Insights from genomic profiling of transcription factors (original) (raw)

• Lee, T. I. & Young, R. A. Transcription of eukaryotic protein-coding genes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 34, 77–137 (2000). A detailed review of transcriptional regulation, general factors and accessory proteins that control transcription initation and elongation.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sandelin, A. et al. Mammalian RNA polymerase II core promoters: insights from genome-wide studies. Nature Rev. Genet. 8, 424–436 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• ENCODE Project Consortium. Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project. Nature 447, 799–816 (2007). This paper demonstrates how genome-wide studies of transcription factor binding, chromatin structure, DNA replication and sequence conservation can synergize.
• Cooper, S. J., Trinklein, N. D., Anton, E. D., Nguyen, L. & Myers, R. M. Comprehensive analysis of transcriptional promoter structure and function in 1% of the human genome. Genome Res. 16, 1–10 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kimura, K. et al. Diversification of transcriptional modulation: large-scale identification and characterization of putative alternative promoters of human genes. Genome Res. 16, 55–65 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lander, E. S. et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature 409, 860–921 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Vaquerizas, J. M., Kummerfeld, S. K., Teichmann, S. A. & Luscombe, N. M. A census of human transcription factors: function, expression and evolution. Nature Rev. Genet. 10, 252–263 (2009). A summary of the expression, conservation and activity of the set of human sequence-specific transcription factors.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Venter, J. C. et al. The sequence of the human genome. Science 291, 1304–1351 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Jimenez-Sanchez, G., Childs, B. & Valle, D. Human disease genes. Nature 409, 853–855 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wederell, E. D. et al. Global analysis of in vivo Foxa2-binding sites in mouse liver using massively parallel sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 4549–4564 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Reed, B. D., Charos, A. E., Szekely, A. M., Weissman, S. M. & Snyder, M. Genome-wide occupancy of SREBP1 and its partners NFY and SP1 reveals novel functional roles and combinatorial regulation of distinct classes of genes. PLOS Genet. 4, e1000133 (2008).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Scacheri, P. C. et al. Genome-wide analysis of menin binding provides insights to MEN1 tumorigenesis. PLoS Genet. 2, e51 (2006).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hatzis, P. et al. Genome-wide pattern of TCF7L2/TCF4 chromatin occupancy in colorectal cancer cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 2732–2744 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• O'Geen, H. et al. Genome-wide analysis of KAP1 binding suggests autoregulation of KRAB-ZNFs. PLoS Genet. 3, e89 (2007).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Xu, X. et al. A comprehensive ChIP–chip analysis of E2F1, E2F4, and E2F6 in normal and tumor cells reveals iterchangeable roles of E2F family members. Genome Res. 17, 1550–1561 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Robertson, G. et al. Genome-wide profiles of STAT1 DNA association using chromatin immunoprecipitation and massively parallel sequencing. Nature Methods 4, 1–7 (2007). An early demonstration that high-throughput sequencing of ChIP samples can be used to identify genome-wide binding sites of site-specific transcription factors.
  Article Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. S., Mortazavi, A., Myers, R. M. & Wold, B. Genome-wide mapping of in vivo protein–DNA interactions. Science 316, 1497–1502 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Rada-Iglesias, A. et al. Whole-genome maps of USF1 and USF2 binding and histone H3 acetylation reveal new aspects of promoter structure and candidate genes for common human disorders. Genome Res. 18, 380–392 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Vogel, M. J., Peric-Hupkes, D. & van Steensel, B. Detection of in vivo protein–DNA interactions using DamID in mammalian cells. Nature Protoc. 2, 1467–1478 (2007).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Valouev, A. et al. Genome-wide analysis of transcription factor binding sites based on ChIP–seq data. Nature Methods 5, 829–834 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. S. et al. Systematic evaluation of variability in ChIP–chip experiments using predefined DNA targets. Genome Res. 18, 393–403 (2008).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bieda, M., Xu, X., Singer, M., Green, R. & Farnham, P. J. Unbiased location analysis of E2F1 binding sites suggests a widespread role for E2F1 in the human genome. Genome Res. 16, 595–605 (2006). A demonstration that some factors bind exclusively to proximal promoters and do not have strict motif requirements for their binding sites.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kim, T. H. et al. A high-resolution map of active promoters in the human genome. Nature 436, 876–880 (2005). An early demonstration that high-density oligonucleotide arrays can be used to identify genome-wide binding sites for human transcription factors.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Cawley, S. et al. Unbiased mapping of transcription factor binding sites along human chromosomes 21 and 22 points to widespread regulation of noncoding RNAs. Cell 116, 499–509 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nix, D. A., Courdy, S. J. & Boucher, K. M. Empirical methods for controlling false positives and estimating confidence in ChIP–seq peaks. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 523 (2008).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. et al. Model-based analysis of ChIP–seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9, R137 (2008).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Fejes, A. P. et al. FindPeaks 3.1: a tool for identifying areas of enrichment from massively parallel short-read sequencing technology. Bioinformatics 24, 1729–1730 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Rozowsky, J. et al. PeakSeq enables systematic scoring of ChIP–seq experiments relative to controls. Nature Biotech. 27, 66–75 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Michalopoulos, G. K. & Zarnegar, R. Structural and functional characterization of the mouse hepatocyte growth factor gene promoter. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 4152–4160 (1994).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Fujishiro, K. et al. Analysis of tissue-specific and PPARα-dependent induction of FABP gene expression in the mouse liver by an in vivo DNA electroporation method. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 239, 165–172 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Weinmann, A. S., Yan, P. S., Oberley, M. J., Huang, T. H.-M. & Farnham, P. J. Isolating human transcription factor targets by coupling chromatin immunoprecipitation and CpG island microarray analysis. Genes Dev. 16, 235–244 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Li, Z. et al. A global transcriptional regulatory role for c-Myc in Burkitt's lymphoma cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 8164–8169 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ren, B. et al. E2F integrates cell cycle progression with DNA repair, replication, and G2/M checkpoints. Genes Dev. 16, 245–256 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Odom, D. T. et al. Control of pancreas and liver gene expression by HNF transcription factors. Science 303, 1378–1381 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Consortium, T. E. P. The ENCODE (ENCyclopedia of DNA Elements) Project. Science 306, 636–640 (2004).
  Article Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. S. et al. Chromosome-wide mapping of estrogen receptor binding reveals long-range regulation requiring the forkhead protein FoxA1. Cell 122, 33–43 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Yang, A. et al. Relationships between p63 binding, DNA sequence, transcription activity, and biological function in human cells. Mol. Cell 24, 593–602 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Chen, X. et al. Integration of external signaling pathways with the core transcriptional network in embryonic stem cells. Cell 133, 1106–1117 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Mann, R. S. & Carroll, S. B. Molecular mechanisms of selector gene function and evolution. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 12, 592–600 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Moorman, C. et al. Hotspots of transcription factor colocalization in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 12027–12032 (2006). This demonstrates clustering of transcription factors throughout the D. melanogaster genome.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Elnitski, L., Jin, V. X., Farnham, P. J. & Jones, S. J. M. Locating mammalian transcription factor binding sites: a survey of computational and experimental techniques. Genome Res. 16, 1455–1464 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Panne, D. The enhanceosome. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 18, 236–242 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Maniatis, T. et al. Structure and function of the interferon-β enhanceosome. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 63, 609–620 (1998).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Dean, A. On a chromosome far, far away: LCRs and gene expression. Trends Genet. 22, 38–45 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Heintzman, N. D. et al. Histone modifications at human enhancers reflect global cell-type-specific gene expression. Nature 459, 108–112 (2009). This identifies specific histone modifications that are associated with cell-type-specific transcriptional regulation.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Heintzman, N. D. et al. Distinct predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome. Nature Genet. 39, 311–318 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wright, W. E. & Funk, W. D. CASTing for multicomponent DNA-binding components. Trends Biochem. Sci. 18, 77–80 (1993).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Morgan, X. C., Ni, S., Miranker, D. P. & Iyer, V. R. Predicting combinatorial binding of transcription factors to regulatory elements in the human genome by association rule mining. BMC Bioinformatics 8, 445 (2007).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Rabinovich, A., Jin, V. X., Rabinovich, R., Xu, X. & Farnham, P. J. E2F in vivo binding specificity: comparison of consensus versus non-consensus binding sites. Genome Res. 18, 1763–1777 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Gineitis, D. & Treisman, R. Differential usage of signal transduction pathways defines two types of serum response factor target gene. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 24531–24539 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Cooper, S. J., Trinklein, N. D., Nguyen, L. & Myers, R. M. Serum response factor binding sites differ in three human cell types. Genome Res. 17, 136–144 (2009).
  Article Google Scholar
• Jin, V. X., O'Geen, H., Iyengar, S., Green, R. & Farnham, P. J. Identification of an OCT4 and SRY regulatory module using integrated computational and experimental genomics approaches. Genome Res. 17, 807–817 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Li, X.-Y. et al. Transcription factors bind thousands of active and inactive regions in the Drosophila blastoderm. PLoS Biol. 6, e27 (2008).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Badis, G. et al. Diversity and complexity in DNA recognition by transcription factors. Science 324, 1720–1723 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Li, H. et al. Molecular basis for site-specific read-out of histone H3K4me3 by the BPTF PHD finger of NURF. Nature 442, 91–95 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Pena, P. V. et al. Molecular mechanism of histone H3K4me3 recognition by plant homeodomain of ING2. Nature 442, 100–103 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Shi, X. et al. Proteome-wide analysis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifies several PHD fingers as novel direct and selective binding modules of histone H3 methylated at either lysine 4 or lysine 36. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 2450–2455 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Vermeulen, M. et al. Selective anchoring of TFIID to nucleosomes by trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 4. Cell 131, 58–69 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Albert, T. et al. The chromatin structure of the dual c-myc promoter P1/P2 is regulated by separate elements. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 20482–20490 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Jin, V. X., Rabinovich, A., Squazzo, S. L., Green, R. & Farnham, P. J. A computational genomics approach to identify _cis_-regulatory modules from chromatin immunoprecipitation microarray data — a case study using E2F1. Genome Res. 16, 1585–1595 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Krig, S. R. et al. Identification of genes directly regulated by the oncogene ZNF217 using chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)–chip assays. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 9703–9712 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Martone, R. et al. Distribution of NF-κB-binding sites across human chromosome 22. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 12247–12252 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Krum, S. A. et al. Unique ERα cistromes control cell type-specific gene regulation. Mol. Endocrinol. 22, 2393–2406 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Voss, T. C. & Hager, G. L. Visualizing chromatin dynamics in intact cells. Biochem. Biophys. Acta 1783, 2044–2051 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Osborne, C. S. et al. Active genes dynamically colocalize to shared sites of ongoing transcription. Nature Genet. 36, 1065–1071 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bartlett, J. et al. Specialized transcription factories. Biochem. Soc. Symp. 73, 67–75 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Dekker, J., Rippe, K., Dekker, M. & Kleckner, N. Capturing chromosome conformation. Science 295, 1306–1311 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Visel, A. et al. ChIP–seq accurately predicts tissue-specific activity of enhancers. Nature 457, 854–858 (2009). This study demonstrates that using ChIP–seq to identify binding sites for p300 is a highly accurate method for identifying enhancers that can be shown, using follow-up assays in transgenic mice, to function in a tissue-specific manner.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Camenisch, T. D., Brilliant, M. H. & Segal, D. J. Critical parameters for genome editing using zinc finger nucleases. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 8, 669–676 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bletran, A., Liu, Y., Parikh, S., Temple, B. & Blancafort, P. Interrogating genomes with combinatorial artificial transcription factor libraries: asking zinc finger questions. Assay Drug Dev. Technol. 4, 317–331 (2006).
  Article Google Scholar
• Faruqi, A. F., Egholm, M. & Glazer, P. M. Peptide nucleic acid-targeted mutagenesis of a chromosomal gene in mouse cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 1398–1403 (1998).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Burnett, R. et al. DNA sequence-specific polyamides alleviate transcription inhibition associated with long GAA-TCC repeats in Friedreich's ataxia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 11497–11502 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Guenther, M. G., Levine, S. S., Boyer, L. A., Jaenisch, R. & Young, R. A. A chromatin landmark and transcription initiation at most promoters in human cells. Cell 130, 77–88 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Muse, G. W. et al. RNA polymerase is poised for activation across the genome. Nature Genet. 39, 1507–1511 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Komashko, V. M. et al. Using ChIP–chip technology to reveal common principles of transcriptional repression in normal and cancer cells. Genome Res. 18, 521–532 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Acevedo, L. G. et al. Genome-scale ChIP–chip analysis using 10,000 human cells. Biotechniques 43, 791–797 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• O'Neill, L. P., VerMilyea, M. D. & Turner, B. M. Epigenetic characterization of the early embryo with a chromatin immunoprecipitation protocol applicable to small cell populations. Nature Genet. 38, 835–841 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Dahl, J. A. & Collas, P. Q2ChIP, a quick and quantitative chromatin immunoprecipitation assay, unravels epigenetic dynamics of developmentally regulated genes in human carcinoma cells. Stem Cells 25, 1037–1046 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Attema, J. L. et al. Epigenetic characterization of hematopoietic stem cell differentiation using miniChIP and bisulfite sequencing analysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 12371–12376 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Xu, H., Wei, C.-L., Lin, F. & Sung, W.-K. An HMM approach to genome-wide identification of differential histone modification sites from ChIP–seq data. Bioinformatics 24, 2344–2349 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Jothi, R., Cuddapah, S., Barski, A., Cui, K. & Zhao, K. Genome-wide identification of in vivo protein–DNA binding sites from ChIP–seq data. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 5221–5231 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hoffman, B. G. & Jones, S. J. Genome-wide identification of DNA–protein interactions using chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with flow cell sequencing. J. Endocrinol. 201, 1–13 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar