571–584 (2009). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Hajkova, P. et al. Chromatin dynamics during epigenetic reprogramming in the mouse germ line. Nature452, 877–881 (2008). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Seki, Y. et al. Extensive and orderly reprogramming of genome-wide chromatin modifications associated with specification and early development of germ cells in mice. Dev. Biol.278, 440–458 (2005). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Mansour, A.A. et al. The H3K27 demethylase Utx regulates somatic and germ cell epigenetic reprogramming. Nature488, 409–413 (2012). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Tachibana, M. et al. Histone methyltransferases G9a and GLP form heteromeric complexes and are both crucial for methylation of euchromatin at H3–K9. Genes Dev.19, 815–826 (2005). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Dong, K.B. et al. DNA methylation in ES cells requires the lysine methyltransferase G9a but not its catalytic activity. EMBO J.27, 2691–2701 (2008). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Tachibana, M., Matsumura, Y., Fukuda, M., Kimura, H. & Shinkai, Y. G9a/GLP complexes independently mediate H3K9 and DNA methylation to silence transcription. EMBO J.27, 2681–2690 (2008). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Kurimoto, K. et al. Complex genome-wide transcription dynamics orchestrated by Blimp1 for the specification of the germ cell lineage in mice. Genes Dev.22, 1617–1635 (2008). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Yamaji, M. et al. Critical function of Prdm14 for the establishment of the germ cell lineage in mice. Nat. Genet.40, 1016–1022 (2008). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Lee, J. et al. Erasing genomic imprinting memory in mouse clone embryos produced from day 11.5 primordial germ cells. Development129, 1807–1817 (2002). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Sato, S., Yoshimizu, T., Sato, E. & Matsui, Y. Erasure of methylation imprinting of Igf2r during mouse primordial germ-cell development. Mol. Reprod. Dev.65, 41–50 (2003). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Hackett, J.A. et al. Promoter DNA methylation couples genome-defence mechanisms to epigenetic reprogramming in the mouse germline. Development139, 3623–3632 (2012). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Guibert, S., Forne, T. & Weber, M. Global profiling of DNA methylation erasure in mouse primordial germ cells. Genome Res.22, 633–641 (2012). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Popp, C. et al. Genome-wide erasure of DNA methylation in mouse primordial germ cells is affected by AID deficiency. Nature463, 1101–1105 (2010). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, S. et al. Tet1 controls meiosis by regulating meiotic gene expression. Nature492, 443–447 (2012).This work shows that during PGCs development Tet1 is required for the demethylation and the consequent expression of a specific functional class of genes, which are required for meiosis. ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Cortellino, S. et al. Thymine DNA glycosylase is essential for active DNA demethylation by linked deamination-base excision repair. Cell146, 67–79 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Hanna, J. et al. Direct cell reprogramming is a stochastic process amenable to acceleration. Nature462, 595–601 (2009).Work described in refs. 92 and 93 demonstrates that reprogramming of somatic cells via the forced expression of a defined set of transcriptional factors is initially triggered by a series of stochastic (epigenetic) events that subsequently lead to the hierarchical activation of the pluripotency network. ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Buganim, Y. et al. Single-cell expression analyses during cellular reprogramming reveal an early stochastic and a late hierarchic phase. Cell150, 1209–1222 (2012). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Bui, H.T. et al. Effect of trichostatin A on chromatin remodeling, histone modifications, DNA replication, and transcriptional activity in cloned mouse embryos. Biol. Reprod.83, 454–463 (2010). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Esteban, M.A. et al. Vitamin C enhances the generation of mouse and human induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell6, 71–79 (2010). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Huangfu, D. et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells by defined factors is greatly improved by small-molecule compounds. Nat. Biotechnol.26, 795–797 (2008). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Kishigami, S. et al. Significant improvement of mouse cloning technique by treatment with trichostatin A after somatic nuclear transfer. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.340, 183–189 (2006). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Liang, G., Taranova, O., Xia, K. & Zhang, Y. Butyrate promotes induced pluripotent stem cell generation. J. Biol. Chem.285, 25516–25521 (2010). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Mali, P. et al. Butyrate greatly enhances derivation of human induced pluripotent stem cells by promoting epigenetic remodeling and the expression of pluripotency–associated genes. Stem Cells28, 713–720 (2010). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Ang, Y.S. et al. Wdr5 mediates self-renewal and reprogramming via the embryonic stem cell core transcriptional network. Cell145, 183–197 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Shi, Y. et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic fibroblasts by Oct4 and Klf4 with small-molecule compounds. Cell Stem Cell3, 568–574 (2008). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Shi, Y. et al. A combined chemical and genetic approach for the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell2, 525–528 (2008). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Epsztejn-Litman, S. et al. De novo DNA methylation promoted by G9a prevents reprogramming of embryonically silenced genes. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.15, 1176–1183 (2008). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Ma, D.K., Chiang, C.H., Ponnusamy, K., Ming, G.L. & Song, H. G9a and Jhdm2a regulate embryonic stem cell fusion-induced reprogramming of adult neural stem cells. Stem Cells26, 2131–2141 (2008). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Ho, L. et al. An embryonic stem cell chromatin remodeling complex, esBAF, is an essential component of the core pluripotency transcriptional network. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA106, 5187–5191 (2009). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Ho, L. et al. esBAF facilitates pluripotency by conditioning the genome for LIF/STAT3 signalling and by regulating polycomb function. Nat. Cell Biol.13, 903–913 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Singhal, N. et al. Chromatin-remodeling components of the BAF complex facilitate reprogramming. Cell141, 943–955 (2010). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Pasque, V., Gillich, A., Garrett, N. & Gurdon, J.B. Histone variant macroH2A confers resistance to nuclear reprogramming. EMBO J.30, 2373–2387 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Koche, R.P. et al. Reprogramming factor expression initiates widespread targeted chromatin remodeling. Cell Stem Cell8, 96–105 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Pereira, C.F. et al. Heterokaryon-based reprogramming of human B lymphocytes for pluripotency requires Oct4 but not Sox2. PLoS Genet.4, e1000170 (2008). ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCAS Google Scholar
Simonsson, S. & Gurdon, J. DNA demethylation is necessary for the epigenetic reprogramming of somatic cell nuclei. Nat. Cell Biol.6, 984–990 (2004). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Piccolo, F.M. et al. Using heterokaryons to understand pluripotency and reprogramming. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B366, 2260–2265 (2011). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Foshay, K.M. et al. Embryonic stem cells induce pluripotency in somatic cell fusion through biphasic reprogramming. Mol. Cell46, 159–170 (2012). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Stadtfeld, M., Maherali, N., Breault, D.T. & Hochedlinger, K. Defining molecular cornerstones during fibroblast to iPS cell reprogramming in mouse. Cell Stem Cell2, 230–240 (2008). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Doege, C.A. et al. Early-stage epigenetic modification during somatic cell reprogramming by Parp1 and Tet2. Nature488, 652–655 (2012).This work shows that Tet2 is required during early phases of iPSC reprogramming for remodeling the chromatin at the promoters of key pluripotency genes in a demethylation-independent manner. ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Hackett, J.A. et al. Germline DNA demethylation dynamics and imprint erasure through 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. Science advance online publication, doi:10.1126/science.1229277 (13 December 2012).
Takagi, N. Requirement of mitoses for the reversal of X-inactivation in cell hybrids between murine embryonal carcinoma cells and normal female thymocytes. Exp. Cell Res.175, 363–375 (1988). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Gurdon, J.B. The developmental capacity of nuclei taken from intestinal epithelium cells of feeding tadpoles. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol.10, 622–640 (1962). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Wakayama, T., Perry, A.C., Zuccotti, M., Johnson, K.R. & Yanagimachi, R. Full-term development of mice from enucleated oocytes injected with cumulus cell nuclei. Nature394, 369–374 (1998). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Tada, M., Takahama, Y., Abe, K., Nakatsuji, N. & Tada, T. Nuclear reprogramming of somatic cells by in vitro hybridization with ES cells. Curr. Biol.11, 1553–1558 (2001). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell126, 663–676 (2006). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar