Energy requirements for decent living in India, Brazil and South Africa (original) (raw)

References

  1. Goldemberg, J., Johansson, T. B., Reddy, A. N. & Williams, R. H. Basic needs and much more with one kilowatt per capita. Ambio 14, 190–200 (1985).
    Google Scholar
  2. Rogelj, J. et al. Energy system transformations for limiting end-of-century warming to below 1.5 °C. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 519–527 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  3. Riahi, K. et al. The shared socioeconomic pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: an overview. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 153–168 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  4. Grubler, A. et al. A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5 °C target and sustainable development goals without negative emission technologies. Nat. Energy 3, 515–527 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
  5. Kriegler, E. et al. Fossil-fueled development (SSP5): An energy and resource intensive scenario for the 21st century. Glob. Environ. Change 42, 297–315 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  6. Rao, N. D. & Pachauri, S. Energy access and living standards: some observations on recent trends. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 025011 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  7. Steckel, J. C., Brecha, R. J., Jakob, M., Strefler, J. & Luderer, G. Development without energy? Assessing future scenarios of energy consumption in developing countries. Ecol. Econ. 90, 53–67 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  8. Steinberger, J. K. & Roberts, J. T. From constraint to sufficiency: the decoupling of energy and carbon from human needs, 1975–2005. Ecol. Econ. 70, 425–433 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
  9. Lamb, W. F. & Rao, N. D. Human development in a climate-constrained world: what the past says about the future. Glob. Environ. Change 33, 14–22 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  10. Smil, V. Energy Transitions: History, Requirements, Prospects (Praeger, 2010).
  11. Ribas, A., Lucena, A. F. P. & Schaeffer, R. Bridging the energy divide and securing higher collective well-being in a climate-constrained world. Energy Policy 108, 435–450 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  12. Arto, I., Capellán-Pérez, I., Lago, R., Bueno, G. & Bermejo, R. The energy requirements of a developed world. Energy Sustain. Dev. 33, 1–13 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  13. Energy for a Sustainable Future (The Secretary General’s Advisory Group on Energy and Climate Change, 2010).
  14. Chakravarty, S. & Tavoni, M. Energy poverty alleviation and climate change mitigation: is there a trade off? Energy Econ. 40, S67–S73 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  15. Rao, N. D. & Min, J. Less global inequality can improve climate outcomes. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Change 9, e513 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
  16. Rao, N. D. & Min, J. Decent living standards: material prerequisites for human wellbeing. Soc. Indic. Res. 138, 225–244 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
  17. Alkire, S. & Santos, M. E. Measuring acute poverty in the developing world: robustness and scope of the multidimensional poverty index. World Dev. 59, 251–274 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  18. Doyal, L. & Gough, I. Theory of Human Need (Macmillan, 1991).
  19. Mastrucci, A., Byers, E., Pachauri, S. & Rao, N. D. Improving the SDG energy poverty targets: residential cooling needs in the Global South. Energy Build. 186, 405–415 (2019).
    Article Google Scholar
  20. World Bank, Poverty: Overview http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/poverty/overview#1 (2018).
  21. Chilling Prospects: Providing Sustainable Cooling for All (UN Sustainable Energy for All, 2018).
  22. Ahmad, S., Pachauri, S. & Creutzig, F. Synergies and trade-offs between energy-efficient urbanization and health. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 114017 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  23. Mastrucci, A. & Rao, N. D. Bridging India’s housing gap: lowering costs and CO2 emissions. Build. Res. Inf. 47, 8–23 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
  24. Rao, N. D. et al. Healthy, affordable and climate-friendly diets in India. Glob. Environ. Change 49, 154–165 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
  25. McMichael, A. J., Powles, J. W., Butler, C. D. & Uauy, R. Food, livestock production, energy, climate change, and health. Lancet 370, 1253–1263 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  26. FAOSTAT Statistical Database (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 1997).
  27. Cameron, C. et al. Policy trade-offs between climate mitigation and clean cook-stove access in South Asia. Nat. Energy 1, 15010 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  28. Creutzig, F. et al. Towards demand-side solutions for mitigating climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 260–263 (2018).
    Article MathSciNet Google Scholar
  29. Mastrucci, A. & Rao, N. D. Decent housing in the developing world: reducing life-cycle energy requirements. Energy Build. 152, 629–642 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  30. Ryen, E. G., Babbitt, C. W. & Williams, E. Consumption-weighted life cycle assessment of a consumer electronic product community. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 2549–2559 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  31. Creutzig, F. et al. Beyond technology: demand-side solutions for climate change mitigation. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 41, 173–198 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  32. Adoption of the Paris Agreement FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev.1 (UNFCCC, 2015).
  33. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Outcome of the Work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention (Durban, 2011); https://unfccc.int/files/meetings/durban_nov_2011/decisions/application/pdf/cop17_lcaoutcome.pdf
  34. Klinsky, S. et al. Why equity is fundamental in climate change policy research. Glob. Environ. Change 44, 170–173 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  35. After Paris: Inequality, Fair Shares and the Climate Emergency (Civil Society Equity Review, 2017).
  36. Zimm, C. & Nakicenovic, N. What are the implications of the Paris Agreement for inequality? Clim. Policy https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1581048 (2019).
  37. Pauliuk, S., Arvesen, A., Stadler, K. & Hertwich, E. G. Industrial ecology in integrated assessment models. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 13–20 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  38. Volkart, K., Mutel, C. L. & Panos, E. Integrating life cycle assessment and energy system modelling: methodology and application to the world energy scenarios. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 16, 121–133 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
  39. Miller, R. E. & Blair, P. D. Intput-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009).
  40. Stadler, K. et al. EXIOBASE 3: developing a time series of detailed environmentally extended multi-regional input-output tables. J. Ind. Ecol. 22, 502–515 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
  41. Finnveden, G. et al. Recent developments in life cycle assessment. J. Environ. Manag. 91, 1–21 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
  42. Islam, S., Ponnambalam, S. G. & Lam, H. L. Review on life cycle inventory: methods, examples and applications. J. Clean. Prod. 136, 266–278 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  43. Min, J. & Rao, N. D. Estimating uncertainty in household energy footprints. J. Ind. Ecol. 22, 1307–1317 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
  44. Muthayya, S. et al. The global hidden hunger indices and maps: an advocacy tool for action. PLoS One 8, e67860 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  45. EnergyPlus v. 8.5 (US Department of Energy, 2016); https://energyplus.net/
  46. Rao, N. D. & Ummel, K. White goods for white people? Drivers of electric appliance growth in emerging economies. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 27, 106–116 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
  47. McCollum, D. L. et al. Energy investment needs for fulfilling the Paris Agreement and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nat. Energy 3, 589–599 (2018).
    Article Google Scholar
  48. Guidance Notes for Lead Authors of the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report on Addressing Uncertainties (IPCC, 2005); https://wg1.ipcc.ch/publications/supportingmaterial/uncertainty-guidance-note.pdf
  49. O’Neill, B. C. et al. A new scenario framework for climate change research: the concept of shared socioeconomic pathways. Clim. Change 122, 387–400 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  50. Household Consumption Expenditure Rd 68, 2011-12 (National Sample Survey Office, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, 2012).
  51. Consumer Expenditure Survey - POF 2008-09 (Instituto Brasilieiro de Geografia e Estatistica, 2009).
  52. Income and Expenditure Survey 2010-11 (Statistics South Africa, 2011).
  53. Wernet, G. et al. The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 21, 1218–1230 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar

Download references