Exploring the three-dimensional organization of genomes: interpreting chromatin interaction data (original) (raw)

• ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489, 57–74 (2012).
• Nègre, N. et al. A _cis_-regulatory map of the Drosophila genome. Nature 471, 527–531 (2011).
  Article PubMed Central PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Gerstein, M. B. et al. Integrative analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome by the modENCODE project. Science 330, 1775–1787 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Dekker, J., Rippe, K., Dekker, M. & Kleckner, N. Capturing chromosome conformation. Science 295, 1306–1311 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• van Steensel, B. & Dekker, J. Genomics tools for unraveling chromosome architecture. Nature Biotech. 28, 1089–1095 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Müller, I., Boyle, S., Singer, R. H., Bickmore, W. A. & Chubb, J. R. Stable morphology, but dynamic internal reorganisation, of interphase human chromosomes in living cells. PLoS ONE 5, e11560 (2010).
  Article PubMed Central PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Boyle, S., Rodesch, M. J., Halvensleben, H. A., Jeddeloh, J. A. & Bickmore, W. A. Fluorescence in situ hybridization with high-complexity repeat-free oligonucleotide probes generated by massively parallel synthesis. Chromosome Res. 19, 901–909 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Cremer, T. & Cremer, C. Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells. Nature Rev. Genet. 2, 292–301 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Branco, M. R. & Pombo, A. Intermingling of chromosome territories in interphase suggests role in translocations and transcription-dependent associations. PLoS Biol. 4, e138 (2006).
  Article PubMed Central PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Iborra, F. J., Pombo, A., Jackson, D. A. & Cook, P. R. Active RNA polymerases are localized within discrete transcription “factories' in human nuclei. J. Cell Sci. 109, 1427–1436 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Fraser, P. & Bickmore, W. Nuclear organization of the genome and the potential for gene regulation. Nature 447, 413–417 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Brown, J. M. et al. Association between active genes occurs at nuclear speckles and is modulated by chromatin environment. J. Cell Biol. 182, 1083–1097 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Schoenfelder, S. et al. Preferential associations between co-regulated genes reveal a transcriptional interactome in erythroid cells. Nature Genet. 42, 53–61 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Guelen, L. et al. Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions. Nature 453, 948–951 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Németh, A. et al. Initial genomics of the human nucleolus. PLoS Genet. 6, e1000889 (2010).
  Article PubMed Central PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• van Koningsbruggen, S. et al. High-resolution whole-genome sequencing reveals that specific chromatin domains from most human chromosomes associate with nucleoli. Mol. Biol. Cell. 21, 3735–3748 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Tolhuis, B. et al. Interactions among Polycomb domains are guided by chromosome architecture. PLoS Genet. 7, e1001343 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Bantignies, F. et al. Polycomb-dependent regulatory contacts between distant Hox loci in Drosophila. Cell 144, 214–226 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Pirrotta, V. & Li, H. B. A view of nuclear Polycomb bodies. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 22, 101–109 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• de Wit, E. & de Laat, W. A decade of 3C technologies: insights into nuclear organization. Genes Dev. 26, 11–24 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Hakim, O. & Misteli, T. SnapShot: chromosome conformation capture. Cell 148, 1068–1068.e2 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Ethier, S. D., Miura, H. & Dostie, J. Discovering genome regulation with 3C and 3C-related technologies. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1819, 401–410 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Felsenfeld, G. & Groudine, M. Controlling the double helix. Nature 421, 448–453 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Rippe, K. Making contacts on a nucleic acid polymer. Trends Biochem. Sci. 26, 733–740 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Fudenberg, G. & Mirny, L. A. Higher-order chromatin structure: bridging physics and biology. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 22, 115–124 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Chubb, J. R., Boyle, S., Perry, P. & Bickmore, W. A. Chromatin motion is constrained by association with nuclear compartments in human cells. Curr. Biol. 12, 439–445 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Marshall, W. F. et al. Interphase chromosomes undergo constrained diffusional motion in living cells. Curr. Biol. 7, 930–939 (1997).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kalhor, R., Tjong, H., Jayathilaka, N., Alber, F. & Chen, L. Genome architectures revealed by tethered chromosome conformation capture and population-based modeling. Nature Biotech. 30, 90–98 (2011). These authors apply simulations to analyse genome-wide chromatin interaction data to generate spatial models of nuclear organization that also capture the cell-to-cell variability in chromosome organization.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Tjong, H., Gong, K., Chen, L. & Alber, F. Physical tethering and volume exclusion determine higher-order genome organization in budding yeast. Genome Res. 22, 1295–1305 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Miele, A. & Dekker, J. Long-range chromosomal interactions and gene regulation. Mol. BioSyst. 4, 1046–1057 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Krivega, I. & Dean, A. Enhancer and promoter interactions—long distance calls. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 22, 79–85 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tolhuis, B., Palstra, R. J., Splinter, E., Grosveld, F. & de Laat, W. Looping and interaction between hypersensitive sites in the active β-globin locus. Mol. Cell 10, 1453–1465 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ott, C. J. et al. Intronic enhancers coordinate epithelial-specific looping of the active CFTR locus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 19934–19939 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Gheldof, N. et al. Cell-type-specific long-range looping interactions identify distant regulatory elements of the CFTR gene. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 4235–4336 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Dekker, J. The 3 C's of chromosome conformation capture: controls, controls, controls. Nature Methods 3, 17–21 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Palstra, R. J. et al. The β-globin nuclear compartment in development and erythroid differentiation. Nature Genet. 35, 190–194 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Drissen, R. et al. The active spatial organization of the β-globin locus requires the transcription factor EKLF. Genes Dev. 18, 2485–2490 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Vakoc, C. R. et al. Proximity among distant regulatory elements at the β-globin locus requires GATA-1 and FOG-1. Mol. Cell 17, 453–462 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Deng, W. et al. Controlling long-range genomic interactions at a native locus by targeted tethering of a looping factor. Cell 149, 1233–1244 (2012). In this work, the authors show that physical tethering of an enhancer to its target promoter can activate the gene, providing one of the first direct mechanistic insights into the role of chromatin looping in gene control.
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Vernimmen, D., De Gobbi, M., Sloane-Stanley, J. A., Wood, W. G. & Higgs, D. R. Long-range chromosomal interactions regulate the timing of the transition between poised and active gene expression. EMBO J. 26, 2041–2051 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Spilianakis, C. G. & Flavell, R. A. Long-range intrachromosomal interactions in the T helper type 2 cytokine locus. Nature Immunol. 5, 1017–1027 (2004).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Ahmadiyeh, N. et al. 8q24 prostate, breast, and colon cancer risk loci show tissue-specific long-range interaction with MYC. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 9742–9746 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wright, J. B., Brown, S. J. & Cole, M. D. Upregulation of c-MYC in cis through a large chromatin loop linked to a cancer risk-associated single-nucleotide polymorphism in colorectal cancer cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30, 1411–1420 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Majumder, P., Gomez, J. A., Chadwick, B. P. & Boss, J. M. The insulator factor CTCF controls MHC class II gene expression and is required for the formation of long-distance chromatin interactions. J. Exp. Med. 205, 785–798 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Miele, A., Bystricky, K. & Dekker, J. Yeast silent mating type loci form heterochromatic clusters through silencer protein-dependent long-range interactions. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000478 (2009).
  Article PubMed Central PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Sanyal, A., Lajoie, B. R., Jain, G. & Dekker, J. The long-range interaction landscape of gene promoters. Nature 489, 109–113 (2012). In this paper, thousands of long-range interactions across 30 Mb in the human genome are discovered. This paper describes some of the statistical approaches that can be used to identify significant locus–locus interactions in comprehensive chromatin interaction data sets.
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Duan, Z. et al. A three-dimensional model of the yeast genome. Nature 465, 363–367 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Simonis, M. et al. Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture-on-chip (4C). Nature Genet. 38, 1348–1354 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hakim, O. et al. Diverse gene reprogramming events occur in the same spatial clusters of distal regulatory elements. Genome Res. 21, 697–706 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Gibcus, J. H. & Dekker, J. The hierarchy of the 3D genome. Mol. Cell 49, 773–782 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Phillips, J. E. & Corces, V. G. CTCF: master weaver of the genome. Cell 137, 1194–1211 (2009).
  Article PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Handoko, L. et al. CTCF-mediated functional chromatin interactome in pluripotent cells. Nature Genet. 43, 630–638 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kleinjan, D. A. & van Heyningen, V. Long-range control of gene expression: emerging mechanisms and disruption in disease. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 76, 8–32 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gerstein, M. B. et al. Architecture of the human regulatory network derived from ENCODE data. Nature 489, 91–100 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Thurman, R. E. et al. The accessible chromatin landscape of the human genome. Nature 489, 75–82 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Shen, Y. et al. A map of the _cis_-regulatory sequences in the mouse genome. Nature 488, 116–120 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Sexton, T. et al. Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome. Cell 148, 458–472 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nora, E. P. et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 485, 381–385 (2012). This paper describes the discovery of TADs using 5C and shows that TAD boundaries are independent of chromatin modification but are defined by genetic cis -elements.
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Dixon, J. R. et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485, 376–380 (2012). This paper describes the discovery of TADs and discusses a computational strategy to identify TAD boundaries using Hi-C data sets.
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Hou, C., Li, L., Qin, Z. S. & Corces, V. G. Gene density, transcription, and insulators contribute to the partition of the Drosophila genome into physical domains. Mol. Cell 48, 471–484 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Gaszner, M. & Felsenfeld, G. Insulators: exploiting transcriptional and epigenetic mechanisms. Nature Rev. Genet. 7, 703–713 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Caron, H. et al. The human transcriptome map: clustering of highly expressed genes in chromosomal domains. Science 291, 1289–1292 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Spellman, P. T. & Rubin, G. M. Evidence for large domains of similarly expressed genes in the Drosophila genome. J. Biol. 1, 5 (2002).
  Article PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Lieberman-Aiden, E. et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289–293 (2009). This work describes development of the Hi-C method and how polymer simulations can be used to analyse chromatin interaction data. This work also described the fractal globule state of chromatin at the 1–10 Mb scale.
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Marti-Renom, M. A. & Mirny, L. A. Bridging the resolution gap in structural modeling of 3D genome organization. PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1002125 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Baù, D. & Marti-Renom, M. A. Structure determination of genomic domains by satisfaction of spatial restraints. Chromosome Res. 19, 25–35 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Jhunjhunwala, S. et al. The 3D structure of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain locus: implications for long-range genomic interactions. Cell 133, 265–279 (2008). This worked combined FISH data and polymer modelling to obtained spatial models for the immunoglobulin heavy-chain locus.
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Fraser, J. et al. Chromatin conformation signatures of cellular differentiation. Genome Biol. 10, R37 (2009).
  Article PubMed Central PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Russel, D. et al. Putting the pieces together: integrative modeling platform software for structure determination of macromolecular assemblies. PLoS Biol. 10, e1001244 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Sanyal, A., Baù, D., Martí-Renom, M. A. & Dekker, J. Chromatin globules: a common motif of higher order chromosome structure? Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 23, 325–331 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Baù, D. et al. The three-dimensional folding of the α-globin gene domain reveals formation of chromatin globules. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 18, 107–114 (2011). These authors describe a restraint-based modelling approach to use chromatin interaction data to derive spatial models of chromatin domains.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Umbarger, M. A. et al. The three-dimensional architecture of a bacterial genome and its alteration by genetic perturbation. Mol. Cell 44, 252–264 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ebersbach, G., Briegel, A., Jensen, G. J. & Jacobs-Wagner, C. A self-associating protein critical for chromosome attachment, division, and polar organization in caulobacter. Cell 134, 956–968 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Bowman, G. R. et al. A polymeric protein anchors the chromosomal origin/ParB complex at a bacterial cell pole. Cell 134, 945–955 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Tanizawa, H. et al. Mapping of long-range associations throughout the fission yeast genome reveals global genome organization linked to transcriptional regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 8164–8177 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Hu, M. et al. Bayesian inference of spatial organizations of chromosomes. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, e1002893 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Jin, Q. W., Fuchs, J. & Loidl, J. Centromere clustering is a major determinant of yeast interphase nuclear organization. J. Cell Sci. 113, 1903–1912 (2000).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Taddei, A. & Gasser, S. M. Structure and function in the budding yeast nucleus. Genetics 192, 107–129 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• van den Engh, G., Sachs, R. & Trask, B. J. Estimating genomic distance from DNA sequence location in cell nuclei by a random walk model. Science 257, 1410 (1992).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• McManus, J. et al. Unusual chromosome structure of fission yeast DNA in mouse cells. J. Cell Sci. 107, 469–486 (1994).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hahnfeldt, P. et al. Polymer models for interphase chromosomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 90, 7854–7858 (1993).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Marko, J. F. & Siggia, E. D. Polymer models of meiotic and mitotic chromosomes. Mol. Biol. Cell 8, 2217–2231 (1997).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Sachs, R. K. et al. A random-walk/giant-loop model for interphase chromosomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 2710–2714 (1995).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sikorav, J. L. & Jannink, G. Kinetics of chromosome condensation in the presence of topoisomerases: a phantom chain model. Biophys. J. 66, 827 (1994).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Grosberg, A., Rabin, Y., Havlin, S. & Neer, A. Crumpled globule model of the three-dimensional structure of DNA. Europhys. Lett. 23, 373 (1993).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Vologodskii, A. V., Levene, S. D., Klenin, K. V., Frank-Kamenetskii, M. & Cozzarelli, N. R. Conformational and thermodynamic properties of supercoiled DNA. J. Mol. Biol. 227, 1224–1243 (1992).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bohn, M. & Heermann, D. W. Repulsive forces between looping chromosomes induce entropy-driven segregation. PLoS ONE 6, e14428 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Dorier, J. & Stasiak, A. The role of transcription factories-mediated interchromosomal contacts in the organization of nuclear architecture. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 7410–7421 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Vettorel, T., Grosberg, A. Y. & Kremer, K. Statistics of polymer rings in the melt: a numerical simulation study. Phys. Biol. 6, 025013 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Rosa, A. & Everaers, R. Structure and dynamics of interphase chromosomes. PLoS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000153 (2008).
  Article PubMed Central PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Cook, P. R. & Marenduzzo, D. Entropic organization of interphase chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 186, 825–834 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Jerabek, H. & Heermann, D. W. Expression-dependent folding of interphase chromatin. PLoS ONE 7, e37525 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Bohn, M. & Heermann, D. W. Diffusion-driven looping provides a consistent framework for chromatin organization. PLoS ONE 5, e12218 (2010).
  Article PubMed Central PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Mateos-Langerak, J. et al. Spatially confined folding of chromatin in the interphase nucleus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 3812–3817 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Barbieri, M. et al. Complexity of chromatin folding is captured by the strings and binders switch model. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 109, 16173–16178 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Rosa, A., Becker, N. B. & Everaers, R. Looping probabilities in model. Interphase chromosomes. Biophys. J. 98, 2410–2419 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Grosberg, A. Y., Nechaev, S. K. & Shakhnovich, E. I. The role of topological constraints in the kinetics of collapse of macromolecules. J. Physique 49, 2095–2100 (1988).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Mirny, L. A. The fractal globule as a model of chromatin architecture in the cell. Chromosome Res. 19, 37–51 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Rapkin, L. M., Anchel, D. R. P., Li, R. & Bazett-Jones, D. P. A view of the chromatin landscape. Micron 43, 150–158 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Belmont, A. S. et al. Insights into interphase large-scale chromatin structure from analysis of engineered chromosome regions. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 75, 453–460 (2011).
  Article Google Scholar
• Towbin, B. D. et al. Step-wise methylation of histone h3k9 positions heterochromatin at the nuclear periphery. Cell 150, 934–947 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Emanuel, M., Radja, N. H., Henriksson, A. & Schiessel, H. The physics behind the larger scale organization of DNA in eukaryotes. Phys. Biol. 6, 025008 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Shopland, L. S. et al. Folding and organization of a contiguous chromosome region according to the gene distribution pattern in primary genomic sequence. J. Cell Biol. 174, 27–38 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Rubinstein, M. & Colby, R. H. Polymer Physics (Oxford Univ. Press, 2003).
  Google Scholar
• Würtele, H. & Chartrand, P. Genome-wide scanning of HoxB1-associated loci in mouse ES cells using an open-ended chromosome conformation capture methodology. Chromosome Res. 14, 477–495 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zhao, Z. et al. Circular chromosome conformation capture (4C) uncovers extensive networks of epigenetically regulated intra- and interchromosomal interactions. Nature Genet. 38, 1341–1347 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Dostie, J. et al. Chromosome conformation capture carbon copy (5C): a massively parallel solution for mapping interactions between genomic elements. Genome Res. 16, 1299–1309 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Lajoie, B. R., van Berkum, N. L., Sanyal, A. & Dekker, J. My5C: web tools for chromosome conformation capture studies. Nature Methods 6, 690–691 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Horike, S., Cai, S., Miyano, M., Cheng, J. F. & Kohwi-Shigematsu, T. Loss of silent-chromatin looping and impaired imprinting of DLX5 in Rett syndrome. Nature Genet. 37, 31–40 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Fullwood, M. J. et al. An oestrogen-receptor-α-bound human chromatin interactome. Nature 462, 58–64 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. et al. Spatial organization of the mouse genome and its role in recurrent chromosomal translocations. Cell 148, 908–921 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Imakaev, M. et al. Iterative correction of Hi-C data reveals hallmarks of chromosome organization. Nature Methods 9, 999–1003 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Central PubMed Google Scholar
• Mouse ENCODE Consortium. An encyclopedia of mouse DNA elements (Mouse ENCODE). Genome Biol. 13, 418 (2012).