Law Making Process Research Papers (original) (raw)

Pembentukan undang-undang pada medio 2019-2020 kerap dianggap tidak berkualitas yang disebabkan pembahasan yang sembunyi-sembunyi, tidak transparan, dan terkesan terburu-buru. Kondisi ini memperburuk proses legislasi di Indonesia. Mekanisme fast-track legislation yang tidak dimiliki di Indonesia namun seolah-olah telah dipraktikkan, mengakibatkan adanya asumsi tirani legislasi dalam proses pembentukan undang-undang di Indonesia. Oleh karena itu fast-track legislation menjadi alternatif gagasan untuk membatasi kekuasaan praktik pembentukan undang-undang yang buruk tidak terulang kembali. Artikel ini dimaksudkan untuk meninjau bagaimana pengaturan dan praktik fast-track legislation di berbagai negara serta menganalisis proyeksi pengadopsian fast-track legislation ke dalam sistem pembentukan undang-undang di Indonesia dengan cara menelaah secara konseptual tentang pembatasan kekuasaan presiden di bidang legislasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif, dengan pendekatan perbandingan hukum. penelitian dilakukan dengan meneliti materi pengaturan dan praktik pelaksanaan fast-track legislation di beberapa negara yang memilikinya seperti Inggris, Amerika Serikat, Selandia Baru, Perancis, Kolombia, dan Ekuador untuk ditemukan hal yang dapat diadopsi dan hal yang perlu dihindari apabila kemudian diadopsi ke dalam pembentukan undang-undang di Indonesia.

- by Ibnu Sina Chandranegara
- •
- Legislative Politics, Legislation, Law Making Process

В гражданското общество правото и законодателството са от особено значение, тъй като законът е специфичен посредник и средство за създаване, функциониране и възпроизвеждане на почти всички елементи на гражданското общество. Тоест както на държавата, разбирана като съвкупност от административни, правораздавателни, контролни и най-вече правосъздаващи институции, така и най-общо на недържавните елементи като политически партии, граждански организации, неформални обединения с различен профил и цели. Изработването на различни законодателни решения, тяхното превръщане в закони не е само и единствено въпрос на законодателна инициатива, на техническо изработване на отделни нормативни програми. Това не е въпрос единствено на формална юриспруденция. Не е просто технически или процедурен проблем. Всъщност състоянието на законодателния процес и участието на структурите на гражданското общество в него е индикатор за реалното съществуване на такива структури и за тяхното истинско обществено място. Нещо повече, участието, при това не просто формално, на такива граждански структури в законодателния процес е показател за наличието и зрелостта на гражданското общество въобще.

- by Yavor Genchev
- •
- Whistleblowing, Anti-Corruption, Concession, Educational Planning

This study described that phenomenon in the law-making process in Indonesia by displaying the data on the behaviours or issuance of laws during lame duck sessions from 1997 to 2020. Compared with that of regular sessions, laws issued during the lame duck sessions significantly looked more productive but they did not comply with the mandate of laws desiring that each bill was supposed to be discussed in three sessions at the longest. In terms of the materials regulated in Laws, many lawmakers took advantage of a lame duck session to pass any laws in favour of the state officials that often generated public rejection and had shifted its participatory role through a judicial review at the Constitutional Court. Empirical tests of the law’s response to economic growth using econometrics analysis also indicate that current laws have a negative impact on the economy. House of the Representatives (DPR) and the President had actually understood the logic that a lame duck session was not such a right time to make a law; however, making a law during a lame duck session was not prohibited and there were no such clear rulings restricting the making of a law during this session.

- by Fitra Arsil and +1
- •
- Presidential Studies, Indonesian Politics, Legislation, Public accountability