Re: gens License Check - Non-free (original) (raw)
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
- To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: gens License Check - Non-free
- From: Ken Arromdee <arromdee@rahul.net>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 18:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
- Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.44.0406151834050.14034-100000@violet.rahul.net>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87u0xcgx10.fsf@aule.evenmere.org>
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
Being derivative is a property of a work, not a property of its distribution. And it is that property of the combined work to which the FSF objects
No, it isn't.
The FSF doesn't prohibit derivatives (of GPL works and proprietary works together). Rather, the FSF prohibits distributing derivatives. In other words, the reason that distribution matters is not because being a derivative is somehow dependent on being distributed--rather, the reason that it matters is that distribution is separately and explicitly mentioned.
And "being a derivative" is a property of a work. "Being a derivative which has been distributed" is not really a property of the work alone, but rather a property of the work plus its history. A series of instructions which result in the same work but with a different history might change things.
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: gens License Check - Non-free
* From: Brian Thomas Sniffen bts@alum.mit.edu
- Re: gens License Check - Non-free
- Prev by Date:Re: gens License Check - Non-free
- Next by Date:Re: gens License Check - Non-free
- Previous by thread:Re: gens License Check - Non-free
- Next by thread:Re: gens License Check - Non-free
- Index(es):