Re: gens License Check - Non-free (original) (raw)
- To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: gens License Check - Non-free
- From: Michael Poole <mdpoole@troilus.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:47:06 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87n030vh3p.fsf@sanosuke.troilus.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1087583272.3206.2.camel@Tachpaule> (Patrick Herzig's message of "Fri, 18 Jun 2004 20:27:53 +0200")
- References: <UgHhGC.A.KS.x7w0AB@murphy> <[🔎] 40D31083.9090002@almg.gov.br> <[🔎] 20040618131639.F1892@links.magenta.com> <[🔎] 87zn70vk8f.fsf@sanosuke.troilus.org> <[🔎] 1087583272.3206.2.camel@Tachpaule>
Patrick Herzig writes:
The question is if the Linux kernel itself can be interpreted as being a "storage or distribution medium". Storage or distribution of binary blobs is at least not the primary purpose of the Linux kernel as it would be much easier to just store or distribute them on tape.
What does the primary purpose have anything to do with it? When I buy a new computer, I do it because I want the functionality it offers -- not because it is a distribution medium for software.
Also, the Linux kernel is, unlike a tape or a CD, not really suitable for storing or distributing binary blobs as it is (in that sense) intangible and needs to be attached to a medium to be stored or distributed.
I don't follow. Does this line of argument mean that a Debian mirror server or archive violates the GPL, since Debian too is intangible?
Michael
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: gens License Check - Non-free
* From: Michael Poole mdpoole@troilus.org - Re: gens License Check - Non-free
* From: Patrick Herzig patrick54@herzig.lu
- Re: gens License Check - Non-free
- References:
- Re: gens License Check - Non-free
* From: Humberto Massa humberto.massa@almg.gov.br - Re: gens License Check - Non-free
* From: Raul Miller moth@debian.org - Re: gens License Check - Non-free
* From: Michael Poole mdpoole@troilus.org - Re: gens License Check - Non-free
* From: Patrick Herzig patrick54@herzig.lu
- Re: gens License Check - Non-free
- Prev by Date:Re: How long is it acceptable to leave *undistributable* files in the kernel package?
- Next by Date:Re: gens License Check - Non-free
- Previous by thread:Re: gens License Check - Non-free
- Next by thread:Re: gens License Check - Non-free
- Index(es):