Prostaglandin E2 vaginal gel or tablets for the induction of labour at term: a randomised controlled trial (original) (raw)
A randomized trial of vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel and dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor at term
Jonathan Schaffir
Primary Care Update for OB/GYNS, 1998
View PDFchevron_right
Outcome of induction of labor with prostaglandin E1 25 mg vaginal tablet – A retrospective study
Asvin.L. Vinod
Tropical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2019
View PDFchevron_right
Oral versus vaginal prostaglandin for labor induction
Vladic Stjernholm, Ylva, Tomislav Vladic
View PDFchevron_right
Induction of labour using prostaglandin E2 gel: the effect of changing the time of first insertion
David Somerset
PubMed, 1995
View PDFchevron_right
Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term.
Josephine Kavanagh
Cochrane database of …, 2003
View PDFchevron_right
Induction of labor by prostaglandin E2: intracervical gel or vaginal pessaries?
Tom Weber, Jens Lyndrup
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1991
View PDFchevron_right
Induction of labour using low and high dose regimens of prostaglandin E2 vaginal tablets
Ahmed Mahfouz
East African Medical Journal, 2004
View PDFchevron_right
Foley catheter with vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel alone for induction of labour: a randomized controlled trial
Dr Shailza Vardhan (SUSMR Assistant Professor)
International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology
View PDFchevron_right
The Effectiveness and Safety of Prostaglandin E2 Pessary versus Intravaginal Gel for Induction of Labor
Majd Ghawji
Scholars International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
View PDFchevron_right
Maternal and fetal outcomes with the use of prostaglandins E2 as a cervical ripening agent for induction of labour
Shagun Gupta
International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology
View PDFchevron_right
Induction of labour: a comparison of a single prostaglandin E2 vaginal tablet with amniotomy and intravenous oxytocin
Edith Hillan
Bjog-an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1982
View PDFchevron_right
A study to evaluate the efficacy of combined prostaglandins and vaginal estradiol compared to prostaglandin alone in labor induction
Saniya Sheikh
International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2020
View PDFchevron_right
Role of Intracervical Dinoprostone Gel Administration versus Vaginal Administration of Oral Prostaglandin E 2 Tablet for Induction of Labour L Research
satyabhama marandi
2015
View PDFchevron_right
Prostaglandin E2 vaginal suppository for induction of labour: an efficient, safe and popular method
Jens Lyndrup
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1987
View PDFchevron_right
Role of Intracervical Dinoprostone Gel Administration versus Vaginal Administration of Oral Prostaglandin E2 Tablet for Induction of Labour
tapasi pati
2015
View PDFchevron_right
Induction of labor with vaginal prostaglandin-E2in grand multiparous women
Abdulrahim Rouzi
International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics, 1998
View PDFchevron_right
Weekly administration of prostaglandin E2 gel compared with expectant management in women with previous cesareans
Stanley Gall
Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1999
View PDFchevron_right
Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial
Hubertina Scheepers
The Lancet, 2011
View PDFchevron_right
The effect of vaginal prostaglandin E2 pessaries on induction of labor
mark torchia
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1984
View PDFchevron_right
Prostaglandin E2 labour induction with intravaginal (Minprostin) versus intracervical (Prepidil) administration at term: randomized study of maternal and neonatal outcome and patient's perception using the osgood semantic differential scales
Frank Louwen
BioMed research international, 2014
View PDFchevron_right
Prostaglandin E vaginal gel to treat dystocia in spontaneous labour: a multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial
Lawrence Oppenheimer
BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2005
View PDFchevron_right
Randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol and intracervical prostaglandin E 2 gel for induction of labor at term
Richard STUBBLEFIELD
Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1995
View PDFchevron_right
Induction of labor by prostaglandin E2 in relation to the Bishop score
Werner Rath
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2000
View PDFchevron_right
Induction of labour: The effect of vaginal prostaglandin or i.v. oxytocin — a matter of time only?
Tom Weber, Jens Lyndrup
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 1990
View PDFchevron_right
A Randomized Trial Comparing Vaginal and Cervical Prostaglandin Gel for Cervical Ripening and Labor Induction
Bernadette Mermillod
Obstetrics & Gynecology, 1998
View PDFchevron_right
Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial
Sally Tracy
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2013
View PDFchevron_right
Uterine rupture at term pregnancy with the use of intracervical prostaglandin E2, gel for induction of labor
Adrian Shulman
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1991
View PDFchevron_right
PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES SJIF Impact Factor: 7.187 INDUCTION OF LABOUR WITH FOLEY'S CATHETER AND PROSTAGLANDIN E 2 TABLET VERSUS PROSTAGLANDIN E 2 TABLET ALONE
Editor iajps
View PDFchevron_right
Induction of labor with prostaglandin E2 in women with previous cesarean section and unfavorable cervix
E. Lahav
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2004
View PDFchevron_right
THE INDUCTION OF LABOUR WITH PROSTAGLANDIN E2
Arnold Gillespie
Bjog-an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1970
View PDFchevron_right
Initiation of labor with a moderately favorable cervix: a comparison between prostaglandin E2 gel and oxytocin
William Rayburn
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1989
View PDFchevron_right