Prediction of off-target activities for the end-to-end design of CRISPR guide RNAs (original) (raw)

• Doench, J. G. et al. Optimized sgRNA design to maximize activity and minimize off-target effects of CRISPR–Cas9. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 184–191 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hsu, P. D. et al. DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 827–832 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Tsai, S. Q. et al. GUIDE-seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR–Cas nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 187–197 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Frock, R. L. et al. Genome-wide detection of DNA double-stranded breaks induced by engineered nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 179–186 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wang, X. et al. Unbiased detection of off-target cleavage by CRISPR–Cas9 and TALENs using integrase-defective lentiviral vectors. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 175–178 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kim, D. et al. Digenome-seq: genome-wide profiling of CRISPR–Cas9 off-target effects in human cells. Nat. Methods 12, 237–243 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kim, D., Kim, S., Kim, S., Park, J. & Kim, J.-S. Genome-wide target specificities of CRISPR–Cas9 nucleases revealed by multiplex Digenome-seq. Genome Res. 26, 406–415 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Tsai, S. Q. et al. CIRCLE-seq: a highly sensitive in vitro screen for genome-wide CRISPR–Cas9 nuclease off-targets. Nat. Methods 14, 607–614 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Cameron, P. et al. Mapping the genomic landscape of CRISPR–Cas9 cleavage. Nat. Methods 14, 600–606 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ran, F. A. et al. In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Nature 520, 186–191 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Yan, W. X. et al. BLISS is a versatile and quantitative method for genome-wide profiling of DNA double-strand breaks. Nat. Commun. 8, 15058 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Crosetto, N. et al. Nucleotide-resolution DNA double-strand break mapping by next-generation sequencing. Nat. Methods 10, 361–365 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Stemmer, M., Thumberger, T., del Sol Keyer, M., Wittbrodt, J. & Mateo, J. L. CCTop: an intuitive, flexible and reliable CRISPR/Cas9 target prediction tool. PLoS ONE 10, e0124633 (2015).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bae, S., Park, J. & Kim, J. S. Cas-OFFinder: a fast and versatile algorithm that searches for potential off-target sites of Cas9 RNA-guided endonucleases. Bioinformatics 30, 1473–1475 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Haeussler, M. et al. Evaluation of off-target and on-target scoring algorithms and integration into the guide RNA selection tool CRISPOR. Genome Biol. 17, 148 (2016).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Labun, K., Montague, T. G., Gagnon, J. A., Thyme, S. B. & Valen, E. CHOPCHOP v2: a web tool for the next generation of CRISPR genome engineering. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W272–W276 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Heigwer, F., Kerr, G. & Boutros, M. E-CRISP: fast CRISPR target site identification. Nat. Methods 11, 122–123 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ma, J. et al. CRISPR-DO for genome-wide CRISPR design and optimization. Bioinformatics 32, 3336–3338 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Singh, R., Kuscu, C., Quinlan, A., Qi, Y. & Adli, M. Cas9–chromatin binding information enables more accurate CRISPR off-target prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e118 (2015).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Cradick, T. J., Qiu, P., Lee, C. M., Fine, E. J. & Bao, G. COSMID: a web-based tool for identifying and validating CRISPR/Cas off-target sites. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 3, e214 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Xu, H.et al. Sequence determinants of improved CRISPR sgRNA design. Genome Res. 25, 1147–1157 2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chari, R., Mali, P., Moosburner, M. & Church, G. M. Unraveling CRISPR–Cas9 genome engineering parameters via a library-on-library approach. Nat. Methods 12, 823–826 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Doench, J. G.et al. Rational design of highly active sgRNAs for CRISPR–Cas9-mediated gene inactivation. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 1262–1267 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wang, T., Wei, J. J., Sabatini, D. M. & Lander, E. S. Genetic screens in human cells using the CRISPR–Cas9 system. Science 343, 80–84 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Moreno-Mateos, M. A. et al. CRISPRscan: designing highly efficient sgRNAs for CRISPR–Cas9 targeting in vivo. Nat. Methods 12, 982–988 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Housden, B. E. et al. Identification of potential drug targets for tuberous sclerosis complex by synthetic screens combining CRISPR-based knockouts with RNAi. Sci. Signal. 8, rs9 (2015).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kim, D. et al. Genome-wide analysis reveals specificities of Cpf1 endonucleases in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 863–868 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kleinstiver, B. P. et al. Genome-wide specificities of CRISPR–Cas Cpf1 nucleases in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 869–874 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. et al. CRISPR/Cas9 systems have off-target activity with insertions or deletions between target DNA and guide RNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 7473–7485 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kleinstiver, B. P. et al. High-fidelity CRISPR–Cas9 nucleases with no detectable genome-wide off-target effects. Nature 529, 490–495 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Aguirre, A. J. et al. Genomic copy number dictates a gene-independent cell response to CRISPR/Cas9 targeting. Cancer Discov. 6, 914–929 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Munoz, D. M. et al. CRISPR screens provide a comprehensive assessment of cancer vulnerabilities but generate false-positive hits for highly amplified genomic regions. Cancer Discov. 6, 900–913 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Morgens, D. W. et al. Genome-scale measurement of off-target activity using Cas9 toxicity in high-throughput screens. Nat. Commun. 8, 15178 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Yates, A. et al. Ensembl 2016. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D710–D716 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lee, C. M., Davis, T. H. & Bao, G. Examination of CRISPR/Cas9 design tools and the effect of target site accessibility on Cas9 activity. Exp. Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1113/EP086043 (2017).
  Google Scholar
• Horlbeck, M. A. et al. Nucleosomes impede Cas9 access to DNA in vivo and in vitro. eLife 5, e12677 (2016).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. P. & Cox, D. R. An analysis of transformations. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Methodol. 26, 211–252 (1964).
  Google Scholar
• Reyon, D.et al. FLASH assembly of TALENs for high-throughput genome editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 460–465 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Tsai, S. Q., Topkar, V. V., Joung, J. K. & Aryee, M. J. Open-source guideseq software for analysis of GUIDE-seq data. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 483 (2016).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Russell, S. & Norvig, P. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach: International Edition 3rd edn (Pearson, New Jersey, 2010).
• Frank, E., Trigg, L., Holmes, G. & Witten, I. H. Naive Bayes for regression. Mach. Learn. 41, 5–25 (2000).
  Article Google Scholar
• Freund, Y. & Schapire, R. E. A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. J. Comp. Syst. Sci. 55, 119–139 (1997).
  Article Google Scholar
• Bishop, C. M. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Springer, New York, 2007).
• Wolpert, D. H. Stacked generalization. Neural Netw. 5, 241–259 (1992).
  Article Google Scholar
• Baeza-Yates, R. A. & Perleberg, C. H. Fast and practical approximate string matching. Inf. Process. Lett. 59, 21–27 (1996).
  Article Google Scholar
• Hoffman, M. M. et al. Integrative annotation of chromatin elements from ENCODE data. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 827–841 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar