Effective description of general extensions of the Standard Model: the complete tree-level dictionary (original) (raw)

• ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE].
• CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE].
• F. del Aguila, M. Pérez-Victoria and J. Santiago, Effective description of quark mixing, Phys. Lett. B 492 (2000) 98 [hep-ph/0007160] [INSPIRE].
• Z. Han and W. Skiba, Effective theory analysis of precision electroweak data, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 075009 [hep-ph/0412166] [INSPIRE].
• F. del Aguila and J. de Blas, Electroweak constraints on new physics, Fortsch. Phys. 59 (2011) 1036 [arXiv:1105.6103] [INSPIRE].
• M. Ciuchini, E. Franco, S. Mishima and L. Silvestrini, Electroweak Precision Observables, New Physics and the Nature of a 126 GeV Higgs Boson, JHEP 08 (2013) 106 [arXiv:1306.4644] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• J. de Blas, M. Chala and J. Santiago, Global Constraints on Lepton-Quark Contact Interactions, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 095011 [arXiv:1307.5068] [INSPIRE].
  ADS Google Scholar
• J. de Blas, Electroweak limits on physics beyond the Standard Model, EPJ Web Conf. 60 (2013) 19008 [arXiv:1307.6173] [INSPIRE].
  Article Google Scholar
• A. Pomarol and F. Riva, Towards the Ultimate SM Fit to Close in on Higgs Physics, JHEP 01 (2014) 151 [arXiv:1308.2803] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• A. Falkowski and F. Riva, Model-independent precision constraints on dimension-6 operators, JHEP 02 (2015) 039 [arXiv:1411.0669] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• A. Buckley et al., Global fit of top quark effective theory to data, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 091501 [arXiv:1506.08845] [INSPIRE].
  ADS Google Scholar
• J. de Blas, M. Chala and J. Santiago, Renormalization Group Constraints on New Top Interactions from Electroweak Precision Data, JHEP 09 (2015) 189 [arXiv:1507.00757] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• A. Falkowski, M. Gonzalez-Alonso, A. Greljo and D. Marzocca, Global constraints on anomalous triple gauge couplings in effective field theory approach, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 011801 [arXiv:1508.00581] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• L. Berthier and M. Trott, Consistent constraints on the Standard Model Effective Field Theory, JHEP 02 (2016) 069 [arXiv:1508.05060] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• A. Falkowski and K. Mimouni, Model independent constraints on four-lepton operators, JHEP 02 (2016) 086 [arXiv:1511.07434] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• J. de Blas et al., Electroweak precision observables and Higgs-boson signal strengths in the Standard Model and beyond: present and future, JHEP 12 (2016) 135 [arXiv:1608.01509] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS MATH Google Scholar
• J. de Blas et al., Electroweak precision constraints at present and future colliders, PoS(ICHEP2016)690 [arXiv:1611.05354] [INSPIRE].
• A. Falkowski, M. González-Alonso and K. Mimouni, Compilation of low-energy constraints on 4-fermion operators in the SMEFT, JHEP 08 (2017) 123 [arXiv:1706.03783] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• J. de Blas et al., The Global Electroweak and Higgs Fits in the LHC era, in 5th Large Hadron Collider Physics Conference (LHCP 2017), Shanghai, China, 15–20 May 2017 [arXiv:1710.05402] [INSPIRE].
• I. Brivio and M. Trott, The Standard Model as an Effective Field Theory, arXiv:1706.08945 [INSPIRE].
• A. Pich, I. Rosell, J. Santos and J.J. Sanz-Cillero, Fingerprints of heavy scales in electroweak effective Lagrangians, JHEP 04 (2017) 012 [arXiv:1609.06659] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
• I. Rosell, C. Krause, A. Pich, J. Santos and J.J. Sanz-Cillero, Tracks of resonances in electroweak effective Lagrangians, in 2017 European Physical Society Conference on High Energy Physics (EPS-HEP 2017), Venice, Italy, 5–12 July 2017 [arXiv:1710.06622] [INSPIRE].
• F. del Aguila, M. Pérez-Victoria and J. Santiago, Observable contributions of new exotic quarks to quark mixing, JHEP 09 (2000) 011 [hep-ph/0007316] [INSPIRE].
• F. del Aguila, J. de Blas and M. Pérez-Victoria, Effects of new leptons in Electroweak Precision Data, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 013010 [arXiv:0803.4008] [INSPIRE].
  ADS Google Scholar
• F. del Aguila, J. de Blas and M. Pérez-Victoria, Electroweak Limits on General New Vector Bosons, JHEP 09 (2010) 033 [arXiv:1005.3998] [INSPIRE].
  Article MATH Google Scholar
• J. de Blas, M. Chala, M. Pérez-Victoria and J. Santiago, Observable Effects of General New Scalar Particles, JHEP 04 (2015) 078 [arXiv:1412.8480] [INSPIRE].
  Article Google Scholar
• B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian, JHEP 10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS MATH Google Scholar
• E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators I: Formalism and lambda Dependence, JHEP 10 (2013) 087 [arXiv:1308.2627] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS MATH Google Scholar
• A. Falkowski, B. Fuks, K. Mawatari, K. Mimasu, F. Riva and V. Sanz, Rosetta: an operator basis translator for Standard Model effective field theory, Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 583 [arXiv:1508.05895] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators II: Yukawa Dependence, JHEP 01 (2014) 035 [arXiv:1310.4838] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• R. Alonso, E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimension Six Operators III: Gauge Coupling Dependence and Phenomenology, JHEP 04 (2014) 159 [arXiv:1312.2014] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• R. Alonso, H.-M. Chang, E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and B. Shotwell, Renormalization group evolution of dimension-six baryon number violating operators, Phys. Lett. B 734 (2014) 302 [arXiv:1405.0486] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• J. Elias-Miró, J.R. Espinosa, E. Masso and A. Pomarol, Renormalization of dimension-six operators relevant for the Higgs decays h → γγ, γZ, JHEP 08 (2013) 033 [arXiv:1302.5661] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• J. Elias-Miro, J.R. Espinosa, E. Masso and A. Pomarol, Higgs windows to new physics through d = 6 operators: constraints and one-loop anomalous dimensions, JHEP 11 (2013) 066 [arXiv:1308.1879] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• B. Henning, X. Lu and H. Murayama, How to use the Standard Model effective field theory, JHEP 01 (2016) 023 [arXiv:1412.1837] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
• A. Drozd, J. Ellis, J. Quevillon and T. You, The Universal One-Loop Effective Action, JHEP 03 (2016) 180 [arXiv:1512.03003] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• F. del Aguila, Z. Kunszt and J. Santiago, One-loop effective lagrangians after matching, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 244 [arXiv:1602.00126] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• B. Henning, X. Lu and H. Murayama, One-loop Matching and Running with Covariant Derivative Expansion, JHEP 01 (2018) 123 [arXiv:1604.01019] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
• S.A.R. Ellis, J. Quevillon, T. You and Z. Zhang, Mixed heavy-light matching in the Universal One-Loop Effective Action, Phys. Lett. B 762 (2016) 166 [arXiv:1604.02445] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS MATH Google Scholar
• J. Fuentes-Martin, J. Portoles and P. Ruiz-Femenia, Integrating out heavy particles with functional methods: a simplified framework, JHEP 09 (2016) 156 [arXiv:1607.02142] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
• Z. Zhang, Covariant diagrams for one-loop matching, JHEP 05 (2017) 152 [arXiv:1610.00710] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
• S.A.R. Ellis, J. Quevillon, T. You and Z. Zhang, Extending the Universal One-Loop Effective Action: Heavy-Light Coefficients, JHEP 08 (2017) 054 [arXiv:1706.07765] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS MathSciNet Google Scholar
• R. Rahman, Higher Spin Theory - Part I, PoS(Modave VIII)004 [arXiv:1307.3199] [INSPIRE].
• M. Porrati and R. Rahman, A Model Independent Ultraviolet Cutoff for Theories with Charged Massive Higher Spin Fields, Nucl. Phys. B 814 (2009) 370 [arXiv:0812.4254] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS MATH Google Scholar
• A. Manohar and H. Georgi, Chiral Quarks and the Nonrelativistic Quark Model, Nucl. Phys. B 234 (1984) 189 [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• G.F. Giudice, C. Grojean, A. Pomarol and R. Rattazzi, The Strongly-Interacting Light Higgs, JHEP 06 (2007) 045 [hep-ph/0703164] [INSPIRE].
• E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Naive Dimensional Analysis Counting of Gauge Theory Amplitudes and Anomalous Dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 726 (2013) 697 [arXiv:1309.0819] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS MATH Google Scholar
• G. Buchalla, O. Catá and C. Krause, On the Power Counting in Effective Field Theories, Phys. Lett. B 731 (2014) 80 [arXiv:1312.5624] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
• B.M. Gavela, E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and L. Merlo, Analysis of General Power Counting Rules in Effective Field Theory, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 485 [arXiv:1601.07551] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• G. Buchalla, O. Catà, A. Celis and C. Krause, Comment on “Analysis of General Power Counting Rules in Effective Field Theory”, arXiv:1603.03062 [INSPIRE].
• D. Liu, A. Pomarol, R. Rattazzi and F. Riva, Patterns of Strong Coupling for LHC Searches, JHEP 11 (2016) 141 [arXiv:1603.03064] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• G. Ecker, J. Gasser, H. Leutwyler, A. Pich and E. de Rafael, Chiral Lagrangians for Massive Spin 1 Fields, Phys. Lett. B 223 (1989) 425 [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• V. Cirigliano, G. Ecker, M. Eidemuller, R. Kaiser, A. Pich and J. Portoles, Towards a consistent estimate of the chiral low-energy constants, Nucl. Phys. B 753 (2006) 139 [hep-ph/0603205] [INSPIRE].
• W. Buchmüller, R. Ruckl and D. Wyler, Leptoquarks in lepton-quark collisions, Phys. Lett. B 191 (1987) 442 [Erratum ibid. B 448 (1999) 320] [INSPIRE].
• E. Del Nobile, R. Franceschini, D. Pappadopulo and A. Strumia, Minimal Matter at the Large Hadron Collider, Nucl. Phys. B 826 (2010) 217 [arXiv:0908.1567] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS MATH Google Scholar
• T. Han, I. Lewis and Z. Liu, Colored Resonant Signals at the LHC: Largest Rate and Simplest Topology, JHEP 12 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1010.4309] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• J.A. Aguilar-Saavedra and M. Pérez-Victoria, Probing the Tevatron t tbar asymmetry at LHC, JHEP 05 (2011) 034 [arXiv:1103.2765] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• B. Grinstein, A.L. Kagan, J. Zupan and M. Trott, Flavor Symmetric Sectors and Collider Physics, JHEP 10 (2011) 072 [arXiv:1108.4027] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• S. Dawson and C.W. Murphy, Standard Model EFT and Extended Scalar Sectors, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 015041 [arXiv:1704.07851] [INSPIRE].
  ADS Google Scholar
• J.C. Criado, MatchingTools: a Python library for symbolic effective field theory calculations, Comput. Phys. Commun. C 227 (2018) 42 [arXiv:1710.06445] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, On Gauge Invariance and Minimal Coupling, JHEP 09 (2013) 063 [arXiv:1305.0017] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• C. Arzt, M.B. Einhorn and J. Wudka, Patterns of deviation from the standard model, Nucl. Phys. B 433 (1995) 41 [hep-ph/9405214] [INSPIRE].
• LHCb collaboration, Test of lepton universality using B + → K + ℓ + ℓ − decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 151601 [arXiv:1406.6482] [INSPIRE].
• LHCb collaboration, Test of lepton universality with B 0 → K *0 ℓ + ℓ − decays, JHEP 08 (2017) 055 [arXiv:1705.05802] [INSPIRE].
• LHCb collaboration, Differential branching fractions and isospin asymmetries of B → K (*) μ + μ − decays, JHEP 06 (2014) 133 [arXiv:1403.8044] [INSPIRE].
• LHCb collaboration, Measurement of Form-Factor-Independent Observables in the Decay B 0 → K *0 μ + μ −, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 191801 [arXiv:1308.1707] [INSPIRE].
• LHCb collaboration, Angular analysis of the B 0 → K *0 μ + μ − decay using 3 fb −1 of integrated luminosity, JHEP 02 (2016) 104 [arXiv:1512.04442] [INSPIRE].
• LHCb collaboration, Angular analysis and differential branching fraction of the decay B 0 s → ϕμ + μ −, JHEP 09 (2015) 179 [arXiv:1506.08777] [INSPIRE].
• B. Capdevila, A. Crivellin, S. Descotes-Genon, J. Matias and J. Virto, Patterns of New Physics in b → sℓ + ℓ − transitions in the light of recent data, JHEP 01 (2018) 093 [arXiv:1704.05340] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• G. D’Amico et al., Flavour anomalies after the \( {R}_{K^{*}} \) measurement, JHEP 09 (2017) 010 [arXiv:1704.05438] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• W. Altmannshofer, P. Stangl and D.M. Straub, Interpreting Hints for Lepton Flavor Universality Violation, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 055008 [arXiv:1704.05435] [INSPIRE].
  ADS Google Scholar
• L.-S. Geng, B. Grinstein, S. Jäger, J. Martin Camalich, X.-L. Ren and R.-X. Shi, Towards the discovery of new physics with lepton-universality ratios of b → sℓℓ decays, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 093006 [arXiv:1704.05446] [INSPIRE].
  ADS Google Scholar
• M. Ciuchini et al., On Flavourful Easter eggs for New Physics hunger and Lepton Flavour Universality violation, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 688 [arXiv:1704.05447] [INSPIRE].
  Article Google Scholar
• A. Celis, J. Fuentes-Martin, A. Vicente and J. Virto, Gauge-invariant implications of the LHCb measurements on lepton-flavor nonuniversality, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 035026 [arXiv:1704.05672] [INSPIRE].
  ADS Google Scholar
• L. Di Luzio and M. Nardecchia, What is the scale of new physics behind the B-flavour anomalies?, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 536 [arXiv:1706.01868] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• A. Crivellin, D. Müller, A. Signer and Y. Ulrich, Correlating lepton flavor universality violation in B decays with μ → eγ using leptoquarks, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 015019 [arXiv:1706.08511] [INSPIRE].
  ADS Google Scholar
• D. Buttazzo, A. Greljo, G. Isidori and D. Marzocca, B-physics anomalies: a guide to combined explanations, JHEP 11 (2017) 044 [arXiv:1706.07808] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• I. Dorsner, S. Fajfer and A. Greljo, Cornering Scalar Leptoquarks at LHC, JHEP 10 (2014) 154 [arXiv:1406.4831] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• J. de Blas, J.M. Lizana and M. Pérez-Victoria, Combining searches of Z’ and W’ bosons, JHEP 01 (2013) 166 [arXiv:1211.2229] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• D. Pappadopulo, A. Thamm, R. Torre and A. Wulzer, Heavy Vector Triplets: Bridging Theory and Data, JHEP 09 (2014) 060 [arXiv:1402.4431] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS MathSciNet MATH Google Scholar
• A. Bevan et al., Standard Model updates and new physics analysis with the Unitarity Triangle fit, arXiv:1411.7233 [INSPIRE].
• ETM collaboration, N. Carrasco et al., B-physics from N f = 2 tmQCD: the Standard Model and beyond, JHEP 03 (2014) 016 [arXiv:1308.1851] [INSPIRE].
• S.M. Boucenna, A. Celis, J. Fuentes-Martin, A. Vicente and J. Virto, Non-abelian gauge extensions for B-decay anomalies, Phys. Lett. B 760 (2016) 214 [arXiv:1604.03088] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• S.M. Boucenna, A. Celis, J. Fuentes-Martin, A. Vicente and J. Virto, Phenomenology of an SU(2) × SU(2) × U(1) model with lepton-flavour non-universality, JHEP 12 (2016) 059 [arXiv:1608.01349] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• F. del Aguila, M. Chala, J. Santiago and Y. Yamamoto, Collider limits on leptophilic interactions, JHEP 03 (2015) 059 [arXiv:1411.7394] [INSPIRE].
  Article ADS Google Scholar
• F. del Aguila, M. Chala, J. Santiago and Y. Yamamoto, Four and two-lepton signals of leptophilic gauge interactions at large colliders, PoS(CORFU2014)109 [arXiv:1505.00799] [INSPIRE].
• F. del Aguila, J. de Blas, P. Langacker and M. Pérez-Victoria, Impact of extra particles on indirect Z’ limits, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 015015 [arXiv:1104.5512] [INSPIRE].
  ADS Google Scholar