What are super-enhancers? (original) (raw)

• Banerji, J., Rusconi, S. & Schaffner, W. Expression of a β-globin gene is enhanced by remote SV40 DNA sequences. Cell 27, 299–308 (1981).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Neuberger, M.S. Expression and regulation of immunoglobulin heavy chain gene transfected into lymphoid cells. EMBO J. 2, 1373–1378 (1983).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Gillies, S.D., Morrison, S.L., Oi, V.T. & Tonegawa, S. A tissue-specific transcription enhancer element is located in the major intron of a rearranged immunoglobulin heavy chain gene. Cell 33, 717–728 (1983).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Banerji, J., Olson, L. & Schaffner, W. A lymphocyte-specific cellular enhancer is located downstream of the joining region in immunoglobulin heavy chain genes. Cell 33, 729–740 (1983).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lelli, K.M., Slattery, M. & Mann, R.S. Disentangling the many layers of eukaryotic transcriptional regulation. Annu. Rev. Genet. 46, 43–68 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Spitz, F. & Furlong, E.E.M. Transcription factors: from enhancer binding to developmental control. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 613–626 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bulger, M. & Groudine, M. Functional and mechanistic diversity of distal transcription enhancers. Cell 144, 327–339 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Shlyueva, D., Stampfel, G. & Stark, A. Transcriptional enhancers: from properties to genome-wide predictions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 272–286 (2014).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Deng, W. et al. Controlling long-range genomic interactions at a native locus by targeted tethering of a looping factor. Cell 149, 1233–1244 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Tolhuis, B., Palstra, R.J., Splinter, E., Grosveld, F. & de Laat, W. Looping and interaction between hypersensitive sites in the active β-globin locus. Mol. Cell 10, 1453–1465 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Visel, A. et al. ChIP-seq accurately predicts tissue-specific activity of enhancers. Nature 457, 854–858 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Thurman, R.E. et al. The accessible chromatin landscape of the human genome. Nature 489, 75–82 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 488, 57–60 (2012).
• Johnson, D.S., Mortazavi, A., Myers, R.M. & Wold, B. Genome-wide mapping of in vivo protein-DNA interactions. Science 316, 1497–1502 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Barski, A. et al. High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell 129, 823–837 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Heintzman, N.D. et al. Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome. Nat. Genet. 39, 311–318 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ernst, J. et al. Mapping and analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types. Nature 473, 43–49 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Rada-Iglesias, A. et al. A unique chromatin signature uncovers early developmental enhancers in humans. Nature 470, 279–283 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Creyghton, M.P. et al. Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 21931–21936 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zhu, J. et al. Genome-wide chromatin state transitions associated with developmental and environmental cues. Cell 152, 642–654 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Nord, A.S. et al. Rapid and pervasive changes in genome-wide enhancer usage during mammalian development. Cell 155, 1521–1531 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Whyte, W.A. et al. Master transcription factors and mediator establish super-enhancers at key cell identity genes. Cell 153, 307–319 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hnisz, D. et al. Super-enhancers in the control of cell identity and disease. Cell 155, 934–947 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lovén, J. et al. Selective inhibition of tumor oncogenes by disruption of super-enhancers. Cell 153, 320–334 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Parker, S.C.J. et al. Chromatin stretch enhancer states drive cell-specific gene regulation and harbor human disease risk variants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 17921–17926 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kagey, M.H. et al. Mediator and cohesin connect gene expression and chromatin architecture. Nature 467, 430–435 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Siersbæk, R. et al. Transcription factor cooperativity in early adipogenic hotspots and super-enhancers. Cell Rep. 7, 1443–1455 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Akhtar-Zaidi, B. et al. Epigenomic enhancer profiling defines a signature of colon cancer. Science 336, 736–739 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chapuy, B. et al. Discovery and characterization of super-enhancer–associated dependencies in diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Cancer Cell 24, 777–790 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Jang, M.K. et al. The bromodomain protein Brd4 is a positive regulatory component of P-TEFb and stimulates RNA polymerase II–dependent transcription. Mol. Cell 19, 523–534 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Dey, A., Chitsaz, F., Abbasi, A., Misteli, T. & Ozato, K. The double bromodomain protein Brd4 binds to acetylated chromatin during interphase and mitosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 8758–8763 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Dawson, M.A. et al. Inhibition of BET recruitment to chromatin as an effective treatment for _MLL_-fusion leukaemia. Nature 478, 529–533 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Delmore, J.E. et al. BET bromodomain inhibition as a therapeutic strategy to target c-Myc. Cell 146, 904–917 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Mertz, J.A. et al. Targeting MYC dependence in cancer by inhibiting BET bromodomains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 16669–16674 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zuber, J. et al. RNAi screen identifies Brd4 as a therapeutic target in acute myeloid leukaemia. Nature 478, 524–528 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Xiang, J.-F. et al. Human colorectal cancer–specific CCAT1-L lncRNA regulates long-range chromatin interactions at the MYC locus. Cell Res. 24, 513–531 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kwiatkowski, N. et al. Targeting transcription regulation in cancer with a covalent CDK7 inhibitor. Nature 511, 616–620 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Knoechel, B. et al. An epigenetic mechanism of resistance to targeted therapy in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat. Genet. 46, 364–370 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Shi, J. et al. Role of SWI/SNF in acute leukemia maintenance and enhancer-mediated Myc regulation. Genes Dev. 27, 2648–2662 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Northcott, P.A. et al. Enhancer hijacking activates GFI1 family oncogenes in medulloblastoma. Nature 511, 428–434 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Affer, M. et al. Promiscuous MYC locus rearrangements hijack enhancers but mostly super-enhancers to dysregulate MYC expression in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 28, 1725–1735 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Walker, B.A. et al. Translocations at 8q24 juxtapose MYC with genes that harbor superenhancers resulting in overexpression and poor prognosis in myeloma patients. Blood Cancer J. 4, e191 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Gröschel, S. et al. A single oncogenic enhancer rearrangement causes concomitant EVI1 and GATA2 deregulation in leukemia. Cell 157, 369–381 (2014).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Hayday, A.C. et al. Activation of a translocated human c-myc gene by an enhancer in the immunoglobulin heavy-chain locus. Nature 307, 334–340 (1984).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Taub, R. et al. Translocation of the c-myc gene into the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus in human Burkitt lymphoma and murine plasmacytoma cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79, 7837–7841 (1982).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Maurano, M.T. et al. Systematic localization of common disease-associated variation in regulatory DNA. Science 337, 1190–1195 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Pasquali, L. et al. Pancreatic islet enhancer clusters enriched in type 2 diabetes risk-associated variants. Nat. Genet. 46, 136–143 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Trynka, G. et al. Chromatin marks identify critical cell types for fine mapping complex trait variants. Nat. Genet. 45, 124–130 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Xie, W. et al. Epigenomic analysis of multilineage differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Cell 153, 1134–1148 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Li, Q., Peterson, K.R., Fang, X. & Stamatoyannopoulos, G. Locus control regions. Blood 100, 3077–3086 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Grosveld, F., van Assendelft, G.B., Greaves, D.R. & Kollias, G. Position-independent, high-level expression of the human β-globin gene in transgenic mice. Cell 51, 975–985 (1987).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gaulton, K.J. et al. A map of open chromatin in human pancreatic islets. Nat. Genet. 42, 255–259 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Song, L. et al. Open chromatin defined by DNaseI and FAIRE identifies regulatory elements that shape cell-type identity. Genome Res. 21, 1757–1767 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Corradin, O. et al. Combinatorial effects of multiple enhancer variants in linkage disequilibrium dictate levels of gene expression to confer susceptibility to common traits. Genome Res. 24, 1–13 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Perry, M.W., Boettiger, A.N., Bothma, J.P. & Levine, M. Shadow enhancers foster robustness of Drosophila gastrulation. Curr. Biol. 20, 1562–1567 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Frankel, N. et al. Phenotypic robustness conferred by apparently redundant transcriptional enhancers. Nature 466, 490–493 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Biggin, M.D. Animal transcription networks as highly connected, quantitative continua. Dev. Cell 21, 611–626 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Fisher, W.W. et al. DNA regions bound at low occupancy by transcription factors do not drive patterned reporter gene expression in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 21330–21335 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Junion, G. et al. A transcription factor collective defines cardiac cell fate and reflects lineage history. Cell 148, 473–486 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Carey, M., Lin, Y.S., Green, M.R. & Ptashne, M. A mechanism for synergistic activation of a mammalian gene by GAL4 derivatives. Nature 345, 361–364 (1990).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lewis, E.B. A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila. Nature 276, 565–570 (1978).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• McGinnis, W., Levine, M.S., Hafen, E., Kuroiwa, A. & Gehring, W.J. A conserved DNA sequence in homoeotic genes of the Drosophila Antennapedia and bithorax complexes. Nature 308, 428–433 (1984).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Pearson, J.C., Lemons, D. & McGinnis, W. Modulating Hox gene functions during animal body patterning. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 893–904 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Goto, T., Macdonald, P. & Maniatis, T. Early and late periodic patterns of even skipped expression are controlled by distinct regulatory elements that respond to different spatial cues. Cell 57, 413–422 (1989).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Harding, K., Hoey, T., Warrior, R. & Levine, M. Autoregulatory and gap gene response elements of the even-skipped promoter of Drosophila. EMBO J. 8, 1205–1212 (1989).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Park, D., Lee, Y., Bhupindersingh, G. & Iyer, V.R. Widespread misinterpretable ChIP-seq bias in yeast. PLoS ONE 8, e83506 (2013).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Teytelman, L., Thurtle, D.M., Rine, J. & van Oudenaarden, A. Highly expressed loci are vulnerable to misleading ChIP localization of multiple unrelated proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 18602–18607 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Fan, X. & Struhl, K. Where does Mediator bind in vivo? PLoS ONE 4, e5029 (2009).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Shalem, O. et al. Genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout screening in human cells. Science 343, 84–87 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar