A clinician's guide to microbiome analysis (original) (raw)

• Manichanh, C., Borruel, N., Casellas, F. & Guarner, F. The gut microbiota in IBD. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 9, 599–608 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Salonen, A., de Vos, W. M. & Palva, A. Gastrointestinal microbiota in irritable bowel syndrome: present state and perspectives. Microbiology 156, 3205–3215 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tang, W. H. et al. Intestinal microbial metabolism of phosphatidylcholine and cardiovascular risk. N. Engl. J. Med. 368, 1575–1584 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Pedersen, H. K. et al. Human gut microbes impact host serum metabolome and insulin sensitivity. Nature 535, 376–381 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sears, C. L. & Garrett, W. S. Microbes, microbiota, and colon cancer. Cell Host Microbe 15, 317–328 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Marchesi, J. R. & Ravel, J. The vocabulary of microbiome research: a proposal. Microbiome 3, 31 (2015).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Costello, E. K., Stagaman, K., Dethlefsen, L., Bohannan, B. J. & Relman, D. A. The application of ecological theory toward an understanding of the human microbiome. Science 336, 1255–1262 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Cho, I. et al. Antibiotics in early life alter the murine colonic microbiome and adiposity. Nature 488, 621–626 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Dethlefsen, L., Huse, S., Sogin, M. L. & Relman, D. A. The pervasive effects of an antibiotic on the human gut microbiota, as revealed by deep 16S rRNA sequencing. PLoS Biol. 6, e280 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Petrosino, J. F., Highlander, S., Luna, R. A., Gibbs, R. A. & Versalovic, J. Metagenomic pyrosequencing and microbial identification. Clin. Chem. 55, 856–866 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Acinas, S. G., Marcelino, L. A., Klepac-Ceraj, V. & Polz, M. F. Divergence and redundancy of 16S rRNA sequences in genomes with multiple rrn operons. J. Bacteriol. 186, 2629–2635 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Neefs, J. M., Van de Peer, Y., De Rijk, P., Chapelle, S. & De Wachter, R. Compilation of small ribosomal subunit RNA structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 3025–3049 (1993).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Claesson, M. J. et al. Comparison of two next-generation sequencing technologies for resolving highly complex microbiota composition using tandem variable 16S rRNA gene regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, e200 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Clooney, A. G. et al. Comparing apples and oranges?: Next generation sequencing and its impact on microbiome analysis. PLoS ONE 11, e0148028 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Findley, K. et al. Topographic diversity of fungal and bacterial communities in human skin. Nature 498, 367–370 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lavelle, A. et al. Spatial variation of the colonic microbiota in patients with ulcerative colitis and control volunteers. Gut 64, 1553–1561 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Huse, S. M. et al. Comparison of brush and biopsy sampling methods of the ileal pouch for assessment of mucosa-associated microbiota of human subjects. Microbiome 2, 5 (2014).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chiodini, R. J. et al. Microbial population differentials between mucosal and submucosal intestinal tissues in advanced crohn's disease of the ileum. PLoS ONE 10, e0134382 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Watt, E. et al. Extending colonic mucosal microbiome analysis-assessment of colonic lavage as a proxy for endoscopic colonic biopsies. Microbiome 4, 61 (2016).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Budding, A. E. et al. Rectal swabs for analysis of the intestinal microbiota. PLoS ONE 9, e101344 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Shobar, R. M. et al. The effects of bowel preparation on microbiota-related metrics differ in health and in inflammatory bowel disease and for the mucosal and luminal microbiota compartments. Clin. Transl Gastroenterol. 7, e143 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Gevers, D. et al. The treatment-naive microbiome in new-onset Crohn's disease. Cell Host Microbe 15, 382–392 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Flemer, B. et al. Tumour-associated and non-tumour-associated microbiota in colorectal cancer. Gut http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309595 (2016).
• Gorzelak, M. A. et al. Methods for improving human gut microbiome data by reducing variability through sample processing and storage of stool. PLoS ONE 10, e0134802 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Cardona, S. et al. Storage conditions of intestinal microbiota matter in metagenomic analysis. BMC Microbiol. 12, 158 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bahl, M. I., Bergstrom, A. & Licht, T. R. Freezing fecal samples prior to DNA extraction affects the Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio determined by downstream quantitative PCR analysis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 329, 193–197 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Shaw, A. G. et al. Latitude in sample handling and storage for infant faecal microbiota studies: the elephant in the room? Microbiome 4, 40 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40168-016-0186-x (2016).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Vogtmann, E. et al. Comparison of collection methods for fecal samples in microbiome studies. Am. J. Epidemiol. 185, 115–123 (2017).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hill, C. J. et al. Effect of room temperature transport vials on DNA quality and phylogenetic composition of faecal microbiota of elderly adults and infants. Microbiome 4, 19 (2016).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. L. et al. A robust ambient temperature collection and stabilization strategy: enabling worldwide functional studies of the human microbiome. Sci. Rep. 6, 31731 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Flores, R. et al. Collection media and delayed freezing effects on microbial composition of human stool. Microbiome 3, 33 (2015).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Choo, J. M., Leong, L. E. & Rogers, G. B. Sample storage conditions significantly influence faecal microbiome profiles. Scientif. Rep. 5, 16350 (2015).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Sherker, A. R., Cherepanov, V., Alvandi, Z., Ramos, R. & Feld, J. J. Optimal preservation of liver biopsy samples for downstream translational applications. Hepatol. Int. 7, 758–766 (2013).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Persson, S., de Boer, R. F., Kooistra-Smid, A. M. & Olsen, K. E. Five commercial DNA extraction systems tested and compared on a stool sample collection. Diagnost. Microbiol. Infecti. Dis. 69, 240–244 (2011).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Yuan, S., Cohen, D. B., Ravel, J., Abdo, Z. & Forney, L. J. Evaluation of methods for the extraction and purification of DNA from the human microbiome. PLoS ONE 7, e33865 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Li, F., Hullar, M. A. & Lampe, J. W. Optimization of terminal restriction fragment polymorphism (TRFLP) analysis of human gut microbiota. J. Microbiol. Methods 68, 303–311 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ariefdjohan, M. W., Savaiano, D. A. & Nakatsu, C. H. Comparison of DNA extraction kits for PCR-DGGE analysis of human intestinal microbial communities from fecal specimens. Nutr. J. 9, 23 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Becker, L., Steglich, M., Fuchs, S., Werner, G. & Nubel, U. Comparison of six commercial kits to extract bacterial chromosome and plasmid DNA for MiSeq sequencing. Scientif. Rep. 6, 28063 (2016).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Mirsepasi, H. et al. Microbial diversity in fecal samples depends on DNA extraction method: easyMag DNA extraction compared to QIAamp DNA stool mini kit extraction. BMC Res. Notes 7, 50 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wesolowska-Andersen, A. et al. Choice of bacterial DNA extraction method from fecal material influences community structure as evaluated by metagenomic analysis. Microbiome 2, 19 (2014).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Gerasimidis, K. et al. The effect of DNA extraction methodology on gut microbiota research applications. BMC Res. Notes 9, 365 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hart, M. L., Meyer, A., Johnson, P. J. & Ericsson, A. C. Comparative evaluation of DNA extraction methods from feces of multiple host species for downstream next-generation sequencing. PLoS ONE 10, e0143334 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kennedy, N. A. et al. The impact of different DNA extraction kits and laboratories upon the assessment of human gut microbiota composition by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. PLoS ONE 9, e88982 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Salter, S. J. et al. Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses. BMC Biol. 12, 87 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-014-0087-z (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lauder, A. P. et al. Comparison of placenta samples with contamination controls does not provide evidence for a distinct placenta microbiota. Microbiome 4, 29 (2016).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Perez-Munoz, M. E., Arrieta, M. C., Ramer-Tait, A. E. & Walter, J. A critical assessment of the “sterile womb” and “in utero colonization” hypotheses: implications for research on the pioneer infant microbiome. Microbiome 5, 48 (2017).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Edri, S. & Tuller, T. Quantifying the effect of ribosomal density on mRNA stability. PLoS ONE 9, e102308 (2014).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Goodwin, S., McPherson, J. D. & McCombie, W. R. Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies. Nature reviews. Genetics 17, 333–351 (2016).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Treangen, T. J. et al. MetAMOS: a modular and open source metagenomic assembly and analysis pipeline. Genome Biol. 14, R2 (2013).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Namiki, T., Hachiya, T., Tanaka, H. & Sakakibara, Y. MetaVelvet: an extension of Velvet assembler to de novo metagenome assembly from short sequence reads. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, e155 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Luo, R. et al. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. GigaScience 1, 18 (2012).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Compeau, P. E. C., Pevzner, P. A. & Tesla, G. How to apply de Bruijn graphs to genome assembly. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 987–991 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Simpson, J. T. et al. ABySS: a parallel assembler for short read sequence data. Genome Res. 19, 1117–1123 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Peng, Y., Leung, H. C., Yiu, S. M. & Chin, F. Y. IDBA-UD: a de novo assembler for single-cell and metagenomic sequencing data with highly uneven depth. Bioinformatics 28, 1420–1428 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Afiahayati, Sato, K. & Sakakibara, Y. MetaVelvet-SL: an extension of the Velvet assembler to a de novo metagenomic assembler utilizing supervised learning. DNA Res.: Int. J. Rapid Publ. Rep. Genes Genomes 22, 69–77 (2015).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Teeling, H., Waldmann, J., Lombardot, T., Bauer, M. & Glockner, F. O. TETRA: a web-service and a stand-alone program for the analysis and comparison of tetranucleotide usage patterns in DNA sequences. BMC Bioinformat. 5, 163 (2004).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Patil, K. R., Roune, L. & McHardy, A. C. The PhyloPythiaS web server for taxonomic assignment of metagenome sequences. PLoS ONE 7, e38581 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wood, D. E. & Salzberg, S. L. Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol. 15, R46 (2014).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Truong, D. T. et al. MetaPhlAn2 for enhanced metagenomic taxonomic profiling. Nature Methods 12, 902–903 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Brady, A. & Salzberg, S. L. Phymm and PhymmBL: metagenomic phylogenetic classification with interpolated Markov models. Nature Methods 6, 673–676 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Leung, H., Yiu, S. & Chin, F. MetaCluster-TA: taxonomic annotation for metagenomic data based on assembly-assisted binning. BMC Genom. 15 (Suppl. 1), S12 (2014).
  Article Google Scholar
• Wu, M. & Scott, A. J. Phylogenomic analysis of bacterial and archaeal sequences with AMPHORA2. Bioinformatics 28, 1033–1034 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lin, H. H. & Liao, Y. C. Accurate binning of metagenomic contigs via automated clustering sequences using information of genomic signatures and marker genes. Scientif. Rep. 6, 24175 (2016).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Peabody, M. A., Van Rossum, T., Lo, R. & Brinkman, F. S. Evaluation of shotgun metagenomics sequence classification methods using in silico and in vitro simulated communities. BMC Bioinformat. 16, 363 (2015).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Ounit, R., Wanamaker, S., Close, T. J. & Lonardi, S. CLARK: fast and accurate classification of metagenomic and genomic sequences using discriminative k-mers. BMC Genom. 16, 236 (2015).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Lindgreen, S., Adair, K. L. & Gardner, P. P. An evaluation of the accuracy and speed of metagenome analysis tools. Scientif. Rep. 6, 19233 (2016).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Zhu, W., Lomsadze, A. & Borodovsky, M. Ab initio gene identification in metagenomic sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, e132 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Rho, M., Tang, H. & Ye, Y. FragGeneScan: predicting genes in short and error-prone reads. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, e191 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hyatt, D., LoCascio, P. F., Hauser, L. J. & Uberbacher, E. C. Gene and translation initiation site prediction in metagenomic sequences. Bioinformatics 28, 2223–2230 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410 (1990).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Huerta-Cepas, J. et al. eggNOG 4.5: a hierarchical orthology framework with improved functional annotations for eukaryotic, prokaryotic and viral sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D286–D293 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tatusov, R. L. et al. The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics 4, 41 (2003).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 27–30 (2000).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Finn, R. D. et al. Pfam: the protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D222–230 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Haft, D. H., Selengut, J. D. & White, O. The TIGRFAMs database of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 371–373 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hunter, S. et al. InterPro: the integrative protein signature database. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D211–D215 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Meyer, F. et al. The metagenomics RAST server - a public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes. BMC Bioinformat. 9, 386 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Seshadri, R., Kravitz, S. A., Smarr, L., Gilna, P. & Frazier, M. CAMERA: a community resource for metagenomics. PLoS Biol. 5, e75 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hunter, S. et al. EBI metagenomics—a new resource for the analysis and archiving of metagenomic data. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D600–606 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Caporaso, J. G. et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nature Methods 7, 335–336 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Schloss, P. D. et al. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 7537–7541 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Edgar, R. C. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nature Methods 10, 996–998 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Plummer, E., Twin, J., Bulach, D. M., Garland, S. M. & Tabrizi, S. N. A comparison of three bioinformatics pipelines for the analysis of preterm gut microbiota using 16S rRNA gene sequencing data. J. Proteomics Bioinform, 8, 283–291 (2015).
  Article Google Scholar
• Westcott, S. L. & Schloss, P. D. de novo clustering methods outperform reference-based methods for assigning 16S rRNA gene sequences to operational taxonomic units. PeerJ 3, e1487 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Jervis-Bardy, J. et al. Deriving accurate microbiota profiles from human samples with low bacterial content through post-sequencing processing of Illumina MiSeq data. Microbiome 3, 19 (2015).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kopylova, E. et al. Open-source sequence clustering methods improve the state of the art. mSystems 1, e00003–00015 (2016).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Edgar, R. C., Haas, B. J., Clemente, J. C., Quince, C. & Knight, R. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27, 2194–2200 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Haas, B. J. et al. Chimeric 16S rRNA sequence formation and detection in Sanger and 454-pyrosequenced PCR amplicons. Genome Res. 21, 494–504 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wang, Q., Garrity, G. M., Tiedje, J. M. & Cole, J. R. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 5261–5267 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• DeSantis, T. Z. et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 5069–5072 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Maidak, B. L. et al. The RDP-II (Ribosomal Database Project). Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 173–174 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Koljalg, U. et al. UNITE: a database providing web-based methods for the molecular identification of ectomycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 166, 1063–1068 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Allard, G., Ryan, F. J., Jeffery, I. B. & Claesson, M. J. SPINGO: a rapid species-classifier for microbial amplicon sequences. BMC Bioinformat. 16, 324 (2015).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Edgar, R. C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26, 2460–2461 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Chen, W., Zhang, C. K., Cheng, Y., Zhang, S. & Zhao, H. A comparison of methods for clustering 16S rRNA sequences into OTUs. PLoS ONE 8, e70837 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nature Methods 13, 581–583 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Huson, D. H. et al. MEGAN Community Edition — Interactive exploration and analysis of large-scale microbiome sequencing data. PLoS Computat. Biol. 12, e1004957 (2016).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE 8, e61217 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Langille, M. G. et al. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nature Biotechnol. 31, 814–821 (2013).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Asshauer, K. P., Wemheuer, B., Daniel, R. & Meinicke, P. Tax4Fun: predicting functional profiles from metagenomic 16S rRNA data. Bioinformatics 31, 2882–2884 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• van Nood, E. et al. Duodenal infusion of donor feces for recurrent Clostridium difficile. N. Engl. J. Med. 368, 407–415 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Le Chatelier, E. et al. Richness of human gut microbiome correlates with metabolic markers. Nature 500, 541–546 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Claesson, M. J. et al. Gut microbiota composition correlates with diet and health in the elderly. Nature 488, 178–184 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Olle, B. Medicines from microbiota. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 309–315 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• US Food and Drug Administration. Early Clinical Trials With Live Biotherapeutic Products: Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Control Information; Guidance for Industry (FDA, 2016).
• Goldberg, B., Sichtig, H., Geyer, C., Ledeboer, N. & Weinstock, G. M. Making the leap from research laboratory to clinic: challenges and opportunities for next-generation sequencing in infectious disease diagnostics. mBio 6, e01888–e01815 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wilson, M. R. et al. Acute west nile virus meningoencephalitis diagnosed via metagenomic deep sequencing of cerebrospinal fluid in a renal transplant patient. Am. J. Transplant. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajt.14058 (2016).
• Zeevi, D. et al. Personalized nutrition by prediction of glycemic responses. Cell 163, 1079–1094 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bauer, E., Laczny, C. C., Magnusdottir, S., Wilmes, P. & Thiele, I. Phenotypic differentiation of gastrointestinal microbes is reflected in their encoded metabolic repertoires. Microbiome 3, 55 (2015).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Heinken, A. & Thiele, I. Systems biology of host-microbe metabolomics. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med. 7, 195–219 (2015).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• [No authors listed.] Babraham Bioinformatics http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/
• [No authors listed.] Hannonlab http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit/index.html
• Schmieder, R. & Edwards, R. Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 27, 863–864 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Patel, R. K. & Jain, M. NGS QC Toolkit: a toolkit for quality control of next generation sequencing data. PLoS ONE 7, e30619 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zhou, Q., Su, X., Jing, G. & Ning, K. Meta-QC-Chain: comprehensive and fast quality control method for metagenomic data. Genom. Proteom. Bioinformat. 12, 52–56 (2014).
  Article Google Scholar
• Peng, Y., Leung, H. C., Yiu, S. M. & Chin, F. Y. Meta-IDBA: a de novo assembler for metagenomic data. Bioinformatics 27, i94–i101 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zerbino, D. R. & Birney, E. Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs. Genome Res. 18, 821–829 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Boisvert, S., Raymond, F., Godzaridis, E., Laviolette, F. & Corbeil, J. Ray Meta: scalable de novo metagenome assembly and profiling. Genome Biol. 13, R122 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Li, D., Liu, C. M., Luo, R., Sadakane, K. & Lam, T. W. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 31, 1674–1676 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kang, D. D., Froula, J., Egan, R. & Wang, Z. MetaBAT, an efficient tool for accurately reconstructing single genomes from complex microbial communities. PeerJ 3, e1165 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Haider, B. et al. Omega: an overlap-graph de novo assembler for metagenomics. Bioinformatics 30, 2717–2722 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Reddy, R. M., Mohammed, M. H. & Mande, S. S. MetaCAA: a clustering-aided methodology for efficient assembly of metagenomic datasets. Genomics 103, 161–168 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nurk, S., Meleshko, D., Korobeynikov, A. & Pevzner, P. metaSPAdes: a new versatile de novo metagenomics assembler. arXiv 1604.03071 (2016).
• Ye, Y. & Tang, H. An ORFome assembly approach to metagenomics sequences analysis. J. Bioinformat. Computat. Biol. 7, 455–471 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Yu, F., Sun, Y., Liu, L. & Farmerie, W. GSTaxClassifier: a genomic signature based taxonomic classifier for metagenomic data analysis. Bioinformation 4, 46–49 (2010).
  Article Google Scholar
• Sunagawa, S. et al. Metagenomic species profiling using universal phylogenetic marker genes. Nature Methods 10, 1196–1199 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ounit, R. & Lonardi, S. Higher classification sensitivity of short metagenomic reads with CLARK-S. Bioinformatics http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw542 (2016).
• Diaz, N. N., Krause, L., Goesmann, A., Niehaus, K. & Nattkemper, T. W. TACOA: taxonomic classification of environmental genomic fragments using a kernelized nearest neighbor approach. BMC Bioinformat. 10, 56 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Rosen, G. L., Reichenberger, E. R. & Rosenfeld, A. M. NBC: the Naive Bayes Classification tool webserver for taxonomic classification of metagenomic reads. Bioinformatics 27, 127–129 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Stark, M., Berger, S. A., Stamatakis, A. & von Mering, C. MLTreeMap—accurate Maximum Likelihood placement of environmental DNA sequences into taxonomic and functional reference phylogenies. BMC Genom. 11, 461 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Freitas, T. A., Li, P. E., Scholz, M. B. & Chain, P. S. Accurate read-based metagenome characterization using a hierarchical suite of unique signatures. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e69 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Gerlach, W. & Stoye, J. Taxonomic classification of metagenomic shotgun sequences with CARMA3. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, e91 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ames, S. K. et al. Scalable metagenomic taxonomy classification using a reference genome database. Bioinformatics 29, 2253–2260 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Droge, J., Gregor, I. & McHardy, A. C. Taxator-tk: precise taxonomic assignment of metagenomes by fast approximation of evolutionary neighborhoods. Bioinformatics 31, 817–824 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• MacDonald, N. J., Parks, D. H. & Beiko, R. G. Rapid identification of high-confidence taxonomic assignments for metagenomic data. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, e111 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Monzoorul Haque, M., Ghosh, T. S., Komanduri, D. & Mande, S. S. SOrt-ITEMS: sequence orthology based approach for improved taxonomic estimation of metagenomic sequences. Bioinformatics 25, 1722–1730 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Mohammed, M. H., Ghosh, T. S., Singh, N. K. & Mande, S. S. SPHINX—an algorithm for taxonomic binning of metagenomic sequences. Bioinformatics 27, 22–30 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nalbantoglu, O. U., Way, S. F., Hinrichs, S. H. & Sayood, K. RAIphy: phylogenetic classification of metagenomics samples using iterative refinement of relative abundance index profiles. BMC Bioinformat. 12, 41 (2011).
  Article Google Scholar
• Koslicki, D., Foucart, S. & Rosen, G. WGSQuikr: fast whole-genome shotgun metagenomic classification. PLoS ONE 9, e91784 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chan, C. K., Hsu, A. L., Halgamuge, S. K. & Tang, S. L. Binning sequences using very sparse labels within a metagenome. BMC Bioinformat. 9, 215 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Schreiber, F., Gumrich, P., Daniel, R. & Meinicke, P. Treephyler: fast taxonomic profiling of metagenomes. Bioinformatics 26, 960–961 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Weber, M. et al. Practical application of self-organizing maps to interrelate biodiversity and functional data in NGS-based metagenomics. ISME J. 5, 918–928 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Pati, A., Heath, L. S., Kyrpides, N. C. & Ivanova, N. ClaMS: a classifier for metagenomic sequences. Standards Genom. Sci. 5, 248–253 (2011).
  Article Google Scholar
• Davenport, C. F. et al. Genometa—a fast and accurate classifier for short metagenomic shotgun reads. PLoS ONE 7, e41224 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sharma, A. K., Gupta, A., Kumar, S., Dhakan, D. B. & Sharma, V. K. Woods: a fast and accurate functional annotator and classifier of genomic and metagenomic sequences. Genomics 106, 1–6 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ghosh, T. S., Monzoorul Haque, M. & Mande, S. S. DiScRIBinATE: a rapid method for accurate taxonomic classification of metagenomic sequences. BMC Bioinformat. 11 (Suppl. 7), S14 (2010).
  Article Google Scholar
• Liu, J. et al. Composition-based classification of short metagenomic sequences elucidates the landscapes of taxonomic and functional enrichment of microorganisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e3 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Mohammed, M. H. et al. INDUS - a composition-based approach for rapid and accurate taxonomic classification of metagenomic sequences. BMC Genom. 12 (Suppl. 3), S4 (2011).
  Article Google Scholar
• Sharma, V. K., Kumar, N., Prakash, T. & Taylor, T. D. Fast and accurate taxonomic assignments of metagenomic sequences using MetaBin. PLoS ONE 7, e34030 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Liu, B., Gibbons, T., Ghodsi, M., Treangen, T. & Pop, M. Accurate and fast estimation of taxonomic profiles from metagenomic shotgun sequences. BMC Genom. 12 (Suppl. 2), S4 (2011).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Rasheed, Z. & Rangwala, H. Metagenomic taxonomic classification using extreme learning machines. J. Bioinformat. Computat. Biol. 10, 1250015 (2012).
  Article Google Scholar
• Ander, C., Schulz-Trieglaff, O. B., Stoye, J. & Cox, A. J. metaBEETL: high-throughput analysis of heterogeneous microbial populations from shotgun DNA sequences. BMC Bioinformat. 14 (Suppl. 5), S2 (2013).
  Article Google Scholar
• Porter, M. S. & Beiko, R. G. SPANNER: taxonomic assignment of sequences using pyramid matching of similarity profiles. Bioinformatics 29, 1858–1864 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Piro, V. C., Lindner, M. S. & Renard, B. Y. DUDes: a top-down taxonomic profiler for metagenomics. Bioinformatics 32, 2272–2280 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Menzel, P., Ng, K. L. & Krogh, A. Fast and sensitive taxonomic classification for metagenomics with Kaiju. Nature Commun. 7, 11257 (2016).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Wu, Y. W., Tang, Y. H., Tringe, S. G., Simmons, B. A. & Singer, S. W. MaxBin: an automated binning method to recover individual genomes from metagenomes using an expectation-maximization algorithm. Microbiome 2, 26 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Petrenko, P., Lobb, B., Kurtz, D. A., Neufeld, J. D. & Doxey, A. C. MetAnnotate: function-specific taxonomic profiling and comparison of metagenomes. BMC Biol. 13, 92 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Luo, C., Rodriguez, R. L. & Konstantinidis, K. T. MyTaxa: an advanced taxonomic classifier for genomic and metagenomic sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, e73 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Jiang, H., An, L., Lin, S. M., Feng, G. & Qiu, Y. A statistical framework for accurate taxonomic assignment of metagenomic sequencing reads. PLoS ONE 7, e46450 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Klingenberg, H., Asshauer, K. P., Lingner, T. & Meinicke, P. Protein signature-based estimation of metagenomic abundances including all domains of life and viruses. Bioinformatics 29, 973–980 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Reddy, R. M., Mohammed, M. H. & Mande, S. S. TWARIT: an extremely rapid and efficient approach for phylogenetic classification of metagenomic sequences. Gene 505, 259–265 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hou, T. et al. Classification of metagenomics data at lower taxonomic level using a robust supervised classifier. Evol. Bioinformat. Online 11, 3–10 S20523 (2015).
  CAS Google Scholar
• Kristiansson, E., Hugenholtz, P. & Dalevi, D. ShotgunFunctionalizeR: an R-package for functional comparison of metagenomes. Bioinformatics 25, 2737–2738 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Li, W. Analysis and comparison of very large metagenomes with fast clustering and functional annotation. BMC Bioinformat. 10, 359 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Kelley, D. R., Liu, B., Delcher, A. L., Pop, M. & Salzberg, S. L. Gene prediction with Glimmer for metagenomic sequences augmented by classification and clustering. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, e9 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hoff, K. J., Lingner, T., Meinicke, P. & Tech, M. Orphelia: predicting genes in metagenomic sequencing reads. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, W101–W105 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Guo, J., Hu, G. & Zhu, H. Gene prediction in metagenomic fragments based on the SVM algorithm. BMC Bioinformat. 14 (Suppl. 5), S12 (2013).
  Article Google Scholar
• van der Veen, B. E., Harris, H. M., O'Toole, P. W. & Claesson, M. J. Metaphor: finding bi-directional best hit homology relationships in (meta)genomic datasets. Genomics 104, 459–463 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Liu, B. & Pop, M. MetaPath: identifying differentially abundant metabolic pathways in metagenomic datasets. BMC Proc. 5 (Suppl. 2), S9 (2011).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Overbeek, R. et al. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D206–D214 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Powell, S. et al. eggNOG v4.0: nested orthology inference across 3686 organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D231–D239 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Abubucker, S. et al. Metabolic reconstruction for metagenomic data and its application to the human microbiome. PLoS Computat. Biol. 8, e1002358 (2012).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Segata, N. et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 12, R60 (2011).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Markowitz, V. M. et al. IMG/M 4 version of the integrated metagenome comparative analysis system. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D568–573 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wu, S., Zhu, Z., Fu, L., Niu, B. & Li, W. WebMGA: a customizable web server for fast metagenomic sequence analysis. BMC Genom. 12, 444 (2011).
  Article Google Scholar
• Goll, J. et al. METAREP: JCVI metagenomics reports—an open source tool for high-performance comparative metagenomics. Bioinformatics 26, 2631–2632 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Su, X., Pan, W., Song, B., Xu, J. & Ning, K. Parallel-META 2.0: enhanced metagenomic data analysis with functional annotation, high performance computing and advanced visualization. PloS one 9, e89323 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kultima, J. R. et al. MOCAT: a metagenomics assembly and gene prediction toolkit. PLoS ONE 7, e47656 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Afgan, E. et al. The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2016 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W3–W10 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Fosso, B. et al. BioMaS: a modular pipeline for Bioinformatic analysis of Metagenomic AmpliconS. BMC Bioinformat. 16, 203 (2015).
  Article Google Scholar
• Angly, F. et al. PHACCS, an online tool for estimating the structure and diversity of uncultured viral communities using metagenomic information. BMC Bioinformat. 6, 41 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Arumugam, M., Harrington, E. D., Foerstner, K. U., Raes, J. & Bork, P. SmashCommunity: a metagenomic annotation and analysis tool. Bioinformatics 26, 2977–2978 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Schloss, P. D. & Handelsman, J. Introducing DOTUR, a computer program for defining operational taxonomic units and estimating species richness. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 1501–1506 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Li, W. & Godzik, A. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 22, 1658–1659 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hao, X., Jiang, R. & Chen, T. Clustering 16S rRNA for OTU prediction: a method of unsupervised Bayesian clustering. Bioinformatics 27, 611–618 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Cai, Y. & Sun, Y. ESPRIT-Tree: hierarchical clustering analysis of millions of 16S rRNA pyrosequences in quasilinear computational time. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, e95 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ghodsi, M., Liu, B. & Pop, M. DNACLUST: accurate and efficient clustering of phylogenetic marker genes. BMC Bioinformat. 12, 271 (2011).
  Article Google Scholar
• Russell, D. J., Way, S. F., Benson, A. K. & Sayood, K. A grammar-based distance metric enables fast and accurate clustering of large sets of 16S sequences. BMC Bioinformat. 11, 601 (2010).
  Article Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Yao, J., Sun, Y. & Mai, V. M-Pick, a modularity-based method for OTU picking of 16S rRNA sequences. BMC Bioinformat. 14, 43 (2013).
  Article Google Scholar
• Mahe, F., Rognes, T., Quince, C., de Vargas, C. & Dunthorn, M. Swarm v2: highly-scalable and high-resolution amplicon clustering. PeerJ 3, e1420 (2015).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Franzen, O. et al. Improved OTU-picking using long-read 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and generic hierarchical clustering. Microbiome 3, 43 (2015).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wei, Z. G. & Zhang, S. W. MtHc: a motif-based hierarchical method for clustering massive 16S rRNA sequences into OTUs. Mol. bioSystems 11, 1907–1913 (2015).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Mysara, M., Saeys, Y., Leys, N., Raes, J. & Monsieurs, P. CATCh, an ensemble classifier for chimera detection in 16S rRNA sequencing studies. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81, 1573–1584 (2015).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Soergel, D. A., Dey, N., Knight, R. & Brenner, S. E. Selection of primers for optimal taxonomic classification of environmental 16S rRNA gene sequences. ISME J. 6, 1440–1444 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chaudhary, N., Sharma, A. K., Agarwal, P., Gupta, A. & Sharma, V. K. 16S classifier: a tool for fast and accurate taxonomic classification of 16S rRNA hypervariable regions in metagenomic datasets. PLoS ONE 10, e0116106 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Stoddard, S. F., Smith, B. J., Hein, R., Roller, B. R. & Schmidt, T. M. rrnDB: improved tools for interpreting rRNA gene abundance in bacteria and archaea and a new foundation for future development. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D593–D598 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Jaziri, F. et al. PhylOPDb: a 16S rRNA oligonucleotide probe database for prokaryotic identification. Database (Oxford) http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/database/bau036 (2014).
• Ritari, J., Salojarvi, J., Lahti, L. & de Vos, W. M. Improved taxonomic assignment of human intestinal 16S rRNA sequences by a dedicated reference database. BMC Genom. 16, 1056 (2015).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Lozupone, C., Hamady, M. & Knight, R. UniFrac—an online tool for comparing microbial community diversity in a phylogenetic context. BMC Bioinformat. 7, 371 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Gilmore, R. D., Cieplak, W., Policastro, P. F. & Hackstadt, T. The 120 kilodalton outer membrane (rOmpB) of Rickettsia rickettsii is encoded by an unusually long open reading frame: evidence for protein processing from a large precursor. Mol. Microbiol. 5, 2361–2370 (1991).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Paulson, J. N., Stine, O. C., Bravo, H. C. & Pop, M. Differential abundance analysis for microbial marker-gene surveys. Nature Methods 10, 1200–1202 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Angly, F. E. et al. CopyRighter: a rapid tool for improving the accuracy of microbial community profiles through lineage-specific gene copy number correction. Microbiome 2, 11 (2014).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Beck, D., Settles, M. & Foster, J. A. OTUbase: an R infrastructure package for operational taxonomic unit data. Bioinformatics 27, 1700–1701 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Seguritan, V. & Rohwer, F. FastGroup: a program to dereplicate libraries of 16S rDNA sequences. BMC Bioinformat. 2, 9 (2001).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Giongo, A. et al. PANGEA: pipeline for analysis of next generation amplicons. ISME J. 4, 852–861 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kumar, S. et al. CLOTU: an online pipeline for processing and clustering of 454 amplicon reads into OTUs followed by taxonomic annotation. BMC Bioinformat. 12, 182 (2011).
  Article Google Scholar
• Nebel, M. E. et al. JAGUC—a software package for environmental diversity analyses. J. Bioinformat. Computat. Biol. 9, 749–773 (2011).
  Article Google Scholar
• Albanese, D., Fontana, P., De Filippo, C., Cavalieri, D. & Donati, C. MICCA: a complete and accurate software for taxonomic profiling of metagenomic data. Scientif. Rep. 5, 9743 (2015).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Weisman, D., Yasuda, M. & Bowen, J. L. FunFrame: functional gene ecological analysis pipeline. Bioinformatics 29, 1212–1214 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar