Epigenetic control of CD8+ T cell differentiation (original) (raw)

• Youngblood, B., Hale, J. S. & Ahmed, R. T-cell memory differentiation: insights from transcriptional signatures and epigenetics. Immunology 139, 277–284 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Opferman, J. T., Ober, B. T. & Ashton-Rickardt, P. G. Linear differentiation of cytotoxic effectors into memory T lymphocytes. Science 283, 1745–1748 (1999).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Akondy, R. S. et al. Origin and differentiation of human memory CD8 T cells after vaccination. Nature 552, 362–367 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Youngblood, B. et al. Effector CD8 T cells dedifferentiate into long-lived memory cells. Nature 552, 404–409 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Henning, A. N., Klebanoff, C. A. & Restifo, N. P. Silencing stemness in T cell differentiation. Science 359, 163–164 (2018).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Restifo, N. P. & Gattinoni, L. Lineage relationship of effector and memory T cells. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 25, 556–563 (2013).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Teixeiro, E. et al. Different T cell receptor signals determine CD8+ memory versus effector development. Science 323, 502–505 (2009).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wirth, T. C. et al. Repetitive antigen stimulation induces stepwise transcriptome diversification but preserves a core signature of memory CD8+ T cell differentiation. Immunity 33, 128–140 (2010).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kaech, S. M. & Cui, W. Transcriptional control of effector and memory CD8+ T cell differentiation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 12, 749–761 (2012). This is a review of the transcriptional pathways involved in CD8+ T cell differentiation and function during an acute immune response.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Roychoudhuri, R. et al. Transcriptional profiles reveal a stepwise developmental program of memory CD8+ T cell differentiation. Vaccine 33, 914–923 (2015). This study analyses the transcriptional profiles of CD8+ T cell subsets during a vaccine-induced immune response, identifying progressive changes consistent with the linear model.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gattinoni, L. et al. A human memory T cell subset with stem cell-like properties. Nat. Med. 17, 1290–1297 (2011).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Willinger, T., Freeman, T., Hasegawa, H., McMichael, A. J. & Callan, M. F. Molecular signatures distinguish human central memory from effector memory CD8 T cell subsets. J. Immunol. 175, 5895–5903 (2005).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sarkar, S. et al. Functional and genomic profiling of effector CD8 T cell subsets with distinct memory fates. J. Exp. Med. 205, 625–640 (2008).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Scott-Browne, J. P. et al. Dynamic changes in chromatin accessibility occur in CD8+ T cells responding to viral infection. Immunity 45, 1327–1340 (2016). This study identifies unique chromatin accessibility patterns in CD8+ T cell subsets during acute and chronic viral infections.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• He, B. et al. CD8+ T cells utilize highly dynamic enhancer repertoires and regulatory circuitry in response to infections. Immunity 45, 1341–1354 (2016). In this study, the authors perform comprehensive mapping of enhancers and super enhancers in CD8+ T cell subsets, uncovering highly specific enhancer repertoires.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Gallimore, A. et al. Induction and exhaustion of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes visualized using soluble tetrameric major histocompatibility complex class I-peptide complexes. J. Exp. Med. 187, 1383–1393 (1998).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zajac, A. J. et al. Viral immune evasion due to persistence of activated T cells without effector function. J. Exp. Med. 188, 2205–2213 (1998).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Schietinger, A. & Greenberg, P. D. Tolerance and exhaustion: defining mechanisms of T cell dysfunction. Trends Immunol. 35, 51–60 (2014).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Pauken, K. E. & Wherry, E. J. Overcoming T cell exhaustion in infection and cancer. Trends Immunol. 36, 265–276 (2015).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Freeman, G. J. et al. Engagement of the PD-1 immunoinhibitory receptor by a novel B7 family member leads to negative regulation of lymphocyte activation. J. Exp. Med. 192, 1027–1034 (2000).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hokey, D. A. et al. Activation drives PD-1 expression during vaccine-specific proliferation and following lentiviral infection in macaques. Eur. J. Immunol. 38, 1435–1445 (2008).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ahmadzadeh, M. et al. Tumor antigen-specific CD8 T cells infiltrating the tumor express high levels of PD-1 and are functionally impaired. Blood 114, 1537–1544 (2009).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Fourcade, J. et al. Upregulation of Tim-3 and PD-1 expression is associated with tumor antigen-specific CD8+ T cell dysfunction in melanoma patients. J. Exp. Med. 207, 2175–2186 (2010).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Matsuzaki, J. et al. Tumor-infiltrating NY-ESO-1-specific CD8+ T cells are negatively regulated by LAG-3 and PD-1 in human ovarian cancer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 7875–7880 (2010).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ball, M. P. et al. Targeted and genome-scale strategies reveal gene-body methylation signatures in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 27, 361–368 (2009).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Jones, P. A. Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 484–492 (2012). This is a review of the mechanisms and functions of DNA methylation in mammals.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Scharer, C. D., Barwick, B. G., Youngblood, B. A., Ahmed, R. & Boss, J. M. Global DNA methylation remodeling accompanies CD8 T cell effector function. J. Immunol. 191, 3419–3429 (2013).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, R. M. et al. Epigenetic networks regulate the transcriptional program in memory and terminally differentiated CD8+ T cells. J. Immunol. 198, 937–949 (2017).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Abdelsamed, H. A. et al. Human memory CD8 T cell effector potential is epigenetically preserved during in vivo homeostasis. J. Exp. Med. 214, 1593–1606 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Shin, M. S. et al. DNA methylation regulates the differential expression of CX3CR1 on human IL-7Rαlow and IL-7Rαhigh effector memory CD8+ T cells with distinct migratory capacities to the fractalkine. J. Immunol. 195, 2861–2869 (2015).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Stadler, M. B. et al. DNA-binding factors shape the mouse methylome at distal regulatory regions. Nature 480, 490–495 (2011).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Meissner, A. et al. Genome-scale DNA methylation maps of pluripotent and differentiated cells. Nature 454, 766–770 (2008).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Irizarry, R. A. et al. The human colon cancer methylome shows similar hypo- and hypermethylation at conserved tissue-specific CpG island shores. Nat. Genet. 41, 178–186 (2009).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ji, H. et al. Comprehensive methylome map of lineage commitment from haematopoietic progenitors. Nature 467, 338–342 (2010).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Branco, M. R., Ficz, G. & Reik, W. Uncovering the role of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in the epigenome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 7–13 (2011).
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Araki, Y., Fann, M., Wersto, R. & Weng, N. P. Histone acetylation facilitates rapid and robust memory CD8 T cell response through differential expression of effector molecules (eomesodermin and its targets: perforin and granzyme B). J. Immunol. 180, 8102–8108 (2008).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Araki, Y. et al. Genome-wide analysis of histone methylation reveals chromatin state-based regulation of gene transcription and function of memory CD8+ T cells. Immunity 30, 912–925 (2009).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Russ, B. E. et al. Distinct epigenetic signatures delineate transcriptional programs during virus-specific CD8+ T cell differentiation. Immunity 41, 853–865 (2014).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Crompton, J. G. et al. Lineage relationship of CD8+ T cell subsets is revealed by progressive changes in the epigenetic landscape. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 13, 502–513 (2016). This study identifies progressive, genome-wide changes in histone modifications in CD8+ T cell subsets, consistent with the linear model.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Juelich, T. et al. Interplay between chromatin remodeling and epigenetic changes during lineage-specific commitment to granzyme B expression. J. Immunol. 183, 7063–7072 (2009).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Denton, A. E., Russ, B. E., Doherty, P. C., Rao, S. & Turner, S. J. Differentiation-dependent functional and epigenetic landscapes for cytokine genes in virus-specific CD8+ T cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 15306–15311 (2011).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kuroda, S. et al. Basic leucine zipper transcription factor, ATF-like (BATF) regulates epigenetically and energetically effector CD8 T-cell differentiation via Sirt1 expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 14885–14889 (2011).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Shin, H. M. et al. Epigenetic modifications induced by Blimp-1 regulate CD8+ T cell memory progression during acute virus infection. Immunity 39, 661–675 (2013).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nguyen, M. L. et al. Dynamic regulation of permissive histone modifications and GATA3 binding underpin acquisition of granzyme A expression by virus-specific CD8+ T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 46, 307–318 (2016).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Strahl, B. D. & Allis, C. D. The language of covalent histone modifications. Nature 403, 41–45 (2000). This is a review on histone modifications and their general function.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kimura, H. Histone modifications for human epigenome analysis. J. Hum. Genet. 58, 439–445 (2013).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Geginat, J., Lanzavecchia, A. & Sallusto, F. Proliferation and differentiation potential of human CD8+ memory T-cell subsets in response to antigen or homeostatic cytokines. Blood 101, 4260–4266 (2003).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. E. et al. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 125, 315–326 (2006).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Pan, G. et al. Whole-genome analysis of histone H3 lysine 4 and lysine 27 methylation in human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 1, 299–312 (2007).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zhao, X. D. et al. Whole-genome mapping of histone H3 Lys4 and 27 trimethylations reveals distinct genomic compartments in human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 1, 286–298 (2007).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Harker, N. et al. Pre-TCR signaling and CD8 gene bivalent chromatin resolution during thymocyte development. J. Immunol. 186, 6368–6377 (2011).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ing-Simmons, E. et al. Spatial enhancer clustering and regulation of enhancer-proximal genes by cohesin. Genome Res. 25, 504–513 (2015).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Vahedi, G. et al. Super-enhancers delineate disease-associated regulatory nodes in T cells. Nature 520, 558–562 (2015).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Whyte, W. A. et al. Master transcription factors and mediator establish super-enhancers at key cell identity genes. Cell 153, 307–319 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hnisz, D. et al. Super-enhancers in the control of cell identity and disease. Cell 155, 934–947 (2013).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kieffer-Kwon, K. R. et al. Interactome maps of mouse gene regulatory domains reveal basic principles of transcriptional regulation. Cell 155, 1507–1520 (2013).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Heinz, S., Romanoski, C. E., Benner, C. & Glass, C. K. The selection and function of cell type-specific enhancers. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 144–154 (2015). This is a review on the characteristics and function of enhancers and their role in regulating signal-driven transcriptional programmes.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sarraf, S. A. & Stancheva, I. Methyl-CpG binding protein MBD1 couples histone H3 methylation at lysine 9 by SETDB1 to DNA replication and chromatin assembly. Mol. Cell 15, 595–605 (2004).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Agarwal, N. et al. MeCP2 interacts with HP1 and modulates its heterochromatin association during myogenic differentiation. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 5402–5408 (2007).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Fujita, N. et al. Methyl-CpG binding domain 1 (MBD1) interacts with the Suv39h1-HP1 heterochromatic complex for DNA methylation-based transcriptional repression. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 24132–24138 (2003).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kersh, E. N. Impaired memory CD8 T cell development in the absence of methyl-CpG-binding domain protein 2. J. Immunol. 177, 3821–3826 (2006).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Musselman, C. A., Lalonde, M. E., Cote, J. & Kutateladze, T. G. Perceiving the epigenetic landscape through histone readers. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 1218–1227 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Di Croce, L. & Helin, K. Transcriptional regulation by Polycomb group proteins. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 1147–1155 (2013).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Luco, R. F. et al. Regulation of alternative splicing by histone modifications. Science 327, 996–1000 (2010).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Buenrostro, J. D., Giresi, P. G., Zaba, L. C., Chang, H. Y. & Greenleaf, W. J. Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nat. Methods 10, 1213–1218 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sen, D. R. et al. The epigenetic landscape of T cell exhaustion. Science 354, 1165–1169 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Pauken, K. E. et al. Epigenetic stability of exhausted T cells limits durability of reinvigoration by PD-1 blockade. Science 354, 1160–1165 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Moskowitz, D. M. et al. Epigenomics of human CD8 T cell differentiation and aging. Sci. Immunol. 2, eaag0192 (2017).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Heffner, M. & Fearon, D. T. Loss of T cell receptor-induced Bmi-1 in the KLRG1+ senescent CD8+ T lymphocyte. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 13414–13419 (2007).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. J., Kieboom, K., Marino, S., DePinho, R. A. & van Lohuizen, M. The oncogene and Polycomb-group gene bmi-1 regulates cell proliferation and senescence through the ink4a locus. Nature 397, 164–168 (1999).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sherr, C. J. Principles of tumor suppression. Cell 116, 235–246 (2004).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zhao, E. et al. Cancer mediates effector T cell dysfunction by targeting microRNAs and EZH2 via glycolysis restriction. Nat. Immunol. 17, 95–103 (2016).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kato, K. et al. Identification of stem cell transcriptional programs normally expressed in embryonic and neural stem cells in alloreactive CD8+ T cells mediating graft-versus-host disease. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 16, 751–771 (2010).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Gray, S. M., Amezquita, R. A., Guan, T., Kleinstein, S. H. & Kaech, S. M. Polycomb repressive complex 2-mediated chromatin repression guides effector CD8+ T cell terminal differentiation and loss of multipotency. Immunity 46, 596–608 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• He, S. et al. Ezh2 phosphorylation state determines its capacity to maintain CD8+ T memory precursors for antitumour immunity. Nat. Commun. 8, 2125 (2017).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ladle, B. H. et al. De novo DNA methylation by DNA methyltransferase 3a controls early effector CD8+ T-cell fate decisions following activation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 10631–10636 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kakaradov, B. et al. Early transcriptional and epigenetic regulation of CD8+ T cell differentiation revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing. Nat. Immunol. 18, 422–432 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Pace, L. et al. The epigenetic control of stemness in CD8+ T cell fate commitment. Science 359, 177–186 (2018).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Xing, S. et al. Tcf1 and Lef1 transcription factors establish CD8+ T cell identity through intrinsic HDAC activity. Nat. Immunol. 17, 695–703 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Roychoudhuri, R. et al. BACH2 regulates CD8+ T cell differentiation by controlling access of AP-1 factors to enhancers. Nat. Immunol. 17, 851–860 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kagoya, Y. et al. BET bromodomain inhibition enhances T cell persistence and function in adoptive immunotherapy models. J. Clin. Invest. 126, 3479–3494 (2016). This is a functional study examining the effect of the bromodomain inhibitor JQ1 on T cell differentiation and antitumour activity and its underlying mechanism.
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lee, P. P. et al. A critical role for Dnmt1 and DNA methylation in T cell development, function, and survival. Immunity 15, 763–774 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Pastor, W. A., Aravind, L. & Rao, A. TETonic shift: biological roles of TET proteins in DNA demethylation and transcription. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 341–356 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Tsagaratou, A. et al. Dissecting the dynamic changes of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in T-cell development and differentiation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E3306–3315 (2014).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Carty, S. A. et al. The loss of TET2 promotes CD8+ T cell memory differentiation. J. Immunol. 200, 82–91 (2018).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lyko, F. & Brown, R. DNA methyltransferase inhibitors and the development of epigenetic cancer therapies. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 97, 1498–1506 (2005).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nora, E. P. et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 485, 381–385 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Dixon, J. R. et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485, 376–380 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Fraser, J. et al. Hierarchical folding and reorganization of chromosomes are linked to transcriptional changes in cellular differentiation. Mol. Syst. Biol. 11, 852 (2015).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Schmitt, A. D. et al. A compendium of chromatin contact maps reveals spatially active regions in the human genome. Cell Rep. 17, 2042–2059 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Li, G. et al. Extensive promoter-centered chromatin interactions provide a topological basis for transcription regulation. Cell 148, 84–98 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Phillips-Cremins, J. E. et al. Architectural protein subclasses shape 3D organization of genomes during lineage commitment. Cell 153, 1281–1295 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Rao, S. S. et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 159, 1665–1680 (2014). This study describes the application of Hi-C to multiple human and mouse cell lines, acquiring high-resolution data that enable the characterization of chromatin looping patterns in exquisite detail.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Javierre, B. M. et al. Lineage-specific genome architecture links enhancers and non-coding disease variants to target gene promoters. Cell 167, 1369–1384.e19 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. C. et al. Global changes in the nuclear positioning of genes and intra- and interdomain genomic interactions that orchestrate B cell fate. Nat. Immunol. 13, 1196–1204 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Dekker, J., Rippe, K., Dekker, M. & Kleckner, N. Capturing chromosome conformation. Science 295, 1306–1311 (2002).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Dekker, J., Marti-Renom, M. A. & Mirny, L. A. Exploring the three-dimensional organization of genomes: interpreting chromatin interaction data. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 390–403 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Shih, H. Y. et al. Tcra gene recombination is supported by a Tcra enhancer- and CTCF-dependent chromatin hub. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E3493–E3502 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Tsytsykova, A. V. et al. Activation-dependent intrachromosomal interactions formed by the TNF gene promoter and two distal enhancers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 16850–16855 (2007).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Spilianakis, C. G. & Flavell, R. A. Long-range intrachromosomal interactions in the T helper type 2 cytokine locus. Nat. Immunol. 5, 1017–1027 (2004).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ktistaki, E. et al. CD8 locus nuclear dynamics during thymocyte development. J. Immunol. 184, 5686–5695 (2010).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Muto, A. et al. Nipbl and mediator cooperatively regulate gene expression to control limb development. PLOS Genet. 10, e1004671 (2014).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Watson, L. A. et al. Dual effect of CTCF loss on neuroprogenitor differentiation and survival. J. Neurosci. 34, 2860–2870 (2014).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Heath, H. et al. CTCF regulates cell cycle progression of alphabeta T cells in the thymus. EMBO J. 27, 2839–2850 (2008).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Seitan, V. C. et al. Cohesin-based chromatin interactions enable regulated gene expression within preexisting architectural compartments. Genome Res. 23, 2066–2077 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ding, N. et al. Mediator links epigenetic silencing of neuronal gene expression with x-linked. mental retardation. Mol. Cell 31, 347–359 (2008).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Tomaz, R. A. et al. Jmjd2c facilitates the assembly of essential enhancer-protein complexes at the onset of embryonic stem cell differentiation. Development 144, 567–579 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Stephen, T. L. et al. SATB1 expression governs epigenetic repression of PD-1 in tumor-reactive T cells. Immunity 46, 51–64 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, S. A. & Restifo, N. P. Adoptive cell transfer as personalized immunotherapy for human cancer. Science 348, 62–68 (2015). This is a review of current ACT practices for cancer treatment and the challenges and future directions of the field.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Pardoll, D. M. The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer 12, 252–264 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Angelosanto, J. M., Blackburn, S. D., Crawford, A. & Wherry, E. J. Progressive loss of memory T cell potential and commitment to exhaustion during chronic viral infection. J. Virol. 86, 8161–8170 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Philip, M. et al. Chromatin states define tumour-specific T cell dysfunction and reprogramming. Nature 545, 452–456 (2017). This comprehensive analysis of chromatin accessibility during the early and later stages of T cell exhaustion demonstrates the therapeutic relevance of this type of analysis via pharmacological inhibition of a putative. exhaustion-associated transcription factor.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Blackburn, S. D., Shin, H., Freeman, G. J. & Wherry, E. J. Selective expansion of a subset of exhausted CD8 T cells by αPD-L1 blockade. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 15016–15021 (2008).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Paley, M. A. et al. Progenitor and terminal subsets of CD8+ T cells cooperate to contain chronic viral infection. Science 338, 1220–1225 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wu, T. et al. The TCF1-Bcl6 axis counteracts type I interferon to repress exhaustion and maintain T cell stemness. Sci. Immunol. 1, eaai8593 (2016).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Im, S. J. et al. Defining CD8+ T cells that provide the proliferative burst after PD-1 therapy. Nature 537, 417–421 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• He, R. et al. Follicular CXCR5- expressing CD8+ T cells curtail chronic viral infection. Nature 537, 412–428 (2016).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Schietinger, A. et al. Tumor-specific T cell dysfunction is a dynamic antigen-driven differentiation program initiated early during tumorigenesis. Immunity 45, 389–401 (2016). This is an exhaustive study on the transcriptome of early-stage and late-stage exhausted T cells in a tumour-driven model demonstrating unique profiles at these stages and including comparisons with transcriptomes of viral-driven and self-tolerant models of T cell dysfunction.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Barber, D. L. et al. Restoring function in exhausted CD8 T cells during chronic viral infection. Nature 439, 682–687 (2006).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Duraiswamy, J., Freeman, G. J. & Coukos, G. Therapeutic PD-1 pathway blockade augments with other modalities of immunotherapy T-cell function to prevent immune decline in ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 73, 6900–6912 (2013).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Odorizzi, P. M., Pauken, K. E., Paley, M. A., Sharpe, A. & Wherry, E. J. Genetic absence of PD-1 promotes accumulation of terminally differentiated exhausted CD8+ T cells. J. Exp. Med. 212, 1125–1137 (2015). This is a functional study showing that PD1 is not required for virally initiated T cell exhaustion but is needed to maintain the exhausted cell pool and prevent terminal differentiation.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ghoneim, H. E. et al. De novo epigenetic programs inhibit PD-1 blockade-mediated T cell rejuvenation. Cell 170, 142–157.e19 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wherry, E. J. et al. Molecular signature of CD8+ T cell exhaustion during chronic viral infection. Immunity 27, 670–684 (2007).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Doering, T. A. et al. Network analysis reveals centrally connected genes and pathways involved in CD8+ T cell exhaustion versus memory. Immunity 37, 1130–1144 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Singer, M. et al. A distinct gene module for dysfunction uncoupled from activation in tumor-infiltrating T cells. Cell 166, 1500–1511.e9 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Mognol, G. P. et al. Exhaustion-associated regulatory regions in CD8+ tumor-infiltrating T cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E2776–E2785 (2017). This study demonstrates the innovative use of ATAC–seq to identify exhaustion-specific and activation-specific regulatory regions in a tumour-driven model of T cell exhaustion.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Simeonov, D. R. et al. Discovery of stimulation-responsive immune enhancers with CRISPR activation. Nature 549, 111–115 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Gattinoni, L. et al. Acquisition of full effector function in vitro paradoxically impairs the in vivo antitumor efficacy of adoptively transferred CD8+ T cells. J. Clin. Invest. 115, 1616–1626 (2005).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, S. A. et al. Durable complete responses in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic melanoma using T-cell transfer immunotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 17, 4550–4557 (2011).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Rufer, N., Dragowska, W., Thornbury, G., Roosnek, E. & Lansdorp, P. M. Telomere length dynamics in human lymphocyte subpopulations measured by flow cytometry. Nat. Biotechnol. 16, 743–747 (1998).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sommermeyer, D. et al. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells derived from defined CD8+ and CD4+ subsets confer superior antitumor reactivity in vivo. Leukemia 30, 492–500 (2016).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Klebanoff, C. A. et al. Memory T cell-driven differentiation of naive cells impairs adoptive immunotherapy. J. Clin. Invest. 126, 318–334 (2016).
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Powell, D. J. Jr., Dudley, M. E., Robbins, P. F. & Rosenberg, S. A. Transition of late-stage effector T cells to CD27+ CD28+ tumor-reactive effector memory T cells in humans after adoptive cell transfer therapy. Blood 105, 241–250 (2005).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gattinoni, L. et al. Wnt signaling arrests effector T cell differentiation and generates CD8+ memory stem cells. Nat. Med. 15, 808–813 (2009).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hinrichs, C. S. et al. IL-2 and IL-21 confer opposing differentiation programs to CD8+ T cells for adoptive immunotherapy. Blood 111, 5326–5333 (2008).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Crompton, J. G. et al. Akt inhibition enhances expansion of potent tumor-specific lymphocytes with memory cell characteristics. Cancer Res. 75, 296–305 (2015).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tyrakis, P. A. et al. S-2-hydroxyglutarate regulates CD8+ T-lymphocyte fate. Nature 540, 236–241 (2016). This is a functional study demonstrating the impact that the metabolic intermediary S -2HG can have on CD8+ T cell differentiation via epigenetic modulations.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Losman, J. A. & Kaelin, W. G. Jr. What a difference a hydroxyl makes: mutant IDH, (R)-2-hydroxyglutarate, and cancer. Genes Dev. 27, 836–852 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• O'Neill, L. A., Kishton, R. J. & Rathmell, J. A guide to immunometabolism for immunologists. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 16, 553–565 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Etchegaray, J. P. & Mostoslavsky, R. Interplay between metabolism and epigenetics: a nuclear adaptation to environmental changes. Mol. Cell 62, 695–711 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sukumar, M. et al. Inhibiting glycolytic metabolism enhances CD8+ T cell memory and antitumor function. J. Clin. Invest. 123, 4479–4488 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Crompton, J. G., Clever, D., Vizcardo, R., Rao, M. & Restifo, N. P. Reprogramming antitumor immunity. Trends Immunol. 35, 178–185 (2014).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell 126, 663–676 (2006).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Themeli, M., Riviere, I. & Sadelain, M. New cell sources for T cell engineering and adoptive immunotherapy. Cell Stem Cell 16, 357–366 (2015).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Soufi, A., Donahue, G. & Zaret, K. S. Facilitators and impediments of the pluripotency reprogramming factors' initial engagement with the genome. Cell 151, 994–1004 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zhang, H. et al. Intrachromosomal looping is required for activation of endogenous pluripotency genes during reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 13, 30–35 (2013).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ang, Y. S. et al. Wdr5 mediates self-renewal and reprogramming via the embryonic stem cell core transcriptional network. Cell 145, 183–197 (2011).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chronis, C. et al. Cooperative binding of transcription factors orchestrates reprogramming. Cell 168, 442–459.e20 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Mansour, A. A. et al. The H3K27 demethylase Utx regulates somatic and germ cell epigenetic reprogramming. Nature 488, 409–413 (2012).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wei, Z. et al. Klf4 organizes long-range chromosomal interactions with the Oct4 locus in reprogramming and pluripotency. Cell Stem Cell 13, 36–47 (2013).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Yong, W. S., Hsu, F. M. & Chen, P. Y. Profiling genome-wide DNA methylation. Epigenetics Chromatin 9, 26 (2016).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Crawford, G. E. et al. Genome-wide mapping of DNase hypersensitive sites using massively parallel signature sequencing (MPSS). Genome Res. 16, 123–131 (2006).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Giresi, P. G., Kim, J., McDaniell, R. M., Iyer, V. R. & Lieb, J. D. FAIRE (Formaldehyde-Assisted Isolation of Regulatory Elements) isolates active regulatory elements from human chromatin. Genome Res. 17, 877–885 (2007).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Schoenfelder, S. et al. The pluripotent regulatory circuitry connecting promoters to their long-range interacting elements. Genome Res. 25, 582–597 (2015).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Li, G. et al. Chromatin Interaction Analysis with Paired-End Tag (ChIA-PET) sequencing technology and application. BMC Genomics 15 (Suppl. 12), S11 (2014).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Simons, B. D. & Clevers, H. Strategies for homeostatic stem cell self-renewal in adult tissues. Cell 145, 851–862 (2011).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lin, W. H. et al. Asymmetric PI3K signaling driving developmental and regenerative cell fate bifurcation. Cell Rep. 13, 2203–2218 (2015).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Pollizzi, K. N. et al. Asymmetric inheritance of mTORC1 kinase activity during division dictates CD8+ T cell differentiation. Nat. Immunol. 17, 704–711 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Verbist, K. C. et al. Metabolic maintenance of cell asymmetry following division in activated T lymphocytes. Nature 532, 389–393 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Nicholson, J. M. et al. Histone structures: targets for modifications by molecular assemblies. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1030, 644–655 (2004).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Del Rizzo, P. A. & Trievel, R. C. Substrate and product specificities of SET domain methyltransferases. Epigenetics 6, 1059–1067 (2011).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Fueyo, R., Garcia, M. A. & Martinez-Balbas, M. A. Jumonji family histone demethylases in neural development. Cell Tissue Res. 359, 87–98 (2015).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Jeong, K. W. et al. Recognition of enhancer element-specific histone methylation by TIP60 in transcriptional activation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 1358–1365 (2011).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Li, H. et al. Molecular basis for site-specific read-out of histone H3K4me3 by the BPTF PHD finger of NURF. Nature 442, 91–95 (2006).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Pradeepa, M. M., Sutherland, H. G., Ule, J., Grimes, G. R. & Bickmore, W. A. Psip1/Ledgf p52 binds methylated histone H3K36 and splicing factors and contributes to the regulation of alternative splicing. PLOS Genet. 8, e1002717 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Jin, Q. et al. Distinct roles of GCN5/PCAF-mediated H3K9ac and CBP/p300-mediated H3K18/27ac in nuclear receptor transactivation. EMBO J. 30, 249–262 (2011).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sengupta, N. & Seto, E. Regulation of histone deacetylase activities. J. Cell. Biochem. 93, 57–67 (2004).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Santos, L., Escande, C. & Denicola, A. Potential modulation of sirtuins by oxidative stress. Oxid Med. Cell Longev 2016, 9831825 (2016).
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Taniguchi, Y. The Bromodomain and Extra-Terminal Domain (BET) family: functional anatomy of BET paralogous proteins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17, E1849 (2016).
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Benevento, M., van de Molengraft, M., van Westen, R., van Bokhoven, H. & Kasri, N. N. The role of chromatin repressive marks in cognition and disease: a focus on the repressive complex GLP/G9a. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 124, 88–96 (2015).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Azzaz, A. M. et al. Human heterochromatin protein 1α promotes nucleosome associations that drive chromatin condensation. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 6850–6861 (2014).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Rea, S. et al. Regulation of chromatin structure by site-specific histone H3 methyltransferases. Nature 406, 593–599 (2000).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Rice, J. C. et al. Histone methyltransferases direct different degrees of methylation to define distinct chromatin domains. Mol. Cell 12, 1591–1598.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar