BRAF mutation predicts sensitivity to MEK inhibition (original) (raw)

Nature volume 439, pages 358–362 (2006)Cite this article

Abstract

The kinase pathway comprising RAS, RAF, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) and extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK) is activated in most human tumours, often through gain-of-function mutations of RAS and RAF family members1. Using small-molecule inhibitors of MEK and an integrated genetic and pharmacologic analysis, we find that mutation of BRAF is associated with enhanced and selective sensitivity to MEK inhibition when compared to either ‘wild-type’ cells or cells harbouring a RAS mutation. This MEK dependency was observed in BRAF mutant cells regardless of tissue lineage, and correlated with both downregulation of cyclin D1 protein expression and the induction of G1 arrest. Pharmacological MEK inhibition completely abrogated tumour growth in BRAF mutant xenografts, whereas RAS mutant tumours were only partially inhibited. These data suggest an exquisite dependency on MEK activity in BRAF mutant tumours, and offer a rational therapeutic strategy for this genetically defined tumour subtype.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 51 print issues and online access

$199.00 per year

only $3.90 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davies, H. et al. Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature 417, 949–954 (2002)
    Article CAS ADS PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Brose, M. S. et al. BRAF and RAS mutations in human lung cancer and melanoma. Cancer Res. 62, 6997–7000 (2002)
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Gorden, A. et al. Analysis of BRAF and N-RAS mutations in metastatic melanoma tissues. Cancer Res. 63, 3955–3957 (2003)
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Crews, C. M., Alessandrini, A. & Erikson, R. L. The primary structure of MEK, a protein kinase that phosphorylates the ERK gene product. Science 258, 478–480 (1992)
    Article CAS ADS PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Sebolt-Leopold, J. S. et al. Blockade of the MAP kinase pathway suppresses growth of colon tumors in vivo . Nature Med. 5, 810–816 (1999)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Ohren, J. F. et al. Structures of human MAP kinase kinase 1 (MEK1) and MEK2 describe novel noncompetitive kinase inhibition. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 1192–1197 (2004)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Mody, N., Leitch, J., Armstrong, C., Dixon, J. & Cohen, P. Effects of MAP kinase cascade inhibitors on the MKK5/ERK5 pathway. FEBS Lett. 502, 21–24 (2001)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Stinson, S. F. et al. Morphological and immunocytochemical characteristics of human tumour cell lines for use in a disease-oriented anticancer drug screen. Anticancer Res. 12, 1035–1053 (1992)
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Golub, T. R. et al. Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science 286, 531–537 (1999)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Zhao, A. et al. Resorcylic acid lactones: naturally occurring potent and selective inhibitors of MEK. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 52, 1086–1094 (1999)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  11. Dombrowski, A. et al. Production of a family of kinase-inhibiting lactones from fungal fermentations. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 52, 1077–1085 (1999)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  12. Chopra, A. P., Boone, S. A., Liang, X. & Duesbery, N. S. Anthrax lethal factor proteolysis and inactivation of MAPK kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 9402–9406 (2003)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Alessi, D. R., Cuenda, A., Cohen, P., Dudley, D. T. & Saltiel, A. R. PD 098059 is a specific inhibitor of the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase in vitro and in vivo . J. Biol. Chem. 270, 27489–27494 (1995)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Cheng, M., Sexl, V., Sherr, C. J. & Roussel, M. F. Assembly of cyclin D-dependent kinase and titration of p27Kip1 regulated by mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK1). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 1091–1096 (1998)
    Article CAS ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  15. Sebolt-Leopold, J. S. & Herrera, R. Targeting the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade to treat cancer. Nature Rev. Cancer 4, 937–947 (2004)
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  16. Wellbrock, C. et al. V599EB-RAF is an oncogene in melanocytes. Cancer Res. 64, 2338–2342 (2004)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  17. Karasarides, M. et al. B-RAF is a therapeutic target in melanoma. Oncogene 23, 6292–6298 (2004)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  18. Muise-Helmericks, R. C. et al. Cyclin D expression is controlled post-transcriptionally via a phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt-dependent pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 29864–29872 (1998)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Diehl, J. A., Cheng, M., Roussel, M. F. & Sherr, C. J. Glycogen synthase kinase-3β regulates cyclin D1 proteolysis and subcellular localization. Genes Dev. 12, 3499–3511 (1998)
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  20. Filmus, J. et al. Induction of cyclin D1 overexpression by activated ras. Oncogene 9, 3627–3633 (1994)
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Liu, J. J. et al. Ras transformation results in an elevated level of cyclin D1 and acceleration of G1 progression in NIH 3T3 cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 3654–3663 (1995)
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  22. Albanese, C. et al. Transforming p21ras mutants and c-Ets-2 activate the cyclin D1 promoter through distinguishable regions. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 23589–23597 (1995)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  23. Aktas, H., Cai, H. & Cooper, G. M. Ras links growth factor signalling to the cell cycle machinery via regulation of cyclin D1 and the Cdk inhibitor p27KIP1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 3850–3857 (1997)
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  24. Kerkhoff, E. & Rapp, U. R. Induction of cell proliferation in quiescent NIH 3T3 cells by oncogenic c-Raf-1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 2576–2586 (1997)
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  25. Weber, J. D., Raben, D. M., Phillips, P. J. & Baldassare, J. J. Sustained activation of extracellular-signal-regulated kinase 1 (ERK1) is required for the continued expression of cyclin D1 in G1 phase. Biochem. J. 326, 61–68 (1997)
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  26. Hamad, N. M. et al. Distinct requirements for Ras oncogenesis in human versus mouse cells. Genes Dev. 16, 2045–2057 (2002)
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  27. Gonzalez-Garcia, A. et al. RalGDS is required for tumour formation in a model of skin carcinogenesis. Cancer Cell 7, 219–226 (2005)
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Garraway, L. A. et al. Integrative genomic analyses identify MITF as a lineage survival oncogene amplified in malignant melanoma. Nature 436, 117–122 (2005)
    Article CAS ADS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank H. Ju, W. L. Wong and H. Tseng for technical assistance. This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (L.A.G., C.A.P., G.G., T.R.G., W.R.S. and N.R.), the William H. Goodwin and Alice Goodwin Foundation for Cancer Research, the MSKCC Experimental Therapeutics Program (D.B.S. and N.R.), the Waxman Foundation (D.B.S. and N.R.), the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (G.G. and T.R.G.), Golfers Against Cancer (D.B.S. and N.R.) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (D.B.S. and C.A.P.).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Andrea Basso
    Present address: Schering-Plough, 2015 Galloping Hill Rd, Kenilworth, New Jersey, 07033, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medicine,
    David B. Solit & Neal Rosen
  2. Department of Pediatrics,
    Christine A. Pratilas
  3. Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Chemistry, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, 10021, New York, USA
    David B. Solit, Christine A. Pratilas, Ayana Sawai, Andrea Basso, Qing Ye, Jose M. Lobo, Yuhong She & Neal Rosen
  4. Department of Medical Oncology,
    Levi A. Garraway & William R. Sellers
  5. Department of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, 44 Binney Street, Massachusetts, 02115, Boston, USA
    Todd R. Golub
  6. Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, 320 Charles Street, Massachusetts, 02141, Cambridge, USA
    Levi A. Garraway, Gad Getz, Todd R. Golub & William R. Sellers
  7. Departments of Medicine and Urology, New York University Medical Center, 550 First Avenue, New York, 10016, New York, USA
    Iman Osman
  8. Pfizer Global Research and Development, 2800 Plymouth Road, Michigan, 48105, Ann Arbor, USA
    Judith Sebolt-Leopold

Authors

  1. David B. Solit
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Levi A. Garraway
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Christine A. Pratilas
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Ayana Sawai
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. Gad Getz
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  6. Andrea Basso
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  7. Qing Ye
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  8. Jose M. Lobo
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  9. Yuhong She
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  10. Iman Osman
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  11. Todd R. Golub
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  12. Judith Sebolt-Leopold
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  13. William R. Sellers
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  14. Neal Rosen
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence toNeal Rosen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

J.S.-L. is an employee of Pfizer Global Research.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Figure Legends

Legends to accompany the Supplementary Figures and Supplementary Table. (DOC 25 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

Significant Compounds Following Supervised Pharmacologic Analysis of BRAF(V600E) Mutation in NCI60 Cancer Cell Lines. (PDF 55 kb)

Supplementary Figure 1

Hypothemycin causes downregulation of p-ERK and cyclin D1 expression in BRAF(V600E) mutant cells. (PDF 213 kb)

Supplementary Figure 2

PD0325901 selectively inhibits the growth of BRAF mutant cell lines. (PDF 61 kb)

Supplementary Figure 3

Sensitivity of Colo205 and SKMEL30 xenograft tumours to the MEK inhibitor PD0325901. (PDF 16 kb)

Supplementary Figure 4

dSensitivity of xenograft tumours to PD0325901 does not correlate with basal levels of p-ERK. (PDF 137 kb)

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Solit, D., Garraway, L., Pratilas, C. et al. BRAF mutation predicts sensitivity to MEK inhibition.Nature 439, 358–362 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04304

Download citation

Editorial Summary

Tumour profiling advances

Molecular tumour profiling is one way in which effective targeted cancer treatment regimes might be developed. Two groups report significant developments in this direction. Bild et al. studied gene expression patterns that reflect the activation of various oncogenic (cancer-causing) signal transduction pathways. Using combinations of these pathway signatures, they predict which patients with breast, lung or ovarian cancer have a particularly poor prognosis. The ability to identify molecular pathways that are deregulated in a particular cancer in this way might be used to predict its sensitivity to specific therapeutic drugs. Solit et al. studied tumour cells with mutations in the RAS and BRAF genes, thought to cause cancer at least in part by activating the MEK/ERK signalling pathway. They show that tumours with the BRAF mutation, but not RAS, are highly sensitive to PD0325901, an MEK inhibitor that is in early-stage clinical trials in patients with melanoma, colon, breast and lung cancers. So by testing for the presence of BRAF mutations it may be possible to identify those patients most likely to benefit from this type of drug.

Associated content