At the heart of the chromosome: SMC proteins in action (original) (raw)

• Losada, A. & Hirano, T. Dynamic molecular linkers of the genome: the first decade of SMC proteins. Genes Dev. 19, 1269–1287 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nasmyth, K. & Haering, C. H. The structure and function of SMC and kleisin complexes. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 74, 595–648 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Peterson, C. L. The SMC family: novel motor proteins for chromosome condensation? Cell 79, 389–392 (1994).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hirano, T. Condensins: organizing and segregating the genome. Curr. Biol. 15, R265–R275 (2005).
• Haering, C. H. & Nasmyth, K. Building and breaking bridges between sister chromatids. BioEssays 25, 1178–1191 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lehmann, A. R. The role of SMC proteins in the responses to DNA damage. DNA Repair (Amst.) 4, 309–314 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Thanbichler, M., Wang, S. C. & Shapiro, L. The bacterial nucleoid: A highly organized and dynamic structure. J. Cell. Biochem. 96, 506–521 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Saitoh, N., Goldberg, I. G., Wood, E. R. & Earnshaw, W. C. ScII: an abundant chromosome scaffold protein is a member of a family of putative ATPases with an unusual predicted tertiary structure. J. Cell Biol. 127, 303–318 (1994). This study proposes, for the first time, that SMC proteins might be folded by antiparallel coiled-coil interactions, forming an ABC-like ATP-binding pocket at their ends.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Melby, T. E. G., Ciampaglio, C. N., Briscoe, G. & Erickson, H. P. The symmetrical structure of structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) and MukB proteins: long, antiparallel coiled coils, folded at a flexible hinge. J. Cell Biol. 142, 1595–1604 (1998). Electron microscopy shows that SMC proteins form a V-shaped dimer with two antiparallel coiled-coil arms.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Haering, C. H., Lowe, J., Hochwagen, A. & Nasmyth, K. Molecular architecture of SMC proteins and the yeast cohesin complex. Mol. Cell 9, 773–788 (2002). Biochemical and structural analyses reveal a tripartite ring-like structure of Smc1–Smc3–Scc1, providing a molecular basis for the ring model of sister-chromatid cohesion.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hirano, M. & Hirano, T. Hinge-mediated dimerization of SMC protein is essential for its dynamic interaction with DNA. EMBO J. 21, 5733–5744 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Matoba, K., Yamazoe, M., Mayanagi, K., Morikawa, K. & Hiraga, S. Comparison of MukB homodimer versus MukBEF complex molecular architectures by electron microscopy reveals a higher-order multimerization. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 333, 694–702 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Mascarenhas, J. et al. Dynamic assembly, localization and proteolysis of the Bacillus subtilis SMC complex. BMC Cell Biol. 6, 28 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Anderson, D. E., Losada, A., Erickson, H. P. & Hirano, T. Condensin and cohesin display different arm conformations with characteristic hinge angles. J. Cell Biol. 156, 419–424 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Yoshimura, S. H. et al. Condensin architecture and interaction with DNA: regulatory non-SMC subunits bind to the head of SMC heterodimer. Curr. Biol. 12, 508–513 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hirano, M. & Hirano, T. Positive and negative regulation of SMC–DNA interactions by ATP and accessory proteins. EMBO J. 23, 2664–2673 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Dervyn, E. et al. The bacterial condensin/cohesin-like protein complex acts in DNA repair and regulation of gene expression. Mol. Microbiol. 51, 1629–1640 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Yamazoe, M. et al. Complex formation of MukB, MukE and MukF proteins involved in chromosome partitioning in Escherichia coli. EMBO J. 18, 5873–5884 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Haering, C. H. et al. Structure and stability of cohesin's Smc1–kleisin interaction. Mol. Cell 15, 951–964 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lammens, A., Schele, A. & Hopfner, K.-P. Structural biochemistry of ATP-driven dimerization and DNA-stimulated activation of SMC ATPases. Curr. Biol. 14, 1778–1782 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hopfner, K.-P. et al. Structural biology of Rad50 ATPase: ATP-driven conformational control in DNA double-strand break repair and the ABC-ATPase superfamily. Cell 101, 789–800 (2000). Crystallization of the Rad50 head domain provides the first compelling evidence for the dimerization of two ABC domains in a nucleotide-sandwich manner.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Smith, P. C. et al. ATP binding to the motor domain from an ABC transporter drives formation of a nucleotide sandwich dimer. Mol. Cell 10, 139–149 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Locher, K. P., Lee, A. T. & Rees, D. C. The E. coli BtuCD structure: a framework for ABC transporter architecture and mechanism. Science 296, 1091–1098 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hirano, M., Anderson, D. E., Erickson, H. P. & Hirano, T. Bimodal activation of SMC ATPase by intra- and inter-molecular interactions. EMBO J. 20, 3238–3250 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hopfner, K.-P. et al. The Rad50 zinc-hook is a structure joining Mre11 complexes in DNA recombination and repair. Nature 418, 562–566 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Chiu, A., Revenkova, E. & Jessberger, R. DNA interaction and dimerization of eukaryotic SMC hinge domains. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 26233–26242 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sergeant, J. et al. Composition and architecture of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe Rad18 (Smc5–6) complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 172–184 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hirano, M. & Hirano, T. Opening closed arms: long-distance activation of SMC ATPase by hinge–DNA interaction. Mol. Cell 21, 175–186 (2006). Comprehensive mutational analyses of BsSMC demonstrate that the hinge domain has a crucial role in modulating the mechanochemical cycle of SMC proteins.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hirano, M. & Hirano, T. ATP-dependent aggregation of single-stranded DNA by a bacterial SMC homodimer. EMBO J. 17, 7139–7148 (1998).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Sharma, S., Quiocho, F. A. & Davidson, A. L. Trapping the transition state of an ATP-binding cassette transporter: evidence for a concerted mechanism of maltose transport. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 98, 1525–1530 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Moreno-Herrero, F. et al. Mesoscale conformational changes in the DNA-repair complex Rad50–Mre11–Nbs1 upon binding DNA. Nature 437, 440–443 (2005). Atomic force microscopy provides evidence that DNA binding by the Rad50 head domains might induce a conformational change in its coiled-coil domains, converting the apex–apex interaction from the intramolecular mode to the intermolecular mode.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Mascarenhas, J., Soppa, J., Strunnikov, A. V. & Graumann, P. L. Cell cycle-dependent localization of two novel prokaryotic chromosome segregation and condensation proteins in Bacillus subtilis that interact with SMC protein. EMBO J. 21, 3108–3118 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Soppa, J. et al. Discovery of two novel families of proteins that are proposed to interact with prokaryotic SMC proteins, and characterization of the Bacillus subtilis family members ScpA and ScpB. Mol. Microbiol. 45, 59–71 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Volkov, A., Mascarenhas, J., Andrei-Selmer, C., Ulrich, H. D. & Graumann, P. L. A prokaryotic condensin/cohesin-like complex can actively compact chromosomes from a single position on the nucleoid and binds to DNA as a ring-like structure. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 5638–5650 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Schleiffer, A. et al. Kleisins: a superfamily of bacterial and eukaryotic SMC protein partners. Mol. Cell 11, 571–575 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Fennell-Fezzie, R., Gradia, S. D., Akey, D. & Berger, J. M. The MukF subunit of Escherichia coli condensin: architecture and functional relationship to kleisins. EMBO J. 24, 1921–1930 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kim, J.-S. et al. Crystal structure of ScpB from Chlorobium tepidum, a protein involved in chromosome partitioning. Protein 62, 322–328 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Hopfner, K.-P. & Tainer, J. A. Rad50/SMC proteins and ABC transporters: unifying concepts from high-resolution structures. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 13, 249–255 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Lu, G., Lin, J., Davidson, A. L. & Quiocho, F. A. A tweezer-like motion of the ATP-binding cassette dimer in an ABC transport cycle. Mol. Cell 12, 651–661 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ono, T. et al. Differential contributions of condensin I and condensin II to mitotic chromosome architecture in vertebrate cells. Cell 115, 109–121 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Stray, J. E. & Lindsley, J. E. Biochemical analysis of the yeast condensin Smc2/4 complex: an ATPase that promotes knotting of circular DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 26238–26248 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Stray, J. E., Crisona, N. J., Belotserkovskii, B. P., Lindsley, J. E. & Cozzarelli, N. R. The Saccharomyces cerevisiase Smc2/4 condensin compacts DNA into (+) chiral structures without net supercoiling. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 34723–34734 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sutani, T. & Yanagida, M. DNA renaturation activity of the SMC complex implicated in chromosome condensation. Nature 388, 798–801 (1997).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sakai, A., Hizume, K., Sutani, T., Takeyasu, K. & Yanagida, M. Condensin but not cohesin SMC heterodimer induces DNA reannealing through protein–protein assembly. EMBO J. 22, 2764–2775 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kimura, K. & Hirano, T. Dual roles of the 11S regulatory subcomplex in condensin functions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 97, 11972–11977 (2000).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kimura, K. & Hirano, T. ATP-dependent positive supercoiling of DNA by 13S condensin: a biochemical implication for chromosome condensation. Cell 90, 625–634 (1997). This study shows that condensin I has the ability to introduce positive supercoils into closed circular DNA in the presence of ATP and topoisomerase I.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kimura, K., Hirano, M., Kobayashi, R. & Hirano, T. Phosphorylation and activation of 13S condensin by Cdc2 in vitro. Science 282, 487–490 (1998).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hagstrom, K. A., Holmes, V. F., Cozzarelli, N. R. & Meyer, B. J. C. elegans condensin promotes mitotic chromosome architecture, centromere organization, and sister chromatid segregation during mitosis and meiosis. Genes Dev. 16, 729–742 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kimura, K., Rybenkov, V. V., Crisona, N. J., Hirano, T. & Cozzarelli, N. R. 13S condensin actively reconfigures DNA by introducing global positive writhe: implications for chromosome condensation. Cell 98, 239–248 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bazett-Jones, D. P., Kimura, K. & Hirano, T. Efficient supercoiling of DNA by a single condensin complex as revealed by electron spectroscopic imaging. Mol. Cell 9, 1183–1190 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Strick, T. R., Kawaguchi, T. & Hirano, T. Real-time detection of single-molecule DNA compaction by condensin I. Curr. Biol. 14, 874–880 (2004). A DNA nanomanipulation assay demonstrates that condensin I supports dynamic and reversible compaction of a single DNA molecule in an ATP-hydrolysis-dependent manner.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kireeva, N., Lakonishok, M., Kireev, I., Hirano, T. & Belmont, A. S. Visualization of early chromosome condensation: a hierarchical folding, axial glue model of chromosome structure. J. Cell Biol. 166, 775–785 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Maeshima, K. & Laemmli, U. K. A two-step scaffolding model for mitotic chromosome assembly. Dev. Cell 4, 467–480 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hudson, D. F., Vagnarelli, P., Gassmann, R. & Earnshaw, W. C. Condensin is required for nonhistone protein assembly and structural integrity of vertebrate chromosomes. Dev. Cell 5, 323–336 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Csankovszki, G., McDonel, P. & Meyer, B. J. Recruitment and spreading of the C. elegans dosage compensation complex along X chromosomes. Science 303, 1182–1185 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Neuwald, A. F. & Hirano, T. HEAT repeats associated with condensins, cohesins and other chromosome-related complexes. Genome Res. 10, 1445–1452 (2000).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Groves, M. R. & Barford, D. Topological characteristics of helical repeat proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9, 383–389 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Uhlmann, F., Lottspeich, F. & Nasmyth, K. Sister-chromatid separation at anaphase onset is promoted by cleavage of the cohesin subunit Scc1. Nature 400, 37–42 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gruber, S., Haering, C. H. & Nasmyth, K. Chromosomal cohesin forms a ring. Cell 112, 765–777 (2003). Genetic engineering of cohesin subunits in vivo provides evidence for the ring model. Artificial cleavage of either Smc1 or Scc1 releases cohesin from chromosomes and promotes the separation of sister chromatids.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ivanov, D. & Nasmyth, K. A topological interaction between cohesin rings and a circular minichromosome. Cell 122, 849–860 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Losada, A. & Hirano, T. Intermolecular DNA interactions stimulated by the cohesin complex in vitro: implications for sister chromatid cohesion. Curr. Biol. 11, 268–272 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kagansky, A., Freeman, L., Lukyanov, D. & Strunnikov, A. Histone tail-independent chromatin binding activity of recombinant cohesin holocomplex. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 3382–3388 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hirano, T. SMC-mediated chromosome mechanics: a conserved scheme from bacteria to vertebrates? Genes Dev. 13, 11–19 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ciosk, R. et al. Cohesin's binding to chromosomes depends on a separate complex consisting of Scc2 and Scc4 proteins. Mol. Cell 5, 243–254 (2000).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Weitzer, S., Lehane, C. & Uhlmann, F. A model for ATP hydrolysis-dependent binding of cohesin to DNA. Curr. Biol. 13, 1930–1940 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Arumugam, P. et al. ATP hydrolysis is required for cohesin's association with chromosomes. Curr. Biol. 13, 1941–1953 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Chang, C.-R., Wu, C.-S., Hom, Y. & Gartenberg, M. R. Targeting of cohesin by transcriptionally silent chromatin. Genes Dev. 19, 3031–3042 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Blat, Y. & Kleckner, N. Cohesins bind to preferential sites along yeast chromosome III, with differential regulation along arms versus the centric region. Cell 98, 249–259 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Laloraya, S., Guacci, V. & Koshland, D. Chromosomal addresses of the cohesin component Mcd1p. J. Cell Biol. 151, 1047–1056 (2000).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Tanaka, T., Cosma, M. P., Wirth, K. & Nasmyth, K. Identification of cohesin association sites at centromeres and along chromosome arms. Cell 98, 847–858 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nonaka, N. et al. Recruitment of cohesin to heterochromatic regions by Swi6/HP1 in fission yeast. Nat. Cell Biol. 4, 89–93 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Huang, C. E., Milutinovich, M. & Koshland, D. Rings, bracelet or snaps: fashionable alternatives for Smc complexes. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 360, 537–542 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Gillespie, P. J. & Hirano, T. Scc2 couples replication licensing to sister chromatid cohesion in Xenopus egg extracts. Curr. Biol. 14, 1598–1603 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Takahashi, T. S., Yiu, P., Chou, M. F., Gygi, S. & Walter, J. C. Recruitment of Xenopus Scc2 and cohesin to chromatin requires the pre-replication complex. Nature Cell Biol. 6, 991–996 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Uhlmann, F. & Nasmyth, K. Cohesion between sister chromatids must be established during DNA replication. Curr. Biol. 8, 1095–1101 (1998).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lengronne, A. et al. Cohesin relocation from sites of chromosomal loading to places of convergent transcription. Nature 430, 573–578 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Glynn, E. F. et al. Genome-wide mapping of the cohesin complex in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Biol. 2, e259 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, T. & Ganley, A. R. Recombination regulation by transcription-induced cohesin dissociation in rDNA repeats. Science 309, 1581–1584 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Rollins, R. A., Korom, M., Aulner, N., Martens, A. & Dorsett, D. Drosophila Nipped-B protein supports sister chromatid cohesion and opposes the stromalin/Scc3 cohesion factor to facilitate long-range activation of the cut gene. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 3100–3111 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Dorsett, D. et al. Effects of sister chromatid cohesion proteins on cut gene expression during wing development in Drosophila. Development 132, 4743–4753 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Unal, E. et al. DNA damage response pathway uses histone modification to assemble a double-strand break-specific cohesion domain. Mol. Cell 16, 991–1002 (2004).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Strom, L., Lindroos, H. B., Shirahige, K. & Sjogren, C. Postreplicative recruitment of cohesin to double-strand breaks is required for DNA repair. Mol. Cell 16, 1003–1015 (2004).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar