Ramsahoye, B. H. et al. Non-CpG methylation is prevalent in embryonic stem cells and may be mediated by DNA methyltransferase 3a. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA97, 5237–5242 (2000). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Ziller, M. J. et al. Genomic distribution and inter-sample variation of non-CpG methylation across human cell types. PLoS Genet.7, e1002389 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Okano, M., Bell, D. W., Haber, D. A. & Li, E. DNA methyltransferases DNMT3A and DNMT3B are essential for de novo methylation and mammalian development. Cell99, 247–257 (1999). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Li, E., Bestor, T. H. & Jaenisch, R. Targeted mutation of the DNA methyltransferase gene results in embryonic lethality. Cell69, 915–926 (1992). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Holliday, R. & Pugh, J. E. DNA modification mechanisms and gene activity during development. Science187, 226–232 (1975). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Riggs, A. D. X inactivation, differentiation, and DNA methylation. Cytogenet. Cell Genet.14, 9–25 (1975). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Laird, P. W. Principles and challenges of genomewide DNA methylation analysis. Nature Rev. Genet.11, 191–203 (2010). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Illingworth, R. S. et al. Orphan CpG islands identify numerous conserved promoters in the mammalian genome. PLoS Genet.6, e1001134 (2010). This paper reconciles the apparent dissimilarities in CpG content between the mouse and human genome and shows that functional enrichment for unmethylated regions reveals an almost equivalent compliment of CpG islands. Moreover, it confirms that half of the CpG islands do not occur at known promoter regions and are more frequently methylated than those at promoters. ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Macleod, D., Charlton, J., Mullins, J. & Bird, A. P. SP1 sites in the mouse Aprt gene promoter are required to prevent methylation of the CpG island. Genes Dev.8, 2282–2292 (1994). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Brandeis, M. et al. SP1 elements protect a CpG island from de novo methylation. Nature371, 435–438 (1994). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Lienert, F. et al. Identification of genetic elements that autonomously determine DNA methylation states. Nature Genet.43, 1091–1097 (2011). This study extends to numerous different sites within pluripotent cells, the observations of References 12 and 13, which had first demonstrated that transcription factor binding instructs local demethylation. ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Stadler, M. B. et al. DNA-binding factors shape the mouse methylome at distal regulatory regions. Nature480, 490–495 (2011). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Clouaire, T. et al. CFP1 integrates both CpG content and gene activity for accurate H3K4me3 deposition in embryonic stem cells. Genes Dev.26, 1714–1728 (2012). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Erfurth, F. E. et al. MLL protects CpG clusters from methylation within the Hoxa9 gene, maintaining transcript expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA105, 7517–7522 (2008). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Otani, J. et al. Structural basis for recognition of H3K4 methylation status by the DNA methyltransferase 3A ATRX–DNMT3–DNMT3L domain. EMBO Rep.10, 1235–1241 (2009). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Ooi, S. K. et al. DNMT3L connects unmethylated lysine 4 of histone H3 to de novo methylation of DNA. Nature448, 714–717 (2007). This work highlights the important relationship between DNMT3 enzyme binding and local chromatin context. Particularly, it showed that recruitment of DNA methyltransferases requires histone tail templates that lack euchromatic H3K4 methylation. ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Yang, X. et al. Gene reactivation by 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine-induced demethylation requires SRCAP-mediated H2A.Z insertion to establish nucleosome depleted regions. PLoS Genet.8, e1002604 (2012). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Brinkman, A. B. et al. Sequential ChIP-bisulfite sequencing enables direct genome-scale investigation of chromatin and DNA methylation cross-talk. Genome Res.22, 1128–1138 (2012). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Jones, P. A. Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nature Rev. Genet.13, 484–492 (2012). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Ginno, P. A., Lott, P. L., Christensen, H. C., Korf, I. & Chedin, F. R-loop formation is a distinctive characteristic of unmethylated human CpG island promoters. Mol. Cell45, 814–825 (2012). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Jeltsch, A. On the enzymatic properties of DNMT1: specificity, processivity, mechanism of linear diffusion and allosteric regulation of the enzyme. Epigenetics1, 63–66 (2006). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Song, J., Rechkoblit, O., Bestor, T. H. & Patel, D. J. Structure of DNMT1–DNA complex reveals a role for autoinhibition in maintenance DNA methylation. Science331, 1036–1040 (2011). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Schoorlemmer, J. et al. Characterization of a negative retinoic acid response element in the murine OCT4 promoter. Mol. Cell. Biol.14, 1122–1136 (1994). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Dennis, K., Fan, T., Geiman, T., Yan, Q. & Muegge, K. LSH, a member of the SNF2 family, is required for genome-wide methylation. Genes Dev.15, 2940–2944 (2001). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Myant, K. & Stancheva, I. LSH cooperates with DNA methyltransferases to repress transcription. Mol. Cell. Biol.28, 215–226 (2008). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Epsztejn-Litman, S. et al. De novo DNA methylation promoted by G9A prevents reprogramming of embryonically silenced genes. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol.15, 1176–1183 (2008). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Dong, K. B. et al. DNA methylation in ES cells requires the lysine methyltransferase G9A but not its catalytic activity. EMBO J.27, 2691–2701 (2008). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Ayyanathan, K. et al. Regulated recruitment of HP1 to a euchromatic gene induces mitotically heritable, epigenetic gene silencing: a mammalian cell culture model of gene variegation. Genes Dev.17, 1855–1869 (2003). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Lehnertz, B. et al. SUV39H-mediated histone H3 lysine 9 methylation directs DNA methylation to major satellite repeats at pericentric heterochromatin. Curr. Biol.13, 1192–1200 (2003). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Xu, G. L. et al. Chromosome instability and immunodeficiency syndrome caused by mutations in a DNA methyltransferase gene. Nature402, 187–191 (1999). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Chen, T., Tsujimoto, N. & Li, E. The PWWP domain of DNMT3A and DNMT3B is required for directing DNA methylation to the major satellite repeats at pericentric heterochromatin. Mol. Cell. Biol.24, 9048–9058 (2004). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Gopalakrishnan, S., Sullivan, B. A., Trazzi, S., Della Valle, G. & Robertson, K. D. DNMT3B interacts with constitutive centromere protein CENP-C to modulate DNA methylation and the histone code at centromeric regions. Hum. Mol. Genet.18, 3178–3193 (2009). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Okada, T. et al. CENP-B controls centromere formation depending on the chromatin context. Cell131, 1287–1300 (2007). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Waterston, R. H. et al. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature420, 520–562 (2002). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Liang, G. et al. Cooperativity between DNA methyltransferases in the maintenance methylation of repetitive elements. Mol. Cell. Biol.22, 480–491 (2002). By investigating the levels of demethylation inDnmt1-knockout compared withDnmt3a- orDnmt3b-knockout mouse ESCs across different genomic features, Lianget al. demonstrate selective demethylation within particular repetitive element classes in the absence ofde novomethyltransferase activity. ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Rowe, H. M. et al. KAP1 controls endogenous retroviruses in embryonic stem cells. Nature463, 237–240 (2010). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Wolf, D. & Goff, S. P. TRIM28 mediates primer binding site-targeted silencing of murine leukemia virus in embryonic cells. Cell131, 46–57 (2007). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Wiznerowicz, M. et al. The Kruppel-associated box repressor domain can trigger de novo promoter methylation during mouse early embryogenesis. J. Biol. Chem.282, 34535–34541 (2007). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Matsui, T. et al. Proviral silencing in embryonic stem cells requires the histone methyltransferase ESET. Nature464, 927–931 (2010). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Karimi, M. M. et al. DNA methylation and SETDB1/H3K9me3 regulate predominantly distinct sets of genes, retroelements, and chimeric transcripts in mESCs. Cell Stem Cell8, 676–687 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Leung, D. C. et al. Lysine methyltransferase G9a is required for de novo DNA methylation and the establishment, but not the maintenance, of proviral silencing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA108, 5718–5723 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Ooi, S. K. et al. Dynamic instability of genomic methylation patterns in pluripotent stem cells. Epigenet. Chromat.3, 17 (2010). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Jones, P. L. et al. Methylated DNA and MeCP2 recruit histone deacetylase to repress transcription. Nature Genet.19, 187–191 (1998). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Nan, X. et al. Transcriptional repression by the methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 involves a histone deacetylase complex. Nature393, 386–389 (1998). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Jahner, D. et al. De novo methylation and expression of retroviral genomes during mouse embryogenesis. Nature298, 623–628 (1982). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Stewart, C. L., Stuhlmann, H., Jahner, D. & Jaenisch, R. De novo methylation, expression, and infectivity of retroviral genomes introduced into embryonal carcinoma cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA79, 4098–4102 (1982). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Smallwood, S. A. & Kelsey, G. De novo DNA methylation: a germ cell perspective. Trends Genet.28, 33–42 (2012). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Lucifero, D., Mann, M. R., Bartolomei, M. S. & Trasler, J. M. Gene-specific timing and epigenetic memory in oocyte imprinting. Hum. Mol. Genet.13, 839–849 (2004). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Davis, T. L., Yang, G. J., McCarrey, J. R. & Bartolomei, M. S. The H19 methylation imprint is erased and re-established differentially on the parental alleles during male germ cell development. Hum. Mol. Genet.9, 2885–2894 (2000). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Lee, D. H. et al. CTCF-dependent chromatin bias constitutes transient epigenetic memory of the mother at the H19-IGF2 imprinting control region in prospermatogonia. PLoS Genet.6, e1001224 (2010). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Henckel, A. et al. Histone methylation is mechanistically linked to DNA methylation at imprinting control regions in mammals. Hum. Mol. Genet.18, 3375–3383 (2009). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Messerschmidt, D. M. et al. TRIM28 is required for epigenetic stability during mouse oocyte to embryo transition. Science335, 1499–1502 (2012). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Quenneville, S. et al. In embryonic stem cells, ZFP57/KAP1 recognize a methylated hexanucleotide to affect chromatin and DNA methylation of imprinting control regions. Mol. Cell44, 361–372 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Tsumura, A. et al. Maintenance of self-renewal ability of mouse embryonic stem cells in the absence of DNA methyltransferases DNMT1, DNMT3A and DNMT3B. Genes Cells11, 805–814 (2006). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Chen, T., Ueda, Y., Dodge, J. E., Wang, Z. & Li, E. Establishment and maintenance of genomic methylation patterns in mouse embryonic stem cells by DNMT3A and DNMT3B. Mol. Cell. Biol.23, 5594–5605 (2003). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Jackson, M. et al. Severe global DNA hypomethylation blocks differentiation and induces histone hyperacetylation in embryonic stem cells. Mol. Cell. Biol.24, 8862–8871 (2004). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Tucker, K. L. et al. Germ-line passage is required for establishment of methylation and expression patterns of imprinted but not of nonimprinted genes. Genes Dev.10, 1008–1020 (1996). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Ng, R. K. et al. Epigenetic restriction of embryonic cell lineage fate by methylation of ELF5. Nature Cell Biol.10, 1280–1290 (2008). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Nakanishi, M. O. et al. Trophoblast-specific DNA methylation occurs after the segregation of the trophectoderm and inner cell mass in the mouse periimplantation embryo. Epigenetics7, 173–182 (2012). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Hu, Y. G. et al. Regulation of DNA methylation activity through DNMT3L promoter methylation by DNMT3 enzymes in embryonic development. Hum. Mol. Genet.17, 2654–2664 (2008). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Ficz, G. et al. Dynamic regulation of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mouse ES cells and during differentiation. Nature473, 398–402 (2011). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Booth, M. J. et al. Quantitative sequencing of 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine at single-base resolution. Science336, 934–937 (2012). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Macfarlan, T. S. et al. Embryonic stem cell potency fluctuates with endogenous retrovirus activity. Nature487, 57–63 (2012). This paper presents compelling evidence that epigenetically unstable endogenous retroelement activity corresponds with extra-embryonic potential in pluripotent stem cell populations. ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Feldman, N. et al. G9A-mediated irreversible epigenetic inactivation of Oct-3/4 during early embryogenesis. Nature Cell Biol.8, 188–194 (2006). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Athanasiadou, R. et al. Targeting of de novo DNA methylation throughout the Oct-4 gene regulatory region in differentiating embryonic stem cells. PLoS ONE5, e9937 (2010). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
You, J. S. et al. OCT4 establishes and maintains nucleosome-depleted regions that provide additional layers of epigenetic regulation of its target genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA108, 14497–14502 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Maatouk, D. M. et al. DNA methylation is a primary mechanism for silencing postmigratory primordial germ cell genes in both germ cell and somatic cell lineages. Development133, 3411–3418 (2006). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Pohlers, M. et al. A role for E2F6 in the restriction of male-germ-cell-specific gene expression. Curr. Biol.15, 1051–1057 (2005). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Velasco, G. et al. DNMT3B recruitment through E2F6 transcriptional repressor mediates germ-line gene silencing in murine somatic tissues. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA107, 9281–9286 (2010). ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Borgel, J. et al. Targets and dynamics of promoter DNA methylation during early mouse development. Nature Genet.42, 1093–1100 (2010). In addition to presenting the first study of genome-scale remethylation kinetics during mammalian implantation, this paper confirms that DNMT3B is specifically necessary to silence the germline gene promoters, which is one of the best established instances of direct, coordinated silencing by DNA methylation. ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Hackett, J. A. et al. Promoter DNA methylation couples genome-defence mechanisms to epigenetic reprogramming in the mouse germline. Development139, 3623–3632 (2012). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Chan, M. M., Smith, Z. D., Egli, D., Regev, A. & Meissner, A. Mouse ooplasm confers context-specific reprogramming capacity. Nature Genet.44, 978–980 (2012). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Hackett, J. A. et al. Germline DNA demethylation dynamics and imprint erasure through 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. Science 6 Dec 2012 (doi:10.1126/science.1229277). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Augui, S., Nora, E. P. & Heard, E. Regulation of X-chromosome inactivation by the X-inactivation centre. Nature Rev. Genet.12, 429–442 (2011). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Gendrel, A. V. et al. SMCHD1-dependent and -independent pathways determine developmental dynamics of CpG island methylation on the inactive X chromosome. Dev. Cell23, 265–279 (2012). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Hodges, E. et al. Directional DNA methylation changes and complex intermediate states accompany lineage specificity in the adult hematopoietic compartment. Mol. Cell44, 17–28 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Deaton, A. M. et al. Cell type-specific DNA methylation at intragenic CpG islands in the immune system. Genome Res.21, 1074–1086 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Trowbridge, J. J., Snow, J. W., Kim, J. & Orkin, S. H. DNA methyltransferase 1 is essential for and uniquely regulates hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Cell Stem Cell5, 442–449 (2009). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Broske, A. M. et al. DNA methylation protects hematopoietic stem cell multipotency from myeloerythroid restriction. Nature Genet.41, 1207–1215 (2009). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Hogart, A. et al. Genome-wide DNA methylation profiles in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells reveal overrepresentation of ETS transcription factor binding sites. Genome Res.5, 1407–1418 (2012). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Fan, G. et al. DNA methylation controls the timing of astrogliogenesis through regulation of JAK-STAT signaling. Development132, 3345–3356 (2005). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Tadokoro, Y., Ema, H., Okano, M., Li, E. & Nakauchi, H. De novo DNA methyltransferase is essential for self-renewal, but not for differentiation, in hematopoietic stem cells. J. Exp. Med.204, 715–722 (2007). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Challen, G. A. et al. DNMT3A is essential for hematopoietic stem cell differentiation. Nature Genet.44, 23–31 (2012). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Bocker, M. T. et al. Genome-wide promoter DNA methylation dynamics of human hematopoietic progenitor cells during differentiation and aging. Blood117, e182–e189 (2011). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Calvanese, V. et al. A promoter DNA demethylation landscape of human hematopoietic differentiation. Nucleic Acids Res.40, 116–131 (2012). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Figueroa, M. E. et al. Leukemic IDH1 and IDH2 mutations result in a hypermethylation phenotype, disrupt TET2 function, and impair hematopoietic differentiation. Cancer Cell18, 553–567 (2010). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Ko, M. et al. Ten-eleven-translocation 2 (TET2) negatively regulates homeostasis and differentiation of hematopoietic stem cells in mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA108, 14566–14571 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Moran-Crusio, K. et al. TET2 loss leads to increased hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and myeloid transformation. Cancer Cell20, 11–24 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Quivoron, C. et al. TET2 inactivation results in pleiotropic hematopoietic abnormalities in mouse and is a recurrent event during human lymphomagenesis. Cancer Cell20, 25–38 (2011). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Kallin, E. M. et al. TET2 facilitates the derepression of myeloid target genes during CEBPα-induced transdifferentiation of pre-B cells. Mol. Cell48, 266–276 (2012). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Klug, M. et al. Active DNA demethylation in human postmitotic cells correlates with activating histone modifications, but not transcription levels. Genome Biol.11, R63 (2010). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Lee, P. P. et al. A critical role for DNMT1 and DNA methylation in T cell development, function, and survival. Immunity15, 763–774 (2001). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Chappell, C., Beard, C., Altman, J., Jaenisch, R. & Jacob, J. DNA methylation by DNA methyltransferase 1 is critical for effector CD8 T cell expansion. J. Immunol.176, 4562–4572 (2006). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Shaknovich, R. et al. DNA methyltransferase 1 and DNA methylation patterning contribute to germinal center B-cell differentiation. Blood118, 3559–3569 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Makar, K. W. & Wilson, C. B. DNA methylation is a nonredundant repressor of the Th2 effector program. J. Immunol.173, 4402–4406 (2004). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Makar, K. W. et al. Active recruitment of DNA methyltransferases regulates interleukin 4 in thymocytes and T cells. Nature Immunol.4, 1183–1190 (2003). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Bruniquel, D. & Schwartz, R. H. Selective, stable demethylation of the interleukin-2 gene enhances transcription by an active process. Nature Immunol.4, 235–240 (2003). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Murayama, A. et al. A specific CpG site demethylation in the human interleukin 2 gene promoter is an epigenetic memory. EMBO J.25, 1081–1092 (2006). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Zheng, Y. et al. Role of conserved non-coding DNA elements in the Foxp3 gene in regulatory T-cell fate. Nature463, 808–812 (2010). This study carefully dissects the sequential activation of different enhancers asFoxp3is activated in regulatory T cells. ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Lorincz, M. C., Dickerson, D. R., Schmitt, M. & Groudine, M. Intragenic DNA methylation alters chromatin structure and elongation efficiency in mammalian cells. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol.11, 1068–1075 (2004). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Shukla, S. et al. CTCF-promoted RNA polymerase II pausing links DNA methylation to splicing. Nature479, 74–79 (2011). This study mechanistically links CTCF binding at unmethylated regions downstream of generally excluded weak exons to their inclusion within mature mRNA transcripts through local Pol II pausing. ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Ohinata, Y. et al. BLIMP1 is a critical determinant of the germ cell lineage in mice. Nature436, 207–213 (2005). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Ancelin, K. et al. BLIMP1 associates with PRMT5 and directs histone arginine methylation in mouse germ cells. Nature Cell Biol.8, 623–630 (2006). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Okamura, D., Tokitake, Y., Niwa, H. & Matsui, Y. Requirement of OCT3/4 function for germ cell specification. Dev. Biol.317, 576–584 (2008). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Saitou, M., Barton, S. C. & Surani, M. A. A molecular programme for the specification of germ cell fate in mice. Nature418, 293–300 (2002). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Sato, M. et al. Identification of PGC7, a new gene expressed specifically in preimplantation embryos and germ cells. Mech. Dev.113, 91–94 (2002). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Seki, Y. et al. Extensive and orderly reprogramming of genome-wide chromatin modifications associated with specification and early development of germ cells in mice. Dev. Biol.278, 440–458 (2005). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Hajkova, P. et al. Epigenetic reprogramming in mouse primordial germ cells. Mech. Dev.117, 15–23 (2002). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Lees-Murdock, D. J., De Felici, M. & Walsh, C. P. Methylation dynamics of repetitive DNA elements in the mouse germ cell lineage. Genomics82, 230–237 (2003). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Lane, N. et al. Resistance of IAPs to methylation reprogramming may provide a mechanism for epigenetic inheritance in the mouse. Genesis35, 88–93 (2003). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Popp, C. et al. Genome-wide erasure of DNA methylation in mouse primordial germ cells is affected by AID deficiency. Nature463, 1101–1105 (2010). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Guibert, S., Forne, T. & Weber, M. Global profiling of DNA methylation erasure in mouse primordial germ cells. Genome Res.22, 633–641 (2012). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Seisenberger, S. et al. The dynamics of genome-wide DNA methylation reprogramming in mouse primordial germ cells. Mol. Cell48, 849–862 (2012). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Farthing, C. R. et al. Global mapping of DNA methylation in mouse promoters reveals epigenetic reprogramming of pluripotency genes. PLoS Genet.4, e1000116 (2008). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Hajkova, P. et al. Genome-wide reprogramming in the mouse germ line entails the base excision repair pathway. Science329, 78–82 (2010). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Dawlaty, M. M. et al. Tet1 is dispensable for maintaining pluripotency and its loss is compatible with embryonic and postnatal development. Cell Stem Cell9, 166–175 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Kurimoto, K. et al. Complex genome-wide transcription dynamics orchestrated by BLIMP1 for the specification of the germ cell lineage in mice. Genes Dev.22, 1617–1635 (2008). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Kagiwada, S., Kurimoto, K., Hirota, T., Yamaji, M. & Saitou, M. Replication-coupled passive DNA demethylation for the erasure of genome imprints in mice. EMBO J. 14 Dec 2012 (doi:10.1038/emboj.2012.331). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Seki, Y. et al. Cellular dynamics associated with the genome-wide epigenetic reprogramming in migrating primordial germ cells in mice. Development134, 2627–2638 (2007). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Hajkova, P. et al. Chromatin dynamics during epigenetic reprogramming in the mouse germ line. Nature452, 877–881 (2008). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Smallwood, S. A. et al. Dynamic CpG island methylation landscape in oocytes and preimplantation embryos. Nature Genet.43, 811–814 (2011). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Oakes, C. C., La Salle, S., Smiraglia, D. J., Robaire, B. & Trasler, J. M. Developmental acquisition of genome-wide DNA methylation occurs prior to meiosis in male germ cells. Dev. Biol.307, 368–379 (2007). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Bourc'his, D., Xu, G. L., Lin, C. S., Bollman, B. & Bestor, T. H. DNMT3L and the establishment of maternal genomic imprints. Science294, 2536–2539 (2001). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Hata, K., Okano, M., Lei, H. & Li, E. DNMT3L cooperates with the DNMT3 family of de novo DNA methyltransferases to establish maternal imprints in mice. Development129, 1983–1993 (2002). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Kaneda, M. et al. Essential role for de novo DNA methyltransferase DNMT3A in paternal and maternal imprinting. Nature429, 900–903 (2004). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Kaneda, M. et al. Genetic evidence for DNMT3A-dependent imprinting during oocyte growth obtained by conditional knockout with _Zp3_-Cre and complete exclusion of DNMT3B by chimera formation. Genes Cells 1 Feb 2012 (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2443.2009.01374.x). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Bourc'his, D. & Bestor, T. H. Meiotic catastrophe and retrotransposon reactivation in male germ cells lacking DNMT3L. Nature431, 96–99 (2004). This work links the sterile phenotype ofDnmt3l-null males to inappropriate repetitive element activity, thus highlighting the role ofde novomethylation in protecting the germ line from spurious retrotransposition. ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Kato, Y. et al. Role of the DNMT3 family in de novo methylation of imprinted and repetitive sequences during male germ cell development in the mouse. Hum. Mol. Genet.16, 2272–2280 (2007). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Kobayashi, H. et al. Contribution of intragenic DNA methylation in mouse gametic DNA methylomes to establish oocyte-specific heritable marks. PLoS Genet.8, e1002440 (2012). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
De La Fuente, R. et al. LSH is required for meiotic chromosome synapsis and retrotransposon silencing in female germ cells. Nature Cell Biol.8, 1448–1454 (2006). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Howlett, S. K. & Reik, W. Methylation levels of maternal and paternal genomes during preimplantation development. Development113, 119–127 (1991). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Aravin, A. A. et al. A piRNA pathway primed by individual transposons is linked to de novo DNA methylation in mice. Mol. Cell31, 785–799 (2008). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Watanabe, T. et al. Role for piRNAs and noncoding RNA in de novo DNA methylation of the imprinted mouse Rasgrf1 locus. Science332, 848–852 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Aravin, A. A., Sachidanandam, R., Girard, A., Fejes-Toth, K. & Hannon, G. J. Developmentally regulated piRNA clusters implicate MILI in transposon control. Science316, 744–747 (2007). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Kuramochi-Miyagawa, S. et al. DNA methylation of retrotransposon genes is regulated by PIWI family members MILI and MIWI2 in murine fetal testes. Genes Dev.22, 908–917 (2008). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Santos, F., Hendrich, B., Reik, W. & Dean, W. Dynamic reprogramming of DNA methylation in the early mouse embryo. Dev. Biol.241, 172–182 (2002). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Oswald, J. et al. Active demethylation of the paternal genome in the mouse zygote. Curr. Biol.10, 475–478 (2000). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Kim, S. H. et al. Differential DNA methylation reprogramming of various repetitive sequences in mouse preimplantation embryos. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.324, 58–63 (2004). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Wossidlo, M. et al. Dynamic link of DNA demethylation, DNA strand breaks and repair in mouse zygotes. EMBO J.29, 1877–1888 (2010). This work measures demethylation during zygotic progression, emphasizing DNA replication and the activity of DNA repair pathways as the time when demethylation is most robustly observed. ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Iqbal, K., Jin, S. G., Pfeifer, G. P. & Szabo, P. E. Reprogramming of the paternal genome upon fertilization involves genome-wide oxidation of 5-methylcytosine. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA108, 3642–3647 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Wossidlo, M. et al. 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in the mammalian zygote is linked with epigenetic reprogramming. Nature Commun.2, 241 (2011). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Gu, T. P. et al. The role of Tet3 DNA dioxygenase in epigenetic reprogramming by oocytes. Nature477, 606–610 (2011). This work first described oocyte contributed TET3 as the responsible agent in the rapid hydroxymethylation of the paternal genome after fertilization and characterized the deleterious effects of its knockout on embryonic progression. ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Okada, Y., Yamagata, K., Hong, K., Wakayama, T. & Zhang, Y. A role for the elongator complex in zygotic paternal genome demethylation. Nature463, 554–558 (2010). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Ziegler-Birling, C., Helmrich, A., Tora, L. & Torres-Padilla, M. E. Distribution of p53 binding protein 1 (53BP1) and phosphorylated H2A.X during mouse preimplantation development in the absence of DNA damage. Int. J. Dev. Biol.53, 1003–1011 (2009). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Burton, A. & Torres-Padilla, M. E. Epigenetic reprogramming and development: a unique heterochromatin organization in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Brief Funct. Genom.9, 444–454 (2010). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Puschendorf, M. et al. PRC1 and SUV39H specify parental asymmetry at constitutive heterochromatin in early mouse embryos. Nature Genet.40, 411–420 (2008). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Santos, F., Peters, A. H., Otte, A. P., Reik, W. & Dean, W. Dynamic chromatin modifications characterise the first cell cycle in mouse embryos. Dev. Biol.280, 225–236 (2005). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Nakamura, T. et al. PGC7 binds histone H3K9me2 to protect against conversion of 5mC to 5hmC in early embryos. Nature486, 415–419 (2012). This study clarifies the mechanism through which Stella (also known as PGC7) protects maternally methylated DNA from oxidation or demethylation by recognizing H3K9 methylation in the chromatinized maternal genome. ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Nakamura, T. et al. PGC7/Stella protects against DNA demethylation in early embryogenesis. Nature Cell Biol.9, 64–71 (2007). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Hirasawa, R. et al. Maternal and zygotic DNMT1 are necessary and sufficient for the maintenance of DNA methylation imprints during preimplantation development. Genes Dev.22, 1607–1616 (2008). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Ratnam, S. et al. Dynamics of DNMT1 methyltransferase expression and intracellular localization during oogenesis and preimplantation development. Dev. Biol.245, 304–314 (2002). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Hashimoto, H. et al. Recognition and potential mechanisms for replication and erasure of cytosine hydroxymethylation. Nucleic Acids Res.40, 4841–4849 (2012). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Valinluck, V. & Sowers, L. C. Endogenous cytosine damage products alter the site selectivity of human DNA maintenance methyltransferase DNMT1. Cancer Res.67, 946–950 (2007). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Reese, K. J., Lin, S., Verona, R. I., Schultz, R. M. & Bartolomei, M. S. Maintenance of paternal methylation and repression of the imprinted H19 gene requires MBD3. PLoS Genet.3, e137 (2007). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Yildirim, O. et al. MDB3/NURD complex regulates expression of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine marked genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell147, 1498–1510 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Ito, S. et al. Role of TET proteins in 5mC to 5hmC conversion, ES-cell self-renewal and inner cell mass specification. Nature466, 1129–1133 (2010). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Hendrich, B., Guy, J., Ramsahoye, B., Wilson, V. A. & Bird, A. Closely related proteins MBD2 and MBD3 play distinctive but interacting roles in mouse development. Genes Dev.15, 710–723 (2001). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Kaji, K., Nichols, J. & Hendrich, B. MBD3, a component of the NuRD co-repressor complex, is required for development of pluripotent cells. Development134, 1123–1132 (2007). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Kishikawa, S., Murata, T., Ugai, H., Yamazaki, T. & Yokoyama, K. K. Control elements of Dnmt1 gene are regulated in cell-cycle dependent manner. Nucleic Acids Res. (Suppl. 3), 307–308 (2003).
Chuang, L. S. et al. Human DNA-(cytosine-5) methyltransferase-PCNA complex as a target for p21WAF1. Science277, 1996–2000 (1997). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Sharif, J. et al. The SRA protein Np95 mediates epigenetic inheritance by recruiting DNMT1 to methylated DNA. Nature450, 908–912 (2007). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Bostick, M. et al. UHRF1 plays a role in maintaining DNA methylation in mammalian cells. Science317, 1760–1764 (2007). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Arita, K., Ariyoshi, M., Tochio, H., Nakamura, Y. & Shirakawa, M. Recognition of hemi-methylated DNA by the SRA protein UHRF1 by a base-flipping mechanism. Nature455, 818–821 (2008). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Avvakumov, G. V. et al. Structural basis for recognition of hemi-methylated DNA by the SRA domain of human UHRF1. Nature455, 822–825 (2008). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Du, Z. et al. DNMT1 stability is regulated by proteins coordinating deubiquitination and acetylation-driven ubiquitination. Sci. Signal.3, ra80 (2010). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Esteve, P. O. et al. Regulation of DNMT1 stability through SET7-mediated lysine methylation in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA106, 5076–5081 (2009). ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Robertson, K. D. et al. DNMT1 forms a complex with Rb, E2F1 and HDAC1 and represses transcription from E2F-responsive promoters. Nature Genet.25, 338–342 (2000). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Wang, J. et al. The lysine demethylase LSD1 (KDM1) is required for maintenance of global DNA methylation. Nature Genet.41, 125–129 (2009). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Fuks, F., Burgers, W. A., Brehm, A., Hughes-Davies, L. & Kouzarides, T. DNA methyltransferase DNMT1 associates with histone deacetylase activity. Nature Genet.24, 88–91 (2000). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Rothbart, S. B. et al. Association of UHRF1 with methylated H3K9 directs the maintenance of DNA methylation. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol.19, 1155–1160 (2012). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Lorincz, M. C., Schubeler, D., Hutchinson, S. R., Dickerson, D. R. & Groudine, M. DNA methylation density influences the stability of an epigenetic imprint and DNMT3A/B-independent de novo methylation. Mol. Cell. Biol.22, 7572–7580 (2002). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Tahiliani, M. et al. Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science324, 930–935 (2009). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Cortellino, S. et al. Thymine DNA glycosylase is essential for active DNA demethylation by linked deamination-base excision repair. Cell146, 67–79 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Cortazar, D. et al. Embryonic lethal phenotype reveals a function of TDG in maintaining epigenetic stability. Nature470, 419–423 (2011). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Siomi, M. C., Sato, K., Pezic, D. & Aravin, A. A. PIWI-interacting small RNAs: the vanguard of genome defence. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.12, 246–258 (2011). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Frost, R. J. et al. MOV10L1 is necessary for protection of spermatocytes against retrotransposons by PIWI-interacting RNAs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA107, 11847–11852 (2010). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Reuter, M. et al. Loss of the MILI-interacting Tudor domain-containing protein-1 activates transposons and alters the MILI-associated small RNA profile. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol.16, 639–646 (2009). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Shoji, M. et al. The TDRD9–MIWI2 complex is essential for piRNA-mediated retrotransposon silencing in the mouse male germline. Dev. Cell17, 775–787 (2009). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar