The selection and function of cell type-specific enhancers (original) (raw)

• Banerji, J., Rusconi, S. & Schaffner, W. Expression of a β-globin gene is enhanced by remote SV40 DNA sequences. Cell 27, 299–308 (1981).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lettice, L. A. et al. A long-range Shh enhancer regulates expression in the developing limb and fin and is associated with preaxial polydactyly. Hum. Mol. Genet. 12, 1725–1735 (2003).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Heintzman, N. D. et al. Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome. Nature Genet. 39, 311–318 (2007).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. S. et al. Genome-wide analysis of estrogen receptor binding sites. Nature Genet. 38, 1289–1297 (2006).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Barish, G. D. et al. Bcl-6 and NF-κB cistromes mediate opposing regulation of the innate immune response. Genes Dev. 24, 2760–2765 (2010).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• John, S. et al. Chromatin accessibility pre-determines glucocorticoid receptor binding patterns. Nature Genet. 43, 264–268 (2011).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Heinz, S. et al. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime _cis_-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol. Cell 38, 576–589 (2010). This paper shows that the LDTF PU.1 binds to different loci in different cell types. The loci are marked by H3K4me1, act as beacons for SDTFs binding and drive cell type-specific cellular responses.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lefterova, M. I. et al. Cell-specific determinants of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ function in adipocytes and macrophages. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30, 2078–2089 (2010).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Nielsen, R. et al. Genome-wide profiling of PPARγ:RXR and RNA polymerase II occupancy reveals temporal activation of distinct metabolic pathways and changes in RXR dimer composition during adipogenesis. Genes Dev. 22, 2953–2967 (2008).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ghisletti, S. et al. Identification and characterization of enhancers controlling the inflammatory gene expression program in macrophages. Immunity 32, 317–328 (2010). This paper shows that PU.1 is an LDTF necessary for priming signal-dependent enhancers in macrophages, which defines their transcriptional response to inflammatory stimuli.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Pennacchio, L. A. et al. In vivo enhancer analysis of human conserved non-coding sequences. Nature 444, 499–502 (2006).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Woolfe, A. et al. Highly conserved non-coding sequences are associated with vertebrate development. PLoS Biol. 3, e7 (2005).
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Heintzman, N. D. et al. Histone modifications at human enhancers reflect global cell-type-specific gene expression. Nature 459, 108–112 (2009).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Visel, A. et al. ChIP–seq accurately predicts tissue-specific activity of enhancers. Nature 457, 854–858 (2009).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Thurman, R. E. et al. The accessible chromatin landscape of the human genome. Nature 489, 75–82 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. E. et al. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489, 57–74 (2012). This paper summarizes the work of the ENCODE consortium to annotate functional DNA elements in the human genome.
  Google Scholar
• West, J. A. et al. Nucleosomal occupancy changes locally over key regulatory regions during cell differentiation and reprogramming. Nature Commun. 5, 4719 (2014).
  CAS Google Scholar
• Chan, H. M. & La Thangue, N. B. p300/CBP proteins: HATs for transcriptional bridges and scaffolds. J. Cell Sci. 114, 2363–2373 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• De Santa, F. et al. A large fraction of extragenic RNA Pol II transcription sites overlap enhancers. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000384 (2010).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kim, T.-K. et al. Widespread transcription at neuronal activity-regulated enhancers. Nature 465, 182–187 (2010). References 19 and 20 report the existence of widespread transcription at enhancers, which correlates with the transcription of neighbouring genes.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Stadler, M. B. et al. DNA-binding factors shape the mouse methylome at distal regulatory regions. Nature 480, 490–495 (2011).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ernst, J. & Kellis, M. Discovery and characterization of chromatin states for systematic annotation of the human genome. Nature Biotech. 28, 817–825 (2010).
  CAS Google Scholar
• He, H. H. et al. Nucleosome dynamics define transcriptional enhancers. Nature Genet. 42, 343–347 (2010).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Rada-Iglesias, A. et al. A unique chromatin signature uncovers early developmental enhancers in humans. Nature 470, 279–283 (2011).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Creyghton, M. P. et al. Histone H3K27ac separates active from poised enhancers and predicts developmental state. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 21931–21936 (2010).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zentner, G. E., Tesar, P. J. & Scacheri, P. C. Epigenetic signatures distinguish multiple classes of enhancers with distinct cellular functions. Genome Res. 21, 1273–1283 (2011).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Calo, E. & Wysocka, J. Modification of enhancer chromatin: what, how, and why? Mol. Cell 49, 825–837 (2013).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gottgens, B. et al. The scl +18/19 stem cell enhancer is not required for hematopoiesis: identification of a 5′ bifunctional hematopoietic-endothelial enhancer bound by Fli-1 and Elf-1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 1870–1883 (2004).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sanchez, M. et al. An SCL 3′ enhancer targets developing endothelium together with embryonic and adult haematopoietic progenitors. Development 126, 3891–3904 (1999).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Delabesse, E. et al. Transcriptional regulation of the SCL locus: identification of an enhancer that targets the primitive erythroid lineage in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 5215–5225 (2005).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zaret, K. S. et al. Pioneer factors, genetic competence, and inductive signaling: programming liver and pancreas progenitors from the endoderm. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 73, 119–126 (2008).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Pham, T. H. et al. Mechanisms of in vivo binding site selection of the hematopoietic master transcription factor PU.1. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 6391–6402 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Adams, C. C. & Workman, J. L. Binding of disparate transcriptional activators to nucleosomal DNA is inherently cooperative. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 1405–1421 (1995).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Boyes, J. & Felsenfeld, G. Tissue-specific factors additively increase the probability of the all-or-none formation of a hypersensitive site. EMBO J. 15, 2496–2507 (1996).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hoffman, B. G. et al. Locus co-occupancy, nucleosome positioning, and H3K4me1 regulate the functionality of FOXA2-, HNF4A-, and PDX1-bound loci in islets and liver. Genome Res. 20, 1037–1051 (2010).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Samstein, R. M. et al. Foxp3 exploits a pre-existent enhancer landscape for regulatory T cell lineage specification. Cell 151, 153–166 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Shlyueva, D. et al. Hormone-responsive enhancer-activity maps reveal predictive motifs, indirect repression, and targeting of closed chromatin. Mol. Cell 54, 180–192 (2014).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Vahedi, G. et al. STATs shape the active enhancer landscape of T cell populations. Cell 151, 981–993 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Xu, J. et al. Combinatorial assembly of developmental stage-specific enhancers controls gene expression programs during human erythropoiesis. Dev. Cell. 23, 796–811 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Soufi, A., Donahue, G. & Zaret, K. S. Facilitators and impediments of the pluripotency reprogramming factors' initial engagement with the genome. Cell 151, 994–1004 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Scott, E. W., Simon, M. C., Anastasi, J. & Singh, H. Requirement of transcription factor PU.1 in the development of multiple hematopoietic lineages. Science 265, 1573–1577 (1994).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kazemian, M., Pham, H., Wolfe, S. A., Brodsky, M. H. & Sinha, S. Widespread evidence of cooperative DNA binding by transcription factors in Drosophila development. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 8237–8252 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Heinz, S. et al. Effect of natural genetic variation on enhancer selection and function. Nature 503, 487–492 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Stefflova, K. et al. Cooperativity and rapid evolution of cobound transcription factors in closely related mammals. Cell 154, 530–540 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Trompouki, E. et al. Lineage regulators direct BMP and Wnt pathways to cell-specific programs during differentiation and regeneration. Cell 147, 577–589 (2011).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Yanez-Cuna, J. O., Dinh, H. Q., Kvon, E. Z., Shlyueva, D. & Stark, A. Uncovering _cis_-regulatory sequence requirements for context-specific transcription factor binding. Genome Res. 22, 2018–2030 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Mercer, E. M. et al. Multilineage priming of enhancer repertoires precedes commitment to the B and myeloid cell lineages in hematopoietic progenitors. Immunity 35, 413–425 (2011).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Mullen, A. C. et al. Master transcription factors determine cell-type-specific responses to TGF-β signaling. Cell 147, 565–576 (2011). References 36 and 48 show that SDTFs bind to open chromatin regions that are defined by combinations of LDTFs.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. S. et al. Chromosome-wide mapping of estrogen receptor binding reveals long-range regulation requiring the forkhead protein FoxA1. Cell 122, 33–43 (2005).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kaikkonen, M. U. et al. Remodeling of the enhancer landscape during macrophage activation is coupled to enhancer transcription. Mol. Cell 51, 310–325 (2013). This paper shows that the SDTF NF-κB contributes to the de novo priming (and activation) of enhancers in conjunction with LDTFs, and that transcription elongation is required for the methylation of the flanking H3K4 by MLL3 and MLL4.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sullivan, A. L. et al. Serum response factor utilizes distinct promoter- and enhancer-based mechanisms to regulate cytoskeletal gene expression in macrophages. Mol. Cell. Biol. 31, 861–875 (2011).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ostuni, R. et al. Latent enhancers activated by stimulation in differentiated cells. Cell 152, 157–171 (2013). This paper describes signal-dependent selection of latent enhancers in macrophages and their persistence after signal termination as a molecular memory of prior activation.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Voss, T. C. et al. Dynamic exchange at regulatory elements during chromatin remodeling underlies assisted loading mechanism. Cell 146, 544–554 (2011).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Gosselin, D. et al. Environment drives selection and function of enhancers controlling tissue-specific macrophage identities. Cell 159, 1327–1340 (2014).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lavin, Y. et al. Tissue-resident macrophage enhancer landscapes are shaped by the local microenvironment. Cell 159, 1312–1326 (2014). References 54 and 55 demonstrate how specific tissue environments differentially influence the selection and function of enhancers in macrophage populations.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Herz, H. M., Hu, D. & Shilatifard, A. Enhancer malfunction in cancer. Mol. Cell 53, 859–866 (2014).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wang, Z. et al. Genome-wide mapping of HATs and HDACs reveals distinct functions in active and inactive genes. Cell 138, 1019–1031 (2009).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Euskirchen, G. M. et al. Diverse roles and interactions of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex revealed using global approaches. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002008 (2011).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Morris, S. A. et al. Overlapping chromatin-remodeling systems collaborate genome wide at dynamic chromatin transitions. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 21, 73–81 (2014).
  CAS Google Scholar
• Kagey, M. H. et al. Mediator and cohesin connect gene expression and chromatin architecture. Nature 467, 430–435 (2010).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Siersbaek, R. et al. Transcription factor cooperativity in early adipogenic hotspots and super-enhancers. Cell Rep. 7, 1443–1455 (2014).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, M. G., Lunyak, V. V. & Glass, C. K. Sensors and signals: a coactivator/corepressor/epigenetic code for integrating signal-dependent programs of transcriptional response. Genes Dev. 20, 1405–1428 (2006).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Blazek, E., Mittler, G. & Meisterernst, M. The mediator of RNA polymerase II. Chromosoma 113, 399–408 (2005).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Malik, S. & Roeder, R. G. The metazoan Mediator co-activator complex as an integrative hub for transcriptional regulation. Nature Rev. Genet. 11, 761–772 (2010).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Vermeulen, M. et al. Selective anchoring of TFIID to nucleosomes by trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 4. Cell 131, 58–69 (2007).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Dey, A., Chitsaz, F., Abbasi, A., Misteli, T. & Ozato, K. The double bromodomain protein Brd4 binds to acetylated chromatin during interphase and mitosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 8758–8763 (2003).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Koch, F. et al. Transcription initiation platforms and GTF recruitment at tissue-specific enhancers and promoters. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 956–963 (2011).
  CAS Google Scholar
• Zhang, W. et al. Bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4) regulates RNA polymerase II serine 2 phosphorylation in human CD4+ T cells. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 43137–43155 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Collis, P., Antoniou, M. & Grosveld, F. Definition of the minimal requirements within the human β-globin gene and the dominant control region for high level expression. EMBO J. 9, 233–240 (1990).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lam, M. T. et al. Rev–Erbs repress macrophage gene expression by inhibiting enhancer-directed transcription. Nature 498, 511–515 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Andersson, R. et al. An atlas of active enhancers across human cell types and tissues. Nature 507, 455–461 (2014).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Core, L. J. et al. Analysis of nascent RNA identifies a unified architecture of initiation regions at mammalian promoters and enhancers. Nature Genet. 46, 1311–1320 (2014).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wang, D. et al. Reprogramming transcription by distinct classes of enhancers functionally defined by eRNA. Nature 474, 390–394 (2011).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kieffer-Kwon, K. R. et al. Interactome maps of mouse gene regulatory domains reveal basic principles of transcriptional regulation. Cell 155, 1507–1520 (2013).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bonn, S. et al. Tissue-specific analysis of chromatin state identifies temporal signatures of enhancer activity during embryonic development. Nature Genet. 44, 148–156 (2012).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Almada, A. E., Wu, X., Kriz, A. J., Burge, C. B. & Sharp, P. A. Promoter directionality is controlled by U1 snRNP and polyadenylation signals. Nature 499, 360–363 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Fong, Y. W. & Zhou, Q. Stimulatory effect of splicing factors on transcriptional elongation. Nature 414, 929–933 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Muller-McNicoll, M. & Neugebauer, K. M. How cells get the message: dynamic assembly and function of mRNA-protein complexes. Nature Rev. Genet. 14, 275–287 (2013).
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Bieberstein, N. I., Carrillo Oesterreich, F., Straube, K. & Neugebauer, K. M. First exon length controls active chromatin signatures and transcription. Cell Rep. 2, 62–68 (2012).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kowalczyk, M. S. et al. Intragenic enhancers act as alternative promoters. Mol. Cell 45, 447–458 (2012).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Derrien, T. et al. The GENCODE v7 catalog of human long noncoding RNAs: analysis of their gene structure, evolution, and expression. Genome Res. 22, 1775–1789 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Schaukowitch, K. et al. Enhancer RNA facilitates NELF release from immediate early genes. Mol. Cell 56, 29–42 (2014).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Core, L. J., Waterfall, J. J. & Lis, J. T. Nascent RNA sequencing reveals widespread pausing and divergent initiation at human promoters. Science 322, 1845–1848 (2008).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Herz, H. M. et al. Enhancer-associated H3K4 monomethylation by Trithorax-related, the Drosophila homolog of mammalian Mll3/Mll4. Genes Dev. 26, 2604–2620 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lee, J. E. et al. H3K4 mono- and di-methyltransferase MLL4 is required for enhancer activation during cell differentiation. Elife 2, e01503 (2013).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sims, R. J. 3rd & Reinberg, D. Histone H3 Lys 4 methylation: caught in a bind? Genes Dev. 20, 2779–2786 (2006).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Plank, J. L. & Dean, A. Enhancer function: mechanistic and genome-wide insights come together. Mol. Cell 55, 5–14 (2014).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Schmidt, D. et al. A CTCF-independent role for cohesin in tissue-specific transcription. Genome Res. 20, 578–588 (2010).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Liu, W. et al. Brd4 and JMJD6-associated anti-pause enhancers in regulation of transcriptional pause release. Cell 155, 1581–1595 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Nord, A. S. et al. Rapid and pervasive changes in genome-wide enhancer usage during mammalian development. Cell 155, 1521–1531 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hnisz, D. et al. Super-enhancers in the control of cell identity and disease. Cell 155, 934–947 (2013).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Whyte, W. A. et al. Master transcription factors and mediator establish super-enhancers at key cell identity genes. Cell 153, 307–319 (2013). References 91 and 92 describe genomic regions near genes, which are highly enriched for marks of active enhancers and have essential roles in determining cell identity and function.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Dowen, J. M. et al. Control of cell identity genes occurs in insulated neighborhoods in mammalian chromosomes. Cell 159, 374–387 (2014).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Parker, S. C. et al. Chromatin stretch enhancer states drive cell-specific gene regulation and harbor human disease risk variants. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 17921–17926 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Cremer, T. et al. Chromosome territories — a functional nuclear landscape. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 18, 307–316 (2006).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lieberman-Aiden, E. et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289–293 (2009).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Dixon, J. R. et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485, 376–380 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sanyal, A., Lajoie, B. R., Jain, G. & Dekker, J. The long-range interaction landscape of gene promoters. Nature 489, 109–113 (2012). References 97 and 98 use global 3C assays to interrogate the 3D organization of functional elements within the genome.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• de Laat, W. & Grosveld, F. Spatial organization of gene expression: the active chromatin hub. Chromosome Res. 11, 447–459 (2003).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Jin, F. et al. A high-resolution map of the three-dimensional chromatin interactome in human cells. Nature 503, 290–294 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ghavi-Helm, Y. et al. Enhancer loops appear stable during development and are associated with paused polymerase. Nature 512, 96–100 (2014).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Vassetzky, Y., Hair, A. & Mechali, M. Rearrangement of chromatin domains during development in Xenopus. Genes Dev. 14, 1541–1552 (2000).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Yan, J. et al. Transcription factor binding in human cells occurs in dense clusters formed around cohesin anchor sites. Cell 154, 801–813 (2013).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nagano, T. et al. Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure. Nature 502, 59–64 (2013).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Li, G. et al. Extensive promoter-centered chromatin interactions provide a topological basis for transcription regulation. Cell 148, 84–98 (2012). This study shows that promoters can function as enhancers.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Li, W. et al. Functional roles of enhancer RNAs for oestrogen-dependent transcriptional activation. Nature 498, 516–520 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bender, M. A. et al. The hypersensitive sites of the murine β-globin locus control region act independently to affect nuclear localization and transcriptional elongation. Blood 119, 3820–3827 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sur, I. K. et al. Mice lacking a Myc enhancer that includes human SNP rs6983267 are resistant to intestinal tumors. Science 338, 1360–1363 (2012).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Rosenbauer, F. et al. Acute myeloid leukemia induced by graded reduction of a lineage-specific transcription factor, PU.1. Nature Genet. 36, 624–630 (2004).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hong, J. W., Hendrix, D. A. & Levine, M. S. Shadow enhancers as a source of evolutionary novelty. Science 321, 1314 (2008).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Barolo, S. Shadow enhancers: frequently asked questions about distributed _cis_-regulatory information and enhancer redundancy. Bioessays 34, 135–141 (2012).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. C. et al. Global changes in the nuclear positioning of genes and intra- and interdomain genomic interactions that orchestrate B cell fate. Nature Immunol. 13, 1196–1204 (2012).
  CAS Google Scholar
• Welter, D. et al. The NHGRI GWAS Catalog, a curated resource of SNP–trait associations. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D1001–D1006 (2014).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Pasquali, L. et al. Pancreatic islet enhancer clusters enriched in type 2 diabetes risk-associated variants. Nature Genet. 46, 136–143 (2014).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Schaub, M. A., Boyle, A. P., Kundaje, A., Batzoglou, S. & Snyder, M. Linking disease associations with regulatory information in the human genome. Genome Res. 22, 1748–1759 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Trynka, G. et al. Chromatin marks identify critical cell types for fine mapping complex trait variants. Nature Genet. 45, 124–130 (2013).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Raj, T. et al. Polarization of the effects of autoimmune and neurodegenerative risk alleles in leukocytes. Science 344, 519–523 (2014).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kasowski, M. et al. Extensive variation in chromatin states across humans. Science 342, 750–752 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kilpinen, H. et al. Coordinated effects of sequence variation on DNA binding, chromatin structure, and transcription. Science 342, 744–747 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• McVicker, G. et al. Identification of genetic variants that affect histone modifications in human cells. Science 342, 747–749 (2013). References 118–120 report on the effects of natural genetic variation in humans on the binding of transcription factors and histone modifications that are associated with enhancers and gene expression.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Degner, J. F. et al. DNase I sensitivity QTLs are a major determinant of human expression variation. Nature 482, 390–394 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Gaffney, D. J. et al. Dissecting the regulatory architecture of gene expression QTLs. Genome Biol. 13, R7 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Gaulton, K. J. et al. A map of open chromatin in human pancreatic islets. Nature Genet. 42, 255–259 (2010).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Helgadottir, A. et al. A common variant on chromosome 9p21 affects the risk of myocardial infarction. Science 316, 1491–1493 (2007).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Cowper-Sal lari, R. et al. Breast cancer risk-associated SNPs modulate the affinity of chromatin for FOXA1 and alter gene expression. Nature Genet. 44, 1191–1198 (2012).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kasowski, M. et al. Variation in transcription factor binding among humans. Science 328, 232–235 (2010).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bauer, D. E. et al. An erythroid enhancer of BCL11A subject to genetic variation determines fetal hemoglobin level. Science 342, 253–257 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hsu, P. D., Lander, E. S. & Zhang, F. Development and applications of CRISPR–Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell 157, 1262–1278 (2014).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar