Targeting proteins for degradation (original) (raw)
Nussbaum, A.K. et al. Cleavage motifs of the yeast 20S proteasome β subunits deduced from digests of enolase 1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA95, 12504–12509 (1998). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Lee, C., Schwartz, M.P., Prakash, S., Iwakura, M. & Matouschek, A. ATP-dependent proteases degrade their substrates by processively unraveling them from the degradation signal. Mol. Cell7, 627–637 (2001). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Groll, M. et al. Structure of 20S proteasome from yeast at 2.4 Å resolution. Nature386, 463–471 (1997). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Tanaka, K. The proteasome: overview of structure and functions. Proc. Jpn. Acad., Ser. B, Phys. Biol. Sci.85, 12–36 (2009). CAS Google Scholar
Finley, D. Recognition and processing of ubiquitin-protein conjugates by the proteasome. Annu. Rev. Biochem.78, 477–513 (2009). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Lowe, J. et al. Crystal structure of the 20S proteasome from the archaeon T. acidophilum at 3.4 Å resolution. Science268, 533–539 (1995). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Groll, M. et al. A gated channel into the proteasome core particle. Nat. Struct. Biol.7, 1062–1067 (2000). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Johnston, J.A., Johnson, E.S., Waller, P.R.H. & Varshavsky, A. Methotrexate inhibits proteolysis of dihydrofolate reductase by the N-end rule pathway. J. Biol. Chem.270, 8172–8178 (1995). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Thrower, J.S., Hoffman, L., Rechsteiner, M. & Pickart, C.M. Recognition of the polyubiquitin proteolytic signal. EMBO J.19, 94–102 (2000). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Weissman, A.M. Themes and variations on ubiquitylation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.2, 169–178 (2001). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Prakash, S., Tian, L., Ratliff, K.S., Lehotzky, R.E. & Matouschek, A. An unstructured initiation site is required for efficient proteasome-mediated degradation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.11, 830–837 (2004). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Prakash, S., Inobe, T., Hatch, A.J. & Matouschek, A. Substrate selection by the proteasome during degradation of protein complexes. Nat. Chem. Biol.5, 29–36 (2009). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Ciechanover, A. & Ben-Saadon, R. N-terminal ubiquitination: more protein substrates join in. Trends Cell Biol.14, 103–106 (2004). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Cadwell, K. & Coscoy, L. Ubiquitination on nonlysine residues by a viral E3 ubiquitin ligase. Science309, 127–130 (2005). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Hoppe, T. Multiubiquitylation by E4 enzymes: 'one size' doesn't fit all. Trends Biochem. Sci.30, 183–187 (2005). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Pickart, C.M. & Fushman, D. Polyubiquitin chains: polymeric protein signals. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.8, 610–616 (2004). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Jin, L., Williamson, A., Banerjee, S., Philipp, I. & Rape, M. Mechanism of ubiquitin-chain formation by the human anaphase-promoting complex. Cell133, 653–665 (2008). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Hofmann, R.M. & Pickart, C.M. In vitro assembly and recognition of Lys-63 polyubiquitin chains. J. Biol. Chem.276, 27936–27943 (2001). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Saeki, Y. et al. Lysine 63-linked polyubiquitin chain may serve as a targeting signal for the 26S proteasome. EMBO J.28, 359–371 (2009). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Xu, P. et al. Quantitative proteomics reveals the function of unconventional ubiquitin chains in proteasomal degradation. Cell137, 133–145 (2009). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Shaeffer, J.R. & Kania, M.A. Degradation of monoubiquitinated α-globin by 26S proteasomes. Biochemistry34, 4015–4021 (1995). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Boutet, S.C., Disatnik, M.-H., Chan, L.S., Iori, K. & Rando, T.A. Regulation of Pax3 by proteasomal degradation of monoubiquitinated protein in skeletal muscle progenitors. Cell130, 349–362 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Kravtsova-Ivantsiv, Y., Cohen, S. & Ciechanover, A. Modification by single ubiquitin moieties rather than polyubiquitination is sufficient for proteasomal processing of the p105 NF-κB precursor. Mol. Cell33, 496–504 (2009). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Peng, J. et al. A proteomics approach to understanding protein ubiquitination. Nat. Biotechnol.21, 921–926 (2003). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Hicke, L. & Riezman, H. Ubiquitination of a yeast plasma membrane receptor signals its ligand-stimulated endocytosis. Cell84, 277–287 (1996). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Hicke, L., Schubert, H.L. & Hill, C.P. Ubiquitin-binding domains. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.6, 610–621 (2005). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Elsasser, S. & Finley, D. Delivery of ubiquitinated substrates to protein-unfolding machines. Nat. Cell Biol.7, 742–749 (2005). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Deveraux, Q., Ustrell, V., Pickart, C. & Rechsteiner, M. A 26 S protease subunit that binds ubiquitin conjugates. J. Biol. Chem.269, 7059–7061 (1994). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Lam, Y.A., Lawson, T.G., Velayutham, M., Zweier, J.L. & Pickart, C.M. A proteasomal ATPase subunit recognizes the polyubiquitin degradation signal. Nature416, 763–767 (2002). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Elsasser, S., Chandler-Militello, D., Muller, B., Hanna, J. & Finley, D. Rad23 and Rpn10 serve as alternative ubiquitin receptors for the proteasome. J. Biol. Chem.279, 26817–26822 (2004). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Kim, I., Mi, K. & Rao, H. Multiple interactions of rad23 suggest a mechanism for ubiquitylated substrate delivery important in proteolysis. Mol. Biol. Cell15, 3357–3365 (2004). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Verma, R., Oania, R., Graumann, J. & Deshaies, R.J. Multiubiquitin chain receptors define a layer of substrate selectivity in the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Cell118, 99–110 (2004). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Chen, L. & Madura, K. Rad23 promotes the targeting of proteolytic substrates to the proteasome. Mol. Cell. Biol.22, 4902–4913 (2002). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Rao, H. & Sastry, A. Recognition of specific ubiquitin conjugates is important for the proteolytic functions of the ubiquitin-associated domain proteins Dsk2 and Rad23. J. Biol. Chem.277, 11691–11695 (2002). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Wilkinson, C.R. et al. Proteins containing the UBA domain are able to bind to multi-ubiquitin chains. Nat. Cell Biol.3, 939–943 (2001). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Hiyama, H. et al. Interaction of hHR23 with S5a. The ubiquitin-like domain of hHR23 mediates interaction with S5a subunit of 26 S proteasome. J. Biol. Chem.274, 28019–28025 (1999). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Schauber, C. et al. Rad23 links DNA repair to the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway. Nature391, 715–718 (1998). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Richly, H. et al. A series of ubiquitin binding factors connects CDC48/p97 to substrate multiubiquitylation and proteasomal targeting. Cell120, 73–84 (2005). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Madura, K. Rad23 and Rpn10: perennial wallflowers join the melee. Trends Biochem. Sci.29, 637–640 (2004). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Sakata, E. et al. Parkin binds the Rpn10 subunit of 26S proteasomes through its ubiquitin-like domain. EMBO Rep.4, 301–306 (2003). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Kaplun, L. et al. The DNA damage-inducible UbL-UbA protein Ddi1 participates in Mec1-mediated degradation of Ho endonuclease. Mol. Cell. Biol.25, 5355–5362 (2005). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Amerik, A.Y. & Hochstrasser, M. Mechanism and function of deubiquitinating enzymes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1695, 189–207 (2004). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Verma, R. et al. Role of Rpn11 metalloprotease in deubiquitination and degradation by the 26S proteasome. Science298, 611–615 (2002). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Yao, T. & Cohen, R.E. A cryptic protease couples deubiquitination and degradation by the proteasome. Nature419, 403–407 (2002). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Hanna, J. et al. Deubiquitinating enzyme Ubp6 functions noncatalytically to delay proteasomal degradation. Cell127, 99–111 (2006). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Lam, Y.A., Xu, W., DeMartino, G.N. & Cohen, R.E. Editing of ubiquitin conjugates by an isopeptidase in the 26S proteasome. Nature385, 737–740 (1997). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Crosas, B. et al. Ubiquitin chains are remodeled at the proteasome by opposing ubiquitin ligase and deubiquitinating activities. Cell127, 1401–1413 (2006). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Kraut, D.A., Prakash, S. & Matouschek, A. To degrade or release: ubiquitin-chain remodeling. Trends Cell Biol.17, 419–421 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Peters, J.M. The anaphase-promoting complex: proteolysis in mitosis and beyond. Mol. Cell9, 931–943 (2002). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Rape, M., Reddy, S.K. & Kirschner, M.W. The processivity of multiubiquitination by the APC determines the order of substrate degradation. Cell124, 89–103 (2006). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Ye, Y. Diverse functions with a common regulator: ubiquitin takes command of an AAA ATPase. J. Struct. Biol.156, 29–40 (2006). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Jentsch, S. & Rumpf, S. Cdc48 (p97): a “molecular gearbox” in the ubiquitin pathway? Trends Biochem. Sci.32, 6–11 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Jarosch, E. et al. Protein dislocation from the ER requires polyubiquitination and the AAA-ATPase Cdc48. Nat. Cell Biol.4, 134–139 (2002). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Ye, Y., Meyer, H.H. & Rapoport, T.A. The AAA ATPase Cdc48/p97 and its partners transport proteins from the ER into the cytosol. Nature414, 652–656 (2001). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Bachmair, A. & Varshavsky, A. The degradation signal in a short-lived protein. Cell56, 1019–1032 (1989). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Petroski, M.D. & Deshaies, R.J. Context of multiubiquitin chain attachment influences the rate of Sic1 degradation. Mol. Cell11, 1435–1444 (2003). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Takeuchi, J., Chen, H. & Coffino, P. Proteasome substrate degradation requires association plus extended peptide. EMBO J.26, 123–131 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Liu, C.W., Corboy, M.J., DeMartino, G.N. & Thomas, P.J. Endoproteolytic activity of the proteasome. Science299, 408–411 (2003). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Piwko, W. & Jentsch, S. Proteasome-mediated protein processing by bidirectional degradation initiated from an internal site. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.13, 691–697 (2006). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Hinnerwisch, J., Fenton, W.A., Furtak, K.J., Farr, G.W. & Horwich, A.L. Loops in the central channel of ClpA chaperone mediate protein binding, unfolding, and translocation. Cell121, 1029–1041 (2005). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Martin, A., Baker, T.A. & Sauer, R.T. Pore loops of the AAA+ ClpX machine grip substrates to drive translocation and unfolding. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.15, 1147–1151 (2008). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Park, E. et al. Role of the GYVG pore motif of HslU ATPase in protein unfolding and translocation for degradation by HslV peptidase. J. Biol. Chem.280, 22892–22898 (2005). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Yamada-Inagawa, T., Okuno, T., Karata, K., Yamanaka, K. & Ogura, T. Conserved pore residues in the AAA protease FtsH are important for proteolysis and its coupling to ATP hydrolysis. J. Biol. Chem.278, 50182–50187 (2003). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Wang, J. et al. Nucleotide-dependent conformational changes in a protease-associated ATPase HsIU. Structure9, 1107–1116 (2001). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Wang, J. et al. Crystal structures of the HslVU peptidase-ATPase complex reveal an ATP-dependent proteolysis mechanism. Structure9, 177–184 (2001). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Heessen, S., Masucci, M.G. & Dantuma, N.P. The UBA2 domain functions as an intrinsic stabilization signal that protects Rad23 from proteasomal degradation. Mol. Cell18, 225–235 (2005). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Verhoef, L.G. et al. Minimal length requirement for proteasomal degradation of ubiquitin-dependent substrates. FASEB J.23, 123–133 (2009). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Tian, L., Holmgren, R.A. & Matouschek, A. A conserved processing mechanism regulates the activity of transcription factors Cubitus interruptus and NF-κB. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.12, 1045–1053 (2005). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Johnson, E.S., Gonda, D.K. & Varshavsky, A. Cis-trans recognition and subunit-specific degradation of short-lived proteins. Nature346, 287–291 (1990). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Hochstrasser, M. & Varshavsky, A. In vivo degradation of a transcriptional regulator: the yeast α2 repressor. Cell61, 697–708 (1990). CASPubMed Google Scholar
King, R.W., Deshaies, R.J., Peters, J.M. & Kirschner, M.W. How proteolysis drives the cell cycle. Science274, 1652–1659 (1996). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Nishiyama, A. et al. A nonproteolytic function of the proteasome is required for the dissociation of Cdc2 and cyclin B at the end of M phase. Genes Dev.14, 2344–2357 (2000). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Jeffrey, P.D. et al. Mechanism of CDK activation revealed by the structure of a cyclin A-CDK2 complex. Nature376, 313–320 (1995). CASPubMed Google Scholar
King, R.W., Glotzer, M. & Kirschner, M.W. Mutagenic analysis of the destruction signal of mitotic cyclins and structural characterization of ubiquitinated intermediates. Mol. Biol. Cell7, 1343–1357 (1996). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Klotzbucher, A., Stewart, E., Harrison, D. & Hunt, T. The 'destruction box' of cyclin A allows B-type cyclins to be ubiquitinated, but not efficiently destroyed. EMBO J.15, 3053–3064 (1996). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Verma, R., McDonald, H., Yates, J.R. III & Deshaies, R.J. Selective degradation of ubiquitinated Sic1 by purified 26S proteasome yields active S phase cyclin-Cdk. Mol. Cell8, 439–448 (2001). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Dang, Y., Siew, L.M. & Zheng, Y.H. APOBEC3G is degraded by the proteasomal pathway in a Vif-dependent manner without being polyubiquitylated. J. Biol. Chem.283, 13124–13131 (2008). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Gonzalez, S.L., Stremlau, M., He, X., Basile, J.R. & Munger, K. Degradation of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor by the human papillomavirus type 16 E7 oncoprotein is important for functional inactivation and is separable from proteasomal degradation of E7. J. Virol.75, 7583–7591 (2001). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Berezutskaya, E. & Bagchi, S. The human papillomavirus E7 oncoprotein functionally interacts with the S4 subunit of the 26 S proteasome. J. Biol. Chem.272, 30135–30140 (1997). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Hoyt, M.A. & Coffino, P. Ubiquitin-free routes into the proteasome. Cell. Mol. Life Sci.61, 1596–1600 (2004). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Jariel-Encontre, I., Bossis, G. & Piechaczyk, M. Ubiquitin-independent degradation of proteins by the proteasome. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1786, 153–177 (2008). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Orlowski, M. & Wilk, S. Ubiquitin-independent proteolytic functions of the proteasome. Arch. Biochem. Biophys.415, 1–5 (2003). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Verma, R. & Deshaies, R.J. A proteasome howdunit: the case of the missing signal. Cell101, 341–344 (2000). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Murakami, Y. et al. Ornithine decarboxylase is degraded by the 26S proteasome without ubiquitination. Nature360, 597–599 (1992). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, M., Pickart, C.M. & Coffino, P. Determinants of proteasome recognition of ornithine decarboxylase, a ubiquitin-independent substrate. EMBO J.22, 1488–1496 (2003). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang, M., MacDonald, A.I., Hoyt, M.A. & Coffino, P. Proteasomes begin ornithine decarboxylase digestion at the C terminus. J. Biol. Chem.279, 20959–20965 (2004). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Baugh, J.M., Viktorova, E.G. & Pilipenko, E.V. Proteasomes can degrade a significant proportion of cellular proteins independent of ubiquitination. J. Mol. Biol.386, 814–827 (2009). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Baker, T.A. & Sauer, R.T. ATP-dependent proteases of bacteria: recognition logic and operating principles. Trends Biochem. Sci.31, 647–653 (2006). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Striebel, F., Kress, W. & Weber-Ban, E. Controlled destruction: AAA+ ATPases in protein degradation from bacteria to eukaryotes. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.19, 209–217 (2009). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Pearce, M.J., Mintseris, J., Ferreyra, J., Gygi, S.P. & Darwin, K.H. Ubiquitin-like protein involved in the proteasome pathway of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science322, 1104–1107 (2008). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Burns, K.E., Liu, W.T., Boshoff, H.I., Dorrestein, P.C. & Barry, C.E. III. Proteasomal protein degradation in Mycobacteria is dependent upon a prokaryotic ubiquitin-like protein. J. Biol. Chem.284, 3069–3075 (2009). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Iyer, L., Burroughs, A.M. & Aravind, L. Unraveling the biochemistry and provenance of pupylation: a prokaryotic analog of ubiquitination. Biol. Direct3, 45 (2008). PubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Flynn, J.M., Neher, S.B., Kim, Y.I., Sauer, R.T. & Baker, T.A. Proteomic discovery of cellular substrates of the ClpXP protease reveals five classes of ClpX-recognition signals. Mol. Cell11, 671–683 (2003). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Keiler, K.C., Waller, P.R. & Sauer, R.T. Role of a peptide tagging system in degradation of proteins synthesized from damaged messenger RNA. Science271, 990–993 (1996). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Hoskins, J.R. & Wickner, S. Two peptide sequences can function cooperatively to facilitate binding and unfolding by ClpA and degradation by ClpAP. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA103, 909–914 (2006). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Ninnis, R.L., Spall, S.K., Talbo, G.H., Truscott, K.N. & Dougan, D.A. Modification of PATase by L/F-transferase generates a ClpS-dependent N-end rule substrate in Escherichia coli. EMBO J.28, 1732–1744 (2009). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Levchenko, I., Seidel, M., Sauer, R.T. & Baker, T.A.A. Specificity-enhancing factor for the ClpXP degradation machine. Science289, 2354–2356 (2000). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Dougan, D.A., Weber-Ban, E. & Bukau, B. Targeted delivery of an ssrA-tagged substrate by the adaptor protein SspB to its cognate AAA+ protein ClpX. Mol. Cell12, 373–380 (2003). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Muffler, A., Fischer, D., Altuvia, S., Storz, G. & Hengge-Aronis, R. The response regulator RssB controls stability of the σ(S) subunit of RNA polymerase in Escherichia coli. EMBO J.15, 1333–1339 (1996). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhou, Y., Gottesman, S., Hoskins, J.R., Maurizi, M.R. & Wickner, S. The RssB response regulator directly targets s(S) for degradation by ClpXP. Genes Dev.15, 627–637 (2001). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Bougdour, A., Wickner, S. & Gottesman, S. Modulating RssB activity: IraP, a novel regulator of s(S) stability in Escherichia coli. Genes Dev.20, 884–897 (2006). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Bachmair, A., Finley, D. & Varshavsky, A. In vivo half-life of a protein is a function of its amino-terminal residue. Science234, 179–186 (1986). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Tobias, J.W., Shrader, T.E., Rocap, G. & Varshavsky, A. The N-end rule in bacteria. Science254, 1374–1377 (1991). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Erbse, A. et al. ClpS is an essential component of the N-end rule pathway in Escherichia coli. Nature439, 753–756 (2006). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Dougan, D.A., Reid, B.G., Horwich, A.L. & Bukau, B. ClpS, a substrate modulator of the ClpAP machine. Mol. Cell9, 673–683 (2002). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Mogk, A., Schmidt, R. & Bukau, B. The N-end rule pathway for regulated proteolysis: prokaryotic and eukaryotic strategies. Trends Cell Biol.17, 165–172 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Wang, K.H., Roman-Hernandez, G., Grant, R.A., Sauer, R.T. & Baker, T.A. The molecular basis of N-end rule recognition. Mol. Cell32, 406–414 (2008). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Lupas, A.N. & Koretke, K.K. Bioinformatic analysis of ClpS, a protein module involved in prokaryotic and eukaryotic protein degradation. J. Struct. Biol.141, 77–83 (2003). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Schuenemann, V.J. et al. Structural basis of N-end rule substrate recognition in Escherichia coli by the ClpAP adaptor protein ClpS. EMBO Rep.10, 508–514 (2009). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Koodathingal, P. et al. ATP-dependent proteases differ substantially in their ability to unfold globular proteins. J. Biol. Chem.284, 18674–18684 (2009). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Bence, N.F., Sampat, R.M. & Kopito, R.R. Impairment of the ubiquitin-proteasome system by protein aggregation. Science292, 1552–1555 (2001). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Kaganovich, D., Kopito, R. & Frydman, J. Misfolded proteins partition between two distinct quality control compartments. Nature454, 1088–1095 (2008). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Banaszynski, L.A. & Wandless, T.J. Conditional control of protein function. Chem. Biol.13, 11–21 (2006). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Matsuzawa, S., Cuddy, M., Fukushima, T. & Reed, J.C. Method for targeting protein destruction by using a ubiquitin-independent, proteasome-mediated degradation pathway. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA102, 14982–14987 (2005). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Spencer, D.M., Wandless, T.J., Schreiber, S.L. & Crabtree, G.R. Controlling signal transduction with synthetic ligands. Science262, 1019–1024 (1993). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Liberles, S.D., Diver, S.T., Austin, D.J. & Schreiber, S.L. Inducible gene expression and protein translocation using nontoxic ligands identified by a mammalian three-hybrid screen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA94, 7825–7830 (1997). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Janse, D.M., Crosas, B., Finley, D. & Church, G.M. Localization to the proteasome is sufficient for degradation. J. Biol. Chem.279, 21415–21420 (2004). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Stankunas, K. et al. Conditional protein alleles using knockin mice and a chemical inducer of dimerization. Mol. Cell12, 1615–1624 (2003). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Banaszynski, L.A., Chen, L.-C., Maynard-Smith, L.A., Ooi, A.G.L. & Wandless, T.J.A. Rapid, reversible, and tunable method to regulate protein function in living cells using synthetic small molecules. Cell126, 995–1004 (2006). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Pratt, M.R., Schwartz, E.C. & Muir, T.W. Small-molecule-mediated rescue of protein function by an inducible proteolytic shunt. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA104, 11209–11214 (2007). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Gosink, M.M. & Vierstra, R.D. Redirecting the specificity of ubiquitination by modifying ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA92, 9117–9121 (1995). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhou, P., Bogacki, R., McReynolds, L. & Howley, P.M. Harnessing the ubiquitination machinery to target the degradation of specific cellular proteins. Mol. Cell6, 751–756 (2000). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Su, Y., Ishikawa, S., Kojima, M. & Liu, B. Eradication of pathogenic β-catenin by Skp1/Cullin/F box ubiquitination machinery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA100, 12729–12734 (2003). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Sakamoto, K.M. et al. Protacs: chimeric molecules that target proteins to the Skp1-Cullin-F box complex for ubiquitination and degradation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA98, 8554–8559 (2001). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Schneekloth, J.S. et al. Chemical genetic control of protein levels: selective in vivo targeted degradation. J. Am. Chem. Soc.126, 3748–3754 (2004). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Park, E.C., Finley, D. & Szostak, J.W. A strategy for the generation of conditional mutations by protein destabilization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA89, 1249–1252 (1992). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Dohmen, R.J., Wu, P. & Varshavsky, A. Heat-inducible degron: a method for constructing temperature-sensitive mutants. Science263, 1273–1276 (1994). CASPubMed Google Scholar