The spindle checkpoint: structural insights into dynamic signalling (original) (raw)

• Li, R. & Murray, A. W. Feedback control of mitosis in budding yeast. Cell 66, 519–531 (1991).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hoyt, M. A., Totis, L. & Roberts, B. T. S. cerevisiae genes required for cell cycle arrest in response to loss of microtubule function. Cell 66, 507–517 (1991).Refs 1 and 2 describe genetic screens that led to the first molecular identification of spindle-checkpoint components.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nasmyth, K. Disseminating the genome: joining, resolving, and separating sister chromatids during mitosis and meiosis. Annu. Rev. Genet. 35, 673–745 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Rieder, C. L. & Salmon, E. D. The vertebrate cell kinetochore and its roles during mitosis. Trends Cell Biol. 8, 310–318 (1998).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Pidoux, A. L. & Allshire, R. C. Centromeres: getting a grip of chromosomes. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 12, 308–319 (2000).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hwang, L. H. et al. Budding yeast Cdc20: a target of the spindle checkpoint. Science 279, 1041–1044 (1998).Refs 6 and 7 show that CDC20 mutants that are resistant to the checkpoint cannot bind Mad2, establishing Cdc20 as the target of the spindle checkpoint. Furthermore, ref. 6 describes a set of mutual binding dependencies between budding-yeast checkpoint proteins, including an absolute requirement for Mad1 for Mad2–Cdc20-complex formation.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kim, S. H. et al. Fission yeast Slp1: an effector of the Mad2-dependent spindle checkpoint. Science 279, 1045–1047 (1998).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Peters, J. M. The anaphase-promoting complex: proteolysis in mitosis and beyond. Mol. Cell 9, 931–943 (2002).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hoyt, M. A. A new view of the spindle checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 154, 909–911 (2001).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Rieder, C. L., Cole, R. W., Khodjakov, A. & Sluder, G. The checkpoint delaying anaphase in response to chromosome monoorientation is mediated by an inhibitory signal produced by unattached kinetochores. J. Cell Biol. 130, 941–948 (1995).This paper identifies the kinetochores of unattached chromosomes as the site of production of the checkpoint signal. PtK1 cells are followed by video microscopy before and after specific chromosomal regions are destroyed by laser irradiation. The checkpoint is relieved after the centromere is destroyed on the last mono-oriented chromosome. Thus, the checkpoint mechanism monitors an inhibitor of anaphase produced by unattached kinetochores.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Li, X. & Nicklas, R. B. Mitotic forces control a cell-cycle checkpoint. Nature 373, 630–632 (1995).The classic demonstration that lack of tension at kinetochores can activate the spindle checkpoint. In 10% of praying-mantis spermatocytes, a free X chromosome delays anaphase by 5–6 h. Applying tension to this X chromosome with a micromanipulation needle is enough to relieve the checkpoint delay and to induce anaphase.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Chen, R. H., Waters, J. C., Salmon, E. D. & Murray, A. W. Association of spindle assembly checkpoint component XMAD2 with unattached kinetochores. Science 274, 242–246 (1996).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Li, Y. & Benezra, R. Identification of a human mitotic checkpoint gene: hsMAD2. Science 274, 246–248 (1996).Refs 12 and 13 provided the first demonstration of the kinetochore localization of a defined checkpoint protein.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Maney, T., Ginkel, L. M., Hunter, A. W. & Wordeman, L. The kinetochore of higher eucaryotes: a molecular view. Int. Rev. Cytol. 194, 67–131 (2000).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Brunet, S. & Vernos, I. Chromosome motors on the move. From motion to spindle checkpoint activity. EMBO Rep. 2, 669–673 (2001).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kapoor, T. M. & Compton, D. A. Searching for the middle ground. J. Cell Biol. 157, 551–556 (2002).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chan, G. K. T., Schaar, B. T. & Yen, T. J. Characterization of the kinetochore binding domain of CENP-E reveals interactions with the kinetochore proteins CENP-F and hBUBR1. J. Cell Biol. 143, 49–63 (1998).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chan, G. K. et al. Human BUBR1 is a mitotic checkpoint kinase that monitors CENP-E functions at kinetochores and binds the cyclosome/APC. J. Cell Biol. 146, 941–954 (1999).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Yao, X. et al. CENP-E forms a link between attachment of spindle microtubules to kinetochores and the mitotic checkpoint. Nature Cell Biol. 2, 484–491 (2000).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Abrieu, A., Kahana, J. A., Wood, K. W. & Cleveland, D. W. CENP-E as an essential component of the mitotic checkpoint in vitro. Cell 102, 817–826 (2000).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• McEwen, B. F. et al. CENP-E is essential for reliable bioriented spindle attachment, but chromosome alignment can be achieved via redundant mechanisms in mammalian cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 2776–2789 (2001).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Banks, J. D. & Heald, R. Chromosome movement: dynein-out at the kinetochore. Curr. Biol. 11, R128–R131 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Starr, D. A., Williams, B. C., Hays, T. S. & Goldberg, M. L. ZW10 helps recruit dynactin and dynein to the kinetochore. J. Cell Biol. 142, 763–774 (1998).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Savoian, M. S., Goldberg, M. L. & Rieder, C. L. The rate of poleward chromosome motion is attenuated in Drosophila zw10 and rod mutants. Nature Cell Biol. 2, 948–952 (2000).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sharp, D. J., Rogers, G. C. & Scholey, J. M. Cytoplasmic dynein is required for poleward chromosome movement during mitosis in Drosophila embryos. Nature Cell Biol. 2, 922–930 (2000).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Chan, G. K. et al. Human Zw10 and ROD are mitotic checkpoint proteins that bind to kinetochores. Nature Cell Biol. 2, 944–947 (2000).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Basto, R., Gomes, R. & Karess, R. E. Rough deal and Zw10 are required for the metaphase checkpoint in Drosophila. Nature Cell Biol. 2, 939–943 (2000).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Yu, H. G., Muszynski, M. G. & Dawe, R. K. The maize homologue of the cell cycle checkpoint protein MAD2 reveals kinetochore substructure and contrasting mitotic and meiotic localization patterns. J. Cell Biol. 145, 425–435 (1999).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Waters, J. C., Chen, R. H., Murray, A. W. & Salmon, E. D. Localization of Mad2 to kinetochores depends on microtubule attachment, not tension. J. Cell Biol. 141, 1181–1191 (1998).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Skoufias, D. A. et al. Mammalian Mad2 and Bub1/BubR1 recognize distinct spindle-attachment and kinetochore-tension checkpoints. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 4492–4497 (2001).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zhou, J. et al. Minor alteration of microtubule dynamics causes loss of tension across kinetochore pairs and activates the spindle checkpoint. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 17200–17208 (2002).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gorbsky, G. J. & Ricketts, W. A. Differential expression of a phosphoepitope at the kinetochores of moving chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 122, 1311–1321 (1993).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. S. et al. Kinetochore localisation and phosphorylation of the mitotic checkpoint components Bub1 and BubR1 are differentially regulated by spindle events in human cells. J. Cell Sci. 114, 4385–4395 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kapoor, T. M., Mayer, T. U., Coughlin, M. L. & Mitchison, T. J. Probing spindle assembly mechanisms with monastrol, a small molecule inhibitor of the mitotic kinesin, Eg5. J. Cell Biol. 150, 975–988 (2000).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Shonn, M. A., McCarroll, R. & Murray, A. W. Requirement of the spindle checkpoint for proper chromosome segregation in budding yeast meiosis. Science 289, 300–303 (2000).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Stern, B. M. & Murray, A. W. Lack of tension at kinetochores activates the spindle checkpoint in budding yeast. Curr. Biol. 11, 1462–1467 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hoffman, D. B. et al. Microtubule-dependent changes in assembly of microtubule motor proteins and mitotic spindle checkpoint proteins at PtK1 kinetochores. Mol. Biol. Cell 12, 1995–2009 (2001).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. S. & McKeon, F. Kinetochore localization of murine Bub1 is required for normal mitotic timing and checkpoint response to spindle damage. Cell 89, 727–735 (1997).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. S., Ha, E. & McKeon, F. The human homologue of Bub3 is required for kinetochore localization of Bub1 and a Mad3/Bub1-related protein kinase. J. Cell Biol. 142, 1–11 (1998).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Jablonski, S. A. et al. The hBUB1 and hBUBR1 kinases sequentially assemble onto kinetochores during prophase with hBUBR1 concentrating at the kinetochore plates in mitosis. Chromosoma 107, 386–396 (1998).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Basu, J. et al. Localization of the Drosophila checkpoint control protein Bub3 to the kinetochore requires Bub1 but not Zw10 or Rod. Chromosoma 107, 376–385 (1998).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Martinez-Exposito, M. J., Kaplan, K. B., Copeland, J. & Sorger, P. K. Retention of the BUB3 checkpoint protein on lagging chromosomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 8493–8498 (1999).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Adams, R. R., Carmena, M. & Earnshaw, W. E. Chromosomal passengers and the (aurora) ABCs of mitosis. Trends Cell Biol. 11, 49–54 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tanaka, T. U. et al. Evidence that the Ipl1–Sli15 (Aurora kinase–INCENP) complex promotes chromosome bi-orientation by altering kinetochore–spindle pole connections. Cell 108, 317–329 (2002).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Shimoda, S. L. & Solomon, F. Integrating functions at the kinetochore. Cell 109, 9–12 (2002).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Biggins, S. & Murray, A. W. The budding yeast protein kinase Ipl1/Aurora allows the absence of tension to activate the spindle checkpoint. Genes Dev. 15, 3118–3129 (2001).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Piatti, S., Lengauer, C. & Nasmyth, K. Cdc6 is an unstable protein whose de novo synthesis in G1 is important for the onset of S phase and for preventing a 'reductional' anaphase in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 14, 3788–3799 (1995).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kitagawa, K. & Hieter, P. Evolutionary conservation between budding yeast and human kinetochores. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 678–687 (2001).
  CAS Google Scholar
• Murata-Hori, M. & Wang, Y. The kinase activity of Aurora B is required for kinetochore–microtubule interactions in mitosis. Curr. Biol. 12, 894–899 (2002).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kallio, M. J., McCleland, M. L., Stukenberg, P. T. & Gorbsky, G. J. Inhibition of Aurora B kinase blocks chromosome segregation, overrides the spindle checkpoint, and perturbs microtubule dynamics in mitosis. Curr. Biol. 12, 900–905 (2002).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nicklas, R. B. & Ward, S. C. Elements of error correction in mitosis: microtubule capture, release, and tension. J. Cell Biol. 126, 1241–1253 (1994).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nicklas, R. B., Waters, J. C., Salmon, E. D. & Ward, S. C. Checkpoint signals in grasshopper meiosis are sensitive to microtubule attachment, but tension is still essential. J. Cell Sci. 114, 4173–4183 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Chen, R. H., Shevchenko, A., Mann, M. & Murray, A. W. Spindle checkpoint protein Xmad1 recruits Xmad2 to unattached kinetochores. J. Cell Biol. 143, 283–295 (1998).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Millband, D. N. & Hardwick, K. G. Fission yeast Mad3p is required for Mad2p to inhibit the anaphase-promoting complex and localises to kinetochores in a Bub1p, Bub3p and Mph1p dependent manner. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22, 2728–2742 (2002).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sharp-Baker, H. & Chen, R. H. Spindle checkpoint protein Bub1 is required for kinetochore localization of Mad1, Mad2, Bub3, and CENP-E, independently of its kinase activity. J. Cell Biol. 153, 1239–1250 (2001).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Abrieu, A. et al. Mps1 is a kinetochore-associated kinase essential for the vertebrate mitotic checkpoint. Cell 106, 83–93 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Chen, R. H. BubR1 is required for kinetochore localization of other spindle checkpoint proteins and its phosphorylation requires Mad1. J. Cell Biol. 158, 487–496 (2002).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Brady, D. M. & Hardwick, K. G. Complex formation between Mad1p, Bub1p and Bub3p is crucial for spindle checkpoint function. Curr. Biol. 10, 675–678 (2000).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Chung, E. & Chen, R.-H. Spindle checkpoint requires Mad1-bound and Mad1-free Mad2. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 1501–1511 (2002).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Howell, B. J. et al. Visualization of Mad2 dynamics at kinetochores, along spindle fibers, and at spindle poles in living cells. J. Cell Biol. 150, 1233–1250 (2000).A dynamic cycle of interaction of Mad2 with kinetochores, spindle fibres and spindle poles is revealed using an elegant fluorescence-recovery after photobleaching approach. The transient nature of the interaction of Mad2 with kinetochores is consistent with the catalytic model of kinetochore function in generating the 'wait anaphase' signal.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Howell, B. J., Farrar, E., Fang, G. & Salmon, E. D. Visualization of Cdc20 and BubRI dynamics in living cells. Mol. Biol. Cell 12(S), 315a (2001).
  Google Scholar
• Sudakin, V., Chan, G. K. & Yen, T. J. Checkpoint inhibition of the APC/C in HeLa cells is mediated by a complex of BUBR1, BUB3, CDC20, and MAD2. J. Cell Biol. 154, 925–936 (2001).An APC/C inhibitory factor purified from HeLa cells was found to consist of BubR1, Bub3, Cdc20 and Mad2 checkpoint proteins in near equal stoichiometry. The APC inhibitory activity of this complex is 3,000 times than that of recombinant Mad2. This complex might not be generated from kinetochores because it is also present and active in interphase cells. Together with ref. 63 , this paper uncovers a direct role of BubR1 in Cdc20 binding and APC inhibition, but some of the conclusions do not coincide.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Tang, Z., Bharadwaj, R., Li, B. & Yu, H. Mad2-independent inhibition of APC–Cdc20 by the mitotic checkpoint protein BubR1. Dev. Cell 1, 227–237 (2001).A checkpoint complex containing BubR1 and Bub3 is purified from mitotic human cells and found to interact with Cdc20 in the absence of other proteins and to block the binding of Cdc20 to APC. Together with ref. 62 this paper establishes a direct role of BubR1 in Cdc20 binding and checkpoint activity.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Fraschini, R. et al. Bub3 interaction with Mad2, Mad3 and Cdc20 is mediated by WD40 repeats and does not require intact kinetochores. EMBO J. 20, 6648–6659 (2001).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wojcik, E. et al. Kinetochore dynein: its dynamics and role in the transport of the Rough deal checkpoint protein. Nature Cell Biol. 3, 1001–1007 (2001).Together with ref. 66 , this paper shows that dynein might contribute to shutting off the metaphase checkpoint, allowing anaphase to ensue. A complementary set of kinetochore proteins is monitored relative to those described in ref. 66 , revealing a general mechanism of checkpoint inactivation.
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Howell, B. J. et al. Cytoplasmic dynein/dynactin drives kinetochore protein transport to the spindle poles and has a role in mitotic spindle checkpoint inactivation. J. Cell Biol. 155, 1159–1172 (2001).Inhibition of dynein and dynactin activity in PtK1 cells blocks the transport to the spindle poles of many proteins located in the kinetochore outer domain, including Mad2, BubR1 and CENP-E. Furthermore, it prevents Mad2 depletion from kinetochores and induces a mitotic block at metaphase without blocking chromosome congression or anaphase. Thus, dynein and dynactin participate in a kinetochore-disassembly pathway that inactivates the spindle checkpoint.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Gorbsky, G. J., Chen, R. H. & Murray, A. W. Microinjection of antibody to Mad2 protein into mammalian cells in mitosis induces premature anaphase. J. Cell Biol. 141, 1193–1205 (1998).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Canman, J. C., Hoffman, D. B. & Salmon, E. D. The role of pre- and post-anaphase microtubules in the cytokinesis phase of the cell cycle. Curr. Biol. 10, 611–614 (2000).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Basu, J. et al. Mutations in the essential spindle checkpoint gene bub1 cause chromosome missegregation and fail to block apoptosis in Drosophila. J. Cell Biol. 146, 13–28 (1999).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ikui, A. E., Furuya, K., Yanagida, M. & Matsumoto, T. Control of localization of a spindle checkpoint protein, Mad2, in fission yeast. J. Cell Sci. 115, 1603–1610 (2002).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hardwick, K. G., Johnston, R. C., Smith, D. L. & Murray, A. W. MAD3 encodes a novel component of the spindle checkpoint which interacts with Bub3p, Cdc20p, and Mad2p. J. Cell Biol. 148, 871–882 (2000).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Luo, X., Tang, Z., Rizo, J. & Yu, H. The Mad2 spindle checkpoint protein undergoes similar major conformational changes upon binding to either Mad1 or Cdc20. Mol. Cell 9, 59–71 (2002).The structure of Mad2 bound to a synthetic peptide. The Mad2 carboxy-terminal tail undergoes a striking conformational change relative to the unbound form of Mad2. Together with ref. 73 , the paper also identifies a common Mad2-binding motif in Mad1 and Cdc20, and proposes that the carboxy-terminal tail of Mad2 undergoes the same conformational change when bound to these ligands.
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Sironi, L. et al. Crystal structure of the tetrameric Mad1–Mad2 core complex: implications of a 'safety belt' binding mechanism for the spindle checkpoint. EMBO J. 21, 2496–2506 (2002).Reports the structure of the Mad1–Mad2 tetramer. An interaction mechanism defined as a 'safety belt' is identified and its implications for the interaction of Mad2 with Mad1 and Cdc20 are discussed. With refs 72 and 75 , this is the first report of structural work on checkpoint proteins.
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Jin, D. Y., Spencer, F. & Jeang, K. T. Human T cell leukemia virus type 1 oncoprotein Tax targets the human mitotic checkpoint protein MAD1. Cell 93, 81–91 (1998).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Luo, X. et al. Structure of the Mad2 spindle assembly checkpoint protein and its interaction with Cdc20. Nature Struct. Biol. 7, 224–229 (2000).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. & Lees, E. Identification of an overlapping binding domain on Cdc20 for Mad2 and anaphase-promoting complex: model for spindle checkpoint regulation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 5190–5199 (2001).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chen, R. H. et al. The spindle checkpoint of budding yeast depends on a tight complex between the Mad1 and Mad2 proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 10, 2607–2618 (1999).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sironi, L. et al. Mad2 binding to Mad1 and Cdc20, rather than oligomerization, is required for the spindle checkpoint. EMBO J. 20, 6371–6382 (2001).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Pines, J. Cell cycle trials in Salamanca: workshop on G2/M progression and associated checkpoints. EMBO Rep. 3, 17–21 (2002).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hardwick, K. G. et al. Activation of the budding yeast spindle assembly checkpoint without mitotic spindle disruption. Science 273, 953–956 (1996).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Seeley, T. W., Wang, L. & Zhen, J. Y. Phosphorylation of human MAD1 by the BUB1 kinase in vitro. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 257, 589–595 (1999).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Campbell, M. S., Chan, G. K. & Yen, T. J. Mitotic checkpoint proteins HsMAD1 and HsMAD2 are associated with nuclear pore complexes in interphase. J. Cell Sci. 114, 953–963 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Fang, G., Yu, H. & Kirschner, M. W. The checkpoint protein MAD2 and the mitotic regulator CDC20 form a ternary complex with the anaphase-promoting complex to control anaphase initiation. Genes Dev. 12, 1871–1883 (1998).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Michel, L. S. et al. MAD2 haplo-insufficiency causes premature anaphase and chromosome instability in mammalian cells. Nature 409, 355–359 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Geley, S. et al. Anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome-dependent proteolysis of human cyclin A starts at the beginning of mitosis and is not subject to the spindle assembly checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 153, 137–148 (2001).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Rieder, C. L. et al. Mitosis in vertebrate somatic cells with two spindles: implications for the metaphase/anaphase transition checkpoint and cleavage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 5107–5112 (1997).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Fang, G. Checkpoint protein BubR1 acts synergistically with Mad2 to inhibit anaphase-promoting complex. Mol. Biol. Cell 13, 755–766 (2002).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kallio, M. et al. Mammalian p55CDC mediates association of the spindle checkpoint protein Mad2 with the cyclosome/anaphase-promoting complex, and is involved in regulating anaphase onset and late mitotic events. J. Cell Biol. 141, 1393–1406 (1998).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Li, Y. et al. MAD2 associates with the cyclosome/anaphase-promoting complex and inhibits its activity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 12431–12436 (1997).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wassmann, K. & Benezra, R. Mad2 transiently associates with an APC/p55Cdc complex during mitosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 11193–11198 (1998).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wu, H. et al. p55CDC/hCDC20 is associated with BUBR1 and may be a downstream target of the spindle checkpoint kinase. Oncogene 19, 4557–4562 (2000).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Rudner, A. D. & Murray, A. W. Phosphorylation by Cdc28 activates the Cdc20-dependent activity of the anaphase-promoting complex. J. Cell Biol. 149, 1377–1390 (2000).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Huang, J.-Y. & Raff, J. W. The dynamic localisation of the Drosophila APC/C: evidence for the existence of multiple complexes that perform distinct functions and are differentially localised. J. Cell Sci. 115, 2847–2856 (2002).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Uhlmann, F., Lottspeich, F. & Nasmyth, K. Sister-chromatid separation at anaphase onset is promoted by cleavage of the cohesin subunit Scc1. Nature 400, 37–42 (1999).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Alexandru, G. et al. Phosphorylation of the cohesin subunit Scc1 by Polo/Cdc5 kinase regulates sister chromatid separation in yeast. Cell 105, 459–472 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Stemmann, O. et al. Dual inhibition of sister chromatid separation at metaphase. Cell 107, 715–726 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Weinert, T. A. & Hartwell, L. H. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 241, 317–322 (1988).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hartwell, L. H. & Weinert, T. A. Checkpoints: controls that ensure the order of cell cycle events. Science 246, 629–634 (1989).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Fraschini, R., Formenti, E., Lucchini, G. & Piatti, S. Budding yeast Bub2 is localized at spindle pole bodies and activates the mitotic checkpoint via a different pathway from Mad2. J. Cell Biol. 145, 979–991 (1999).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Fesquet, D. et al. A Bub2p-dependent spindle checkpoint pathway regulates the Dbf2p kinase in budding yeast. EMBO J. 18, 2424–2434 (1999).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Pereira, G. et al. The Bub2p spindle checkpoint links nuclear migration with mitotic exit. Mol. Cell 6, 1–10 (2000).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bloecher, A., Venturi, G. M. & Tatchell, K. Anaphase spindle position is monitored by the BUB2 checkpoint. Nature Cell Biol. 2, 556–558 (2000).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Pereira, G., Tanaka, T. U., Nasmyth, K. & Schiebel, E. Modes of spindle pole body inheritance and segregation of the Bfa1p–Bub2p checkpoint protein complex. EMBO J. 20, 6359–6370 (2001).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bardin, A. J. & Amon, A. MEN and SIN: what's the difference? Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 815–826 (2001).
  CAS Google Scholar
• Gachet, Y., Tournier, S., Millar, J. B. & Hyams, J. S. A MAP kinase-dependent actin checkpoint ensures proper spindle orientation in fission yeast. Nature 412, 352–355 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Weiss, E. & Winey, M. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae spindle pole body duplication gene MPS1 is part of a mitotic checkpoint. J. Cell Biol. 132, 111–123 (1996).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Roberts, B. T., Farr, K. A. & Hoyt, M. A. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint gene BUB1 encodes a novel protein kinase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 8282–8291 (1994).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Farr, K. A. & Hoyt, M. A. Bub1p kinase activates the Saccharomyces cerevisiae spindle assembly checkpoint. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 2738–2747 (1998).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Warren, C. D. et al. Distinct chromosome segregation roles for spindle checkpoint proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell (in the press).
• Stucke, V. M., Sillje, H. H. W., Arnaud, L. & Nigg, E. A. Human Mps1 kinase is required for the spindle assembly checkpoint but not for centrosome duplication. EMBO J. 21, 1723–1732 (2002).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hardwick, K. G. & Murray, A. W. Mad1p, a phosphoprotein component of the spindle assembly checkpoint in budding yeast. J. Cell Biol. 131, 709–720 (1995).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Schonn, M. A., McCarroll, R. & Murray, A. W. M. Requirement of the spindle checkpoint for proper chromosome segregation in budding yeast meiosis. Science 289, 300–303 (2000).
  Google Scholar
• Bernard, P., Maure, J. F. & Javerzat, J. P. Fission yeast Bub1 is essential in setting up the meiotic pattern of chromosome segregation. Nature Cell Biol. 3, 522–526 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Dobles, M. et al. Chromosome missegregation and apoptosis in mice lacking the mitotic checkpoint protein Mad2. Cell 101, 635–645 (2000).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kalitsis, P., Earle, E., Fowler, K. J. & Choo, K. H. Bub3 gene disruption in mice reveals essential mitotic spindle checkpoint function during early embryogenesis. Genes Dev. 14, 2277–2282 (2000).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kitagawa, R. & Rose, A. M. Components of the spindle-assembly checkpoint are essential in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature Cell Biol. 1, 514–521 (1999).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lee, H. et al. Mitotic checkpoint inactivation fosters transformation in cells lacking the breast cancer susceptibility gene, Brca2. Mol. Cell 4, 1–10 (1999).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Cahill, D. P. et al. Mutations of mitotic checkpoint genes in human cancers. Nature 392, 300–303 (1998).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tighe, A., Johnson, V. L., Albertella, M. & Taylor, S. S. Aneuploid colon cancer cells have a robust spindle checkpoint. EMBO Rep. 2, 609–614 (2001).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Fodde, R. et al. Mutations in the APC tumour suppressor gene cause chromosomal instability. Nature Cell Biol. 3, 433–438 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kaplan, K. B. et al. A role for the adenomatous polyposis coli protein in chromosome segregation. Nature Cell Biol. 3, 429–432 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Aravind, L. & Koonin, E. V. The HORMA domain: a common structural denominator in mitotic checkpoints, chromosome synapsis and DNA repair. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23, 284–286 (1998).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zecevic, M. et al. Active MAP kinase in mitosis: localization at kinetochores and association with the motor protein CENP-E. J. Cell Biol. 142, 1547–1558 (1998).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Schwab, M. S. et al. Bub1 is activated by the protein kinase p90_Rsk_ during Xenopus oocyte maturation. Curr. Biol. 11, 141–150 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Scaerou, F. et al. The ZW10 and Rough Deal checkpoint proteins function together in a large, evolutionarily conserved complex targeted to the kinetochore. J. Cell Sci. 114, 3103–3114 (2001).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Daum, J. R. et al. The 3F3/2 anti-phosphoepitope antibody binds mitotically phosphorylated anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome. Curr. Biol. 10, 850–852 (2000).
  Google Scholar
• Shannon, K. B., Canman, J. C. & Salmon, E. D. . Mad2 and BubR1 function in a single checkpoint pathway that responds to a loss of tension. Mol. Biol. Cell, 2002 August 6 (DOI 10.1091/mbc.E02-03-0137).
• Martin-Lluesma, S., Stucke, V. M. & Nigg, E. A. . Role of Hec1 in spindle checkpoint signaling and kinetochore recruitment of Mad1/Mad2. Science (in the press).