Land radiative management as contributor to regional-scale climate adaptation and mitigation (original) (raw)

References

1. IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge University Press, 2013).
2. Seneviratne, S. I., Donat, M. G., Pitman, A. J., Knutti, R. & Wilby, R. L. Allowable CO2 emissions based on regional and impact-related climate targets. Nature 529, 477–4832 (2016).
   Article Google Scholar
3. Adoption of the Paris Agreement FCCC/CP/2015/L.9/Rev. 1 (UNFCCC, 2015); http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf
4. Crutzen, P. J. Albedo enhancement by stratospheric sulfur injections: a contribution to resolve a policy dilemma? Clim. Chang. 77, 211–219 (2006).
   Article Google Scholar
5. Kravitz, B. et al. The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP). Atmos. Sci. Lett. 12, 162–167 (2011).
   Article Google Scholar
6. MacMartin, D. G., Caldeira, K. & Keith, D. W. Solar geoengineering to limit the rate of temperature change.Philos. Trans. A 372, 0134 (2014).
   Article Google Scholar
7. Geoengineering the Climate: Science, Governance and Uncertainty (The Royal Society, 2009); https://royalsociety.org/policy/publications/2009/geoengineering-climate/
8. Ricke, K. L., Morgan, M. G. & Allen, M. R. Regional climate response to solar radiation management. Nat. Geosci. 3, 537–541 (2010).
   Article Google Scholar
9. Schäfer, S. et al. Field tests of solar climate engineering. Nat. Clim. Chang. 3, 766 (2013).
   Article Google Scholar
10. Barrett, S. et al. Climate engineering reconsidered. Nat. Clim. Chang. 4, 527–529 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
11. Sillmann, J. et al. Climate emergencies do not justify geoengineering the climate. Nat. Clim. Chang. 5, 290–292 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
12. IPCC Expert Meeting on Geoengineering (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) (IPCC, 2012).
13. Robock, A., Marquardt, A., Kravitz, B. & Stenchikov, G. Benefits, risks, and costs of stratospheric geoengineering. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L19703 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
14. Ban-Weiss, G. A. & Caldeira, K. Geoengineering as an optimization problem. Environ. Res. Lett. 5, 034009 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
15. Davin, E. L., Seneviratne, S. I., Ciais, P., Olioso, A. & Wang, T. Preferential cooling of hot extremes from cropland albedo management. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 9757–9761 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
16. Hamwey, R. Active amplification of the terrestrial albedo to mitigate climate change: an exploratory study. Mitig. Adapt. Strategies Glob. Change 12, 419–439 (2007).
    Article Google Scholar
17. Singarayer, J. S. & Davies-Barnard, T. Regional climate change mitigation with crops: context and assessment. Philos. Trans. A 370, 4301–4316 (2012).
18. Irvine, P. J., Ridgwell, A. & Lunt, D. J. Climatic effects of surface albedo geoengineering. J. Geophys. Res. 116, D24112 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
19. Akbari, H., Menon, S. & Rosenfeld, A. Global cooling: increasing world-wide urban albedos to offset CO2. Clim. Change 94, 275–286 (2009).
20. Andales, A. A., Batchelor, W. D., Anderson, C. E., Farnham, D. E. & Whigham, D. K. Incorporating tillage effects into a soybean model. Agric. Syst. 66, 69–98 (2000).
    Article Google Scholar
21. Wilhelm, M., Davin, E. L. & Seneviratne, S. I. Climate engineering of vegetated land for hot extremes mitigation: an ESM sensitivity study. J. Geophys. Res. 120, 2612–2623 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
22. Sacks, W. J., Deryng, D., Foley, J. A. & Ramankutty, N. A. Crop planting dates: an analysis of global patterns. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 19, 607–620 (2010).
    Google Scholar
23. Cook, R. J. Toward cropping system that enhance productivity and sustainability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 18389–18394 (2006).
    Article Google Scholar
24. Breuer, L., Eckhardt, K. & Frede, H.-G. Plant parameter values for models in temperate climates. Ecol. Model. 169, 237–293 (2003).
    Article Google Scholar
25. Hirsch A. L., Wilhelm, M., Davin, E. D., Thiery, W. & Seneviratne, S. I. Can climate-effective land management reduce regional warming? J. Geophys. Res. D026125 (2017).
26. Campra, P., Garcia, M., Canton, Y. & Palacios-Orueta, A. Surface temperature cooling trends and negative radiative forcing due to land use change toward greenhouse farming in southeastern Spain. J. Geophys. Res. 113, D18109 (2008).
    Article Google Scholar
27. Gaffin, S. R. et al. Bright is the new black—multi-year performance of high-albedo roofs in a urban climate. Environ. Res. Lett. 7, 014029 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
28. Mackey, C. W., Lee, X. & Smith, R. B. Remotely sensing the cooling effects of city scale efforts to reduce urban heat island. Build. Environ. 49, 348–358 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
29. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision ST/ESA/SER.A/366 (UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2015); https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2014-Report.pdf
30. Matthews, T.K.R, Wilby, R. L. & Murphy, C. Communicating the deadly consequences of global warming for human heat stress. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 3861–3866 (2017).
31. Oleson, K. W., Bonan, G. B. & Feddema, J. Effects of white roofs on urban temperature in a global climate model. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L03701 (2010).
32. Mueller, N. D. et al. Global relationships between cropland intensification and summer temperature extremes over the last 50 years. J. Clim. 30, 7505–7528 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
33. Thiery, W. et al. Present-day irrigation mitigates heat extremes. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 122, 1403–1422 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
34. Lawrence, D. M. et al. The Land Use Model Intercomparison Project (LUMIP) contribution to CMIP6: rationale and experimental design. Geosci. Model. Dev. 9, 2973–2998 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
35. Sagan, C., Toon, O. B. & Pollack, J. B. Anthropogenic albedo changes and the Earth’s climate. Science 206, 1363–1368 (1979).
    Article Google Scholar
36. Boisier, J.-P. et al. Attributing the impacts of land-cover changes in temperate regions on surface temperature and heat fluxes to specific causes: Results from the first LUCID set of simulations. J. Geophys. Res. 117, D12116 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
37. Pielke, R. A. Sr et al. Land use/land cover changes and climate: modeling analysis and observational evidence. WIREs Clim. Chang. 2, 828–850 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
38. Brovkin, V. et al. Effect of anthropogenic land-use and land-cover changes on climate and carbon storage in CMIP5 projections for the twenty-first century. J. Clim. 26, 6859–6881 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
39. Davin, E. L. & de Noblet-Ducoudré, N. Climatic impact of global-scale deforestation: radiative versus non-radiative processes. J. Clim. 23, 97–112 (2010).
40. Kravitz, B. et al. An overview of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP). J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118, 8320–8332 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
41. Lenton, T. M. & Vaughan, N. E. The radiative forcing potential of different climate geoengineering options. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 9, 5539–5561 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
42. Singarayer, J. S., Ridgwell, A. & Irvine, P. Assessing the benefits of crop albedo bio-geoengineering. Environ. Res. Lett. 4, 045110 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
43. Lobell, D., Bala, G. & Duffy, P. Biogeophysical impacts of cropland management changes on climate. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L06708 (2006).
    Google Scholar
44. Ridgwell, A., Singarayer, J. S., Hetherington, A. M. & Valdes, P. J. Tackling regional climate change by leaf albedo bio-geoengineering. Curr. Biol. 19, 146–150 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
45. Crook, J. A., Jackson, L. S., Osprey, S. M. & Forster, P. M. A comparison of temperature and precipitation responses to different Earth radiation management geoengineering schemes. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 120, 9352–9373 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
46. Keith, D. W. & MacMartin, D. G. A temporary, moderate and responsive scenario for solar geoengineering. Nat. Clim. Chang. 5, 201–206 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
47. Pitman, A. J. et al. Uncertainties in climate responses to past land cover change: first results from the LUCID intercomparison study. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L14814 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
48. Morton, O. Crops that cool. Nature (15 January 2009); https://doi.org/10.1038/news.2009.33
49. Smith, K. R. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (eds Field, C. B. et al.) 709–754 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
50. Lobell, D. B. et al. The critical role of extreme heat for maize production in the United States. Nat. Clim. Chang. 3, 497–501 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
51. Lobell, D. B. et al. Greater sensitivity to drought accompanies maize yield increase in the U.S. Midwest. Science 344, 516–519 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
52. Jones, A. et al. The impact of abrupt suspension of solar radiation management (termination effect) in experiment G2 of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP). J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 118, 9743–9752 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
53. Caldeira, K. & Myhrvold, N. P. Projections of the pace of warming following an abrupt increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 034039 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
54. Trisos, C. H., Amatulli, G., Gurevitch, J., Robock, A. & Zambri, B. Potentially dangerous consequences for biodiversity of solar geoengineering implementation and termination. Nat. Ecol. Evol. (in press).
55. Field, C. et al. Technical Summary. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Field, C. et al.) 35–94 (IPCC, Cambridge University Press, 2014).
56. Foley, J. A. et al. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478, 337–342 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
57. Phipps, S. J. et al. The CSIRO Mk3L climate system model version 1.0. Part 1: Description and evaluation. Geosci. Model. Dev. 4, 483–509 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
58. Phipps, S. J. et al. The CSIRO Mk3L climate system model version 1.0. Part 2: Response to external forcings. Geosci. Model. Dev. 5, 649–682 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
59. Seneviratne, S. I. et al. Investigating soil moisture–climate interactions in a changing climate: a review. Earth Sci. Rev. 99, 125–161 (2010).
    Article Google Scholar
60. Vogel, M. M. et al. Regional amplification of projected changes in extreme temperatures strongly controlled by soil moisture–temperature feedbacks. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 1511–1519 (2017).
    Article Google Scholar
61. Kravitz, B. et al. The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (GeoMIP6): simulation design and preliminary results. Geosci. Model. Dev. 8, 3379–3392 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
62. Anderson, G. B. & Bell, M. L. Heat waves in the United States: mortality risk during heat waves and effect modification by heat wave characteristics in 43 U.S. communities. Environ. Health Persp. 119, 210–218 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
63. Sherwood, S. C. & Huber, M. An adaptability limit to climate change due to heat stress. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 9552–9555 (2010).
64. Zander, K. K., Botzen, W. J. W., Oppermann, E., Kjellstrom, T. & Garnett, S. T. Heat stress causes substantial labour productivity loss in Australia. Nat. Clim. Chang. 5, 647–651 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
65. Impacts and Adaptation Response of Infrastructure and Communities to Heatwaves: The Southern Australian Experience of 2009 (National Climate Change Adaption Research Facility, Queensland Univ. Technology, 2010).
66. Doughty, C. E., Field, C. B. & McMillan, A. M. S. Can crop albedo be increased through the modification of leaf trichomes and could this cool regional climate? Clim. Chang. 104, 379–387 (2011).
    Article Google Scholar
67. Derpsch, R., Friedrich, T., Kassam, A. & Hongwen, L. Current status of adoption of no-till farming in the world and some of its main benefits. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 3, 1–25 (2010).
    Google Scholar
68. Friedrich, T., Derpsch, R. & Kassam, A. Overview of the global spread of conservation agriculture. Field Actions Sci. Rep. http://factsreports.revues.org/1941 (2012).
69. Turmel, M.-S., Speratti, A., Baudron, F., Verhulst, N. & Govaerts, B. G. Crop residue management and soil health: a systems analysis. Agric. Syst. 134, 6–16 (2015).
70. Powlson, D. S. et al. Limited potential of no-till agriculture for climate change mitigation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 4, 678–683 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
71. Neufeldt, H., Kissinger, G. & Alcamo, J. No-till agriculture and climate change mitigation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 5, 488–489 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
72. Abdalla, M. et al. Conservation tillage systems: a review of its consequences for greenhouse gas emissions. Soil. Use Manag. 29, 199–209 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
73. Jeong, S. J. et al. Effects of double cropping on summer climate of the North China Plain and neighbouring regions. Nat. Clim. Chang. 4, 615–619 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
74. Pittelkow, C. M. et al. Productivity limits and potential of the principles of conservation agriculture. Nature 517, 365–368 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
75. Seifert, C. A. & Lobell, D. B. Response of double cropping suitability to climate change in the United States. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 024002 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
76. Li, D., Bou-Zeid, E. & Oppenheimer, M. The effectiveness of cool and green roofs as urban heat island mitigation strategies. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 1–16 (2014).
    Google Scholar
77. Robock, A., Oman, L. & G. L. Stenchikov, G. Regional climate responses to geoengineering with tropical and Arctic SO2 injections. J. Geophys. Res. 113, D16101 (2008).
    Article Google Scholar
78. MacMartin, D. G., Keith, D. W., Kravitz, B. & Caldeira, K. Management of trade-offs in geoengineering through optimal choice of non-uniform radiative forcing. Nat. Clim. Chang. 3, 365–368 (2012).
    Article Google Scholar
79. Tilmes, S. et al. The hydrologic impact of geoengineering in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP). J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50868 (2013).
80. Boyd, P. W. Ranking geoengineering schemes. Nat. Clim. Chang. 1, 722–724 (2008).
    Google Scholar
81. Hegerl, G. C. & Solomon, S. Risks of climate engineering. Science 325, 955 (2009).
    Article Google Scholar
82. Parson, E. A. & Keith, D. W. End the deadlock on governance of geoengineering research. Science 339, 1278–1279 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
83. Tjiputra, J. F., Grini, A. & Lee, H. Impact of idealized future stratospheric aerosol injection on the large-scale ocean and land carbon cycles. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 121, 2–27 (2016).
84. Curry, C. L. et al. A multimodel examination of climate extremes in an idealized geoengineering experiment. J. Geophys. Res. 119, 3900–3923 (2014).
    Article Google Scholar
85. Rogelj, J., McCollum, D. L., O’Neill, B. C. & Riahi, K. 2020 emissions levels required to limit warming to below 2 °C. Nat. Clim. Chang. 3, 405–412 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
86. IPCC Summary for policymakers in Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (eds Field, C. B. et al.) 1–32 (IPCC, Cambridge University Press, 2014).
87. Lehner, F. & Stocker, T. F. From local perception to global perspective. Nat. Clim. Chang. 5, 731–735 (2015).
    Article Google Scholar
88. Schleussner, C. F. et al. Science and policy characteristics of the Paris Agreement temperature goal. Nat. Clim. Chang. 6, 827–835 (2016).
    Article Google Scholar
89. IPCC Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (eds Field, C. B. et al.) (IPCC, Cambridge University Press, 2012).
90. Reichstein, M. et al. Climate extremes and the carbon cycle. Nature 500, 287–295 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
91. Haywood, J. M., Jones, A., Bellouin, N. & Stephenson, D. Asymmetric forcing from stratospheric aerosols impacts Sahelian rainfall. Nat. Clim. Chang. 3, 660–665 (2013).
    Article Google Scholar
92. Edenhofer, O. et al. Technical Summary. In Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Clima_te Cha_nge (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) 33–107 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).
93. Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J. & Meehl, G. A. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1 (2012).
94. Gridded Population of the World (GPW), v3: Population Density Grid (SEDAC, Center for International Earth Science Information Network, Columbia University, Accessed 30 August 2014); https://doi.org/10.7927/H4XK8CG2
95. Ramankutty, N. & Foley, J. Estimating historical changes in global land cover: croplands from 1700 to 1992. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 13, 997–1028 (1999).
    Article Google Scholar

Download references