Structural variation in the sequencing era (original) (raw)

• 1000 Genomes Project Consortium et al. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature 526, 68–74 (2015).
  Google Scholar
• Conrad, D. F. et al. Origins and functional impact of copy number variation in the human genome. Nature 464, 704–712 (2010).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sudmant, P. H. et al. Diversity of human copy number variation and multicopy genes. Science 330, 641–646 (2010).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Mills, R. E. et al. Mapping copy number variation by population-scale genome sequencing. Nature 470, 59–65 (2011). This study provides one of the first frameworks for using an ensemble approach to detect structural variants as part of phase 1 for the 1KGP.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sudmant, P. H. et al. An integrated map of structural variation in 2,504 human genomes. Nature 526, 75–81 (2015). This paper describes the development of the 1KGP phase 3 release set, which is currently one of the largest and most diverse reference sets.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sudmant, P. H. et al. Global diversity, population stratification, and selection of human copy-number variation. Science 349, aab3761 (2015).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Weischenfeldt, J., Symmons, O., Spitz, F. & Korbel, J. O. Phenotypic impact of genomic structural variation: insights from and for human disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 125–138 (2013).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Spielmann, M., Lupiáñez, D. G. & Mundlos, S. Structural variation in the 3D genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19, 453–467 (2018).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Alkan, C., Coe, B. P. & Eichler, E. E. Genome structural variation discovery and genotyping. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 363–376 (2011).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lappalainen, T., Scott, A. J., Brandt, M. & Hall, I. M. Genomic analysis in the age of human genome sequencing. Cell 177, 70–84 (2019).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Tuzun, E. et al. Fine-scale structural variation of the human genome. Nat. Genet. 37, 727–732 (2005).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sharp, A. J. et al. Segmental duplications and copy-number variation in the human genome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 77, 78–88 (2005).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hastings, P. J., Lupski, J. R., Rosenberg, S. M. & Ira, G. Mechanisms of change in gene copy number. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 551–564 (2009).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sherry, S. T. dbSNP: the NCBI database of genetic variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 308–311 (2001).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• International HapMap Consortium. The International HapMap Project. Nature 426, 789–796 (2003).
  Google Scholar
• DePristo, M. A. et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat. Genet. 43, 491–498 (2011).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lappalainen, T. et al. Transcriptome and genome sequencing uncovers functional variation in humans. Nature 501, 506–511 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• UK10K Consortium. The UK10K project identifies rare variants in health and disease. Nature 526, 82–90 (2015).
  Google Scholar
• Zook, J. M. et al. Integrating human sequence data sets provides a resource of benchmark SNP and indel genotype calls. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 246–251 (2014).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Exome Aggregation Consortium et al. Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature 536, 285–291 (2016).
  PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Goodwin, S., McPherson, J. D. & McCombie, W. R. Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17, 333–351 (2016).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Macintyre, G., Ylstra, B. & Brenton, J. D. Sequencing structural variants in cancer for precision therapeutics. Trends Genet. 32, 530–542 (2016).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Yi, K. & Ju, Y. S. Patterns and mechanisms of structural variations in human cancer. Exp. Mol. Med. 50, 98 (2018).
  PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Korbel, J. O. et al. Paired-end mapping reveals extensive structural variation in the human genome. Science 318, 420–426 (2007).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Yoon, S., Xuan, Z., Makarov, V., Ye, K. & Sebat, J. Sensitive and accurate detection of copy number variants using read depth of coverage. Genome Res. 19, 1586–1592 (2009).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hajirasouliha, I. et al. Detection and characterization of novel sequence insertions using paired-end next-generation sequencing. Bioinformatics 26, 1277–1283 (2010).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chen, K. et al. BreakDancer: an algorithm for high-resolution mapping of genomic structural variation. Nat. Methods 6, 677–681 (2009).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Abyzov, A., Urban, A. E., Snyder, M. & Gerstein, M. CNVnator: an approach to discover, genotype, and characterize typical and atypical CNVs from family and population genome sequencing. Genome Res. 21, 974–984 (2011).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Korbel, J. O. et al. PEMer: a computational framework with simulation-based error models for inferring genomic structural variants from massive paired-end sequencing data. Genome Biol. 10, R23 (2009).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Rausch, T. et al. DELLY: structural variant discovery by integrated paired-end and split-read analysis. Bioinformatics 28, i333–i339 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Handsaker, R. E., Korn, J. M., Nemesh, J. & McCarroll, S. A. Discovery and genotyping of genome structural polymorphism by sequencing on a population scale. Nat. Genet. 43, 269–276 (2011).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Layer, R. M., Chiang, C., Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. LUMPY: a probabilistic framework for structural variant discovery. Genome Biol. 15, R84 (2014).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chen, X. et al. Manta: rapid detection of structural variants and indels for germline and cancer sequencing applications. Bioinformatics 32, 1220–1222 (2016).
  Google Scholar
• Sindi, S. S., Önal, S., Peng, L. C., Wu, H.-T. & Raphael, B. J. An integrative probabilistic model for identification of structural variation in sequencing data. Genome Biol. 13, R22 (2012).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., Emery, S. B., Myers, B., Kidd, J. M. & Mills, R. E. Resolving complex structural genomic rearrangements using a randomized approach. Genome Biol. 17, 126 (2016).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Michaelson, J. J. & Sebat, J. forestSV: structural variant discovery through statistical learning. Nat. Methods 9, 819–821 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Telenti, A. et al. Deep sequencing of 10,000 human genomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 11901–11906 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kosugi, S. et al. Comprehensive evaluation of structural variation detection algorithms for whole genome sequencing. Genome Biol. 20, 117 (2019). This paper extensively compares the sensitivity of SV detection algorithms and the combinations of these algorithms.
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chaisson, M. J. P. et al. Multi-platform discovery of haplotype-resolved structural variation in human genomes. Nat. Commun. 10, 1784 (2019). This study generates one of the most comprehensive multiplatform haplotype-specific SV discovery sets and provides potential frameworks for their integration.
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wong, K., Keane, T. M., Stalker, J. & Adams, D. J. Enhanced structural variant and breakpoint detection using SVMerge by integration of multiple detection methods and local assembly. Genome Biol. 11, R128 (2010).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lam, H. Y. K. et al. Detecting and annotating genetic variations using the HugeSeq pipeline. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 226–229 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Parikh, H. et al. svclassify: a method to establish benchmark structural variant calls. BMC Genom. 17, 64 (2016).
  Google Scholar
• Collins, R. L. et al. An open resource of structural variation for medical and population genetics. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/578674 (2019).
• Abel, H. J. et al. Mapping and characterization of structural variation in 17,795 deeply sequenced human genomes. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/508515 (2018).
• Hehir-Kwa, J. Y. et al. A high-quality human reference panel reveals the complexity and distribution of genomic structural variants. Nat. Commun. 7, 12989 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Werling, D. M. et al. An analytical framework for whole-genome sequence association studies and its implications for autism spectrum disorder. Nat. Genet. 50, 727–736 (2018).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chiang, C. et al. SpeedSeq: ultra-fast personal genome analysis and interpretation. Nat. Methods 12, 966–968 (2015).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Larson, D. E. et al. svtools: population-scale analysis of structural variation. Bioinformatics https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz492 (2019).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Mimori, T. et al. iSVP: an integrated structural variant calling pipeline from high-throughput sequencing data. BMC Syst. Biol. 7, S8 (2013).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zarate, S. et al. Parliament2: fast structural variant calling using optimized combinations of callers. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/424267 (2018).
• Mohiyuddin, M. et al. MetaSV: an accurate and integrative structural-variant caller for next generation sequencing. Bioinformatics 31, 2741–2744 (2015).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Jeffares, D. C. et al. Transient structural variations have strong effects on quantitative traits and reproductive isolation in fission yeast. Nat. Commun. 8, 14061 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Becker, T. et al. FusorSV: an algorithm for optimally combining data from multiple structural variation detection methods. Genome Biol. 19, 38 (2018).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Pounraja, V. K., Jayakar, G., Jensen, M., Kelkar, N. & Girirajan, S. A machine-learning approach for accurate detection of copy number variants from exome sequencing. Genome Res. 29, 1134–1143 (2019).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Huddleston, J. & Eichler, E. E. An incomplete understanding of human genetic variation. Genetics 202, 1251–1254 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Iafrate, A. J. et al. Detection of large-scale variation in the human genome. Nat. Genet. 36, 949–951 (2004).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kloosterman, W. P. et al. Characteristics of de novo structural changes in the human genome. Genome Res. 25, 792–801 (2015).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Nagasaki, M. et al. Rare variant discovery by deep whole-genome sequencing of 1,070 Japanese individuals. Nat. Commun. 6, 8018 (2015).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Morales, J. et al. A standardized framework for representation of ancestry data in genomics studies, with application to the NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog. Genome Biol. 19, 21 (2018).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zook, J. M. et al. A robust benchmark for germline structural variant detection. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/664623 (2019). This study integrates multiple platforms to develop a gold standard reference set for SV benchmarking.
• Chaisson, M. J. P. et al. Resolving the complexity of the human genome using single-molecule sequencing. Nature 517, 608–611 (2015). This is one of the first papers using PacBio for comprehensive SV discovery, detecting thousands of previously undetectable SVs, including small insertions in tandem repeats and mobile elements.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Treangen, T. J. & Salzberg, S. L. Repetitive DNA and next-generation sequencing: computational challenges and solutions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 36–46 (2012).
  CAS Google Scholar
• Medvedev, P., Stanciu, M. & Brudno, M. Computational methods for discovering structural variation with next-generation sequencing. Nat. Methods 6, S13–S20 (2009).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kitzman, J. O. et al. Haplotype-resolved genome sequencing of a Gujarati Indian individual. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 59–63 (2011).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• McCoy, R. C. et al. Illumina TruSeq synthetic long-reads empower de novo assembly and resolve complex, highly-repetitive transposable elements. PLOS ONE 9, 13 (2014).
  Google Scholar
• Zheng, G. X. Y. et al. Haplotyping germline and cancer genomes with high-throughput linked-read sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 303–311 (2016). This paper is the first major study using linked reads to detect SVs in human genomes and demonstrates the ability of linked reads in phasing large haplotype blocks and detecting gene fusions.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bishara, A. et al. Read clouds uncover variation in complex regions of the human genome. Genome Res. 25, 1570–1580 (2015).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Marks, P. et al. Resolving the full spectrum of human genome variation using linked-reads. Genome Res. 29, 635–645 (2019).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Spies, N. et al. Genome-wide reconstruction of complex structural variants using read clouds. Nat. Methods 14, 915–920 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Fang, L. et al. LinkedSV: detection of mosaic structural variants from linked-read exome and genome sequencing data. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/409789 (2019).
• Elyanow, R., Wu, H.-T. & Raphael, B. J. Identifying structural variants using linked-read sequencing data. Bioinformatics 34, 353–360 (2018).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Eslami Rasekh, M. et al. Discovery of large genomic inversions using long range information. BMC Genom. 18, 65 (2017).
  Google Scholar
• Karaoglanoglu, F. et al. Characterization of segmental duplications and large inversions using linked-reads. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/394528 (2018).
• Xia, L. C. et al. Identification of large rearrangements in cancer genomes with barcode linked reads. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, e19 (2018).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wong, K. H. Y., Levy-Sakin, M. & Kwok, P.-Y. De novo human genome assemblies reveal spectrum of alternative haplotypes in diverse populations. Nat. Commun. 9, 3040 (2018).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Weisenfeld, N. I., Kumar, V., Shah, P., Church, D. M. & Jaffe, D. B. Direct determination of diploid genome sequences. Genome Res. 27, 757–767 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Meleshko, D., Marks, P., Williams, S. & Hajirasouliha, I. Detection and assembly of novel sequence insertions using linked-read technology. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/551028 (2019).
• Sedlazeck, F. J., Lee, H., Darby, C. A. & Schatz, M. C. Piercing the dark matter: bioinformatics of long-range sequencing and mapping. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19, 329–346 (2018). This Review discusses the main bioinformatics challenges faced by many of the described technologies. Topics include phasing, assembly, long-range expression and methylation.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Shajii, A., Numanagić, I., Whelan, C. & Berger, B. Statistical binning for barcoded reads improves downstream analyses. Cell Syst. 7, 219–226.e5 (2018).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Falconer, E. et al. DNA template strand sequencing of single-cells maps genomic rearrangements at high resolution. Nat. Methods 9, 1107–1112 (2012). This is the first major study showing the utility of Strand-seq for the detection of chromosomal rearrangements, along with the first application of this method in human genomes.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sanders, A. D. et al. Characterizing polymorphic inversions in human genomes by single-cell sequencing. Genome Res. 26, 1575–1587 (2016). This paper is the first major work using Strand-seq to detect inversions and reveals numerous inverted loci of interest within the human genome.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hills, M., O’Neill, K., Falconer, E., Brinkman, R. & Lansdorp, P. M. BAIT: organizing genomes and mapping rearrangements in single cells. Genome Med. 5, 82 (2013).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sanders, A. D., Falconer, E., Hills, M., Spierings, D. C. J. & Lansdorp, P. M. Single-cell template strand sequencing by Strand-seq enables the characterization of individual homologs. Nat. Protoc. 12, 1151–1176 (2017).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lieberman-Aiden, E. et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289–293 (2009).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Harewood, L. et al. Hi-C as a tool for precise detection and characterisation of chromosomal rearrangements and copy number variation in human tumours. Genome Biol. 18, 125 (2017). This is the first study detecting both large chromosomal rearrangements and copy number changes with Hi-C.
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Burton, J. N. et al. Chromosome-scale scaffolding of de novo genome assemblies based on chromatin interactions. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 1119–1125 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Steininger, A. et al. Genome-wide analysis of interchromosomal interaction probabilities reveals chained translocations and overrepresentation of translocation breakpoints in genes in a cutaneous T-cell lymphoma cell line. Front. Oncol. 8, 183 (2018).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Seaman, L. et al. Nucleome analysis reveals structure–function relationships for colon cancer. Mol. Cancer Res. 15, 821–830 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, A. & Ay, F. Identification of copy number variations and translocations in cancer cells from Hi-C data. Bioinformatics 34, 338–345 (2018).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zhang, X. et al. Local and global chromatin interactions are altered by large genomic deletions associated with human brain development. Nat. Commun. 9, 5356 (2018).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Dixon, J. R. et al. Integrative detection and analysis of structural variation in cancer genomes. Nat. Genet. 50, 1388–1398 (2018). This study integrates three platforms, showing that their combination is necessary to detect the range of SVs in cancer genomes, and describes the only algorithm that currently detects most SV types with Hi-C.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Díaz, N. et al. Chromatin conformation analysis of primary patient tissue using a low input Hi-C method. Nat. Commun. 9, 4938 (2018).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lee, H. & Schatz, M. C. Genomic dark matter: the reliability of short read mapping illustrated by the genome mappability score. Bioinformatics 28, 2097–2105 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Stephens, Z., Wang, C., Iyer, R. K. & Kocher, J.-P. Detection and visualization of complex structural variants from long reads. BMC Bioinform. 19, 508 (2018).
  CAS Google Scholar
• English, A. C., Salerno, W. J. & Reid, J. G. PBHoney: identifying genomic variants via long-read discordance and interrupted mapping. BMC Bioinform. 15, 180 (2014).
  Google Scholar
• Sedlazeck, F. J. et al. Accurate detection of complex structural variations using single-molecule sequencing. Nat. Methods 15, 461–468 (2018).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Huddleston, J. et al. Discovery and genotyping of structural variation from long-read haploid genome sequence data. Genome Res. 27, 677–685 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Heller, D. & Vingron, M. SVIM: structural variant identification using mapped long reads. Bioinformatics 35, 2907–2915 (2019).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Fang, L., Hu, J., Wang, D. & Wang, K. NextSV: a meta-caller for structural variants from low-coverage long-read sequencing data. BMC Bioinform. 19, 180 (2018).
  Google Scholar
• Wenger, A. M. et al. Accurate circular consensus long-read sequencing improves variant detection and assembly of a human genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 1155–1162 (2019).
• Rhoads, A. & Au, K. F. PacBio sequencing and its applications. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 13, 278–289 (2015).
  Google Scholar
• Pendleton, M. et al. Assembly and diploid architecture of an individual human genome via single-molecule technologies. Nat. Methods 12, 780–786 (2015).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Shi, L. et al. Long-read sequencing and de novo assembly of a Chinese genome. Nat. Commun. 7, 12065 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Seo, J.-S. et al. De novo assembly and phasing of a Korean human genome. Nature 538, 243–247 (2016).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ameur, A. et al. De novo assembly of two Swedish genomes reveals missing segments from the human GRCh38 reference and improves variant calling of population-scale sequencing data. Genes 9, 486 (2018).
  PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kronenberg, Z. N. et al. High-resolution comparative analysis of great ape genomes. Science 360, eaar6343 (2018).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Nagasaki, M. Construction of JRG (Japanese reference genome) with single-molecule real-time sequencing. Hum. Genome Var. 6, 27 (2019).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Audano, P. A. et al. Characterizing the major structural variant alleles of the human genome. Cell 176, 663–675.e19 (2019). This study is the most comprehensive PacBio-based SV discovery project to date, detecting variants over 15 deeply sequenced individuals and creating a call-set reference with major shared SVs.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Clarke, J. et al. Continuous base identification for single-molecule nanopore DNA sequencing. Nat. Nanotechnol. 4, 265–270 (2009).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Eid, J. et al. Real-time DNA sequencing from single polymerase molecules. Science 323, 133–138 (2009).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Cretu Stancu, M. et al. Mapping and phasing of structural variation in patient genomes using nanopore sequencing. Nat. Commun. 8, 1326 (2017). This is the first major paper using nanopore sequencing to detect SVs in human genomes and describes the NanoSV algorithm.
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Gong, L. et al. Picky comprehensively detects high-resolution structural variants in nanopore long reads. Nat. Methods 15, 455–460 (2018).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• De Coster, W. et al. Structural variants identified by Oxford Nanopore PromethION sequencing of the human genome. Genome Res. 29, 1178–1187 (2019).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lam, E. T. et al. Genome mapping on nanochannel arrays for structural variation analysis and sequence assembly. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 771–776 (2012). This is the first major study using Bionano optical mapping to detect SVs in human genomes, leveraging the long molecules to characterize the highly polymorphic major histocompatibility complex.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Schwartz, D. et al. Ordered restriction maps of Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosomes constructed by optical mapping. Science 262, 110–114 (1993).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Teague, B. et al. High-resolution human genome structure by single-molecule analysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 10848–10853 (2010).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Cao, H. et al. Rapid detection of structural variation in a human genome using nanochannel-based genome mapping technology. GigaScience 3, 34 (2014).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Mak, A. C. Y. et al. Genome-wide structural variation detection by genome mapping on nanochannel arrays. Genetics 202, 351–362 (2016).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Levy-Sakin, M. et al. Genome maps across 26 human populations reveal population-specific patterns of structural variation. Nat. Commun. 10, 1025 (2019).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Li, L. et al. OMSV enables accurate and comprehensive identification of large structural variations from nanochannel-based single-molecule optical maps. Genome Biol. 18, 230 (2017).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hastie, A. R. et al. Rapid automated large structural variation detection in a diploid genome by nanochannel based next-generation mapping. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/102764 (2017).
• Lima, L. et al. Comparative assessment of long-read error correction software applied to nanopore RNA-sequencing data. Brief. Bioinform. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbz058 (2019).
• Fu, S., Wang, A. & Au, K. F. A comparative evaluation of hybrid error correction methods for error-prone long reads. Genome Biol. 20, 26 (2019).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Jain, C. & Aluru, S. A comprehensive evaluation of long read error correction methods. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/519330 (2019)
• Jaratlerdsiri, W. et al. Next generation mapping reveals novel large genomic rearrangements in prostate cancer. Oncotarget 8, 23588–23602 (2017).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Xu, J. et al. An integrated framework for genome analysis reveals numerous previously unrecognizable structural variants in leukemia patients’ samples. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/563270 (2019).
• Zhou, B. et al. Comprehensive, integrated, and phased whole-genome analysis of the primary ENCODE cell line K562. Genome Res. 29, 472–484 (2019).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zhou, B. et al. Haplotype-resolved and integrated genome analysis of the cancer cell line HepG2. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, 3846–3861 (2019).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chan, E. K. F. et al. Optical mapping reveals a higher level of genomic architecture of chained fusions in cancer. Genome Res. 28, 726–738 (2018).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• English, A. C. et al. Assessing structural variation in a personal genome—towards a human reference diploid genome. BMC Genom. 16, 286 (2015). This study is one of the first applications of hybrid assembly for structural variant detection, showing highly increased sensitivity from platform integration.
  Google Scholar
• Ritz, A. et al. Characterization of structural variants with single molecule and hybrid sequencing approaches. Bioinformatics 30, 3458–3466 (2014).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Fan, X., Chaisson, M., Nakhleh, L. & Chen, K. HySA: a Hybrid Structural variant Assembly approach using next-generation and single-molecule sequencing technologies. Genome Res. 27, 793–800 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Weischenfeldt, J. et al. Pan-cancer analysis of somatic copy-number alterations implicates IRS4 and IGF2 in enhancer hijacking. Nat. Genet. 49, 65–74 (2017).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• McPherson, A. et al. deFuse: an algorithm for gene fusion discovery in tumor RNA-Seq data. PLOS Comput. Biol. 7, e1001138 (2011).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• McPherson, A. et al. nFuse: discovery of complex genomic rearrangements in cancer using high-throughput sequencing. Genome Res. 22, 2250–2261 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Yorukoglu, D. et al. Dissect: detection and characterization of novel structural alterations in transcribed sequences. Bioinformatics 28, i179–i187 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Franke, M. et al. Formation of new chromatin domains determines pathogenicity of genomic duplications. Nature 538, 265–269 (2016).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gheldof, N. et al. Structural variation-associated expression changes are paralleled by chromatin architecture modifications. PLOS ONE 8, e79973 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Fudenberg, G. & Pollard, K. S. Chromatin features constrain structural variation across evolutionary timescales. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 2175–2180 (2019).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Quigley, D. A. et al. Genomic hallmarks and structural variation in metastatic prostate cancer. Cell 174, 758–769.e9 (2018).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Stranger, B. E. et al. Relative impact of nucleotide and copy number variation on gene expression phenotypes. Science 315, 848–853 (2007).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chiang, C. et al. The impact of structural variation on human gene expression. Nat. Genet. 49, 692–699 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Merker, J. D. et al. Long-read genome sequencing identifies causal structural variation in a Mendelian disease. Genet. Med. 20, 159–163 (2018).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Miao, H. et al. Long-read sequencing identified a causal structural variant in an exome-negative case and enabled preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hereditas 155, 32 (2018).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Roberts, D. S. et al. Linked-read sequencing analysis reveals tumor-specific genome variation landscapes in neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) patients. Otol. Neurotol. 40, e150–e159 (2019).
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Sanchis-Juan, A. et al. Complex structural variants in Mendelian disorders: identification and breakpoint resolution using short- and long-read genome sequencing. Genome Med. 10, 95 (2018).
• Cantsilieris, S. et al. Recurrent structural variation, clustered sites of selection, and disease risk for the complement factor H (CFH) gene family. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E4433–E4442 (2018).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Nattestad, M. et al. Complex rearrangements and oncogene amplifications revealed by long-read DNA and RNA sequencing of a breast cancer cell line. Genome Res. 28, 1126–1135 (2018).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Aneichyk, T. et al. Dissecting the causal mechanism of X-linked dystonia–parkinsonism by integrating genome and transcriptome assembly. Cell 172, 897–909.e21 (2018).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sharim, H. et al. Long-read single-molecule maps of the functional methylome. Genome Res. 29, 646–656 (2019).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lee, I. et al. Simultaneous profiling of chromatin accessibility and methylation on human cell lines with nanopore sequencing. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/504993 (2019).
• Beck, C. R. et al. Megabase length hypermutation accompanies human structural variation at 17p11.2. Cell 176, 1310–1324.e10 (2019).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Viswanathan, S. R. et al. Structural alterations driving castration-resistant prostate cancer revealed by linked-read genome sequencing. Cell 174, 433–447.e19 (2018). This study leverages layered biological information to understand the role of SVs in oncogene amplification for a specific cancer type.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Huynh, L. & Hormozdiari, F. TAD fusion score: discovery and ranking the contribution of deletions to genome structure. Genome Biol. 20, 60 (2019).
• Feuk, L., Carson, A. R. & Scherer, S. W. Structural variation in the human genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7, 85–97 (2006).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sebat, J. Large-scale copy number polymorphism in the human genome. Science 305, 525–528 (2004).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Redon, R. et al. Global variation in copy number in the human genome. Nature 444, 444–454 (2006).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• McCarroll, S. A. et al. Integrated detection and population-genetic analysis of SNPs and copy number variation. Nat. Genet. 40, 1166–1174 (2008).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kidd, J. M. et al. Mapping and sequencing of structural variation from eight human genomes. Nature 453, 56–64 (2008).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zhou, B. et al. Whole-genome sequencing analysis of CNV using low-coverage and paired-end strategies is efficient and outperforms array-based CNV analysis. J. Med. Genet. 55, 735–743 (2018).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Speicher, M. R. & Carter, N. P. The new cytogenetics: blurring the boundaries with molecular biology. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 782–792 (2005).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lee, C., Iafrate, A. J. & Brothman, A. R. Copy number variations and clinical cytogenetic diagnosis of constitutional disorders. Nat. Genet. 39, S48–S54 (2007).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Scherer, S. W. et al. Challenges and standards in integrating surveys of structural variation. Nat. Genet. 39, S7–S15 (2007).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Tattini, L., D’Aurizio, R. & Magi, A. Detection of genomic structural variants from next-generation sequencing data. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 3, 92 (2015).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Guan, P. & Sung, W.-K. Structural variation detection using next-generation sequencing data. Methods 102, 36–49 (2016).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Quinlan, A. R. & Hall, I. M. Characterizing complex structural variation in germline and somatic genomes. Trends Genet. 28, 43–53 (2012).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tan, R. et al. An evaluation of copy number variation detection tools from whole-exome sequencing data. Hum. Mutat. 35, 899–907 (2014).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hehir-Kwa, J. Y., Tops, B. B. J. & Kemmeren, P. The clinical implementation of copy number detection in the age of next-generation sequencing. Expert. Rev. Mol. Diagn. 18, 907–915 (2018).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hehir-Kwa, J. Y., Pfundt, R. & Veltman, J. A. Exome sequencing and whole genome sequencing for the detection of copy number variation. Expert. Rev. Mol. Diagn. 15, 1023–1032 (2015).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Pang, A. W. et al. Towards a comprehensive structural variation map of an individual human genome. Genome Biol. 11, R52 (2010).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Park, H. et al. Discovery of common Asian copy number variants using integrated high-resolution array CGH and massively parallel DNA sequencing. Nat. Genet. 42, 400–405 (2010).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Jain, M. et al. Nanopore sequencing and assembly of a human genome with ultra-long reads. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 338–345 (2018).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Anderson-Trocmé, L. et al. Legacy data confounds genomics studies. Mol. Biol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msz201 (2019).
  Google Scholar
• Lappalainen, I. et al. dbVar and DGVa: public archives for genomic structural variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D936–D941 (2012).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Demaerel, W. et al. The 22q11 low copy repeats are characterized by unprecedented size and structure variability. Genome Res. 29, 1389–1401 (2019).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Carvalho, C. M. B. & Lupski, J. R. Mechanisms underlying structural variant formation in genomic disorders. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17, 224–238 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Vollger, M. R. et al. Long-read sequence and assembly of segmental duplications. Nat. Methods 16, 88–94 (2019).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Jiang, T., Liu, B., Li, J. & Wang, Y. rMETL: sensitive mobile element insertion detection with long read realignment. Bioinformatics https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz106 (2019).
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Meng, G. et al. TSD: a computational tool to study the complex structural variants using PacBio targeted sequencing data. G3 9, 1371–1376 (2019).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Frith, M. C. & Khan, S. A survey of localized sequence rearrangements in human DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 1661–1673 (2018).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Greer, S. U. & Ji, H. P. Structural variant analysis for linked-read sequencing data with gemtools. Bioinformatics https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz239 (2019).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bakhtiari, M., Shleizer-Burko, S., Gymrek, M., Bansal, V. & Bafna, V. Targeted genotyping of variable number tandem repeats with adVNTR. Genome Res. 28, 1709–1719 (2018).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ummat, A. & Bashir, A. Resolving complex tandem repeats with long reads. Bioinformatics 30, 3491–3498 (2014).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Liu, Q., Zhang, P., Wang, D., Gu, W. & Wang, K. Interrogating the “unsequenceable” genomic trinucleotide repeat disorders by long-read sequencing. Genome Med. 9, 65 (2017).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Shao, H. et al. npInv: accurate detection and genotyping of inversions using long read sub-alignment. BMC Bioinform. 19, 261 (2018).
  Google Scholar
• Mitsuhashi, S. Tandem-genotypes: robust detection of tandem repeat expansions from long DNA reads. Genome Biol. 20, 58 (2019).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Mitelman, F., Johansson, B. & Mertens, F. The impact of translocations and gene fusions on cancer causation. Nat. Rev. Cancer 7, 233–245 (2007).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zhang, Q. et al. Clinical application of single-molecule optical mapping to a multigeneration FSHD1 pedigree. Mol. Genet. Genom. Med. 7, e565 (2019).
  Google Scholar
• Norris, A. L., Workman, R. E., Fan, Y., Eshleman, J. R. & Timp, W. Nanopore sequencing detects structural variants in cancer. Cancer Biol. Ther. 17, 246–253 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Euskirchen, P. et al. Same-day genomic and epigenomic diagnosis of brain tumors using real-time nanopore sequencing. Acta Neuropathol. 134, 691–703 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Jacobson, E. C. et al. Hi-C detects novel structural variants in HL-60 and HL-60/S4 cell lines. Genomics https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygeno.2019.05.009 (2019).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Greer, S. U. et al. Linked read sequencing resolves complex genomic rearrangements in gastric cancer metastases. Genome Med. 9, 57 (2017).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sebat, J. et al. Strong association of de novo copy number mutations with autism. Science 316, 445–449 (2007).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Marshall, C. R. et al. Structural variation of chromosomes in autism spectrum disorder. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 82, 477–488 (2008).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sullivan, P. F. & Geschwind, D. H. Defining the genetic, genomic, cellular, and diagnostic architectures of psychiatric disorders. Cell 177, 162–183 (2019).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Yuen, R. K. et al. Genome-wide characteristics of de novo mutations in autism. Npj Genomic Med. 1, 160271–1602710 (2016).
  Google Scholar
• Brand, H. et al. Paired-duplication signatures mark cryptic inversions and other complex structural variation. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 97, 170–176 (2015).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Turner, T. N. et al. Genome sequencing of autism-affected families reveals disruption of putative noncoding regulatory DNA. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 98, 58–74 (2016).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Brandler, W. M. et al. Paternally inherited _cis_-regulatory structural variants are associated with autism. Science 360, 327–331 (2018).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Turner, T. N. et al. Genomic patterns of de novo mutation in simplex autism. Cell 171, 710–722.e12 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Mizuguchi, T. et al. Detecting a long insertion variant in SAMD12 by SMRT sequencing: implications of long-read whole-genome sequencing for repeat expansion diseases. J. Hum. Genet. 64, 191–197 (2019).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Mizuguchi, T. et al. A 12-kb structural variation in progressive myoclonic epilepsy was newly identified by long-read whole-genome sequencing. J. Hum. Genet. 64, 359–368 (2019).
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Barseghyan, H. et al. Next-generation mapping: a novel approach for detection of pathogenic structural variants with a potential utility in clinical diagnosis. Genome Med. 9, 90 (2017).
• Collins, R. L. et al. Defining the diverse spectrum of inversions, complex structural variation, and chromothripsis in the morbid human genome. Genome Biol. 18, 36 (2017).
• Eisfeldt, J. et al. Comprehensive structural variation genome map of individuals carrying complex chromosomal rearrangements. PLOS Genet. 15, e1007858 (2019).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Dutta, U. R. et al. Breakpoint mapping of a novel de novo translocation t(X;20)(q11.1;p13) by positional cloning and long read sequencing. Genomics 111, 1108–1114 (2019).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sherman, R. M. et al. Assembly of a pan-genome from deep sequencing of 910 humans of African descent. Nat. Genet. 51, 30–35 (2019).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zhou, B. et al. Extensive and deep sequencing of the Venter/HuRef genome for developing and benchmarking genome analysis tools. Sci. Data 5, 180261 (2018).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Levy, S. et al. The diploid genome sequence of an individual human. PLOS Biol. 5, e254 (2007).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Miga, K. H. et al. Telomere-to-telomere assembly of a complete human X chromosome. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/735928 (2019).
• Wang, Y.-C. et al. High-coverage, long-read sequencing of Han Chinese trio reference samples. Sci. Data 6, 91 (2019).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zook, J. M. et al. Extensive sequencing of seven human genomes to characterize benchmark reference materials. Sci. Data 3, 160025 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar