Multiple comparison test by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD): Do the confident level control type I error (original) (raw)

1998

View PDFchevron_right

Application of Different Statistical Tests in Educational Research: An Overview

Palash Das

Journal of emerging technologies and innovative research, 2018

View PDFchevron_right

Modifications for the tukey test procedure and evaluation of the power and efficiency of multiple comparison procedures

Clarice Garcia Borges Demétrio

Scientia Agricola, 2008

View PDFchevron_right

MSERA Volume 5 , Number 2 Fall 1998 SPECIAL ISSUE STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE TESTING

James McLean

View PDFchevron_right

Using the Tukey-Kramer omnibus test in the Hayter-Fisher procedure

S. Richter

British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

Statistical significance and other complementary measures for the interpretation of the research results

Mildrey Torres

Statistical significance and other complementary measures for the interpretation of the research results , 2023

View PDFchevron_right

Choosing a Multiple Comparison Procedure Based on Alpha

Jackson Barnette

1999

View PDFchevron_right

Effect Size Use in Studies of Learning Disabilities

Bob Ives

Journal of Learning Disabilities, 2003

View PDFchevron_right

Tukey's Honestly Signiflcant Difierence (HSD) Test

Lynne J. Williams

View PDFchevron_right

Statistical Significance Testing

James McLean

View PDFchevron_right

Type I Error of Four Pairwise Mean Comparison Procedures Conducted as Protected and Unprotected Tests

Jackson Barnette

Journal of modern applied statistical methods: JMASM

View PDFchevron_right

Guide for calculating and interpreting effect sizes and confidence intervals in intellectual and developmental disability research studies

Carl J. Dunst

Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 2012

View PDFchevron_right

Evaluating statistical difference, equivalence, and indeterminancy using inferential confidence intervals: An integrated alternative method of conducting null hypothesis statistical tests

Warren Tryon

Psychological Methods, 2001

View PDFchevron_right

Reconsidering the status of tests of significance: An alternative criterion of adequacy

R. Murray lindsay

Accounting, Organizations and Society, 1995

View PDFchevron_right

Comparisons of methods for multiple hypothesis testing in neuropsychological research

Meryl Butters, Sati Mazumdar

Neuropsychology, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

Evaluating Statistical Difference, Equivalence, and Indeterminacy Using Inferential Confidence Intervals: An Integrated Alternative Method of Conducting Null Hypothesis Statistical Tests

Warren Tryon

Psychological Methods, 2001

View PDFchevron_right

Multifactor Analysis of Differences Between Correlation Coefficients. Research Paper No. 13. Revised Edition

Victor Willson

1975

View PDFchevron_right

Influence Of Using Alternative Means On Type-I Error Rate In The Comparison Of Independent Groups

Mehmet mendeş

Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences

View PDFchevron_right

ANOVA F ve Welch Testi ile Bunların Permutasyon Versiyonlarının 1. Tip Hata ve Testin Gücü Bakımından Karşılaştırılması

Erkut Akkartal

Kafkas Universitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi, 2009

View PDFchevron_right

The Role of Statistical Significance Testing In Educational Research

James Ernest

1998

View PDFchevron_right

Technical and Interpretive Manual Supplement: Special Group Validity Studies With Other Measures and Additional Tables

Cristian Gonzalo Vera

View PDFchevron_right

The Data Analysis Dilemma: Ban or Abandon. A Review of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing

Jackson Barnette

Research in the Schools, 1998

View PDFchevron_right

An Analysis of Application of Multiple Comparison Tests (post-hoc) in ANOVA in Recently Published Medical Research Literature

Prakash Patel

2015

View PDFchevron_right

Statistical Practices of Educational Researchers: An Analysis of their ANOVA, MANOVA, and ANCOVA Analyses

Stephen Olejnik

Review of Educational Research, 1998

View PDFchevron_right

Use of Tests of Statistical Significance and Other Analytic Choices in a School Psychology Journal: Review of Practices and Suggested Alternatives

Patricia Snyder

School Psychology Quarterly, 1998

View PDFchevron_right

An Empirical Comparison of the Anova F-Test, Normal Scores Test and Kruskal-Wallis Test Under Violation of Assumptions

Larry Toothaker

Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1974

View PDFchevron_right

effect size, confidence intervals and statistical power in psychological research 1

arnoldo tellez

View PDFchevron_right

John W. Tukey's contributions to multiple comparisons

Henry Braun

The Annals of Statistics, 2002

View PDFchevron_right

Controlling Error in Multiple Comparisons, with Examples from State-to-State Differences in Educational Achievement

Lyle Jones

Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 1999

View PDFchevron_right

Hidrodinamik Sürtünme Direncinin Araştırılmasında Kullanılacak Deneysel Bir Yöntemin Geliştirilmesi

mehmet Atlar

DergiPark (Istanbul University), 2018

View PDFchevron_right

A Brief Account of Statistical Tests for Single-Case Research with Persons with Developmental Disabilities

Jop Groeneweg

Perceptual and Motor Skills, 2006

View PDFchevron_right

Descriptive Statistical Attributes Of Special Education Datasets DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICAL ATTRIBUTES OF SPECIAL EDUCATION DATA SETS

Valerie Felder

2013

View PDFchevron_right

Comparing the eﬃciency levels of Multiple Comparison Methods for Normal Distributed Observations

Bright E Owusu

2021

View PDFchevron_right

Multiple comparison test by Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD): Do the confident level control type I error (original) (raw)

Related papers