Nanog-dependent feedback loops regulate murine embryonic stem cell heterogeneity (original) (raw)

• Chambers, I. et al. Functional expression cloning of Nanog, a pluripotency sustaining factor in embryonic stem cells. Cell 113, 643–655 (2003).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Mitsui, K. et al. The homeoprotein Nanog is required for maintenance of pluripotency in mouse epiblast and ES cells. Cell 113, 631–642 (2003).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Silva, J. et al. Nanog is the gateway to the pluripotent ground state. Cell 138, 722–737 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Chambers, I. et al. Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development. Nature 450, 1230-U1238 (2007).
  Article Google Scholar
• Canham, M. A., Sharov, A. A., Ko, M. S. H. & Brickman, J. M. Functional heterogeneity of embryonic stem cells revealed through translational amplification of an early endodermal transcript. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000379 (2010).
  Article Google Scholar
• Toyooka, Y., Shimosato, D., Murakami, K., Takahashi, K. & Niwa, H. Identification and characterization of subpopulations in undifferentiated ES cell culture. Development 135, 909–918 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Hayashi, K., Lopes, S. M. C. D., Tang, F. & Surani, M. A. Dynamic equilibrium and heterogeneity of mouse pluripotent stem cells with distinct functional and epigenetic states. Cell Stem Cell 3, 391–401 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Trott, J., Hayashi, K., Surani, A., Babu, M. M. & Martinez-Arias, A. Dissecting ensemble networks in ES cell populations reveals micro-heterogeneity underlying pluripotency. Mol. Biosyst. 8, 744–752 (2012).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Macfarlan, T. S. et al. Embryonic stem cell potency fluctuates with endogenous retrovirus activity. Nature 487, 57–63 (2012).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Niakan, K. K. et al. Sox17 promotes differentiation in mouse embryonic stem cells by directly regulating extraembryonic gene expression and indirectly antagonizing self-renewal. Genes Dev. 24, 312–326 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Singh, A. M., Hamazaki, T., Hankowski, K. E. & Terada, N. A heterogeneous expression pattern for nanog in embryonic stem cells. Stem. Cells 25, 2534–2542 (2007).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Zalzman, M. et al. Zscan4 regulates telomere elongation and genomic stability in ES cells. Nature 464, 858-U866 (2010).
  Article Google Scholar
• Kalmar, T. et al. Regulated fluctuations in Nanog expression mediate cell fate decisions in embryonic stem cells. PLoS Biol. 7, e1000149 (2009).
  Article Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, T. et al. The cyclic gene Hes1 contributes to diverse differentiation responses of embryonic stem cells. Genes Dev. 1870–1875 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Niwa, H., Ogawa, K., Shimosato, D. & Adachi, K. A parallel circuit of LIF signalling pathways maintains pluripotency of mouse ES cells. Nature 460, 118–122 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Arias, A. M. & Brickman, J. M. Gene expression heterogeneities in embryonic stem cell populations: origin and function. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 23, 650–656 (2011).
  Article Google Scholar
• Stewart, M. H., Bendall, S. C., Levadoux-Martin, M. & Bhatia, M. Clonal tracking of hESCs reveals differential contribution to functional assays. Nat. Methods 7, 917-U975 (2010).
  Article Google Scholar
• Lu, R. et al. Systems-level dynamic analyses of fate change in murine embryonic stem cells. Nature 462, 358–U126 (2009).
  Article Google Scholar
• Ivanova, N. et al. Dissecting self-renewal in stem cells with RNA interference. Nature 442, 533–538 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Chu, J. L., Shen, X. H., Wang, J. L. & Orkin, S. H. An extended transcriptional network for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Cell 132, 1049–1061 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Muller, F. J. et al. Regulatory networks define phenotypic classes of human stem cell lines. Nature 455, 401–U455 (2008).
  Article Google Scholar
• Ramirez, J. M. et al. Brief report: Benchmarking human pluripotent stem cell markers during differentiation into the three germ layers unveils a striking heterogeneity: All markers are not equal. Stem Cells 29, 1469–1474 (2011).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ying, Q. L. et al. The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature 453, 519–U515 (2008).
  Article Google Scholar
• Aiba, L. et al. Defining developmental potency and cell lineage trajectories by expression profiling of differentiating mouse embryonic stem cells. DNA Res. 16, 73–80 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Zhang, X. et al. A role for NANOG in G1 to S transition in human embryonicstem cells through direct binding of CDK6 and CDC25A. J. Cell Biol. 184, 67–82 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Muller, F. J. et al. A bioinformatic assay for pluripotency in human cells. Nat. Methods 8, 315–U354 (2011).
  Article Google Scholar
• Williams, R., Schuldt, B. & Muller, F. J. A guide to stem cell identification: progress and challenges in system-wide predictive testing with complex biomarkers. Bioessays 33, 880–890 (2011).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Nora, E. P. et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 485, 381–385 (2012).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Ramakrishna, S. et al. PEST motif sequence regulating human NANOG for proteasomal degradation. Stem Cells Dev. 20, 1512–1520 (2011).
  Article Google Scholar
• Xiong, W. & Ferrell, J. E. A positive-feedback-based bistable ’memory module’ that governs a cell fate decision. Nature 426, 460–465 (2003).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Pina, C. et al. Inferring rules of lineage commitment in haematopoiesis. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 287–294 (2012).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Cristianini, N. & Shawe-Taylor, J. An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000).
  Book Google Scholar
• Tyson, J. J., Chen, K. C. & Novak, B. Sniffers, buzzers, toggles and blinkers: dynamics of regulatory and signaling pathways in the cell. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 15, 221–231 (2003).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Smits, W. K., Kuipers, O. P. & Veening, J. W. Phenotypic variation in bacteria: the role of feedback regulation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4, 259–271 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Ferrell, J. E. Self-perpetuating states in signal transduction: positive feedback, double-negative feedback and bistability. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14, 140–148 (2002).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Becskei, A., Seraphin, B. & Serrano, L. Positive feedback in eukaryotic gene networks: cell differentiation by graded to binary response conversion. EMBO J. 20, 2528–2535 (2001).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• MacArthur, B. D., Ma’ayan, A. & Lemischka, I. R. Systems biology of stem cell fate and cellular reprogramming. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 672–681 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• MacArthur, B. D., Please, C. P. & Oreffo, R. O. C. Stochasticity and the molecular mechanisms of induced pluripotency. PLoS ONE 3, e3086 (2008).
  Article Google Scholar
• MacArthur, B. D., Ma’ayan, A. & Lemischka, I. R. Toward stem cell systems biology: From molecules to networks and landscapes. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 73, 211–215 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Tigges, M., Marquez-Lago, T. T., Stelling, J. & Fussenegger, M. A tunable synthetic mammalian oscillator. Nature 457, 309–312 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Elowitz, M. B. & Leibler, S. A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators. Nature 403, 335–338 (2000).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Glauche, I., Herberg, M. & Roeder, I. Nanog variability and pluripotency regulation of embryonic stem cells—Insights from a mathematical model analysis. PLoS ONE 5, e11238 (2010).
  Article Google Scholar
• Austin, D. W. et al. Gene network shaping of inherent noise spectra. Nature 439, 608–611 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Paulsson, J. Summing up the noise in gene networks. Nature 427, 415–418 (2004).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Estrada, E. & Rodriguez-Velazquez, J. A. Subgraph centrality in complex networks. Phys. Rev. E 71, 056103 (2005).
  Article Google Scholar
• Estrada, E. & Hatano, N. Returnability in complex directed networks (digraphs). Linear Algebra Appl. 430, 1886–1896 (2009).
  Article Google Scholar
• Durinck, S. et al. BioMart and Bioconductor: a powerful link betweenbiological databases and microarray data analysis. Bioinformatics 21, 3439–3440 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Loh, Y. H. et al. The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat. Genet. 38, 431–440 (2006).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Cole, M. F., Johnstone, S. E., Newman, J. J., Kagey, M. H. & Young, R. A. Tcf3 is an integral component of the core regulatory circuitry of embryonic stem cells. Genes Dev. 22, 746–755 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Chen, X. et al. Integration of external signaling pathways with the core transcriptional network in embryonic stem cells. Cell 133, 1106–1117 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Marson, A. et al. Connecting microRNA genes to the core transcriptional regulatory circuitry of embryonic stem cells. Cell 134, 521–533 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Mathur, D. et al. Analysis of the mouse embryonic stem cell regulatory networks obtained by ChIP-chip and ChIP-PET. Genome Biol. 9 (2008).
  Article Google Scholar
• Maherali, N. et al. Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show globalepigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution. Cell Stem Cell 1, 55–70 (2007).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Lee, D. F. et al. Combining competition assays with genetic complementation strategies to dissect mouse embryonic stem cell self-renewal and pluripotency. Nat. Protoc. 7, 729–748 (2012).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Guo, G. J. et al. Resolution of cell fate decisions revealed by single-cell gene expression analysis from zygote to blastocyst. Dev. Cell 18, 675–685 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• O’ Brien, P. C. Robust procedures for testing equality of covariance matrices. Biometrics 48, 819–827 (1992).
  Article Google Scholar
• Manly, B. F. J. Multivariate Statistic Methods: A Primer (Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2005).
  Google Scholar
• Gower, J. C. Algorithm AS 78: The mediancentre. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C 23, 466–470 (1974).
  Google Scholar
• Harary, F. & Manvel, B. On the number of cycles in a graph. Math. Slovaca 21, 55–63 (1971).
  Google Scholar