debian-legal Jun 2004 by thread (original) (raw)

[previous month]	[first page]	[previous page]	Page 1 of 2	[next page]	[last page]	[next month]

[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

• Re: ipw2100 firmware distributable? Marco Franzen
  • Re: ipw2100 firmware distributable? Nathanael Nerode
• Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG# Andrew Suffield
  • Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG# Glenn Maynard
    • Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG# Andrew Suffield
• Re: libkrb53 - odd license term MJ Ray
  • Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Matthew Palmer
    • Re: libkrb53 - odd license term MJ Ray
    • You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Francesco Poli
      • Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Henning Makholm
      • Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Raul Miller
      • Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Henning Makholm
      • Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Lewis Jardine
      • Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Glenn Maynard
      • Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Henning Makholm
      • Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Adam McKenna
      • Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Francesco Poli
      • Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Adam McKenna
      • Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Francesco Poli
      • Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Adam McKenna
      • Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL Michael Poole
      • Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL Adam McKenna
      • Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL Michael Poole
      • Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL Adam McKenna
      • Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Raul Miller
      • Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Anthony DeRobertis
      • Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
      • Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Francesco Poli
      • Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Francesco Poli
      • Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Adam McKenna
      • Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Bernhard R. Link
      • Re: You can't get a copy unless you accept the GPL [was: Re: libkrb53 - odd license term] Francesco Poli
  • Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Nathanael Nerode
    • Re: libkrb53 - odd license term MJ Ray
      • Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Walter Landry
      • Re: libkrb53 - odd license term MJ Ray
      • Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Nathanael Nerode
      • Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Brian Thomas Sniffen
  • Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Anthony DeRobertis
    • Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Glenn Maynard
      • Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Anthony DeRobertis
      • Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Glenn Maynard
      • Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Anthony DeRobertis
      • Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Andrew Suffield
      • Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Glenn Maynard
      • Re: libkrb53 - odd license term MJ Ray
      • Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Glenn Maynard
      • Re: libkrb53 - odd license term MJ Ray
      • Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Glenn Maynard
      • Re: libkrb53 - odd license term MJ Ray
      • Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Glenn Maynard
      • Re: libkrb53 - odd license term MJ Ray
      • Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Walter Landry
      • Re: libkrb53 - odd license term MJ Ray
      • Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Matthew Palmer
      • Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Glenn Maynard
      • Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Matthew Palmer
      • Re: libkrb53 - odd license term MJ Ray
      • Re: libkrb53 - odd license term MJ Ray
      • Re: libkrb53 - odd license term Per Olofsson
• Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Francesco Poli
  • Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Francesco Poli
  • Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Nathanael Nerode
    • Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Francesco Poli
  • Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Nathanael Nerode
    • Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Glenn Maynard
      • Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Nathanael Nerode
      • Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Glenn Maynard
      • Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Nathanael Nerode
  • Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Henning Makholm
  • Re: A radical approach to rewriting the DFSG Branden Robinson
• Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main martin f krafft
  • Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Glenn Maynard
  • Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Andrew Suffield
  • Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Francesco Poli
  • Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Walter Landry
    • Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Carlo Wood
      • Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Andrew Suffield
      • Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Nathanael Nerode
      • Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Glenn Maynard
      • Re: Bug#251983: libcwd: QPL license is non-free; package should not be in main Branden Robinson
• Re: Bug#251885: ITP: cgal -- C++ library for computational geometry Joachim Reichel
  • Re: Bug#251885: ITP: cgal -- C++ library for computational geometry Josh Triplett
• Re: DFSG#10 [was: Re: Draft Debian-legal summary of the LGPL] Branden Robinson
  • Re: DFSG#10 [was: Re: Draft Debian-legal summary of the LGPL] Raul Miller
    • Re: DFSG#10 [was: Re: Draft Debian-legal summary of the LGPL] Branden Robinson
  • Re: DFSG#10 [was: Re: Draft Debian-legal summary of the LGPL] Branden Robinson
    • Re: DFSG#10 [was: Re: Draft Debian-legal summary of the LGPL] Glenn Maynard
      • Re: DFSG#10 [was: Re: Draft Debian-legal summary of the LGPL] Branden Robinson
      • Re: DFSG#10 [was: Re: Draft Debian-legal summary of the LGPL] Glenn Maynard
      • Re: DFSG#10 [was: Re: Draft Debian-legal summary of the LGPL] Branden Robinson
• Re: DFSG#10 and the Open Source Initiative Branden Robinson
• Which license for a documentation? Matthieu Delahaye
  • Re: Which license for a documentation? Walter Landry
    • Re: Which license for a documentation? Barak Pearlmutter
  • Re: Which license for a documentation? MJ Ray
    • Re: Which license for a documentation? Josh Triplett
      • Re: Which license for a documentation? Lewis Jardine
      • Re: Which license for a documentation? Josh Triplett
      • Re: Which license for a documentation? Glenn Maynard
      • Re: Which license for a documentation? Anthony DeRobertis
      • Re: Which license for a documentation? Nathanael Nerode
    • Re: Which license for a documentation? Måns Rullgård
      • Re: Which license for a documentation? Nathanael Nerode
      • Re: Which license for a documentation? Måns Rullgård
      • Re: Which license for a documentation? Lewis Jardine
      • Re: Which license for a documentation? Måns Rullgård
      • Re: Which license for a documentation? Don Armstrong
      • Re: Which license for a documentation? Branden Robinson
      • Re: Which license for a documentation? Måns Rullgård
      • Re: Which license for a documentation? Bernhard R. Link
      • Re: Which license for a documentation? MJ Ray
      • Re: Which license for a documentation? MJ Ray
      • Re: Which license for a documentation? Andrew Suffield
      • Re: Which license for a documentation? Måns Rullgård
      • Re: Which license for a documentation? Andrew Suffield
      • Re: Which license for a documentation? Glenn Maynard
      • Re: Which license for a documentation? Andrew Suffield
      • Re: Which license for a documentation? Glenn Maynard
      • Re: Which license for a documentation? MJ Ray
    • Re: Which license for a documentation? Nathanael Nerode
  • Re: Which license for a documentation? Nathanael Nerode
• XMMS in main? Jerry Haltom
  • Re: XMMS in main? Andrew Suffield
    • Re: XMMS in main? Måns Rullgård
    • Re: XMMS in main? Jerry Haltom
• ALERT - Virus W32/Netsky.p@MM (ED) found; an attachment has been quarantined DSAVOIDCI-PROXY001(Network Associates Anti-Virus - Mailbox Agent)
• oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jeroen van Wolffelaar
  • Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
    • Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jeroen van Wolffelaar
      • Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Andrew Suffield
      • Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
      • Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Sean Kellogg
      • Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Jeroen van Wolffelaar
    • Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Florian Weimer
  • Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Barak Pearlmutter
    • Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Marco Franzen
      • Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Raul Miller
      • Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Marco Franzen
      • Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Barak Pearlmutter
      • Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Marco Franzen
      • Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Brian Thomas Sniffen
      • Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Walter Landry
      • Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Marco Franzen
      • Re: oaklisp: contains 500kB binary in source Barak Pearlmutter
• chugging Jimmy
• gens License Check - Non-free Benjamin Cutler
  • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Brian Thomas Sniffen
    • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Benjamin Cutler
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Brian Thomas Sniffen
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Lewis Jardine
  • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Humberto Massa
    • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Benjamin Cutler
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Humberto Massa
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Benjamin Cutler
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Andrew Suffield
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Josh Triplett
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Ken Arromdee
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Andrew Suffield
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Ken Arromdee
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Josh Triplett
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Andrew Suffield
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Ken Arromdee
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Anthony DeRobertis
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Brian Thomas Sniffen
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Anthony DeRobertis
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Brian Thomas Sniffen
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Anthony DeRobertis
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Brian Thomas Sniffen
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Ken Arromdee
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Evan Prodromou
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Anthony DeRobertis
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Andrew Suffield
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Brian Thomas Sniffen
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Josh Triplett
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Glenn Maynard
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Humberto Massa
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Andrew Suffield
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Benjamin Cutler
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Andrew Suffield
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Benjamin Cutler
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Josh Triplett
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Benjamin Cutler
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Benjamin Cutler
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Humberto Massa
  • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Humberto Massa
  • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Humberto Massa
    • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Raul Miller
    • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Brian Thomas Sniffen
  • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Humberto Massa
    • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Raul Miller
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Michael Poole
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Patrick Herzig
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Michael Poole
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Michael Poole
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Patrick Herzig
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Patrick Herzig
      • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Nathanael Nerode
    • Message not available
      * Re: gens License Check - Non-free Alexander Cherepanov
  • Re: gens License Check - Non-free Humberto Massa
• Creative Commons Attribution license element Evan Prodromou
  • Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Andrew Suffield
    • Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Evan Prodromou
      • Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Andrew Suffield
      • Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Evan Prodromou
  • Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element MJ Ray
    • Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Evan Prodromou
      • Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element MJ Ray
  • Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element MJ Ray
    • Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Josh Triplett
    • Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Evan Prodromou
      • Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element MJ Ray
      • Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Evan Prodromou
  • Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Nathanael Nerode
    • Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element MJ Ray
    • Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Evan Prodromou
      • Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Andrew Suffield
      • Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Evan Prodromou
      • Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Nathanael Nerode
      • Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Nathanael Nerode
  • Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Nathanael Nerode
    • Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Evan Prodromou
      • Re: Creative Commons Attribution license element Nic Suzor
• license change for POSIX manpages Andre Lehovich
  • Re: license change for POSIX manpages Andrew Suffield
    • Re: license change for POSIX manpages Nathanael Nerode
      • FAQ Improvements (was: license change for POSIX manpages) Barak Pearlmutter
  • Re: license change for POSIX manpages MJ Ray
    • Re: license change for POSIX manpages Josh Triplett
      • Re: license change for POSIX manpages Florian Weimer
      • Re: license change for POSIX manpages Josh Triplett
      • Re: license change for POSIX manpages Florian Weimer
      • Re: license change for POSIX manpages Andrew Suffield
      • Re: license change for POSIX manpages Glenn Maynard
      • Re: license change for POSIX manpages Andrew Suffield
      • Re: license change for POSIX manpages Francesco Poli
      • Re: license change for POSIX manpages Nathanael Nerode
      • Re: license change for POSIX manpages Nathanael Nerode
      • Re: license change for POSIX manpages Francesco Poli
  • Re: license change for POSIX manpages Nathanael Nerode
    • Re: license change for POSIX manpages Matthew Palmer
• Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Jim Marhaus
  • Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Nathanael Nerode
    • Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Josh Triplett
    • Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Jim Marhaus
      • Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Glenn Maynard
  • Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Glenn Maynard
    • Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Sean Kellogg
      • Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Mahesh T. Pai
      • Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Andrew Suffield
      • Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Lex Spoon
      • Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? MJ Ray
      • Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Lex Spoon
    • Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Lex Spoon
      • Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Andrew Suffield
      • Re: Mozilla Public License is non-free: stipulates court venue ? Glenn Maynard
• How to proceed with an ITP of questionably licensed software? Andrew Pollock
  • Re: How to proceed with an ITP of questionably licensed software? Glenn Maynard
    • Re: How to proceed with an ITP of questionably licensed software? Andrew Pollock
    • Re: How to proceed with an ITP of questionably licensed software? Francesco Paolo Lovergine
  • Re: How to proceed with an ITP of questionably licensed software? Nathanael Nerode
• Banner Advertisements info
• request-tracker3: license shadiness Michael Poole
  • Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Andrew Suffield
  • Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Jacobo Tarrio
  • Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
    • Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Michael Poole
  • Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Brian Thomas Sniffen
    • Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Josh Triplett
      • Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Don Armstrong
      • Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Josh Triplett
      • Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Don Armstrong
      • Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Brian Thomas Sniffen
  • Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Florian Weimer
    • Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness mdpoole
  • Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Branden Robinson
    • Re: request-tracker3: license shadiness Raul Miller
• Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jim Marhaus
  • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Andrew Suffield
  • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
    • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Josh Triplett
    • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Nathanael Nerode
      • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
      • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Andrew Suffield
      • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Matthew Palmer
      • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
      • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Lex Spoon
      • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Brian Thomas Sniffen
      • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Andreas Barth
      • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Bernhard R. Link
      • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Marco Franzen
      • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Mahesh T. Pai
      • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Nathanael Nerode
    • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Lex Spoon
      • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Matthew Palmer
      • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Lex Spoon
      • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Brian Thomas Sniffen
      • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Lex Spoon
      • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Brian Thomas Sniffen
      • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free MJ Ray
    • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jim Marhaus
  • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Mahesh T. Pai
    • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Lewis Jardine
    • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Francesco Paolo Lovergine
    • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Jim Marhaus
  • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Francesco Paolo Lovergine
    • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Francesco Paolo Lovergine
  • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Lex Spoon
  • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Lex Spoon
    • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Nathanael Nerode
      • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Lex Spoon
      • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Francesco Poli
      • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Brian Thomas Sniffen
      • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free MJ Ray
      • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Lex Spoon
      • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free MJ Ray
      • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Brian Thomas Sniffen
      • Contracts and licenses Brian Thomas Sniffen
      • Re: Contracts and licenses Lewis Jardine
      • Re: Contracts and licenses Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
      • Re: Contracts and licenses Lex Spoon
      • Re: Contracts and licenses Raul Miller
      • Re: Contracts and licenses Brian Thomas Sniffen
      • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Nathanael Nerode
    • Re: Draft Summary: MPL is not DFSG free Brian Thomas Sniffen
• Contractual requirements [was: request-tracker3: license shadiness] Matthew Palmer
  • Re: Contractual requirements [was: request-tracker3: license shadiness] Glenn Maynard
    • PROPOSED: the Dictator Test (was: Contractual requirements [was: request-tracker3: license shadiness]) Branden Robinson
      • Re: PROPOSED: the Dictator Test (was: Contractual requirements [was: request-tracker3: license shadiness]) Zenaan Harkness
      • Re: PROPOSED: the Dictator Test Josh Triplett
      • Re: PROPOSED: the Dictator Test (was: Contractual requirements [was: request-tracker3: license shadiness]) Andrew Suffield
      • Re: PROPOSED: the Dictator Test (was: Contractual requirements [was: request-tracker3: license shadiness]) MJ Ray
      • Re: PROPOSED: the Dictator Test Brian Thomas Sniffen
      • Re: PROPOSED: the Dictator Test (was: Contractual requirements [was: request-tracker3: license shadiness]) Matthew Palmer
• Unfortunate Licence Mix Joachim Breitner
  • Re: Unfortunate Licence Mix Steve Langasek
  • Re: Unfortunate Licence Mix Nathanael Nerode
    • Re: Unfortunate Licence Mix Mahesh T. Pai
  • Re: Unfortunate Licence Mix Josh Triplett
    • xinetd license possibly violates DFSG #4 Branden Robinson
  • Re: Unfortunate Licence Mix Russ Allbery
• Licence problems with psybnc Joachim Breitner
• DBD::InterBase licence Damyan Ivanov
  • Re: DBD::InterBase licence MJ Ray
    • Re: DBD::InterBase licence Damyan Ivanov
• Bug#254596: jftpgw: Several license problems Romain Francoise
  • Re: Bug#254596: jftpgw: Several license problems Nathanael Nerode
• How aggressively should non-distributability bugs be dealt with? Nathanael Nerode
  • Re: How aggressively should non-distributability bugs be dealt with? Joe Wreschnig
  • Re: How aggressively should non-distributability bugs be dealt with? Francesco Poli
    • Re: How aggressively should non-distributability bugs be dealt with? Josh Triplett
      • Re: How aggressively should non-distributability bugs be dealt with? Francesco Poli
      • Re: How aggressively should non-distributability bugs be dealt with? Josh Triplett
      • Re: How aggressively should non-distributability bugs be dealt with? Francesco Poli
• Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Matthew Wilcox
  • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Josh Triplett
  • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
    • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Andrew Suffield
    • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
  • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
    • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Andrew Suffield
  • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
    • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Thiemo Seufer
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Brian Thomas Sniffen
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Matthew Wilcox
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Thiemo Seufer
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Josh Triplett
  • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
    • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
    • Message not available
      * Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Alexander Cherepanov
      * Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
      * Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Josh Triplett
      * Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
      * Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
      * Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Josh Triplett
  • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
  • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
  • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
    • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Joe Moore
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Michael Poole
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Josh Triplett
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Thiemo Seufer
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Francesco Poli
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Raul Miller
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Francesco Poli
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Raul Miller
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Francesco Poli
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Raul Miller
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Francesco Poli
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Evan Prodromou
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
  • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
  • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
  • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
    • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Matthew Palmer
    • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Brian Thomas Sniffen
  • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
  • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
  • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
    • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Glenn Maynard
  • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
    • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? William Lee Irwin III
      • Message not available
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? William Lee Irwin III
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Joe Wreschnig
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? William Lee Irwin III
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? William Lee Irwin III
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Joe Wreschnig
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Josh Triplett
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Francesco Poli
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? William Lee Irwin III
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Joe Wreschnig
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Joe Wreschnig
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Josh Triplett
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Francesco Poli
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Patrick Herzig
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
    • RE: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? David Schwartz
  • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
    • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Josh Triplett
• {MSEMEA#717-276}something for you Microsoft MKB Info Nederland
• Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Joe Wreschnig
  • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? viro
    • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Joe Wreschnig
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Joe Wreschnig
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Andrew Suffield
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Frank Küster
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Brian Thomas Sniffen
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? mdpoole
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Francesco Poli
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Brian Thomas Sniffen
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Dave Howe
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Josh Triplett
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Nathanael Nerode
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Josh Triplett
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Brian Thomas Sniffen
  • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Thiemo Seufer
    • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Thiemo Seufer
    • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Joe Wreschnig
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Joe Wreschnig
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Joe Wreschnig
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Jim Marhaus
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Matthew Wilcox
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Joe Wreschnig
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Josh Triplett
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Andreas Barth
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Andrew Suffield
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Thiemo Seufer
  • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Andreas Barth
• Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
  • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
  • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
    • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Raul Miller
    • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Brian Thomas Sniffen
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
      • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Michael Poole
  • Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package? Humberto Massa
• Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in Humberto Massa
• Visualboy Advance question. Dan Korostelev
  • Re: Visualboy Advance question. Benjamin Cutler
    • Re: Visualboy Advance question. Dan Korostelev
    • Re: Visualboy Advance question. Evan Prodromou
      • Re: Visualboy Advance question. Dan Korostelev
      • Re: Visualboy Advance question. Benjamin Cutler
      • Re: Visualboy Advance question. Evan Prodromou
      • Re: Visualboy Advance question. Benjamin Cutler
      • Re: Visualboy Advance question. Evan Prodromou
      • Re: Visualboy Advance question. Benjamin Cutler
      • Re: Visualboy Advance question. Evan Prodromou
      • cc65 license check -- main or non-free? Benjamin Cutler
      • Re: Visualboy Advance question. Francesco Poli
      • Re: Visualboy Advance question. Matthew Palmer

The last update was on 06:19 GMT Mon May 06. There are 645 messages. Page 1 of 2.

[previous month]	[first page]	[previous page]	Page 1 of 2	[next page]	[last page]	[next month]

[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Other Debian Lists] [Debian Home]

Mail converted by MHonArc