| dbo:abstract |
Shadrake Alan v. Attorney-General is a 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeal of Singapore that clarified the law relating to the offence of scandalizing the court. Alan Shadrake, the author of the book Once a Jolly Hangman: Singapore Justice in the Dock (2010), was charged with contempt of court by way of scandalizing the court. The Prosecution alleged that certain passages in his book asserted that the Singapore judiciary lacks independence, succumbs to political and economic pressure, and takes a person's position in society into account when sentencing; and that it is the method by which Singapore's ruling party, the People's Action Party, stifles political dissent in Singapore. In the High Court, Justice Quentin Loh made significant changes to the law when he rejected the use of the long-standing "inherent tendency" test that had been applied to establish the actus reus of the offence, and instead adopted a "real risk" test. This allows a court to take into consideration the circumstances surrounding the uttering or publication of the impugned words and to only hold someone liable if that person has created a real risk in the circumstances in which the impugned words were communicated. In addition, he ruled that should an impugned statement be found to have scandalized the court, the only applicable defence to contempt of court would be if the statement amounted to "fair criticism". In doing so, he rejected justification and fair comment as defences. Applying the real risk test, Justice Loh found that 11 out of 14 impugned statements were contemptuous and that the defence of fair criticism did not apply to any of the statements. The High Court thus found Shadrake guilty of the offence of contempt by way of scandalizing the court and sentenced him to six weeks' imprisonment and a fine of S$20,000. Upon appeal, the Court of Appeal, while upholding the use of the real risk test, made several changes to the way the test is to be applied. In addition, the Court clarified that fair criticism is an element that determines whether there is liability, rather than operates as a defence. The Court, when applying its modified test, found that only nine of the 14 statements were contemptuous. It upheld the sentence passed by the High Court. Both the High Court and Court of Appeal judgments explored the rationale for the law against contempt of court and its relation with freedom of speech, and emphasized the importance of public confidence in the administration of justice which can be impugned by contempt of court. (en) |
| dbo:thumbnail |
wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Alan_Shadrake_at_a_Re...re_-_20110115_(cropped).jpg?width=300 |
| dbo:wikiPageExternalLink |
http://findpdf.net/pdf-viewer/Case-note-Shadrake-Alan-v-AttorneyGeneral-2011-SGCA-26.html%7Cpublisher=Gateway https://nus.academia.edu/LiannThio/Papers/316513/Beyond_the_Four_Walls_in_an_Age_of_Transnational_Judicial_Conversations_Civil_Liberties_Rights_Theories_and_Constitutional_Adjudication_in_Malaysia_and_Singapore%7Cjournal=Columbia http://www.article19.org/data/files/pdfs/publications/foe-and-contempt-of-court.pdf%7Carchive-url=https:/web.archive.org/web/20130418081548/http:/www.article19.org/data/files/pdfs/publications/foe-and-contempt-of-court.pdf%7Carchive-date=18 http://www.commonlii.org/sg/cases/SGCA/2011/26.html http://www.commonlii.org/sg/cases/SGHC/2010/327.html http://www.commonlii.org/sg/cases/SGHC/2010/339.html http://www.hklii.hk/cgi-bin/sinodisp/eng/hk/cases/hkcfi/1998/564.html http://www.fdrindia.org/publications/OffenceOfScandalasing.pdf%7Carchive-url=https:/web.archive.org/web/20130514174454/http:/fdrindia.org/publications/OffenceOfScandalasing.pdf%7Carchive-date=14 |
| dbo:wikiPageID |
30505284 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageLength |
57890 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger) |
| dbo:wikiPageRevisionID |
1093278057 (xsd:integer) |
| dbo:wikiPageWikiLink |
dbr:Capital_punishment_in_Singapore dbr:Quentin_Loh dbr:Question_of_fact dbr:Defamation dbr:People's_Action_Party dbr:United_States_Constitution dbr:De_minimis dbr:Defense_(legal) dbr:LexisNexis dbr:Commonwealth_of_Nations dbr:Constitution_of_Singapore dbr:Contempt_of_court dbr:Court_of_Appeal_of_New_Zealand dbr:Court_of_Appeal_of_Singapore dbr:Court_of_First_Instance_(Hong_Kong) dbr:Mens_rea dbr:Singapore_Legal_Service dbr:Civil_procedure dbc:Courts_in_Singapore dbr:Oxford_University_Commonwealth_Law_Journal dbc:2011_in_Singapore dbc:2011_in_case_law dbr:Andrew_Phang dbr:Singapore dbr:Singapore_dollar dbr:Clear_and_present_danger dbr:Common_law dbr:Actus_reus dbr:Tort dbr:Ipso_facto dbr:Law_commission dbr:Administration_of_justice dbr:Amnesty_International dbr:First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Foreign_and_Commonwealth_Office dbr:Oxford_University_Press dbr:Parliament_of_Singapore dbr:Central_Narcotics_Bureau dbr:Fair_comment dbr:Good_faith_(law) dbr:Judicial_functions_of_the_House_of_Lords dbr:Judicial_independence_in_Singapore dbr:Judicial_system_of_Singapore dbr:Legal_burden_of_proof dbr:Reasonable_doubt dbr:Red_herring dbr:ARTICLE_19 dbr:High_Commissioner dbr:High_Court_of_Australia dbr:High_Court_of_Justice dbr:High_Court_of_Singapore dbr:The_Guardian dbr:Attorney-General_of_Singapore dbc:Court_of_Appeal_of_Singapore_cases dbr:Alan_Shadrake dbr:Supreme_Court_of_Singapore dbr:Mitigating_factor dbr:Article_14_of_the_Constitution_of_Singapore dbc:Freedom_of_speech_in_Singapore dbr:Politics_of_Germany dbr:Civil_confinement dbc:Singaporean_civil_rights_case_law dbr:Obiter_dictum dbr:Offence_of_scandalizing_the_court_in_Singapore dbr:Sweet_&_Maxwell dbr:Evidential_burden dbr:Sub_judice dbr:Subordinate_Courts_of_Singapore dbr:File:The_Guardian_Building_Window_in_London.JPG dbr:File:Alan_Shadrake_at_a_Reform_Party_r...r,_Singapore_-_20110115_(cropped).jpg dbr:File:CheeSoonJuan-Singapore-20051107.jpg dbr:File:MapofSingaporewithIslands-1924.jpg |
| dbp:appealedFrom |
http://www.commonlii.org/sg/cases/SGHC/2010/327.html http://www.commonlii.org/sg/cases/SGHC/2010/339.html [2011] 2 S.L.R. 445; (en) [2011] 2 S.L.R. 506 (en) |
| dbp:caption |
0001-02-10 (xsd:gMonthDay) |
| dbp:citations |
http://www.commonlii.org/sg/cases/SGCA/2011/26.html [2011] 3 S.L.R. 778 (en) |
| dbp:court |
dbr:Court_of_Appeal_of_Singapore |
| dbp:dateDecided |
2011-05-27 (xsd:date) |
| dbp:fullName |
Shadrake Alan v. Attorney-General (en) |
| dbp:judges |
Andrew Phang Boon Leong J.A., Lai Siu Chiu and Philip Pillai JJ. (en) |
| dbp:opinions |
The "real risk" test is the test for the actus reus of the offence of scandalizing the court in Singapore, and fair criticism is an element relevant to liability rather than being a defence. (en) |
| dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate |
dbt:Blockquote dbt:Citation dbt:Convert dbt:Reflist dbt:Use_dmy_dates dbt:Use_Oxford_spelling dbt:Cite_CommonLII dbt:Constitution_of_Singapore dbt:Infobox_court_case |
| dct:subject |
dbc:Courts_in_Singapore dbc:2011_in_Singapore dbc:2011_in_case_law dbc:Court_of_Appeal_of_Singapore_cases dbc:Freedom_of_speech_in_Singapore dbc:Singaporean_civil_rights_case_law |
| rdf:type |
yago:WikicatCourtsInSingapore yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Assembly108163792 yago:Case107308889 yago:Court108329453 yago:Event100029378 yago:Gathering107975026 yago:Group100031264 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity yago:SocialGroup107950920 |
| rdfs:comment |
Shadrake Alan v. Attorney-General is a 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeal of Singapore that clarified the law relating to the offence of scandalizing the court. Alan Shadrake, the author of the book Once a Jolly Hangman: Singapore Justice in the Dock (2010), was charged with contempt of court by way of scandalizing the court. The Prosecution alleged that certain passages in his book asserted that the Singapore judiciary lacks independence, succumbs to political and economic pressure, and takes a person's position in society into account when sentencing; and that it is the method by which Singapore's ruling party, the People's Action Party, stifles political dissent in Singapore. (en) |
| rdfs:label |
Shadrake v Attorney-General (en) |
| owl:sameAs |
freebase:Shadrake v Attorney-General yago-res:Shadrake v Attorney-General wikidata:Shadrake v Attorney-General https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4v47G |
| prov:wasDerivedFrom |
wikipedia-en:Shadrake_v_Attorney-General?oldid=1093278057&ns=0 |
| foaf:depiction |
wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Alan_Shadrake_at_a_Re...r,_Singapore_-_20110115_(cropped).jpg wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/CheeSoonJuan-Singapore-20051107.jpg wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/MapofSingaporewithIslands-1924.jpg wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/The_Guardian_Building_Window_in_London.jpg |
| foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf |
wikipedia-en:Shadrake_v_Attorney-General |
| is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of |
dbr:Shadrake_v._Attorney-General dbr:Shadrake_v_AG |
| is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of |
dbr:Quentin_Loh dbr:Index_of_Singapore-related_articles dbr:Shadrake_v._Attorney-General dbr:Shadrake_v_AG dbr:M_Ravi |
| is foaf:primaryTopic of |
wikipedia-en:Shadrake_v_Attorney-General |
.jpg?width=300)
