Identifying species threat hotspots from global supply chains (original) (raw)

References

  1. Lenzen, M. et al. International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations. Nature 486, 109–112 (2012).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Essl, F., Winter, M. & Pysek, P. Biodiversity: Trade threat could be even more dire. Nature 487, 39 (2012).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Chaplin-Kramer, R. et al. Spatial patterns of agricultural expansion determine impacts on biodiversity and carbon storage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 7402–7407 (2015).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Bateman, I. J. et al. Conserving tropical biodiversity via market forces and spatial targeting. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 7408–7413 (2015).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Meyer, C., Kreft, H., Guralnick, R. & Jetz, W. Global priorities for an effective information basis of biodiversity distributions. Nat. Commun. 6, 8221 (2015).
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  6. Hortal, J., Lobo, J. M. & Jiménez-Valverde, A. Limitations of biodiversity databases: case study on seed-plant diversity in Tenerife, Canary Islands. Conserv. Biol. 21, 853–863 (2007).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Myers, N., Mittermeler, R. A., Mittermeler, C. G., Da Fonseca, G. A. B. & Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–858 (2000).
    Article CAS Google Scholar
  8. Gaston, K. J. & Fuller, R. A. The sizes of species’ geographic ranges. J. Appl. Ecol. 46, 1–9 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
  9. Dobson, A. P., Rodriguez, J. P., Roberts, W. M. & Wilcove, D. S. Geographic distribution of endangered species in the United States. Science 275, 550–553 (1997).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Ficetola, G. F. et al. An evaluation of the robustness of global amphibian range maps. J. Biogeogr. 41, 211–221 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  11. Jetz, W., Sekercioglu, C. H. & Watson, J. E. M. Ecological correlates and conservation implications of overestimating species geographic ranges. [Correlaciones Ecológicas e Implicaciones para la Conservación de la Sobrestimación de los Rangos Geográficos de Especies.] Conserv. Biol. 22, 110–119 (2008).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Williams, R. et al. Prioritizing global marine mammal habitats using density maps in place of range maps. Ecography 37, 212–220 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  13. Hurlbert, A. H. & Jetz, W. Species richness, hotspots, and the scale dependence of range maps in ecology and conservation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 13384–13389 (2007).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Joppa, L. N. et al. Impact of alternative metrics on estimates of extent of occurrence for extinction risk assessment. Conserv. Biol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12591 (2015).
  15. Jenkins, C. N., Pimm, S. L. & Joppa, L. N. Global patterns of terrestrial vertebrate diversity and conservation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, E2602–E2610 (2013).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  16. Orme, C. D. L. et al. Global hotspots of species richness are not congruent with endemism or threat. Nature 436, 1016–1019 (2005).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  17. Kaschner, K., Tittensor, D. P., Ready, J., Gerrodette, T. & Worm, B. Current and future patterns of global marine mammal biodiversity. PLoS ONE 6, e19653 (2011).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  18. Kesner-Reyes, K. et al. AquaMaps: Algorithm and Data Sources for Aquatic Organisms (eds Froese, R. & Pauly, D.) (2012).
  19. Schipper, J. et al. The status of the world’s land and marine mammals: Diversity, threat, and knowledge. Science 322, 225–230 (2008).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Grenyer, R. et al. Global distribution and conservation of rare and threatened vertebrates. Nature 444, 93–96 (2006).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Chaudhary, A., Pfister, S. & Hellweg, S. Spatially explicit analysis of biodiversity loss due to global agriculture, pasture and forest land use from a producer and consumer perspective. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 3928–3936 (2016).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  22. Kitzes, J. et al. Consumption-based conservation targeting: linking biodiversity loss to upstream demand through a global wildlife footprint. Conserv. Lett. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/con4.12321 (2016).
  23. Moran, D. & Wood, R. Convergence between the Eora, WIOD, EXIOBASE, and OpenEU’s consumption-based carbon accounts. Econ. Syst. Res. 26, 245–261 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  24. Godar, J., Persson, U. M., Tizado, E. J. & Meyfroidt, P. Towards more accurate and policy relevant footprint analyses: Tracing fine-scale socio-environmental impacts of production to consumption. Ecol. Econ. 112, 25–35 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  25. Lenzen, M. et al. Compiling and using input–output frameworks through collaborative virtual laboratories. Sci. Total Environ. 485–486, 241–251 (2014).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Bruckner, M., Fischer, G., Tramberend, S. & Giljum, S. Measuring telecouplings in the global land system: A review and comparative evaluation of land footprint accounting methods. Ecol. Econ. 114, 11–21 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
  27. Pereira, H. M., Navarro, L. M. & Martins, I. S. Global biodiversity change: The bad, the good, and the unknown. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 37, 25–50 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
  28. Hoekstra, A. Y. & Wiedmann, T. O. Humanity’s unsustainable environmental footprint. Science 344, 1114–1117 (2014).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  29. Fisher, M. C. & Garner, T. W. J. The relationship between the emergence of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, the international trade in amphibians and introduced amphibian species. Fungal Biol. Rev. 21, 2–9 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
  30. James, A. N., Gaston, K. J. & Balmford, A. Balancing the Earth’s accounts. Nature 401, 323–324 (1999).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  31. Jenkins, C. N., Van Houtan, K. S., Pimm, S. L. & Sexton, J. O. US protected lands mismatch biodiversity priorities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 5081–5086 (2015).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  32. Withey, J. C. et al. Maximising return on conservation investment in the conterminous USA. Ecol. Lett. 15, 1249–1256 (2012).
    Article PubMed Google Scholar
  33. Brown, C. J. et al. Effective conservation requires clear objectives and prioritizing actions, not places or species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E4342 (2015).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  34. Barnes, M. Aichi targets: Protect biodiversity, not just area. Nature 526, 195 (2015).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  35. Venter, O. et al. Targeting global protected area expansion for imperiled biodiversity. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001891 (2014).
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  36. Fuller, R. A. et al. Replacing underperforming protected areas achieves better conservation outcomes. Nature 466, 365–367 (2010).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  37. Game, E. T., Kareiva, P. & Possingham, H. P. Six common mistakes in conservation priority setting. Conserv. Biol. 27, 480–485 (2013).
    Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  38. IUCN Red List v. 2015-3. (International Union for the Conservation of Nature, 2015); www.iucnredlist.org
  39. Bird species distribution maps of the world v. 5.0. (BirdLife International and NatureServe, Accessed August 2015); http://datazone.birdlife.org
  40. Lenzen, M., Kanemoto, K., Moran, D. & Geschke, A. Mapping the structure of the world economy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 8374–8381 (2012).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  41. Lenzen, M., Moran, D. D., Kanemoto, K. & Geschke, A. Building Eora: a global multi-region input–output database at high country and sector resolution. Econ. Syst. Res. 25, 20–49 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
  42. Moran, D. & Kanemoto, K. Tracing global supply chains to air pollution hotspots. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 94017 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  43. Kanemoto, K., Moran, D. & Hertwich, E. G. Mapping the carbon footprint of nations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 10512–10517 (2016).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  44. Kanemoto, K., Lenzen, M., Peters, G. P., Moran, D. D. & Geschke, A. Frameworks for comparing emissions associated with production, consumption, and international trade. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 172–179 (2012).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  45. Bachmann, C., Roorda, M. J. & Kennedy, C. Developing a multi-scale multi-region input–output model. Econ. Syst. Res. 27, 172–193 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
  46. Feng, K. et al. Outsourcing CO2 within China. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 11654–11659 (2013).
    Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
  47. Chaudhary, A., Burivalova, Z., Koh, L. P. & Hellweg, S. Impact of forest management on species richness: Global meta-analysis and economic trade-offs. Sci. Rep. 6, 23954 (2016).
    Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
  48. Newbold, T. et al. Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond the planetary boundary? A global assessment. Science 353, 45–50 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
  49. Gray, J. S. Marine biodiversity: Patterns, threats and conservation needs. Biodivers. Conserv. 6, 153–175 (1997).
    Article Google Scholar

Download references