Circular chromosome conformation capture (4C) uncovers extensive networks of epigenetically regulated intra- and interchromosomal interactions (original) (raw)

Nature Genetics volume 38, pages 1341–1347 (2006)Cite this article

Abstract

Accumulating evidence converges on the possibility that chromosomes interact with each other to regulate transcription in trans. To systematically explore the epigenetic dimension of such interactions, we devised a strategy termed circular chromosome conformation capture (4C). This approach involves a circularization step that enables high-throughput screening of physical interactions between chromosomes without a preconceived idea of the interacting partners. Here we identify 114 unique sequences from all autosomes, several of which interact primarily with the maternally inherited H19 imprinting control region. Imprinted domains were strongly overrepresented in the library of 4C sequences, further highlighting the epigenetic nature of these interactions. Moreover, we found that the direct interaction between differentially methylated regions was linked to epigenetic regulation of transcription in trans. Finally, the patterns of interactions specific to the maternal H19 imprinting control region underwent reprogramming during in vitro maturation of embryonic stem cells. These observations shed new light on development, cancer epigenetics and the evolution of imprinting.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Subscribe to this journal

Receive 12 print issues and online access

$209.00 per year

only $17.42 per issue

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Additional access options:

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Horike, S., Cai, S., Miyano, M., Cheng, J.-F. & Kohwi-Shigematsu, T. Loss of silent-chromatin looping and impaired imprinting of DLX5 in Rett syndrome. Nat. Genet. 37, 31–40 (2004).
    Article Google Scholar
  2. Osborne, C.S. et al. Active genes dynamically colocalize to shared sites of ongoing transcription. Nat. Genet. 36, 1065–1071 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  3. Brown, K. et al. Association of transcriptionally silent genes with Ikaros complexes at centromeric heterochromatin. Cell 91, 845–854 (1997).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  4. Spilianakis, C., Lalioti, M., Town, T., Lee, G. & Flavell, R. Interchromosomal associations betweeen alternatively expressed loci. Nature 435, 637–645 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  5. Dekker, J. The three 'C's of chromosome conformation capture: controls, controls, controls. Nat Methods. 3, 17–21 (2005).
    Article Google Scholar
  6. Murrell, A., Heeson, S. & Reik, W. Interaction between differentially methylated regions partitions the imprinted genes Igf2 and H19 into parent-specific chromatin loops. Nat. Genet. 36, 889–893 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Kurukuti, S. et al. CTCF binding at the H19 imprinting control region mediates maternally inherited higher-order chromatin conformation to restrict enhancer access to Igf2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 10684–10689 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  8. Dean, W. et al. Altered imprinted gene methylation and expression in completely ES cell-derived mouse fetuses: association with abberant phenotypes. Development 125, 2273–2282 (1998).
    CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Pant, V. et al. The nucleotides responsible for the direct physical contact between the chromatin insulator protein CTCF and the H19 imprinting control region manifest parent of origin-specific long-distance insulation and methylation-free domains. Genes Dev. 17, 586–590 (2003).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  10. Tolhuis, B., Palstra, R., Splinter, E., Grosveld, F. & de Laat, W. Looping and interaction between hypersensitive sites in the active beta-globin locus. Mol. Cell 10, 1453–1465 (2002).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  11. Luedi, P., Hartemink, A. & Jirtle, R. Genome-wide prediction of imprinted murine genes. Genome Res. 15, 875–884 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  12. Okamura, K., Yamada, Y., Sakaki, Y. & Ito, T. An evolutionary scenario for genomic imprinting of Impact lying between nonimprinted neighbors. DNA Res. 11, 381–390 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. Massey, J.B. Membrane and protein interactions of oxysterols. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 17, 296–301 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  14. Ling, J. et al. CTCF mediates interchromosomal interactions between Igf2/H19 and Wsb1/Nf1. Science 312, 269–272 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  15. Wurtele, H. & Chartrand, P. Genome-wide scanning of _HoxB1_-associated loci in mouse ES cells using an open-ended chromosome conformation capture methodology. Chromosome Res. 14, 477–495 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Ohlsson, R., Paldi, A. & Graves, J.M. Did genomic imprinting and X inactivation arise from stochastic expression? Trends Genet. 17, 136–141 (2001).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  17. Kono, T. et al. Birth of parthenogenetic mice that can develop into adulthood. Nature 428, 860–864 (2004).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  18. Sakatani, T. et al. Loss of imprinting of Igf2 alters intestinal maturation and tumorigenesis in mice. Science 307, 1976–1978 (2005).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  19. Bacher, C.P. et al. Transient colocalization of X-inactivation centres accompanies the initiation of X inactivation. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 293–299 (2006).
    Article CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Mattsson for expert technical assistance and M. Merkenschlager and P. Fraser for helpful advice. We are also grateful for the assistance of the Wallenberg microarray group at the Royal Technical University at Stockholm. This work was supported by the Swedish Science Research Council (V.R., R.O.), the Swedish Cancer Research Foundation (C.F., R.O.), the Swedish Pediatric Cancer Foundation (B.C.F, R.O.), HEROIC (European Union integrated project) and the Lundberg Foundation (R.O.).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Zhihu Zhao and Gholamreza Tavoosidana: These authors contributed equally to the work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Development & Genetics, Evolution Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18A, Uppsala, SE-752 36, Sweden
    Zhihu Zhao, Gholamreza Tavoosidana, Mikael Sjölinder, Anita Göndör, Piero Mariano, Sha Wang, Chandrasekhar Kanduri, Magda Lezcano, Kuljeet Singh Sandhu, Umashankar Singh, Vinod Pant, Vijay Tiwari, Sreenivasulu Kurukuti & Rolf Ohlsson

Authors

  1. Zhihu Zhao
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  2. Gholamreza Tavoosidana
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  3. Mikael Sjölinder
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  4. Anita Göndör
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  5. Piero Mariano
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  6. Sha Wang
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  7. Chandrasekhar Kanduri
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  8. Magda Lezcano
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  9. Kuljeet Singh Sandhu
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  10. Umashankar Singh
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  11. Vinod Pant
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  12. Vijay Tiwari
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  13. Sreenivasulu Kurukuti
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar
  14. Rolf Ohlsson
    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Z.Z. generated the 4C library and designed and performed the 4C microarray experiments. G.T. performed the 3C validation, analysis of microarray data and quantitative RT-PCR expression analysis. M.S. performed the 3D DNA FISH analysis. A.G. designed the 3D DNA FISH analysis and analysis of microarray data. P.M. designed the 4C approach and assisted in the analysis. S.W. assisted in the generation of microarrays. C.K. performed the DNA blot analysis. M.L. provided the ES cells and derived embryoid bodies and phenotyped the preparations used in this study. K.S.S. performed the statistical analysis. U.S. assisted in the characterization of the ES and derived embryoid bodies. V.P. generated the mutant 142* mouse strain used in this study. V.T. assisted in characterization of PCR primers and conditions. S.K. assisted in characterization of PCR primers and conditions. R.O. designed and supervised the entire 4C project and assisted in the analysis of microarray data.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The method described in the manuscript is the subject of a patent application. This has not influenced the results and discussion of this report.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhao, Z., Tavoosidana, G., Sjölinder, M. et al. Circular chromosome conformation capture (4C) uncovers extensive networks of epigenetically regulated intra- and interchromosomal interactions.Nat Genet 38, 1341–1347 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1891

Download citation