Sublexical frequency measures for orthographic and phonological units in German (original) (raw)

References

• Aichert, I., &Ziegler, W. (2004). Syllable frequency and syllable structure in apraxia of speech.Brain & Language,88, 148–159.
  Article Google Scholar
• Aichert, I., &Ziegler, W. (2005). Is there a need to control for sublexical frequencies?Brain & Language,95, 170–171.
  Article Google Scholar
• Alameda, J. R., &Cuetos, F. (1995).Diccionario de frecuencia de las unidades lingüísticas del castellano (Vols. 1 & 2). Oviedo: Universidad de Oviedo.
  Google Scholar
• Ans, B., Carbonnel, S., &Valdois, S. (1998). A connectionist multiple-trace memory model for polysyllabic word reading.Psychological Review,105, 678–723.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., &Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model.Journal of Memory & Language,37, 94–117.
  Article Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., &Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
  Google Scholar
• Bailey, T. M., &Hahn, U. (2001). Determinants of Wordlikeliness: Phonotactics or Lexical Neighborhoods?Journal of Memory & Language,44, 568–591.
  Article Google Scholar
• Barber, H., Vergara, M., &Carreiras, M. (2004). Syllable-frequency effects in visual word recognition: Evidence from ERPs.Neuro Report,15, 545–548.
  Google Scholar
• Carreiras, M., Álvarez, C. J., &De Vega, M. (1993). Syllable frequency and visual word recognition in Spanish.Journal of Memory & Language,32, 766–780.
  Article Google Scholar
• Carreiras, M., &Perea, M. (2004). Effects of syllable neighbourhood frequency in visual word recognition and reading: Cross-task comparisons. In L. Ferrand & J. Grainger (Eds.),Psycholinguistique cognitive. Bruxelles: De Broeck Université.
  Google Scholar
• Cholin, J., Levelt, W. J. M., &Schiller, N. O. (2006). Effects of syllable frequency in speech production.Cognition,99, 205–235.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Clahsen, H. (1999). Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,22, 991–1060.
  Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., &Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.Psychological Review,108, 204–256.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Conrad, M., Carreiras, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (in press-a). Contrasting effects of token and type syllable frequency in lexical decision.Language & Cognitive Processes.
• Conrad, M., Carreiras, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (in press-b). Syllable frequency and orthographic redundancy evidence for two different processing mechanisms in visual word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance.
• Conrad, M., Grainger, J., &Jacobs, A. (2007). Phonology as the source of syllable frequency effects in visual word recognition: Evidence from French.Memory & Cognition,35, 974–983.
  Article Google Scholar
• Conrad, M., &Jacobs, A. M. (2004). Replicating syllable frequency effects in Spanish in German: One more challenge to computational models of visual word recognition.Language & Cognitive Processes,19, 369–390.
  Article Google Scholar
• Conrad, M., Stenneken, P., &Jacobs, A. M. (2006). Associated or dissociated effects of syllable-frequency in lexical decision and naming.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,13, 339–345.
  Article Google Scholar
• Davis, C., &Perea, M. (2005). BuscaPalabras: A program for deriving orthographic and phonological neighborhood statistics and other psycholinguistic indices in Spanish.Behavior Research Methods,37, 665–671.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Sigman, M., &Vinckier, F. (2005). The neural code for written words: A proposal.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,9, 335–341.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• De Jong, N. H., Schreuder, R., &Baayen, R. H. (2000). The morphological family size effect and morphology.Language & Cognitive Processes,15, 329–365.
  Article Google Scholar
• del Prado Martín, F. M., Ernestus, M., &Baayen, R. H. (2004). Do type and token reflect different mechanisms? Connectionist modeling of Dutch past-tense formation and final devoicing.Brain & Language,90, 287–298.
  Article Google Scholar
• del Prado Martín, F. M., Kostic, A., &Baayen, R. H. (2004). Putting the bits together: An information theoretical perspective on morphological processing.Cognition,94, 1–18.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Duyck, W., Desmet, T., Verbeke, L. P. C., &Brysbaert, M. (2004). WordGen: A tool for word selection and nonword generation in Dutch, English, German, and French.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,36, 488–499.
  Article Google Scholar
• Eddington, D. (2004). Issues in modeling language processing analogically.Lingua,114, 849–871.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ernestus, M., &Baayen, R. H. (2001). Choosing between the Dutch past-tense suffixes -te and -de. In T. van der Wouden (Eds.),Linguistics in the Netherlands 2001 (pp. 81–93). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  Google Scholar
• Ernestus, M., &Baayen, R. H. (2003). Predicting the unpredictable: Interpreting neutralized segments in Dutch.Language,79, 5–38.
  Article Google Scholar
• Geyken, A. (2007). The DWDS-corpus: A reference corpus for the German language of the 20th century. In C. Fellbaum (Eds.),Collocations and idioms: Linguistic, lexicographic, and computational aspects. London: Continuum.
  Google Scholar
• Goslin, J., &Frauenfelder, U. H. (2000). A comparison of theoretical and human syllabification.Language & Speech,44, 409–436.
  Article Google Scholar
• Goswami, U., &Ziegler, J. C. (2006). A developmental perspective on the neural code for written words.Trends in Cognitive Sciences,10, 142–143.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Goswami, U., Ziegler, J. C., Dalton, L., &Schneider, W. (2003). Nonword reading across orthographies: How flexible is the choice of reading units?Applied Psycholinguistics,24, 235–247.
  Article Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., &Jacobs, A. M. (1993). Masked partial-word priming in visual word recognition: effects of positional letter frequency.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 951–964.
  Article Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., &Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model.Psychological Review,103, 518–565.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., &Whitney, C. (2004). Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe?Trends in Cognitive Sciences,8, 58–59.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Hutzler, F., Bergmann, J., Conrad, M., Kronbichler, M., Stenneken, P., &Jacobs, A. M. (2004). Inhibitory effects of first syllablefrequency in lexical decision: An event-related potential study.Neuroscience Letters,372, 179–184.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Hutzler, F., Conrad, M., &Jacobs, A. M. (2005). Effects of syllablefrequency in lexical decision and naming: An eye-movement study.Brain & Language,92, 138–152.
  Article Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. M. (2002). The cognitive psychology of literacy. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.),International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 8971–8975). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. M., &Graf, R. (2005). Wortformgedächtnis als intuitive Statistik in Sprachen mit unterschiedlicher Konsistenz [Word form memory as intuitive statistics in languages with different consistency].Zeitschrift für Psychologie,213, 133–141.
  Article Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. M., Graf, R., &Kinder, A. (2003). Receiver operating characteristics in the lexical decision task: Evidence for a simple signaldetection process simulated by the multiple read-out model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,29, 481–488.
  Article Google Scholar
• Jacobs, A. M., Rey, A., Ziegler, J. C., &Grainger, J. (1998). MROM-P: An interactive activation, multiple read-out model of orthographic and phonological processes in visual word recognition. In J. Grainger & A. M. Jacobs (Eds.),Localist connectionist approaches to human cognition. (pp. 147–187). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Kuchinke, L., Jacobs, A. M., Grubich, C., Võ, M. L.-H., Conrad, M., &Herrmann, M. (2005). Incidental effects of emotional valence in single word processing: An fMRI study.NeuroImage,28, 1022–1032.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Laganaro, M. (2005). Syllable frequency effect in speech production: Evidence from aphasia.Journal of Neurolinguistics,18, 221–235.
  Article Google Scholar
• Leung, M.-T., Law, S.-P., &Fung, S.-Y. (2004). Type and token frequencies of phonological units in Hong Kong Cantonese.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,36, 500–505.
  Article Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., &Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production.Behavioral & Brain Sciences,22, 1–75.
  Google Scholar
• Liberman, I., Liberman, A. M., Mattingly, I., &Shankweiler, D. (1980).Orthography and the beginning reader. Baltimore, OH: University Park Press.
  Google Scholar
• Martin, N. (2004). Comments on Nickels and Howard (2004) “Dissociating effects of number of phonemes, number of syllables, and syllable complexity on word production in aphasia: It’s the number of phonemes that counts.”Cognitive Neuropsychology,21, 528–530.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Massaro, D. W., &Cohen, M. M. (1994). Visual, orthographic, phonological, and lexical influences in reading.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,20, 1107–1128.
  Article Google Scholar
• Mathey, S., &Zagar, D. (2002). Lexical similarity in visual word recognition: The effect of syllabic neighborhood in French.Current Psychology Letters: Behavior, Brain & Cognition,8, 107–121.
  Google Scholar
• New, B., Brysbaert, M., Segui, J., Ferrand, L., &Rastle, K. (2004). The processing of singular and plural nouns in French and English.Journal of Memory & Language,51, 568–585.
  Article Google Scholar
• New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M., &Ferrand, L. (2004). Lexique 2: A new French lexical database.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,36, 516–524.
  Article Google Scholar
• Nickels, L. A., &Howard, D. (2004a). Dissociating effects of number of phonemes, number of syllables, and syllabic complexity on word production in aphasia: It’s the number of phonemes that counts.Cognitive Neuropsychology,21, 57–78.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Nickels, L. A., &Howard, D. (2004b). Correct responses, error analyses, and theories of word production: A response to Martin.Cognitive Neuropsychology,21, 531–536.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Novick, L. R., &Sherman, S. J. (2004). Type-based bigram frequencies for five-letter words.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,36, 397–401.
  Article Google Scholar
• Nuerk, H.-C., Rey, A., Graf, R., &Jacobs, A. M. (2000). Phonographic sublexical units in visual word recognition.Current Psychology Letters: Behavior, Brain, & Cognition,2, 27–38.
  Google Scholar
• Perea, M., &Carreiras, M. (1998). Effects of syllable frequency and syllable neighborhood frequency in visual word recognition.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 134–144.
  Article Google Scholar
• Peressotti, F., &Grainger, J. (1999). The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming.Perception & Psychophysics,61, 691–706.
  Article Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems.Cognition,19, 1–30.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S. (1987). Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy? In M. Coltheart (Ed.),Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 245–263). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., &McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.Psychological Review,96, 523–568.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Stella, V., &Job, R. (2001). Le sillabe PD/DPSS: Una base di dati sulla frequenza sillabica dell’italiano scritto.Giornale Italiano di Psicologia,28, 633–639.
  Google Scholar
• Stenneken, P., Bastiaanse, R., Huber, W., &Jacobs, A. M. (2005). Syllable structure and sonority in language inventory and aphasic neologisms.Brain & Language,95, 280–292.
  Article Google Scholar
• Stenneken, P., Conrad, M., Hutzler, F., Braun, M., &Jacobs, A. M. (2005). Frequency effects with visual words and syllables in a dyslexic reader.Behavioral Neurology,16, 1–15.
  Google Scholar
• Stenneken, P., Hofmann, M., &Jacobs, A. M. (2005). Patterns of phoneme and syllable frequency in jargon aphasia.Brain & Language,95, 221–222.
  Article Google Scholar
• Stone, G. O., Vanhoy, M., &Van Orden, G. C. (1997). Perception is a two-way street: Feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition.Journal of Memory & Language,36, 337–359.
  Article Google Scholar
• Sumiya, H., &Healy, A. F. (2004). Phonology in the bilingual Stroop effect.Memory & Cognition,32, 752–758.
  Article Google Scholar
• Van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading.Memory & Cognition,15, 181–198.
  Article Google Scholar
• Varley, R., &Whiteside, S. P. (2001). What is the underlying impairment in acquired apraxia of speech?Aphasiology,15, 39–49.
  Article Google Scholar
• Yates, M. (2005). Phonological neighbors speed visual word processing: Evidence from multiple tasks.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,31, 1385–1397.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., &Ferrand, L. (1998). Orthography shapes the perception of speech: The consistency effect in auditory word recognition.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 683–689.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., Ferrand, L., &Montant, M. (2004). Visual phonology: The effects of orthographic consistency on different auditory word recognition tasks.Memory & Cognition,32, 732–741.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., &Goswami, U. (2005). Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory.Psychological Bulletin,131, 3–29.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., Jacobs, A. M., &Stone, G. O. (1996). Statistical analysis of the bidirectional inconsistency of spelling and sound in French.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,28, 504–515.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., &Coltheart, M. (2003). Speed of lexical and nonlexical processing in French: The case of the regularity effect.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,10, 947–953.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., Jacobs, A. M., &Braun, M. (2001). Identical words are read differently in different languages.Psychological Science,12, 379–384.
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., Stone, G. O., &Jacobs, A. M. (1997). What is the pronunciation for -ough and the spelling for /u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,29, 600–618.
  Article Google Scholar
• Ziegler, J. C., Van Orden, G. C., &Jacobs, A. M. (1997). Phonology Can Help or Hurt the Perception of Print.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,23, 845–860.
  Article Google Scholar
• Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., &Butterworth, B. (1998). Two Routes or One in Reading Aloud? A Connectionist Dual-Process Model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1131–1161.
  Article Google Scholar

Download references