Alternative pathways to the 1.5 °C target reduce the need for negative emission technologies (original) (raw)

References

  1. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Twenty-First Session, Held in Paris from 30 November to 13 December 2015. Decision 1/CP.21 (UNFCCC, 2015).
  2. Clarke, L. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) Ch. 6 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
  3. Rogelj, J. et al. Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5 °C. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 519–528 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  4. Luderer, G. et al. Economic mitigation challenges: how further delay closes the door for achieving climate targets. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 034033 (2013).
  5. Decision IPCC/XLIV-4. Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) Products, Outline of the Special Report on 1.5 °C (IPCC, 2016).
  6. Van Vuuren, D. P. et al. Stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations at low levels: An assessment of reduction strategies and costs. Climatic Change 81, 119–159 (2007).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  7. Tavoni, M. et al. Post-2020 climate agreements in the major economies assessed in the light of global models. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 119–126 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  8. Kriegler, E. et al. Making or breaking climate targets: The AMPERE study on staged accession scenarios for climate policy. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 90, 24–44 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  9. Riahi, K. et al. The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overview. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 153–168 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  10. Van Vuuren, D. P. et al. Carbon budgets and energy transition pathways. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 075002 (2016).
  11. Smith, P. et al. Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 42–50 (2016).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  12. Anderson, K. & Peters, G. The trouble with negative emissions. Science 354, 182–183 (2016).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  13. De Coninck, H. & Benson, S. M. Carbon dioxide capture and storage: issues and prospects. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 39, 243–270 (2014).
  14. Global Status of CCS 2015: Summary Report (Global CCS Institute, 2015).
  15. Vaughan, N. E. & Gough, C. Expert assessment concludes negative emissions scenarios may not deliver. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 095003 (2016).
  16. Van Vuuren, D. P., Hof, A. F., Van Sluisveld, M. A. E. & Riahi, K. Open discussion of negative emissions is urgently needed. Nat. Energy 2, 902–904 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  17. Mercure, J. F., Pollitt, H., Bassi, A. M., Viñuales, J. E. & Edwards, N. R. Modelling complex systems of heterogeneous agents to better design sustainability transitions policy. Glob. Environ. Change 37, 102–115 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  18. Geels, F. W., Berkhout, F. & Van Vuuren, D. P. Bridging analytical approaches for low-carbon transitions. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 576–583 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  19. van Vuuren, D. P. et al. Energy, land-use and greenhouse gas emissions trajectories under a green growth paradigm. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 237–250 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  20. Nykvist, B. & Nilsson, M. Rapidly falling costs of battery packs for electric vehicles. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 329–332 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  21. Trutnevyte, E. Does cost optimization approximate the real-world energy transition? Energy 106, 182–193 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  22. Stehfest, E., Van Vuuren, D. P., Kram, T. & Bouwman, A. F. Integrated Assessment of Global Environmental Change with IMAGE 3.0: Model Description and Policy Applications (PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, 2014).
  23. Rogelj, J. et al. Scenarios towards limiting global mean temperature increase below 1.5 °C. Nat. Clim. Change https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0091-3 (2018).
    Google Scholar
  24. Post, M. J. Cultured meat from stem cells: Challenges and prospects. Meat Sci. 92, 297–301 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  25. Verbeke, W. et al. ‘Would you eat cultured meat?’: Consumers’ reactions and attitude formation in Belgium, Portugal and the United Kingdom. Meat Sci. 102, 49–58 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  26. Stehfest, E. et al. Climate benefits of changing diet. Climatic Change 95, 83–102 (2009).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  27. Van Sluisveld, M. A. E., Martínez, S. H. Daioglou, V. & van Vuuren, D. P. Exploring the implications of lifestyle change in 2 °C mitigation scenarios using the IMAGE integrated assessment model. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 102, 309–319 (2015).
  28. Willett, M. D. W. C. Eat, Drink, and Be Healthy: The Harvard Medical School Guide to Healthy Eating (Free Press, 2005).
  29. KC, S. & Lutz, W. The human core of the shared socioeconomic pathways: Population scenarios by age, sex and level of education for all countries to 2100. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 181–192 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  30. Rogelj, J. et al. Differences between carbon budget estimates unravelled. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 245–252 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  31. Popp, A. et al. Land-use futures in the shared socio-economic pathways. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 331–345 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  32. Rogelj, J., McCollum, D. L., Reisinger, A., Meinshausen, M. & Riahi, K. Probabilistic cost estimates for climate change mitigation. Nature 493, 79–83 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  33. Sovacool, B. K. How long will it take? Conceptualizing the temporal dynamics of energy transitions. Energy Res. Social. Sci. 13, 202–215 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  34. Grubler, A., Wilson, C. & Nemet, G. Apples, oranges, and consistent comparisons of the temporal dynamics of energy transitions. Energy Res. Social. Sci. 22, 18–25 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  35. Riahi, K. et al. in Global Energy Assessment - Toward a Sustainable Future Ch. 17 (IIASA, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012).
  36. Paul, K. I. et al. Managing reforestation to sequester carbon, increase biodiversity potential and minimize loss of agricultural land. Land Use Policy 51, 135–149 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  37. Woltjer, G. B. et al. The MAGNET Model: Module Description Report no. 14-057 (LEI Wageningen UR, 2014).
  38. Bondeau, A. et al. Modelling the role of agriculture for the 20th century global terrestrial carbon balance. Glob. Change Biol. 13, 679–706 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  39. Müller, C. et al. Drivers and patterns of land biosphere carbon balance reversal. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 044002 (2016).
  40. Meinshausen, M., Raper, S. C. B. & Wigley, T. M. L. Emulating coupled atmosphere–ocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6 - Part 1: Model description and calibration. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 1417–1456 (2011).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  41. World Energy Outlook (International Energy Agency, 2015).
  42. Doelman, J. C. et al. Exploring SSP land-use dynamics using the IMAGE model: Regional and gridded scenarios of land-use change and land-based climate change mitigation. Glob. Environ. Change 48, 119–135 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
  43. Lucas, P. L., van Vuuren, D. P., Olivier, J. G. J. & den Elzen, M. G. J. Long-term reduction potential of non-CO2 greenhouse gases. Environ. Sci. Policy 10, 85–103 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  44. IPCC Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report (eds Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R. K. and Meyer, L. A.) (IPCC, 2015).
  45. Millar, R. J. et al. Emission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 °C. Nat. Geosci. 10, 741–747 (2017).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  46. Bijl, D. L. et al. A physically-based model of long-term food demand. Glob. Environ. Change 45, 47–62 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  47. Girod, B., van Vuuren, D. P. & de Vries, B. Influence of travel behavior on global CO2 emissions. Transp. Res. A 50, 183–197 (2013).
    Google Scholar
  48. Herrero, M. et al. Greenhouse gas mitigation potentials in the livestock sector. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 452–461 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  49. Bouwman, A. F., Van Der Hoek, K. W., Eickhout, B. & Soenario, I. Exploring changes in world ruminant production systems. Agric. Syst. 84, 121–153 (2005).
    Article Google Scholar
  50. Bylin, C. et al. Designing the ideal offshore platform methane mitigation strategy. In SPE Int. Conf. on Health, Safety and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production 126964 (Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2010).
  51. Höglund-Isaksson, L. Bottom-up simulations of methane and ethane emissions from global oil and gas systems 1980 to 2012. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 024007 (2016).
  52. Hinde, P., Mitchell, I. & Riddell, M. COMETTM – A new ventilation air methane (VAM) abatement technology reducing greenhouse gas potential from the mining industry. Technol. Rev. 60, 211–221 (2016).
    Google Scholar
  53. Patel, S., Tremain, P., Sandford, J., Moghtaderi, B. & Shah, K. Empirical kinetic model of a stone dust looping carbonator for ventilation air methane abatement. Energy Fuels 30, 1869–1878 (2016).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  54. Smith, P. et al. Science-based GHG Emissions Targets for Agriculture and Forestry Commodities (University of Aberdeen, Ecofys, PBL, 2016).
  55. Höglund-Isaksson, L. & Mechler, R. The GAINS Model for Greenhouse Gases—Version 1.0: Methane (CH 4 ) (IIASA, 2005).
  56. Mattick, C. S., Landis, A. E., Allenby, B. R. & Genovese, N. J. Anticipatory life cycle analysis of in vitro biomass cultivation for cultured meat production in the United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 11941–11949 (2015).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  57. Petroff, A. Airbus hopes to launch hybrid passenger planes by 2030. CNNMoney (7 April 2016); http://money.cnn.com/2016/04/07/news/companies/hybrid-electric-plane-airbus-siemens/index.html
  58. Khandelwal, B., Karakurt, A., Sekaran, P. R., Sethi, V. & Singh, R. Hydrogen powered aircraft: The future of air transport. Progress Aerosp. Sci. 60, 45–59 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  59. Luderer, G. et al. Assessment of wind and solar power in global low-carbon energy scenarios: An introduction. Energy Econ. 64, 542–551 (2017).
  60. Marangoni, G. et al. Sensitivity of projected long-term CO2 emissions across the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 113–117 (2017).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  61. Graus, W., Blomen, E., Kleßmann, C., Capone, C. & Stricker, E. Global technical potentials for energy efficiency improvement. In IAEE European Conf. (IAEE, 2009).
  62. Plotkin, S. & Singh, M. Multi-Path Transportation Futures Study: Vehicle Characterization and Scenario Analyses (Argonne National Laboratory, 2009).
  63. Neuffer, B. & Laney, M. Alternative Control Techniques Document Update: NO x Emissions from New Cement Kilns (US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Sector Policies and Programs Division, 2007).
  64. The Cement Sustainability Initiative – Cement Industry Energy and CO 2 Performance (World Business Council for Sustainable Development, 2009).
  65. Xu, J.-H., Fleiter, T., Eichhammer, W. & Fan, Y. Energy consumption and CO2 emissions in China’s cement industry: a perspective from LMDI decomposition analysis. Energy Policy 50, 821–832 (2012).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  66. Worrell, E., Price, L., Neelis, M., Galitsky, C. & Zhou, N. World Best Practice Energy Intensity Values for Selected Industrial Sectors (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2007).
  67. Neelis, M. & Patel, M. Long-term Production, Energy Use and CO 2 Emission Scenarios for the Worldwide Iron and Steel Industry (Utrecht Univ., 2006).
  68. Van Ruijven, B. J. et al. Long-term model-based projections of energy use and CO2 emissions from the global steel and cement industries. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 112, 15–36 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar

Download references