Determinants and dynamics of genome accessibility (original) (raw)

• Felsenfeld, G. & Groudine, M. Controlling the double helix. Nature 421, 448–453 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kaplan, N. et al. The DNA-encoded nucleosome organization of a eukaryotic genome. Nature 458, 362–366 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. et al. Intrinsic histone-DNA interactions are not the major determinant of nucleosome positions in vivo. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 847–852 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Segal, E. & Widom, J. What controls nucleosome positions? Trends Genet. 25, 335–343 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Workman, J. L. & Kingston, R. E. Alteration of nucleosome structure as a mechanism of transcriptional regulation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 545–579 (1998).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kouzarides, T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell 128, 693–705 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. & Reinberg, D. Transcription regulation by histone methylation: interplay between different covalent modifications of the core histone tails. Genes Dev. 15, 2343–2360 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Talbert, P. B. & Henikoff, S. Histone variants — ancient wrap artists of the epigenome. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 264–275 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Albert, I. et al. Translational and rotational settings of H2A.Z nucleosomes across the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature 446, 572–576 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Mikkelsen, T. S. et al. Genome-wide maps of chromatin state in pluripotent and lineage-committed cells. Nature 448, 553–560 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Segal, E. et al. A genomic code for nucleosome positioning. Nature 442, 772–778 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Yuan, G. C. et al. Genome-scale identification of nucleosome positions in S. cerevisiae. Science 309, 626–630 (2005). This was the first high-resolution genome-wide study of nucleosome distribution. It indicated that conserved DNA sequences contribute to the stereotypic nucleosome arrangement found at most yeast promoters.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Boyle, A. P. et al. High-resolution mapping and characterization of open chromatin across the genome. Cell 132, 311–322 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wu, C., Bingham, P. M., Livak, K. J., Holmgren, R. & Elgin, S. C. The chromatin structure of specific genes: I. Evidence for higher order domains of defined DNA sequence. Cell 16, 797–806 (1979). This was the first demonstration that DNase I sensitivity and chromatin structure at gene promoters dynamically respond to transcriptional regulation.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wu, C. The 5′ ends of Drosophila heat shock genes in chromatin are hypersensitive to DNase I. Nature 286, 854–860 (1980).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Mito, Y., Henikoff, J. G. & Henikoff, S. Histone replacement marks the boundaries of _cis_-regulatory domains. Science 315, 1408–1411 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nagy, P. L., Cleary, M. L., Brown, P. O. & Lieb, J. D. Genomewide demarcation of RNA polymerase II transcription units revealed by physical fractionation of chromatin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 6364–6369 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sabo, P. J. et al. Genome-wide identification of DNaseI hypersensitive sites using active chromatin sequence libraries. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 4537–4542 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Crawford, G. E. et al. Identifying gene regulatory elements by genome-wide recovery of DNase hypersensitive sites. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 992–997 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Weintraub, H. & Groudine, M. Chromosomal subunits in active genes have an altered conformation. Science 193, 848–856 (1976). This paper was the first to describe differential sensitivity of active and repressed genes to DNase I digestion.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bulger, M. et al. A complex chromatin landscape revealed by patterns of nuclease sensitivity and histone modification within the mouse β-globin locus. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 5234–5244 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Noll, M., Thomas, J. O. & Kornberg, R. D. Preparation of native chromatin and damage caused by shearing. Science 187, 1203–1206 (1975).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Schones, D. E. et al. Dynamic regulation of nucleosome positioning in the human genome. Cell 132, 887–898 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Mavrich, T. N. et al. Nucleosome organization in the Drosophila genome. Nature 453, 358–362 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Valouev, A. et al. Determinants of nucleosome organization in primary human cells. Nature 474, 516–520 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Jessen, W. J., Hoose, S. A., Kilgore, J. A. & Kladde, M. P. Active PHO5 chromatin encompasses variable numbers of nucleosomes at individual promoters. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 13, 256–263 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Fatemi, M. et al. Footprinting of mammalian promoters: use of a CpG DNA methyltransferase revealing nucleosome positions at a single molecule level. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, e176 (2005).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Gottschling, D. E. Telomere-proximal DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is refractory to methyltransferase activity in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 4062–4065 (1992).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Singh, J. & Klar, A. J. Active genes in budding yeast display enhanced in vivo accessibility to foreign DNA methylases: a novel in vivo probe for chromatin structure of yeast. Genes Dev. 6, 186–196 (1992).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bell, O. et al. Accessibility of the Drosophila genome discriminates PcG repression, H4K16 acetylation and replication timing. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 894–900 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Dekker, J., Rippe, K., Dekker, M. & Kleckner, N. Capturing chromosome conformation. Science 295, 1306–1311 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tolhuis, B., Palstra, R. J., Splinter, E., Grosveld, F. & de Laat, W. Looping and interaction between hypersensitive sites in the active β-globin locus. Mol. Cell 10, 1453–1465 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Dostie, J. et al. Chromosome conformation capture carbon copy (5C): a massively parallel solution for mapping interactions between genomic elements. Genome Res. 16, 1299–1309 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Fullwood, M. J. et al. An oestrogen-receptor-α-bound human chromatin interactome. Nature 462, 58–64 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Simonis, M. et al. Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture-on-chip (4C). Nature Genet. 38, 1348–1354 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tiwari, V. K., Cope, L., McGarvey, K. M., Ohm, J. E. & Baylin, S. B. A novel 6C assay uncovers Polycomb-mediated higher order chromatin conformations. Genome Res. 18, 1171–1179 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zhao, Z. et al. Circular chromosome conformation capture (4C) uncovers extensive networks of epigenetically regulated intra- and interchromosomal interactions. Nature Genet. 38, 1341–1347 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wu, C., Wong, Y. C. & Elgin, S. C. The chromatin structure of specific genes: II. Disruption of chromatin structure during gene activity. Cell 16, 807–814 (1979).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Workman, J. L. Nucleosome displacement in transcription. Genes Dev. 20, 2009–2017 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Han, M. & Grunstein, M. Nucleosome loss activates yeast downstream promoters in vivo. Cell 55, 1137–1145 (1988).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Knezetic, J. A. & Luse, D. S. The presence of nucleosomes on a DNA template prevents initiation by RNA polymerase II in vitro. Cell 45, 95–104 (1986).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Drew, H. R. & Travers, A. A. DNA bending and its relation to nucleosome positioning. J. Mol. Biol. 186, 773–790 (1985).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Satchwell, S. C., Drew, H. R. & Travers, A. A. Sequence periodicities in chicken nucleosome core DNA. J. Mol. Biol. 191, 659–675 (1986).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Struhl, K. Naturally occurring poly(dA-dT) sequences are upstream promoter elements for constitutive transcription in yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 82, 8419–8423 (1985).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Valouev, A. et al. A high-resolution, nucleosome position map of C. elegans reveals a lack of universal sequence-dictated positioning. Genome Res. 18, 1051–1063 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z. et al. A packing mechanism for nucleosome organization reconstituted across a eukaryotic genome. Science 332, 977–980 (2011). The authors showed that in vitro reconstitution of nucleosome positioning outside budding yeast promoters relies mostly on ATP-dependent remodelling rather than sequence determinants.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Li, B., Carey, M. & Workman, J. L. The role of chromatin during transcription. Cell 128, 707–719 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Workman, J. L. & Kingston, R. E. Nucleosome core displacement in vitro via a metastable transcription factor-nucleosome complex. Science 258, 1780–1784 (1992).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Fascher, K. D., Schmitz, J. & Horz, W. Role of _trans_-activating proteins in the generation of active chromatin at the PHO5 promoter in S. cerevisiae. EMBO J. 9, 2523–2528 (1990).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lomvardas, S. & Thanos, D. Nucleosome sliding via TBP DNA binding in vivo. Cell 106, 685–696 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• John, S. et al. Chromatin accessibility pre-determines glucocorticoid receptor binding patterns. Nature Genet. 43, 264–268 (2011). This genome-wide study revealed that tissue-specific DNA binding of glucorticoid receptors is largely directed by pre-existing foci of accessible chromatin.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bucceri, A., Kapitza, K. & Thoma, F. Rapid accessibility of nucleosomal DNA in yeast on a second time scale. EMBO J. 25, 3123–3132 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Li, G., Levitus, M., Bustamante, C. & Widom, J. Rapid spontaneous accessibility of nucleosomal DNA. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 46–53 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Almer, A. & Horz, W. Nuclease hypersensitive regions with adjacent positioned nucleosomes mark the gene boundaries of the PHO5/PHO3 locus in yeast. EMBO J. 5, 2681–2687 (1986).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lam, F. H., Steger, D. J. & O'Shea, E. K. Chromatin decouples promoter threshold from dynamic range. Nature 453, 246–250 (2008). This study systematically dissects the interplay between affinity and location of transcription factor binding sites relative to positioned nucleosomes and implies a role for chromatin to fine-tune the transcriptional response to external signalling.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Clapier, C. R. & Cairns, B. R. The biology of chromatin remodeling complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 78, 273–304 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Becker, P. B. & Horz, W. ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 71, 247–273 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Parnell, T. J., Huff, J. T. & Cairns, B. R. RSC regulates nucleosome positioning at Pol II genes and density at Pol III genes. EMBO J. 27, 100–110 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hartley, P. D. & Madhani, H. D. Mechanisms that specify promoter nucleosome location and identity. Cell 137, 445–458 (2009). This work dissects the order of events and reveals concerted action of sequence determinants, transcription-factor binding and nucleosome remodelling that lead to establishment of NDRs in budding yeast.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Raisner, R. M. et al. Histone variant H2A.Z marks the 5′ ends of both active and inactive genes in euchromatin. Cell 123, 233–248 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Whitehouse, I., Rando, O. J., Delrow, J. & Tsukiyama, T. Chromatin remodelling at promoters suppresses antisense transcription. Nature 450, 1031–1035 (2007). This genome-wide localization study showed that the chromatin remodeller Isw2 slides nucleosomes onto unfavourable A/T-rich sequences, which prevents aberrant transcription from canonical and cryptic start sites.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Izban, M. G. & Luse, D. S. Transcription on nucleosomal templates by RNA polymerase II in vitro: inhibition of elongation with enhancement of sequence-specific pausing. Genes Dev. 5, 683–696 (1991).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lee, C. K., Shibata, Y., Rao, B., Strahl, B. D. & Lieb, J. D. Evidence for nucleosome depletion at active regulatory regions genome-wide. Nature Genet. 36, 900–905 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Belotserkovskaya, R. et al. FACT facilitates transcription-dependent nucleosome alteration. Science 301, 1090–1093 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Schwabish, M. A. & Struhl, K. Asf1 mediates histone eviction and deposition during elongation by RNA polymerase II. Mol. Cell 22, 415–422 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bortvin, A. & Winston, F. Evidence that Spt6p controls chromatin structure by a direct interaction with histones. Science 272, 1473–1476 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kaplan, C. D., Laprade, L. & Winston, F. Transcription elongation factors repress transcription initiation from cryptic sites. Science 301, 1096–1099 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Mason, P. B. & Struhl, K. The FACT complex travels with elongating RNA polymerase II and is important for the fidelity of transcriptional initiation in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 8323–8333 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• McKittrick, E., Gafken, P. R., Ahmad, K. & Henikoff, S. Histone H3.3 is enriched in covalent modifications associated with active chromatin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 1525–1530 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Schwartz, B. E. & Ahmad, K. Transcriptional activation triggers deposition and removal of the histone variant H3.3. Genes Dev. 19, 804–814 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wirbelauer, C., Bell, O. & Schubeler, D. Variant histone H3.3 is deposited at sites of nucleosomal displacement throughout transcribed genes while active histone modifications show a promoter-proximal bias. Genes Dev. 19, 1761–1766 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Roberts, D. N. & Cairns, B. R. Genome-wide dynamics of Htz1, a histone H2A variant that poises repressed/basal promoters for activation through histone loss. Cell 123, 219–231 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Jin, C. et al. H3.3/H2A.Z double variant-containing nucleosomes mark 'nucleosome-free regions' of active promoters and other regulatory regions. Nature Genet. 41, 941–945 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Rando, O. J. Global patterns of histone modifications. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 17, 94–99 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Taverna, S. D., Li, H., Ruthenburg, A. J., Allis, C. D. & Patel, D. J. How chromatin-binding modules interpret histone modifications: lessons from professional pocket pickers. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 1025–1040 (2007).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Wysocka, J. et al. A PHD finger of NURF couples histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation with chromatin remodelling. Nature 442, 86–90 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Dorigo, B., Schalch, T., Bystricky, K. & Richmond, T. J. Chromatin fiber folding: requirement for the histone H4 N-terminal tail. J. Mol. Biol. 327, 85–96 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Shogren-Knaak, M. et al. Histone H4-K16 acetylation controls chromatin structure and protein interactions. Science 311, 844–847 (2006). The authors provide in vitro evidence that H4K16ac antagonizes chromatin condensation by disrupting charge-based histone interactions and binding of the chromatin remodelling factor ACF.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Akhtar, A. & Becker, P. B. Activation of transcription through histone H4 acetylation by MOF, an acetyltransferase essential for dosage compensation in Drosophila. Mol. Cell 5, 367–375 (2000).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Larschan, E. et al. X chromosome dosage compensation via enhanced transcriptional elongation in Drosophila. Nature 471, 115–118 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Fierz, B. et al. Histone H2B ubiquitylation disrupts local and higher-order chromatin compaction. Nature Chem. Biol. 7, 113–119 (2011).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Heitz, E. Das Heterochromatin der Moose. Jahrbücher für wissenschaftliche Botanik 69, 762–818 (1928).
  Google Scholar
• Huisinga, K. L., Brower-Toland, B. & Elgin, S. C. The contradictory definitions of heterochromatin: transcription and silencing. Chromosoma 115, 110–122 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Schotta, G. et al. A silencing pathway to induce H3-K9 and H4-K20 trimethylation at constitutive heterochromatin. Genes Dev. 18, 1251–1262 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Matsui, T. et al. Proviral silencing in embryonic stem cells requires the histone methyltransferase ESET. Nature 464, 927–931 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nielsen, S. J. et al. Rb targets histone H3 methylation and HP1 to promoters. Nature 412, 561–565 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Schultz, D. C., Ayyanathan, K., Negorev, D., Maul, G. G. & Rauscher, F. J. SETDB1: a novel KAP-1-associated histone H3, lysine 9-specific methyltransferase that contributes to HP1-mediated silencing of euchromatic genes by KRAB zinc-finger proteins. Genes Dev. 16, 919–932 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bannister, A. J. et al. Selective recognition of methylated lysine 9 on histone H3 by the HP1 chromo domain. Nature 410, 120–124 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lachner, M., O'Carroll, D., Rea, S., Mechtler, K. & Jenuwein, T. Methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 creates a binding site for HP1 proteins. Nature 410, 116–120 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nakayama, J., Rice, J. C., Strahl, B. D., Allis, C. D. & Grewal, S. I. Role of histone H3 lysine 9 methylation in epigenetic control of heterochromatin assembly. Science 292, 110–113 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lu, X. et al. The effect of H3K79 dimethylation and H4K20 trimethylation on nucleosome and chromatin structure. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 1122–1124 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Beisel, C. & Paro, R. Silencing chromatin: comparing modes and mechanisms. Nature Rev. Genet. 12, 123–135 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Cao, R. et al. Role of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in Polycomb-group silencing. Science 298, 1039–1043 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Muller, J. et al. Histone methyltransferase activity of a Drosophila Polycomb group repressor complex. Cell 111, 197–208 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Stock, J. K. et al. Ring1-mediated ubiquitination of H2A restrains poised RNA polymerase II at bivalent genes in mouse ES cells. Nature Cell Biol. 9, 1428–1435 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Francis, N. J., Kingston, R. E. & Woodcock, C. L. Chromatin compaction by a polycomb group protein complex. Science 306, 1574–1577 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lanzuolo, C., Roure, V., Dekker, J., Bantignies, F. & Orlando, V. Polycomb response elements mediate the formation of chromosome higher-order structures in the bithorax complex. Nature Cell Biol. 9, 1167–1174 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Eskeland, R. et al. Ring1B compacts chromatin structure and represses gene expression independent of histone ubiquitination. Mol. Cell 38, 452–464 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Guelen, L. et al. Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions. Nature 453, 948–951 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Filion, G. J. et al. Systematic protein location mapping reveals five principal chromatin types in Drosophila cells. Cell 143, 212–224 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Schwaiger, M. & Schubeler, D. A question of timing: emerging links between transcription and replication. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 16, 177–183 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gilbert, D. M. Evaluating genome-scale approaches to eukaryotic DNA replication. Nature Rev. Genet. 11, 673–684 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gilbert, D. M. In search of the holy replicator. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 848–855 (2004).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Eaton, M. L. et al. Chromatin signatures of the Drosophila replication program. Genome Res. 21, 164–174 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Cadoret, J. C. et al. Genome-wide studies highlight indirect links between human replication origins and gene regulation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 15837–15842 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Eaton, M. L., Galani, K., Kang, S., Bell, S. P. & MacAlpine, D. M. Conserved nucleosome positioning defines replication origins. Genes Dev. 24, 748–753 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Schwaiger, M. et al. Chromatin state marks cell-type- and gender-specific replication of the Drosophila genome. Genes Dev. 23, 589–601 (2009). This study shows that chromosome-wide changes in acetylation correlate more closely with advanced replication timing rather than with changes in transcription, supporting a chromatin-based regulation of the replication program.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hiratani, I. et al. Global reorganization of replication domains during embryonic stem cell differentiation. PLoS Biol. 6, e245 (2008).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Mechali, M. Eukaryotic DNA replication origins: many choices for appropriate answers. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 728–738 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Aboussekhra, A. et al. Mammalian DNA nucleotide excision repair reconstituted with purified protein components. Cell 80, 859–868 (1995).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Thoma, F. Repair of UV lesions in nucleosomes — intrinsic properties and remodeling. DNA Repair (Amst.) 4, 855–869 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Nag, R. & Smerdon, M. J. Altering the chromatin landscape for nucleotide excision repair. Mutat. Res. 682, 13–20 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Huang, J. C. & Sancar, A. Determination of minimum substrate size for human excinuclease. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 19034–19040 (1994).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ura, K. et al. ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling facilitates nucleotide excision repair of UV-induced DNA lesions in synthetic dinucleosomes. EMBO J. 20, 2004–2014 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• van Attikum, H. & Gasser, S. M. The histone code at DNA breaks: a guide to repair? Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6, 757–765 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Gong, F., Fahy, D. & Smerdon, M. J. Rad4-Rad23 interaction with SWI/SNF links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling with nucleotide excision repair. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 13, 902–907 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Zhang, Q., Jones, K., Patel, M. & Gong, F. The chromatin remodeling factor BRG1 stimulates nucleotide excision repair by facilitating recruitment of XPC to sites of DNA damage. Cell Cycle 8, 3953–3959 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zhao, Q. et al. Modulation of nucleotide excision repair by mammalian SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 30424–30432 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y. et al. INO80 chromatin remodeling complex promotes the removal of UV lesions by the nucleotide excision repair pathway. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 17274–17279 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Yasuda, T. et al. Nucleosomal structure of undamaged DNA regions suppresses the non-specific DNA binding of the XPC complex. DNA Repair (Amst.) 4, 389–395 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Groisman, R. et al. The ubiquitin ligase activity in the DDB2 and CSA complexes is differentially regulated by the COP9 signalosome in response to DNA damage. Cell 113, 357–367 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sugasawa, K. et al. UV-induced ubiquitylation of XPC protein mediated by UV-DDB-ubiquitin ligase complex. Cell 121, 387–400 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Scrima, A. et al. Structural basis of UV DNA-damage recognition by the DDB1-DDB2 complex. Cell 135, 1213–1223 (2008). This study showed the mechanism of UV-damage recognition by the UV-DDB complex. A model is presented whereby damage recognition is compatible with chromatin.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wang, H. et al. Histone H3 and H4 ubiquitylation by the CUL4-DDB-ROC1 ubiquitin ligase facilitates cellular response to DNA damage. Mol. Cell 22, 383–394 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar