The role of transcription in shaping the spatial organization of the genome (original) (raw)

• Cavalli, G. & Misteli, T. Functional implications of genome topology. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 290–299 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Shachar, S. & Misteli, T. Causes and consequences of nuclear gene positioning. J. Cell Sci. 130, 1501–1508 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Dekker, J. & Mirny, L. The 3D genome as moderator of chromosomal communication. Cell 164, 1110–1121 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sexton, T. et al. Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome. Cell 148, 458–472 (2012).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Dixon, J. R. et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485, 376–380 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hou, C., Li, L., Qin, Z. S. & Corces, V. G. Gene density, transcription, and insulators contribute to the partition of the Drosophila genome into physical domains. Mol. Cell 48, 471–484 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Nora, E. P. et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 485, 381–385 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Brangwynne, C. P., Mitchison, T. J. & Hyman, A. A. Active liquid-like behavior of nucleoli determines their size and shape in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 4334–4339 (2011).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sirri, V., Urcuqui-Inchima, S., Roussel, P. & Hernandez-Verdun, D. Nucleolus: the fascinating nuclear body. Histochem. Cell Biol. 129, 13–31 (2008).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nemeth, A. & Grummt, I. Dynamic regulation of nucleolar architecture. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 52, 105–111 (2018).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Falahati, H., Pelham-Webb, B., Blythe, S. & Wieschaus, E. Nucleation by rRNA dictates the precision of nucleolus assembly. Curr. Biol. 26, 277–285 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Heyn, P., Salmonowicz, H., Rodenfels, J. & Neugebauer, K. M. Activation of transcription enforces the formation of distinct nuclear bodies in zebrafish embryos. RNA Biol. 14, 752–760 (2017).
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Verheggen, C., Almouzni, G. & Hernandez-Verdun, D. The ribosomal RNA processing machinery is recruited to the nucleolar domain before RNA polymerase I during Xenopus laevis development. J. Cell Biol. 149, 293–306 (2000).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Mais, C., Wright, J. E., Prieto, J. L., Raggett, S. L. & McStay, B. UBF-binding site arrays form pseudo-NORs and sequester the RNA polymerase I transcription machinery. Genes Dev. 19, 50–64 (2005).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hamdane, N. et al. Disruption of the UBF gene induces aberrant somatic nucleolar bodies and disrupts embryo nucleolar precursor bodies. Gene 612, 5–11 (2017).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Caudron-Herger, M. et al. Alu element-containing RNAs maintain nucleolar structure and function. EMBO J. 34, 2758–2774 (2015).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Heitz, E. Das heterochromatin der moose [German]. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. 69, 762–818 (1928).
  Google Scholar
• Filion, G. J. et al. Systematic protein location mapping reveals five principal chromatin types in Drosophila cells. Cell 143, 212–224 (2010).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Consortium, E. P. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489, 57–74 (2012).
  Google Scholar
• Guelen, L. et al. Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions. Nature 453, 948–951 (2008).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• van Bemmel, J. G. et al. The insulator protein SU(HW) fine-tunes nuclear lamina interactions of the Drosophila genome. PLOS ONE 5, e15013 (2010).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Peric-Hupkes, D. et al. Molecular maps of the reorganization of genome-nuclear lamina interactions during differentiation. Mol. Cell 38, 603–613 (2010).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Nemeth, A. et al. Initial genomics of the human nucleolus. PLOS Genet. 6, e1000889 (2010).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• van Koningsbruggen, S. et al. High-resolution whole-genome sequencing reveals that specific chromatin domains from most human chromosomes associate with nucleoli. Mol. Biol. Cell 21, 3735–3748 (2010).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Dillinger, S., Straub, T. & Nemeth, A. Nucleolus association of chromosomal domains is largely maintained in cellular senescence despite massive nuclear reorganisation. PLOS ONE 12, e0178821 (2017).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kind, J. et al. Single-cell dynamics of genome-nuclear lamina interactions. Cell 153, 178–192 (2013).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ragoczy, T., Telling, A., Scalzo, D., Kooperberg, C. & Groudine, M. Functional redundancy in the nuclear compartmentalization of the late-replicating genome. Nucleus 5, 626–635 (2014).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kalverda, B., Pickersgill, H., Shloma, V. V. & Fornerod, M. Nucleoporins directly stimulate expression of developmental and cell-cycle genes inside the nucleoplasm. Cell 140, 360–371 (2010).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Solovei, I. et al. Nuclear architecture of rod photoreceptor cells adapts to vision in mammalian evolution. Cell 137, 356–368 (2009).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Simonis, M. et al. Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture-on-chip (4C). Nat. Genet. 38, 1348–1354 (2006).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lieberman-Aiden, E. et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289–293 (2009).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Vieux-Rochas, M., Fabre, P. J., Leleu, M., Duboule, D. & Noordermeer, D. Clustering of mammalian Hox genes with other H3K27me3 targets within an active nuclear domain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 4672–4677 (2015).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• van Steensel, B. & Belmont, A. S. Lamina-associated domains: links with chromosome architecture, heterochromatin, and gene repression. Cell 169, 780–791 (2017).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Pinheiro, I. & Heard, E. X chromosome inactivation: new players in the initiation of gene silencing. F1000Res 6, 344 (2017).
  Google Scholar
• McHugh, C. A. et al. The Xist lncRNA interacts directly with SHARP to silence transcription through HDAC3. Nature 521, 232–236 (2015).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Probst, A. V. et al. A strand-specific burst in transcription of pericentric satellites is required for chromocenter formation and early mouse development. Dev. Cell 19, 625–638 (2010).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Velazquez Camacho, O. et al. Major satellite repeat RNA stabilize heterochromatin retention of Suv39h enzymes by RNA-nucleosome association and RNA: DNA hybrid formation. eLife 6, e25293 (2017).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Martienssen, R. & Moazed, D. RNAi and heterochromatin assembly. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 7, a019323 (2015).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Yuan, K. & O’Farrell, P. H. TALE-light imaging reveals maternally guided, H3K9me2/3-independent emergence of functional heterochromatin in Drosophila embryos. Genes Dev. 30, 579–593 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Brackley, C. A., Johnson, J., Kelly, S., Cook, P. R. & Marenduzzo, D. Simulated binding of transcription factors to active and inactive regions folds human chromosomes into loops, rosettes and topological domains. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, 3503–3512 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Naumova, N. et al. Organization of the mitotic chromosome. Science 342, 948–953 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hug, C. B., Grimaldi, A. G., Kruse, K. & Vaquerizas, J. M. Chromatin architecture emerges during zygotic genome activation independent of transcription. Cell 169, 216–228 (2017).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Battulin, N. et al. Comparison of the three-dimensional organization of sperm and fibroblast genomes using the Hi-C approach. Genome Biol. 16, 77 (2015).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Du, Z. et al. Allelic reprogramming of 3D chromatin architecture during early mammalian development. Nature 547, 232–235 (2017).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Jung, Y. H. et al. Chromatin states in mouse sperm correlate with embryonic and adult regulatory landscapes. Cell Rep. 18, 1366–1382 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Carone, B. R. et al. High-resolution mapping of chromatin packaging in mouse embryonic stem cells and sperm. Dev. Cell 30, 11–22 (2014).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Palstra, R. J. et al. Maintenance of long-range DNA interactions after inhibition of ongoing RNA polymerase II transcription. PLOS ONE 3, e1661 (2008).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lund, E. et al. Lamin A/C-promoter interactions specify chromatin state-dependent transcription outcomes. Genome Res. 23, 1580–1589 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kohwi, M., Lupton, J. R., Lai, S. L., Miller, M. R. & Doe, C. Q. Developmentally regulated subnuclear genome reorganization restricts neural progenitor competence in Drosophila. Cell 152, 97–108 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Tumbar, T. & Belmont, A. S. Interphase movements of a DNA chromosome region modulated by VP16 transcriptional activator. Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 134–139 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Chuang, C. H. et al. Long-range directional movement of an interphase chromosome site. Curr. Biol. 16, 825–831 (2006).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bensaude, O. Inhibiting eukaryotic transcription: which compound to choose? How to evaluate its activity? Transcription 2, 103–108 (2011).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Therizols, P. et al. Chromatin decondensation is sufficient to alter nuclear organization in embryonic stem cells. Science 346, 1238–1242 (2014).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Isoda, T. et al. Non-coding transcription instructs chromatin folding and compartmentalization to dictate enhancer-promoter communication and T cell fate. Cell 171, 103–119 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Heinz, S. et al. Transcription elongation can affect genome 3D structure. Cell 174, 1522–1536 (2018).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hu, Y., Plutz, M. & Belmont, A. S. Hsp70 gene association with nuclear speckles is Hsp70 promoter specific. J. Cell Biol. 191, 711–719 (2010).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Khanna, N., Hu, Y. & Belmont, A. S. HSP70 transgene directed motion to nuclear speckles facilitates heat shock activation. Curr. Biol. 24, 1138–1144 (2014).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chen, Y. et al. TSA-Seq mapping of nuclear genome organization. J. Cell Biol. (in the press).
• Brickner, J. Genetic and epigenetic control of the spatial organization of the genome. Mol. Biol. Cell 28, 364–369 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Osborne, C. S. et al. Myc dynamically and preferentially relocates to a transcription factory occupied by Igh. PLOS Biol. 5, e192 (2007).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Schoenfelder, S. et al. Preferential associations between co-regulated genes reveal a transcriptional interactome in erythroid cells. Nat. Genet. 42, 53–61 (2010).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Quinodoz, S. A. et al. Higher-order inter-chromosomal hubs shape 3D genome organization in the nucleus. Cell 174, 744–757 (2018).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Beagrie, R. A. et al. Complex multi-enhancer contacts captured by genome architecture mapping. Nature 543, 519–524 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Denholtz, M. et al. Long-range chromatin contacts in embryonic stem cells reveal a role for pluripotency factors and polycomb proteins in genome organization. Cell Stem Cell 13, 602–616 (2013).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• de Wit, E. et al. The pluripotent genome in three dimensions is shaped around pluripotency factors. Nature 501, 227–231 (2013).
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Ghavi-Helm, Y. et al. Enhancer loops appear stable during development and are associated with paused polymerase. Nature 512, 96–100 (2014).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wang, S. et al. Spatial organization of chromatin domains and compartments in single chromosomes. Science 353, 598–602 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Szabo, Q. et al. TADs are 3D structural units of higher-order chromosome organization in Drosophila. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar8082 (2018).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lupianez, D. G. et al. Disruptions of topological chromatin domains cause pathogenic rewiring of gene-enhancer interactions. Cell 161, 1012–1025 (2015).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Flavahan, W. A. et al. Insulator dysfunction and oncogene activation in IDH mutant gliomas. Nature 529, 110–114 (2016).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Symmons, O. et al. The Shh topological domain facilitates the action of remote enhancers by reducing the effects of genomic distances. Dev. Cell 39, 529–543 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Narendra, V. et al. CTCF establishes discrete functional chromatin domains at the Hox clusters during differentiation. Science 347, 1017–1021 (2015).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sexton, T. & Cavalli, G. The role of chromosome domains in shaping the functional genome. Cell 160, 1049–1059 (2015).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Dekker, J., Guttman, M. & Lomvardas, S. A guide to packing your DNA. Cell 165, 259–261 (2016).
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Dixon, J. R., Gorkin, D. U. & Ren, B. Chromatin domains: the unit of chromosome organization. Mol. Cell 62, 668–680 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Rowley, M. J. & Corces, V. G. Organizational principles of 3D genome architecture. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19, 789–800 (2018).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• van Ruiten, M. S. & Rowland, B. D. SMC complexes: universal DNA looping machines with distinct regulators. Trends Genet. 34, 477–487 (2018).
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Fudenberg, G. et al. Formation of chromosomal domains by loop extrusion. Cell Rep. 15, 2038–2049 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sofueva, S. et al. Cohesin-mediated interactions organize chromosomal domain architecture. EMBO J. 32, 3119–3129 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Rao, S. S. P. et al. Cohesin loss eliminates all loop domains. Cell 171, 305–320 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Schwarzer, W. et al. Two independent modes of chromatin organization revealed by cohesin removal. Nature 551, 51–56 (2017).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wutz, G. et al. Topologically associating domains and chromatin loops depend on cohesin and are regulated by CTCF, WAPL, and PDS5 proteins. EMBO J. 36, 3573–3599 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Haarhuis, J. H. I. et al. The cohesin release factor WAPL restricts chromatin loop extension. Cell 169, 693–707 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Van Bortle, K. & Corces, V. G. tDNA insulators and the emerging role of TFIIIC in genome organization. Transcription 3, 277–284 (2012).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Van Bortle, K. et al. Insulator function and topological domain border strength scale with architectural protein occupancy. Genome Biol. 15, R82 (2014).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Phillips-Cremins, J. E. et al. Architectural protein subclasses shape 3D organization of genomes during lineage commitment. Cell 153, 1281–1295 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Rao, S. S. et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 159, 1665–1680 (2014).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• de Wit, E. et al. CTCF binding polarity determines chromatin looping. Mol. Cell 60, 676–684 (2015).
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Hanssen, L. L. P. et al. Tissue-specific CTCF-cohesin-mediated chromatin architecture delimits enhancer interactions and function in vivo. Nat. Cell Biol. 19, 952–961 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Nora, E. P. et al. Targeted degradation of CTCF decouples local insulation of chromosome domains from genomic compartmentalization. Cell 169, 930–944 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Gambetta, M. C. & Furlong, E. E. M. The insulator protein CTCF is required for correct hox gene expression, but not for embryonic development in Drosophila. Genetics 210, 129–136 (2018).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hsieh, T. H. et al. Mapping nucleosome resolution chromosome folding in yeast by Micro-C. Cell 162, 108–119 (2015).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Donze, D. & Kamakaka, R. T. RNA polymerase III and RNA polymerase II promoter complexes are heterochromatin barriers in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 20, 520–531 (2001).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Yuen, K. C., Slaughter, B. D. & Gerton, J. L. Condensin II is anchored by TFIIIC and H3K4me3 in the mammalian genome and supports the expression of active dense gene clusters. Sci. Adv. 3, e1700191 (2017).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Le, T. B., Imakaev, M. V., Mirny, L. A. & Laub, M. T. High-resolution mapping of the spatial organization of a bacterial chromosome. Science 342, 731–734 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Marbouty, M. et al. Condensin- and replication-mediated bacterial chromosome folding and origin condensation revealed by Hi-C and super-resolution imaging. Mol. Cell 59, 588–602 (2015).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Le, T. B. & Laub, M. T. Transcription rate and transcript length drive formation of chromosomal interaction domain boundaries. EMBO J. 35, 1582–1595 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Liu, C. et al. Genome-wide analysis of chromatin packing in Arabidopsis thaliana at single-gene resolution. Genome Res. 26, 1057–1068 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Crane, E. et al. Condensin-driven remodelling of X chromosome topology during dosage compensation. Nature 523, 240–244 (2015).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ramirez, F. et al. High-resolution TADs reveal DNA sequences underlying genome organization in flies. Nat. Commun. 9, 189 (2018).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ulianov, S. V. et al. Active chromatin and transcription play a key role in chromosome partitioning into topologically associating domains. Genome Res. 26, 70–84 (2016).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bonev, B. et al. Multiscale 3D genome rewiring during mouse neural development. Cell 171, 557–572 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Li, L. et al. Widespread rearrangement of 3D chromatin organization underlies polycomb-mediated stress-induced silencing. Mol. Cell 58, 216–231 (2015).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Giorgetti, L. et al. Structural organization of the inactive X chromosome in the mouse. Nature 535, 575–579 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Darrow, E. M. et al. Deletion of DXZ4 on the human inactive X chromosome alters higher-order genome architecture. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E4504–E4512 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Minajigi, A. et al. A comprehensive Xist interactome reveals cohesin repulsion and an RNA-directed chromosome conformation. Science 349, aab2276 (2015).
  Google Scholar
• Ke, Y. et al. 3D chromatin structures of mature gametes and structural reprogramming during mammalian embryogenesis. Cell 170, 367–381 (2017).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kaaij, L. J. T., van der Weide, R. H., Ketting, R. F. & de Wit, E. Systemic loss and gain of chromatin architecture throughout zebrafish development. Cell Rep. 24, 1–10 (2018).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Rowley, M. J. et al. Evolutionarily conserved principles predict 3D chromatin organization. Mol. Cell 67, 837–852 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• El-Sharnouby, S. et al. Regions of very low H3K27me3 partition the Drosophila genome into topological domains. PLOS ONE 12, e0172725 (2017).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Long, H. K., Prescott, S. L. & Wysocka, J. Ever-changing landscapes: transcriptional enhancers in development and evolution. Cell 167, 1170–1187 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Spurrell, C. H., Dickel, D. E. & Visel, A. The ties that bind: mapping the dynamic enhancer-promoter interactome. Cell 167, 1163–1166 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Andrey, G. & Mundlos, S. The three-dimensional genome: regulating gene expression during pluripotency and development. Development 144, 3646–3658 (2017).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Furlong, E. E. M. & Levine, M. Developmental enhancers and chromosome topology. Science 361, 1341–1345 (2018).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Deng, W. et al. Controlling long-range genomic interactions at a native locus by targeted tethering of a looping factor. Cell 149, 1233–1244 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Deng, W. et al. Reactivation of developmentally silenced globin genes by forced chromatin looping. Cell 158, 849–860 (2014).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Spilianakis, C. G. & Flavell, R. A. Long-range intrachromosomal interactions in the T helper type 2 cytokine locus. Nat. Immunol. 5, 1017–1027 (2004).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Andrey, G. et al. A switch between topological domains underlies HoxD genes collinearity in mouse limbs. Science 340, 1234167 (2013).
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Rubin, A. J. et al. Lineage-specific dynamic and pre-established enhancer-promoter contacts cooperate in terminal differentiation. Nat. Genet. 49, 1522–1528 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Alexander, J. M., Guan, J., Huang, B., Lomvardas, S. & Weiner, O. D. Live-cell imaging reveals enhancer-dependent Sox2 transcription in the absence of enhancer proximity. Preprint at bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/409672 (2018).
  Article Google Scholar
• Benabdallah, N. S. et al. PARP mediated chromatin unfolding is coupled to long- range enhancer activation. Preprint at bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/155325 (2017).
  Article Google Scholar
• Chen, H. et al. Dynamic interplay between enhancer-promoter topology and gene activity. Nat. Genet. 50, 1296–1303 (2018).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lefevre, P., Witham, J., Lacroix, C. E., Cockerill, P. N. & Bonifer, C. The LPS-induced transcriptional upregulation of the chicken lysozyme locus involves CTCF eviction and noncoding RNA transcription. Mol. Cell 32, 129–139 (2008).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lengronne, A. et al. Cohesin relocation from sites of chromosomal loading to places of convergent transcription. Nature 430, 573–578 (2004).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Busslinger, G. A. et al. Cohesin is positioned in mammalian genomes by transcription, CTCF and Wapl. Nature 544, 503–507 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chernukhin, I. et al. CTCF interacts with and recruits the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II to CTCF target sites genome-wide. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 1631–1648 (2007).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Velasco, M. et al. CTCF-mediated chromatin loops between promoter and gene body regulate alternative splicing across individuals. Cell Syst. 5, 628–637 (2017).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hnisz, D., Shrinivas, K., Young, R. A., Chakraborty, A. K. & Sharp, P. A. A. Phase separation model for transcriptional control. Cell 169, 13–23 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Boehning, M. et al. RNA polymerase II clustering through carboxy-terminal domain phase separation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 25, 833–840 (2018).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Jackson, D. A., Hassan, A. B., Errington, R. J. & Cook, P. R. Visualization of focal sites of transcription within human nuclei. EMBO J. 12, 1059–1065 (1993).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• van Steensel, B. et al. Localization of the glucocorticoid receptor in discrete clusters in the cell nucleus. J. Cell Sci. 108, 3003–3011 (1995).
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Cho, W. K. et al. Mediator and RNA polymerase II clusters associate in transcription-dependent condensates. Science 361, 412–415 (2018).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Boija, A. et al. Transcription factors activate genes through the phase-separation capacity of their activation domains. Cell 175, 1842–1855 (2018).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sabari, B. R. et al. Coactivator condensation at super-enhancers links phase separation and gene control. Science 361, eaar3958 (2018).
  PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Nuebler, J., Fudenberg, G., Imakaev, M., Abdennur, N. & Mirny, L. A. Chromatin organization by an interplay of loop extrusion and compartmental segregation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E6697–E6706 (2018).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kueng, S., Oppikofer, M. & Gasser, S. M. SIR proteins and the assembly of silent chromatin in budding yeast. Annu. Rev. Genet. 47, 275–306 (2013).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tolhuis, B. et al. Interactions among polycomb domains are guided by chromosome architecture. PLOS Genet. 7, e1001343 (2011).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bantignies, F. et al. Polycomb-dependent regulatory contacts between distant Hox loci in Drosophila. Cell 144, 214–226 (2011).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ogiyama, Y., Schuettengruber, B., Papadopoulos, G. L., Chang, J. M. & Cavalli, G. Polycomb-dependent chromatin looping contributes to gene silencing during Drosophila development. Mol. Cell 71, 73–88 (2018).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y. et al. Comprehensive characterization of neutrophil genome topology. Genes Dev. 31, 141–153 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Csink, A. K. & Henikoff, S. Genetic modification of heterochromatic association and nuclear organization in Drosophila. Nature 381, 529–531 (1996).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Seum, C., Delattre, M., Spierer, A. & Spierer, P. Ectopic HP1 promotes chromosome loops and variegated silencing in Drosophila. EMBO J. 20, 812–818 (2001).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Larson, A. G. et al. Liquid droplet formation by HP1α suggests a role for phase separation in heterochromatin. Nature 547, 236–240 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Strom, A. R. et al. Phase separation drives heterochromatin domain formation. Nature 547, 241–245 (2017).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Cabianca, D. S. & Gasser, S. M. Spatial segregation of heterochromatin: Uncovering functionality in a multicellular organism. Nucleus 7, 301–307 (2016).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Boumendil, C., Hari, P., Olsen, K. C. F., Acosta, J. C. & Bickmore, W. A. Nuclear pore density controls heterochromatin reorganization during senescence. Genes Dev. 33, 144–149 (2019).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Allshire, R. C. & Madhani, H. D. Ten principles of heterochromatin formation and function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 19, 229–244 (2018).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar