Re: Bacula and OpenSSL (original) (raw)
- To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bacula and OpenSSL
- From: Thomas Dickey <dickey@saltmine.radix.net>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:03:45 -0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 13a15khtd3kn1e3@corp.supernews.com>
- References: <[🔎] 200707121641.53917.kern@sibbald.com> <[🔎] 1184273539.31105.9.camel@tomoyo> <[🔎] 200707122342.09009.kern@sibbald.com> <[🔎] 877ip3pdb9.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org> <[🔎] 139hmllhgn8s811@corp.supernews.com> <[🔎] 871wf3cv5d.fsf@mocca.josefsson.org>
Simon Josefsson simon@josefsson.org wrote:
That is incorrect. The FSF has granted OpenSSL license exceptions to some software that links to OpenSSL. For example, GNU wget.
That's not an example (unless you're intending to show a case where FSF allows itself to do things that it forbids others ;-)
I don't follow, what do you mean? GNU wget is distributed under the GPL with a license exception to permit linking with OpenSSL.
It's a GNU project, as noted.
As far as I know, the FSF doesn't forbid anyone to use GPL with an OpenSSL exception.
That's entirely possible, but you haven't provided an example which isn't contaminated by self-interest on the part of FSF. If you can provide such an example, there's something to discuss.
-- Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bacula and OpenSSL
* From: Simon Josefsson simon@josefsson.org
- Re: Bacula and OpenSSL
- References:
- Bacula and OpenSSL
* From: Kern Sibbald kern@sibbald.com - Re: Bacula and OpenSSL
* From: Josselin Mouette joss@debian.org - Re: Bacula and OpenSSL
* From: Kern Sibbald kern@sibbald.com - Re: Bacula and OpenSSL
* From: Simon Josefsson simon@josefsson.org - Re: Bacula and OpenSSL
* From: Thomas Dickey dickey@saltmine.radix.net - Re: Bacula and OpenSSL
* From: Simon Josefsson simon@josefsson.org
- Bacula and OpenSSL
- Prev by Date:Re: Bacula and OpenSSL
- Next by Date:Re: Bacula and OpenSSL
- Previous by thread:Re: Bacula and OpenSSL
- Next by thread:Re: Bacula and OpenSSL
- Index(es):