Sensitivities of prospective future e + e − colliders to decoupled new physics (original) (raw)

• ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE].
• CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE].
• ATLAS, CMS collaborations, Measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates and constraints on its couplings from a combined ATLAS and CMS analysis of the LHC pp collision data at \( \sqrt{s}=7 \) and 8 TeV, ATLAS-CONF-2015-044 (2015).
• T. Appelquist and J. Carazzone, Infrared Singularities and Massive Fields, Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975) 2856 [INSPIRE].
  ADS Google Scholar
• W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian Analysis of New Interactions and Flavor Conservation, Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 621 [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian, JHEP 10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS MATH Google Scholar
• S. Weinberg, Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 1566 [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• L. Lehman, Extending the Standard Model Effective Field Theory with the Complete Set of Dimension-7 Operators, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 125023 [arXiv:1410.4193] [INSPIRE].
  ADS Google Scholar
• L. Lehman and A. Martin, Low-derivative operators of the Standard Model effective field theory via Hilbert series methods, JHEP 02 (2016) 081 [arXiv:1510.00372] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• B. Henning, X. Lu and H. Murayama, How to use the Standard Model effective field theory, JHEP 01 (2016) 023 [arXiv:1412.1837] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• A. Drozd, J. Ellis, J. Quevillon and T. You, Comparing EFT and Exact One-Loop Analyses of Non-Degenerate Stops, JHEP 06 (2015) 028 [arXiv:1504.02409] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• A. Drozd, J. Ellis, J. Quévillon and T. You, in preparation.
• B. Grinstein and M.B. Wise, Operator analysis for precision electroweak physics, Phys. Lett. B 265 (1991) 326 [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• K. Hagiwara, S. Ishihara, R. Szalapski and D. Zeppenfeld, Low-energy effects of new interactions in the electroweak boson sector, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 2182 [INSPIRE].
  ADS Google Scholar
• K. Hagiwara, R. Szalapski and D. Zeppenfeld, Anomalous Higgs boson production and decay, Phys. Lett. B 318 (1993) 155 [hep-ph/9308347] [INSPIRE].
• Z. Han and W. Skiba, Effective theory analysis of precision electroweak data, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 075009 [hep-ph/0412166] [INSPIRE].
• T. Corbett, O.J.P. Eboli, J. Gonzalez-Fraile and M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Robust Determination of the Higgs Couplings: Power to the Data, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 015022 [arXiv:1211.4580] [INSPIRE].
  ADS Google Scholar
• B. Dumont, S. Fichet and G. von Gersdorff, A Bayesian view of the Higgs sector with higher dimensional operators, JHEP 07 (2013) 065 [arXiv:1304.3369] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
• M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, S. Mishima and L. Silvestrini, Electroweak Precision Observables, New Physics and the Nature of a 126 GeV Higgs Boson, JHEP 08 (2013) 106 [arXiv:1306.4644] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, S. Mishima, M. Pierini, L. Reina and L. Silvestrini, Update of the electroweak precision fit, interplay with Higgs-boson signal strengths and model-independent constraints on new physics, arXiv:1410.6940 [INSPIRE].
• A. Pomarol and F. Riva, Towards the Ultimate SM Fit to Close in on Higgs Physics, JHEP 01 (2014) 151 [arXiv:1308.2803] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• J. Ellis, V. Sanz and T. You, Complete Higgs Sector Constraints on Dimension-6 Operators, JHEP 07 (2014) 036 [arXiv:1404.3667] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• J. Ellis, V. Sanz and T. You, The Effective Standard Model after LHC Run I, JHEP 03 (2015) 157 [arXiv:1410.7703] [INSPIRE].
  Article Google Scholar
• A. Falkowski and F. Riva, Model-independent precision constraints on dimension-6 operators, JHEP 02 (2015) 039 [arXiv:1411.0669] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• L. Berthier and M. Trott, Towards consistent Electroweak Precision Data constraints in the SMEFT, JHEP 05 (2015) 024 [arXiv:1502.02570] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• L. Berthier and M. Trott, Consistent constraints on the Standard Model Effective Field Theory, JHEP 02 (2016) 069 [arXiv:1508.05060] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• A. Efrati, A. Falkowski and Y. Soreq, Electroweak constraints on flavorful effective theories, JHEP 07 (2015) 018 [arXiv:1503.07872] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• A. Falkowski, Effective field theory approach to LHC Higgs data, arXiv:1505.00046 [INSPIRE].
• T. Corbett, O.J.P. Eboli, D. Goncalves, J. Gonzalez-Fraile, T. Plehn and M. Rauch, The Higgs Legacy of the LHC Run I, JHEP 08 (2015) 156 [arXiv:1505.05516] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• A. Buckley et al., Global fit of top quark effective theory to data, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 091501 [arXiv:1506.08845] [INSPIRE].
  ADS Google Scholar
• A. Falkowski, M. Gonzalez-Alonso, A. Greljo and D. Marzocca, Global constraints on anomalous triple gauge couplings in effective field theory approach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 011801 [arXiv:1508.00581] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• J. Brehmer, A. Freitas, D. Lopez-Val and T. Plehn, Pushing Higgs Effective Theory to its Limits, arXiv:1510.03443 [INSPIRE].
• A. Falkowski, B. Fuks, K. Mawatari, K. Mimasu, F. Riva and V. sanz, Rosetta: an operator basis translator for Standard Model effective field theory, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 583 [arXiv:1508.05895] [INSPIRE].
• D.M. Asner et al., ILC Higgs White Paper, arXiv:1310.0763 [INSPIRE].
• A. Freitas et al., Exploring Quantum Physics at the ILC, arXiv:1307.3962 [INSPIRE].
• T. Han, Z. Liu, Z. Qian and J. Sayre, Improving Higgs coupling measurements through ZZ Fusion at the ILC, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 113007 [arXiv:1504.01399] [INSPIRE].
  ADS Google Scholar
• A. Arbey et al., Physics at the e + e − Linear Collider, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 371 [arXiv:1504.01726] [INSPIRE].
  ADS Google Scholar
• K. Fujii et al., Physics Case for the International Linear Collider, arXiv:1506.05992 [INSPIRE].
• T. Barklow et al., ILC Operating Scenarios, arXiv:1506.07830 [INSPIRE].
• TLEP Design Study Working Group collaboration, M. Bicer et al., First Look at the Physics Case of TLEP, JHEP 01 (2014) 164 [arXiv:1308.6176] [INSPIRE].
• M. Baak et al., Working Group Report: Precision Study of Electroweak Interactions, arXiv:1310.6708 [INSPIRE].
• J. Fan, M. Reece and L.-T. Wang, Possible Futures of Electroweak Precision: ILC, FCC-ee and CEPC, JHEP 09 (2015) 196 [arXiv:1411.1054] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• J. Fan, M. Reece and L.-T. Wang, Precision Natural SUSY at CEPC, FCC-ee and ILC, JHEP 08 (2015) 152 [arXiv:1412.3107] [INSPIRE].
  Article Google Scholar
• A. Thamm, R. Torre and A. Wulzer, Future tests of Higgs compositeness: direct vs indirect, JHEP 07 (2015) 100 [arXiv:1502.01701] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• C. Grojean, E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Scaling of Higgs Operators and Γ(h → γγ), JHEP 04 (2013) 016 [arXiv:1301.2588] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
• J. Elias-Miró, J.R. Espinosa, E. Masso and A. Pomarol, Renormalization of dimension-six operators relevant for the Higgs decays h → γγ, γZ, JHEP 08 (2013) 033 [arXiv:1302.5661] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• J. Elias-Miro, J.R. Espinosa, E. Masso and A. Pomarol, Higgs windows to new physics through D = 6 operators: constraints and one-loop anomalous dimensions, JHEP 11 (2013) 066 [arXiv:1308.1879] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators I: Formalism and lambda Dependence, JHEP 10 (2013) 087 [arXiv:1308.2627] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
• E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators II: Yukawa Dependence, JHEP 01 (2014) 035 [arXiv:1310.4838] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• R. Alonso, E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators III: Gauge Coupling Dependence and Phenomenology, JHEP 04 (2014) 159 [arXiv:1312.2014] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• J. Elias-Miró, C. Grojean, R.S. Gupta and D. Marzocca, Scaling and tuning of EW and Higgs observables, JHEP 05 (2014) 019 [arXiv:1312.2928] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• R. Alonso, H.-M. Chang, E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and B. Shotwell, Renormalization group evolution of dimension-six baryon number violating operators, Phys. Lett. B 734 (2014) 302 [arXiv:1405.0486] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• J.D. Wells and Z. Zhang, Precision Electroweak Analysis after the Higgs Boson Discovery, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 033006 [arXiv:1406.6070] [INSPIRE].
  ADS Google Scholar
• D.Yu. Bardin et al., ZFITTER v.6.21: A semianalytical program for fermion pair production in e + e − annihilation, Comput. Phys. Commun. 133 (2001) 229 [hep-ph/9908433] [INSPIRE].
• M. Ghezzi, R. Gomez-Ambrosio, G. Passarino and S. Uccirati, NLO Higgs effective field theory and κ-framework, JHEP 07 (2015) 175 [arXiv:1505.03706] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
• C. Hartmann and M. Trott, Higgs Decay to Two Photons at One Loop in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 191801 [arXiv:1507.03568] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• A. David and G. Passarino, Through precision straits to next standard model heights, Rev. Phys. 1 (2016) 13 [arXiv:1510.00414] [INSPIRE].
  Article Google Scholar
• A. Blondel, Exploring the Physics Frontier with Circular Colliders, Aspen, Colorado, U.S.A., 31 January 2015: http://indico.cern.ch/event/336571/.
• S. Mishima, Sensitivity to new physics from TLEP precision measurements, 6th TLEP workshop, CERN, 16 October 2013: http://indico.cern.ch/event/257713/session/1/contribution/30.
• N. Craig, M. Farina, M. McCullough and M. Perelstein, Precision Higgsstrahlung as a Probe of New Physics, JHEP 03 (2015) 146 [arXiv:1411.0676] [INSPIRE].
  Article Google Scholar
• R. Contino, M. Ghezzi, C. Grojean, M. Mühlleitner and M. Spira, eHDECAY: an Implementation of the Higgs Effective Lagrangian into HDECAY, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 3412 [arXiv:1403.3381] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• J.D. Wells and Z. Zhang, Status and prospects of precision analyses with e + e − → W + W −, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 034001 [arXiv:1507.01594] [INSPIRE].
  ADS Google Scholar
• L. Bian, J. Shu and Y. Zhang, Prospects for Triple Gauge Coupling Measurements at Future Lepton Colliders and the 14 TeV LHC, JHEP 09 (2015) 206 [arXiv:1507.02238] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• B. Gripaios and D. Sutherland, Searches for CP -violating dimension-6 electroweak gauge boson operators, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 076004 [arXiv:1309.7822] [INSPIRE].
  ADS Google Scholar
• T. Corbett, O.J.P. É boli, J. Gonzalez-Fraile and M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Determining Triple Gauge Boson Couplings from Higgs Data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 011801 [arXiv:1304.1151] [INSPIRE].
• C. Bobeth and U. Haisch, Anomalous triple gauge couplings from B-meson and kaon observables, JHEP 09 (2015) 018 [arXiv:1503.04829] [INSPIRE].
  Article Google Scholar
• CEPC-SPPC Study Group, CEPC-SPPC Preliminary Conceptual Design Report. 1. Physics and Detector, IHEP-CEPC-DR-2015-01, IHEP-TH-2015-01, HEP-EP-2015-01 [INSPIRE].