Defining and improving the genome-wide specificities of CRISPR–Cas9 nucleases (original) (raw)

• Doetschman, T. et al. Targeted correction of a mutant HPRT gene in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nature 330, 576–578 (1987).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Thomas, K. R. & Capecchi, M. R. Site-directed mutagenesis by gene targeting in mouse embryo-derived stem cells. Cell 51, 503–512 (1987).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Evans, M. J. & Kaufman, M. H. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 292, 154–156 (1981).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• The 2007 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine - Press Release. Nobelprize.org[online]
• Rouet, P., Smih, F. & Jasin, M. Introduction of double-strand breaks into the genome of mouse cells by expression of a rare-cutting endonuclease. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14, 8096–8106 (1994). This study first demonstrated that nuclease-induced DSBs could stimulate homologous recombination.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Silva, G. et al. Meganucleases and other tools for targeted genome engineering: perspectives and challenges for gene therapy. Curr. Gene Ther. 11, 11–27 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Urnov, F. D., Rebar, E. J., Holmes, M. C., Zhang, H. S. & Gregory, P. D. Genome editing with engineered zinc finger nucleases. Nature 11, 636–646 (2010).
  CAS Google Scholar
• Sander, J. D. & Joung, J. K. CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 347–355 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hsu, P. D., Lander, E. S. & Zhang, F. Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell 157, 1262–1278 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Doudna, J. A. & Charpentier, E. Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science 346, 1258096 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. G., Cha, J. & Chandrasegaran, S. Hybrid restriction enzymes: zinc finger fusions to Fok I cleavage domain. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 93, 1156–1160 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Cermak, T. et al. Efficient design and assembly of custom TALEN and other TAL effector-based constructs for DNA targeting. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, e82 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Li, T. et al. Modularly assembled designer TAL effector nucleases for targeted gene knockout and gene replacement in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 6315–6325 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bitinaite, J., Wah, D. A., Aggarwal, A. K. & Schildkraut, I. FokI dimerization is required for DNA cleavage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 10570–10575 (1998).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wah, D. A., Bitinaite, J., Schildkraut, I. & Aggarwal, A. K. Structure of FokI has implications for DNA cleavage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 10564–10569 (1998).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Boissel, S. et al. megaTALs: a rare-cleaving nuclease architecture for therapeutic genome engineering. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 2591–2601 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816–821 (2012). This was the first published study to demonstrate that the target specificity of Cas9 could be programmed using an engineered single gRNA (a fusion of naturally occurring crRNA and tracrRNA).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Mali, P. et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 339, 823–826 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Cong, L. et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339, 819–823 (2013).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Jinek, M. et al. RNA-programmed genome editing in human cells. eLife 2, e00471 (2013).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hwang, W. Y. et al. Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 227–229 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ran, F. A. et al. In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Nature 520, 186–191 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hou, Z. et al. Efficient genome engineering in human pluripotent stem cells using Cas9 from Neisseria meningitidis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 15644–15649 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zhang, X.-H., Tee, L. Y., Wang, X.-G., Huang, Q.-S. & Yang, S.-H. Off-target effects in CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome engineering. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 4, e264 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Pattanayak, V., Guilinger, J. P. & Liu, D. R. Determining the specificities of TALENs, Cas9, and other genome-editing enzymes. Methods Enzymol. 546, 47–78 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• O'Geen, H., Yu, A. S. & Segal, D. J. How specific is CRISPR/Cas9 really? Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 29, 72–78 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• LaFountaine, J. S., Fathe, K. & Smyth, H. D. C. Delivery and therapeutic applications of gene editing technologies ZFNs, TALENs, and CRISPR/Cas9. Int. J. Pharm. 494, 180–194 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Jamal, M. et al. Keeping CRISPR/Cas on-target. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 20, 1–20 (2015).
  PubMed Google Scholar
• Ishida, K., Gee, P. & Hotta, A. Minimizing off-target mutagenesis risks caused by programmable nucleases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 16, 24751–24771 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bolukbasi, M. F., Gupta, A. & Wolfe, S. A. Creating and evaluating accurate CRISPR-Cas9 scalpels for genomic surgery. Nat. Methods 13, 41–50 (2015).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Yang, H. et al. One-step generation of mice carrying reporter and conditional alleles by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell 154, 1370–1379 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Cho, S. W. et al. Analysis of off-target effects of CRISPR/Cas-derived RNA-guided endonucleases and nickases. Genome Res. 24, 132–141 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Liang, X. et al. Rapid and highly efficient mammalian cell engineering via Cas9 protein transfection. J. Biotechnol. 208, 44–53 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Pattanayak, V. et al. High-throughput profiling of off-target DNA cleavage reveals RNA-programmed Cas9 nuclease specificity. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 839–843 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Fu, Y. et al. High-frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR-Cas nucleases in human cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 822–826 (2013). This was the first study to report high-frequency off-target CRISPR–Cas9 mutagenesis.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hsu, P. D. et al. DNA targeting specificity of RNA-guided Cas9 nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 827–832 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Cradick, T. J., Fine, E. J., Antico, C. J. & Bao, G. CRISPR/Cas9 systems targeting β-globin and CCR5 genes have substantial off-target activity. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 9584–9592 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lin, Y. et al. CRISPR/Cas9 systems have off-target activity with insertions or deletions between target DNA and guide RNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 7473–7485 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zhang, H. et al. The CRISPR/Cas9 system produces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation. Plant Biotechnol. J. 12, 797–807 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gasiunas, G., Barrangou, R., Horvath, P. & Siksnys, V. Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E2579–E2586 (2012).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Cho, S. W., Kim, S., Kim, J. M. & Kim, J.-S. Targeted genome engineering in human cells with the Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 230–232 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Heigwer, F., Kerr, G. & Boutros, M. E-CRISP: fast CRISPR target site identification. Nat. Methods 11, 122–123 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Pattanayak, V., Ramirez, C. L., Joung, J. K. & Liu, D. R. Revealing off-target cleavage specificities of zinc-finger nucleases by in vitro selection. Nat. Methods 8, 765–770 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Guilinger, J. P. et al. Broad specificity profiling of TALENs results in engineered nucleases with improved DNA-cleavage specificity. Nat. Methods 11, 429–435 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sander, J. D. et al. In silico abstraction of zinc finger nuclease cleavage profiles reveals an expanded landscape of off-target sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, e181 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Smith, C. et al. Whole-genome sequencing analysis reveals high specificity of CRISPR/Cas9 and TALEN-based genome editing in human iPSCs. Cell Stem Cell 15, 12–13 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Veres, A. et al. Low incidence of off-target mutations in individual CRISPR-Cas9 and TALEN targeted human stem cell clones detected by whole-genome sequencing. Cell Stem Cell 15, 27–30 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Iyer, V. et al. Off-target mutations are rare in Cas9-modified mice. Nat. Methods 12, 479–479 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tsai, S. Q. & Joung, J. K. What's changed with genome editing? Cell Stem Cell 15, 3–4 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gabriel, R. et al. An unbiased genome-wide analysis of zinc-finger nuclease specificity. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 816–823 (2011). This is the first report of an unbiased genome-wide analysis of nuclease specificity, by analysing IDLV capture into ZFN-induced DSBs.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Osborn, M. J. et al. Evaluation of TCR gene editing achieved by TALENs, CRISPR/Cas9 and megaTAL nucleases. Mol. Ther. 24, 570–581 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wang, X. et al. Unbiased detection of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas9 and TALENs using integrase-defective lentiviral vectors. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 175–178 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tsai, S. Q. et al. GUIDE-seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 187–197 (2015). This study describes the GUIDE-seq method for identifying Cas9 off-target cleavage sites in living cells.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tsai, S. Q., Topkar, V. V., Joung, J. K. & Aryee, M. J. Open-source software guideseq for analysis of GUIDE-seq data. Nat. Biotechnol. (in the press).
• Chiarle, R. et al. Genome-wide translocation sequencing reveals mechanisms of chromosome breaks and rearrangements in B cells. Cell 147, 107–119 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Frock, R. L. et al. Genome-wide detection of DNA double-stranded breaks induced by engineered nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 179–186 (2015). This study describes the HTGTS method for identifying Cas9 off-target cleavage by translocation sequencing.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Crosetto, N. et al. Nucleotide-resolution DNA double-strand break mapping by next-generation sequencing. Nat. Methods 10, 361–365 (2013). This is the original study describing the BLESS method, which was later adapted to analyse CRISPR–Cas9 off-target cleavage.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kim, D. et al. Digenome-seq: genome-wide profiling of CRISPR-Cas9 off-target effects in human cells. Nat. Methods 12, 237–243 (2015). This study describes Digenome-seq, an in vitro genome-wide method for identifying CRISPR–Cas9 off-target cleavage sites.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kim, D., Kim, S., Kim, S., Park, J. & Kim, J.-S. Genome-wide target specificities of CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases revealed by multiplex Digenome-seq. Genome Res. http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gr.199588.115 (2016).
• Fu, Y., Sander, J. D., Reyon, D., Cascio, V. M. & Joung, J. K. Improving CRISPR-Cas nuclease specificity using truncated guide RNAs. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 279–284 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ran, F. A. et al. Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity. Cell 154, 1380–1389 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Mali, P. et al. CAS9 transcriptional activators for target specificity screening and paired nickases for cooperative genome engineering. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 833–838 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Tsai, S. Q. et al. Dimeric CRISPR RNA-guided FokI nucleases for highly specific genome editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 569–576 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Guilinger, J. P., Thompson, D. B. & Liu, D. R. Fusion of catalytically inactive Cas9 to FokI nuclease improves the specificity of genome modification. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 577–582 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wyvekens, N., Topkar, V. V., Khayter, C., Joung, J. K. & Tsai, S. Q. Dimeric CRISPR RNA-guided FokI-dCas9 nucleases directed by truncated gRNAs for highly specific genome editing. Hum. Gene Ther. 26, 425–431 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hara, S. et al. Generation of mutant mice via the CRISPR/Cas9 system using FokI-dCas9. Sci. Rep. 5, 11221 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Nakagawa, Y. et al. Production of knockout mice by DNA microinjection of various CRISPR/Cas9 vectors into freeze-thawed fertilized oocytes. BMC Biotechnol. 15, 33 (2015).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Kleinstiver, B. P. et al. High-fidelity CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with no detectable genome-wide off-target effects. Nature 529, 490–495 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Slaymaker, I. M. et al. Rationally engineered Cas9 nucleases with improved specificity. Science 351, 84–88 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Anders, C., Niewoehner, O., Duerst, A. & Jinek, M. Structural basis of PAM-dependent target DNA recognition by the Cas9 endonuclease. Nature 513, 569–573 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Jinek, M. et al. Structures of Cas9 endonucleases reveal RNA-mediated conformational activation. Science 343, 1247997 (2014).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Nishimasu, H. et al. Crystal structure of Cas9 in complex with guide RNA and target DNA. Cell 156, 935–949 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kim, S., Kim, D., Cho, S. W., Kim, J. & Kim, J. S. Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purified Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Genome Res. 24, 1012–1019 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zuris, J. A. et al. Cationic lipid-mediated delivery of proteins enables efficient protein-based genome editing in vitro and in vivo. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 73–80 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gaj, T., Guo, J., Kato, Y., Sirk, S. J. & Barbas, C. F. Targeted gene knockout by direct delivery of zinc-finger nuclease proteins. Nat. Methods 9, 805–807 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wright, A. V. et al. Rational design of a split-Cas9 enzyme complex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 2984–2989 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zetsche, B., Volz, S. E. & Zhang, F. A split-Cas9 architecture for inducible genome editing and transcription modulation. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 139–142 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nihongaki, Y., Kawano, F., Nakajima, T. & Sato, M. Photoactivatable CRISPR-Cas9 for optogenetic genome editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 755–760 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Davis, K. M., Pattanayak, V., Thompson, D. B., Zuris, J. A. & Liu, D. R. Small molecule-triggered Cas9 protein with improved genome-editing specificity. Nat. Chem. Biol. 11, 316–318 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Jiang, F., Zhou, K., Ma, L., Gressel, S. & Doudna, J. A. A Cas9-guide RNA complex preorganized for target DNA recognition. Science 348, 1477–1481 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Knight, S. C. et al. Dynamics of CRISPR-Cas9 genome interrogation in living cells. Science 350, 823–826 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sternberg, S. H., Redding, S., Jinek, M., Greene, E. C. & Doudna, J. A. DNA interrogation by the CRISPR RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9. Nature 507, 62–67 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kleinstiver, B. P. et al. Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities. Nature 523, 481–485 (2015).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Kleinstiver, B. P. et al. Broadening the targeting range of Staphylococcus aureus CRISPR-Cas9 by modifying PAM recognition. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 1293–1298 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hirano, H. et al. Structure and engineering of Francisella novicida Cas9. Cell 164, 950–961 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bolukbasi, M. F. et al. DNA-binding-domain fusions enhance the targeting range and precision of Cas9. Nat. Methods 12, 1150–1156 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sternberg, S. H., LaFrance, B., Kaplan, M. & Doudna, J. A. Conformational control of DNA target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas9. Nature 527, 110–113 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Jiang, F. et al. Structures of a CRISPR-Cas9 R-loop complex primed for DNA cleavage. Science 351, 867–871 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kiani, S. et al. Cas9 gRNA engineering for genome editing, activation and repression. Nat. Methods 12, 1051–1054 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Dahlman, J. E. et al. Orthogonal gene knockout and activation with a catalytically active Cas9 nuclease. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 1159–1161 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Yang, L. et al. Targeted and genome-wide sequencing reveal single nucleotide variations impacting specificity of Cas9 in human stem cells. Nat. Commun. 5, 5507 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Deltcheva, E. et al. CRISPR RNA maturation by _trans_-encoded small RNA and host factor RNase III. Nature 471, 602–607 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wu, X. et al. Genome-wide binding of the CRISPR endonuclease Cas9 in mammalian cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 670–676 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Cencic, R. et al. Protospacer adjacent motif (PAM)-distal sequences engage CRISPR Cas9 DNA target cleavage. PLoS ONE 9, e109213 (2014).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• O'Geen, H., Henry, I. M., Bhakta, M. S., Meckler, J. F. & Segal, D. J. A genome-wide analysis of Cas9 binding specificity using ChIP-seq and targeted sequence capture. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, 3389–3404 (2015).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar