Regulation of transposable elements by DNA modifications (original) (raw)
Gregory, T. R. Coincidence, coevolution, or causation? DNA content, cell size, and the C-value enigma. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc.76, 65–101 (2001). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Jurka, J., Bao, W. & Kojima, K. K. Families of transposable elements, population structure and the origin of species. Biol. Direct6, 44 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Sotero-Caio, C. G., Platt, R. N., Suh, A. & Ray, D. A. Evolution and diversity of transposable elements in vertebrate genomes. Genome Biol. Evol.9, 161–177 (2017). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Feschotte, C. & Betrán, E. Transposable element domestication as an adaptation to evolutionary conflicts. Trends Genet.33, 817–831 (2017). ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCAS Google Scholar
Joly-Lopez, Z. & Bureau, T. E. Exaptation of transposable element coding sequences. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.49, 34–42 (2018). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Chuong, E. B., Elde, N. C. & Feschotte, C. Regulatory activities of transposable elements: from conflicts to benefits. Nat. Rev. Genet.18, 71–86 (2017). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Gilbert, C. & Feschotte, C. Horizontal acquisition of transposable elements and viral sequences: patterns and consequences. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.49, 15–24 (2018). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Wicker, T. et al. A unified classification system for eukaryotic transposable elements. Nat. Rev. Genet.8, 973–982 (2007). This paper presents a comprehensive description of TE classification and nomenclature, based on a combination of TE sequence structure, phylogeny and mechanisms of transposition. ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Bao, W., Kojima, K. K. & Kohany, O. Repbase Update, a database of repetitive elements in eukaryotic genomes. Mob. DNA6, 11 (2015). ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Terrones, D. & Torres-Padilla, M.-E. Nimble and ready to mingle: transposon outbursts of early development. Trends Genet.34, 806–820 (2018). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Tsukahara, S. et al. Bursts of retrotransposition reproduced in Arabidopsis. Nature461, 423–426 (2009). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Lander, E. S. et al. Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature409, 860–921 (2001). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Mouse Genome Sequencing Consortium. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature420, 520–562 (2002). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Richardson, S. R. et al. Heritable L1 retrotransposition in the mouse primordial germline and early embryo. Genome Res.27, 1395–1405 (2017). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Brouha, B. et al. Hot L1s account for the bulk of retrotransposition in the human population. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA100, 5280–5285 (2003). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Dewannieux, M., Esnault, C. & Heidmann, T. LINE-mediated retrotransposition of marked Alu sequences. Nat. Genet.35, 41–48 (2003). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Czech, B. & Hannon, G. J. One loop to rule them all: the ping-pong cycle and piRNA-guided silencing. Trends Biochem. Sci.41, 324–337 (2016). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Molaro, A. & Malik, H. S. Hide and seek: how chromatin-based pathways silence retroelements in the mammalian germline. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.37, 51–58 (2016). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Kim, M. Y. & Zilberman, D. DNA methylation as a system of plant genomic immunity. Trends Plant Sci.19, 320–326 (2014). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Jacobs, F. M. J. et al. An evolutionary arms race between KRAB zinc-finger genes ZNF91/93 and SVA/L1 retrotransposons. Nature516, 242–245 (2014). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Imbeault, M., Helleboid, P.-Y. & Trono, D. KRAB zinc-finger proteins contribute to the evolution of gene regulatory networks. Nature543, 550–554 (2017). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Rowe, H. M. & Trono, D. Dynamic control of endogenous retroviruses during development. Virology411, 273–287 (2011). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Zemach, A. et al. The Arabidopsis nucleosome remodeler DDM1 allows DNA methyltransferases to access H1-containing heterochromatin. Cell153, 193–205 (2013). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Yoder, J. A., Walsh, C. P. & Bestor, T. H. Cytosine methylation and the ecology of intragenomic parasites. Trends Genet.13, 335–340 (1997). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, G. et al. N6-methyladenine DNA modification in Drosophila. Cell161, 893–906 (2015). This study describes 6mA dynamics duringD. melanogasterembryogenesis and reports a correlation between 6mA demethylation and TE suppression. ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Wu, T. P. et al. DNA methylation on N(6)-adenine in mammalian embryonic stem cells. Nature532, 329–333 (2016). This paper is the first to find 6mA in mammalian genomes, identifying both 6mA and its associated demethylase in mouse ESCs, which when removed led to 6mA enrichment at young LINE-1 elements. ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Schiffers, S. et al. Quantitative LC-MS provides no evidence for m6dA or m4dC in the genome of mouse embryonic stem cells and tissues. Angew. Chemie56, 11268–11271 (2017). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Kang, J. et al. Simultaneous deletion of the methylcytosine oxidases Tet1 and Tet3 increases transcriptome variability in early embryogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA112, E4236–E4245 (2015). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
la Rica de, L. et al. TET-dependent regulation of retrotransposable elements in mouse embryonic stem cells. Genome Biol.17, 234 (2016). In this paper, the authors show that TET enzymes demethylate LINE-1 elements in ESCs but also recruit the co-repressor SIN3A to ensure LINE-1 silencing. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Zhang, P. et al. L1 retrotransposition is activated by Ten-eleven-translocation protein 1 and repressed by methyl-CpG binding proteins. Nucleus8, 548–562 (2017). ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Deniz, O., la Rica, de, L., Cheng, K. C. L., Spensberger, D. & Branco, M. R. SETDB1 prevents TET2-dependent activation of IAP retroelements in naïve embryonic stem cells. Genome Biol.19, 6 (2018). ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCAS Google Scholar
Coluccio, A. et al. Individual retrotransposon integrants are differentially controlled by KZFP/KAP1-dependent histone methylation, DNA methylation and TET-mediated hydroxymethylation in naïve embryonic stem cells. Epigenetics Chromatin11, 7 (2018). ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCAS Google Scholar
Du, J., Johnson, L. M., Jacobsen, S. E. & Patel, D. J. DNA methylation pathways and their crosstalk with histone methylation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.16, 519–532 (2015). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Schübeler, D. Function and information content of DNA methylation. Nature517, 321–326 (2015). ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Allis, C. D. & Jenuwein, T. The molecular hallmarks of epigenetic control. Nat. Rev. Genet.17, 487–500 (2016). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Wu, X. & Zhang, Y. TET-mediated active DNA demethylation: mechanism, function and beyond. Nat. Rev. Genet.18, 517–534 (2017). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Luo, G.-Z. & He, C. DNA N6-methyladenine in metazoans: functional epigenetic mark or bystander? Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.24, 503–506 (2017). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Lechner, M. et al. The correlation of genome size and DNA methylation rate in metazoans. Theory Biosci.132, 47–60 (2013). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Rošic, S. et al. Evolutionary analysis indicates that DNA alkylation damage is a byproduct of cytosine DNA methyltransferase activity. Nat. Genet.50, 452–459 (2018). ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCAS Google Scholar
Lippman, Z., May, B., Yordan, C., Singer, T. & Martienssen, R. Distinct mechanisms determine transposon inheritance and methylation via small interfering RNA and histone modification. PLOS Biol.1, E67 (2003). ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhou, Y., Cambareri, E. B. & Kinsey, J. A. DNA methylation inhibits expression and transposition of the Neurospora Tad retrotransposon. Mol. Genet. Genomics265, 748–754 (2001). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Chernyavskaya, Y. et al. Loss of DNA methylation in zebrafish embryos activates retrotransposons to trigger antiviral signaling. Development144, 2925–2939 (2017). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Walsh, C. P., Chaillet, J. R. & Bestor, T. H. Transcription of IAP endogenous retroviruses is constrained by cytosine methylation. Nat. Genet.20, 116–117 (1998). This study is the first to demonstrate the role of DNA methylation in the silencing of TEs (IAPs) in mouse development. ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Hutnick, L. K. et al. DNA hypomethylation restricted to the murine forebrain induces cortical degeneration and impairs postnatal neuronal maturation. Hum. Mol. Genet.18, 2875–2888 (2009). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Jackson-Grusby, L. et al. Loss of genomic methylation causes p53-dependent apoptosis and epigenetic deregulation. Nat. Genet.27, 31–39 (2001). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Hutnick, L. K., Huang, X., Loo, T.-C., Ma, Z. & Fan, G. Repression of retrotransposal elements in mouse embryonic stem cells is primarily mediated by a DNA methylation-independent mechanism. J. Biol. Chem.285, 21082–21091 (2010). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Matsui, T. et al. Proviral silencing in embryonic stem cells requires the histone methyltransferase ESET. Nature464, 927–931 (2010). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Karimi, M. M. et al. DNA methylation and SETDB1/H3K9me3 regulate predominantly distinct sets of genes, retroelements, and chimeric transcripts in mESCs. Cell Stem Cell8, 676–687 (2011). This paper demonstrates that DNA methylation and H3K9me3 are targeted to different loci and that SETDB1-mediated H3K9me3 enrichment contributes to the silencing of certain ERVs in mouse ESCs. ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Rowe, H. M. et al. KAP1 controls endogenous retroviruses in embryonic stem cells. Nature463, 237–240 (2010). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Fasching, L. et al. TRIM28 represses transcription of endogenous retroviruses in neural progenitor cells. Cell Rep.10, 20–28 (2015). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Fadloun, A. et al. Chromatin signatures and retrotransposon profiling in mouse embryos reveal regulation of LINE-1 by RNA. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.20, 332–338 (2013). This study reveals the dynamic nature of TE expression during mouse pre-implantation, underlining a transient expression of LINE-1s during this period. ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Aravin, A. A. et al. A piRNA pathway primed by individual transposons is linked to de novo DNA methylation in mice. Mol. Cell31, 785–799 (2008). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Hackett, J. A. et al. Promoter DNA methylation couples genome-defence mechanisms to epigenetic reprogramming in the mouse germline. Development139, 3623–3632 (2012). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Bourc’his, D. & Bestor, T. H. Meiotic catastrophe and retrotransposon reactivation in male germ cells lacking Dnmt3L. Nature431, 96–99 (2004). This seminal paper shows in vivo that DNA methylation is required for transposon silencing during spermatogenesis in mice. ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Manakov, S. A. et al. MIWI2 and MILI have differential effects on piRNA biogenesis and DNA methylation. Cell Rep.12, 1234–1243 (2015). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Barau, J. et al. The DNA methyltransferase DNMT3C protects male germ cells from transposon activity. Science354, 909–912 (2016). This study discovers DNMT3C, a fourth DNA methyltransferase enzyme that specifically methylates young TEs in the male germ line. ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Jain, D. et al. rahu is a mutant allele of Dnmt3c, encoding a DNA methyltransferase homolog required for meiosis and transposon repression in the mouse male germline. PLOS Genet.13, e1006964 (2017). ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCAS Google Scholar
Zamudio, N. et al. DNA methylation restrains transposons from adopting a chromatin signature permissive for meiotic recombination. Genes Dev.29, 1256–1270 (2015). In this paper, the authors show that TE silencing during spermatogenesis is required during meiosis owing to an aberrant chromatin structure formed at expressed TE loci, which form meiotic hot spots. ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Kabayama, Y. et al. Roles of MIWI, MILI and PLD6 in small RNA regulation in mouse growing oocytes. Nucleic Acids Res.45, 5387–5398 (2017). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Malki, S., van der Heijden, G. W., O’Donnell, K. A., Martin, S. L. & Bortvin, A. A. Role for retrotransposon LINE-1 in fetal oocyte attrition in mice. Dev. Cell29, 521–533 (2014). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Seisenberger, S. et al. The dynamics of genome-wide DNA methylation reprogramming in mouse primordial germ cells. Mol. Cell48, 849–862 (2012). In this paper, the authors describe global DNA methylation dynamics in mouse PGCs featuring DNA methylation-resistant genomic regions, including IAPs, ERV1 and ERVK families. ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Lane, N. et al. Resistance of IAPs to methylation reprogramming may provide a mechanism for epigenetic inheritance in the mouse. Genesis35, 88–93 (2003). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Kobayashi, H. et al. High-resolution DNA methylome analysis of primordial germ cells identifies gender-specific reprogramming in mice. Genome Res.23, 616–627 (2013). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Liu, S. et al. Setdb1 is required for germline development and silencing of H3K9me3-marked endogenous retroviruses in primordial germ cells. Genes Dev.28, 2041–2055 (2014). This study identifies SETDB1 as responsible for silencing of DNA demethylation-resistant TEs in PGCs. ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Habibi, E. et al. Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing of two distinct interconvertible DNA methylomes of mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell13, 360–369 (2013). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
von Meyenn, F. et al. Impairment of DNA methylation maintenance is the main cause of global demethylation in naive embryonic stem cells. Mol. Cell62, 848–861 (2016). This study shows that replication-dependent passive demethylation is the dominant process during the remodelling of ESC to a naive state. The authors also link H3K9me2 enrichment with UHRF1 recruitment. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Rothbart, S. B. et al. Association of UHRF1 with methylated H3K9 directs the maintenance of DNA methylation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.19, 1155–1160 (2012). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Liu, X. et al. UHRF1 targets DNMT1 for DNA methylation through cooperative binding of hemi-methylated DNA and methylated H3K9. Nat. Commun.4, 1563 (2013). ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Maenohara, S. et al. Role of UHRF1 in de novo DNA methylation in oocytes and maintenance methylation in preimplantation embryos. PLOS Genet.13, e1007042 (2017). ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCAS Google Scholar
Walter, M., Teissandier, A., Pérez-Palacios, R. & Bourc’his, D. An epigenetic switch ensures transposon repression upon dynamic loss of DNA methylation in embryonic stem cells. eLife5, e11418 (2016). ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
von Meyenn, F. et al. Comparative principles of DNA methylation reprogramming during human and mouse in vitro primordial germ cell specification. Dev. Cell39, 104–115 (2016). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Sharif, J. et al. Activation of endogenous retroviruses in Dnmt1(−/−) ESCs involves disruption of SETDB1-mediated repression by NP95 binding to hemimethylated DNA. Cell Stem Cell19, 81–94 (2016). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Berrens, R. V. et al. An endosiRNA-based repression mechanism counteracts transposon activation during global DNA demethylation in embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell21, 694–703 (2017). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Gaudet, F. et al. Induction of tumors in mice by genomic hypomethylation. Science300, 489–492 (2003). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Nguyen, T. H. M. et al. L1 retrotransposon heterogeneity in ovarian tumor cell evolution. Cell Rep.23, 3730–3740 (2018). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Rodic, N. et al. Long interspersed element-1 protein expression is a hallmark of many human cancers. Am. J. Pathol.184, 1280–1286 (2014). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Lee, E. et al. Landscape of somatic retrotransposition in human cancers. Science337, 967–971 (2012). This study provides a detailed overview of somatic TE retrotransposition activity in different types of cancer. ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Burns, K. H. Transposable elements in cancer. Nat. Rev. Genet.17, 415–424 (2017). CAS Google Scholar
Weber, B., Kimhi, S., Howard, G., Eden, A. & Lyko, F. Demethylation of a LINE-1 antisense promoter in the cMet locus impairs Met signalling through induction of illegitimate transcription. Oncogene29, 5775–5784 (2010). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Cruickshanks, H. A. & Tufarelli, C. Isolation of cancer-specific chimeric transcripts induced by hypomethylation of the LINE-1 antisense promoter. Genomics94, 397–406 (2009). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Brocks, D. et al. DNMT and HDAC inhibitors induce cryptic transcription start sites encoded in long terminal repeats. Nat. Genet.49, 1052–1060 (2017). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Cuellar, T. L. et al. Silencing of retrotransposons by SETDB1 inhibits the interferon response in acute myeloid leukemia. J. Cell Biol.216, 3535–3549 (2017). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Roulois, D. et al. DNA-demethylating agents target colorectal cancer cells by inducing viral mimicry by endogenous transcripts. Cell162, 961–973 (2015). This study is the first to report that tumour-suppressive strategies of DNA-demethylating agents are actually via an interferon response associated with ERV activation. ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Chiappinelli, K. B. et al. Inhibiting DNA methylation causes an interferon response in cancer via dsRNA including endogenous retroviruses. Cell162, 974–986 (2015). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Ohtani, H., Liu, M., Zhou, W., Liang, G. & Jones, P. A. Switching roles for DNA and histone methylation depend on evolutionary ages of human endogenous retroviruses. Genome Res.28, 1147–1157 (2018). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Li, Y., Kumar, S. & Qian, W. Active DNA demethylation: mechanism and role in plant development. Plant Cell Rep.37, 77–85 (2018). ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Wyatt, G. R. & Cohen, S. S. The bases of the nucleic acids of some bacterial and animal viruses: the occurrence of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. Biochem. J.55, 774–782 (1953). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Penn, N. W., Suwalski, R., O’Riley, C., Bojanowski, K. & Yura, R. The presence of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in animal deoxyribonucleic acid. Biochem. J.126, 781–790 (1972). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Tahiliani, M. et al. Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science324, 930–935 (2009). This study discovers that TET proteins catalyse the conversion of 5mC to 5hmC by an oxidation reaction. ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Inoue, A. & Zhang, Y. Replication-dependent loss of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mouse preimplantation embryos. Science334, 194–194 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Hashimoto, H. et al. Recognition and potential mechanisms for replication and erasure of cytosine hydroxymethylation. Nucleic Acids Res.40, 4841–4849 (2012). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Globisch, D. et al. Tissue distribution of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine and search for active demethylation intermediates. PLOS ONE5, e15367 (2010). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Almeida, R. D. et al. Semi-quantitative immunohistochemical detection of 5-hydroxymethyl-cytosine reveals conservation of its tissue distribution between amphibians and mammals. Epigenetics7, 137–140 (2012). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Kamstra, J. H., Løken, M., Aleström, P. & Legler, J. Dynamics of DNA hydroxymethylation in zebrafish. Zebrafish12, 230–237 (2015). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Szwagierczak, A., Bultmann, S., Schmidt, C. S., Spada, F. & Leonhardt, H. Sensitive enzymatic quantification of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in genomic DNA. Nucleic Acids Res.38, e181 (2010). ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCAS Google Scholar
Jin, S.-G. et al. 5-Hydroxymethylcytosine is strongly depleted in human cancers but its levels do not correlate with IDH1 mutations. Cancer Res.71, 7360–7365 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Pfaffeneder, T. et al. The discovery of 5-formylcytosine in embryonic stem cell DNA. Angew. Chemie50, 7008–7012 (2011). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Iyer, L. M., Tahiliani, M., Rao, A. & Aravind, L. Prediction of novel families of enzymes involved in oxidative and other complex modifications of bases in nucleic acids. Cell Cycle8, 1698–1710 (2009). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Iyer, L. M. et al. Lineage-specific expansions of TET/JBP genes and a new class of DNA transposons shape fungal genomic and epigenetic landscapes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA111, 1676–1683 (2014). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Chavez, L. et al. Simultaneous sequencing of oxidized methylcytosines produced by TET/JBP dioxygenases in Coprinopsis cinerea. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA111, E5149–E5158 (2014). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Wang, X.-L. et al. Genome-wide mapping of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in three rice cultivars reveals its preferential localization in transcriptionally silent transposable element genes. J. Exp. Bot.66, 6651–6663 (2015). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Ficz, G. et al. Dynamic regulation of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mouse ES cells and during differentiation. Nature473, 398–402 (2011). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Booth, M. J. et al. Quantitative sequencing of 5-methylcytosine and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine at single-base resolution. Science336, 934–937 (2012). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Inoue, A., Shen, L., Dai, Q., He, C. & Zhang, Y. Generation and replication-dependent dilution of 5fC and 5caC during mouse preimplantation development. Cell Res.21, 1670–1676 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Gu, T.-P. et al. The role of Tet3 DNA dioxygenase in epigenetic reprogramming by oocytes. Nature477, 606–610 (2011). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Shen, L. et al. Tet3 and DNA replication mediate demethylation of both the maternal and paternal genomes in mouse zygotes. Cell Stem Cell15, 459–470 (2014). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Kim, S.-H. et al. Differential DNA methylation reprogramming of various repetitive sequences in mouse preimplantation embryos. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.324, 58–63 (2004). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Inoue, A., Matoba, S. & Zhang, Y. Transcriptional activation of transposable elements in mouse zygotes is independent of Tet3-mediated 5-methylcytosine oxidation. Cell Res.22, 1640–1649 (2012). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Vella, P. et al. Tet proteins connect the O-linked N-acetylglucosamine transferase Ogt to chromatin in embryonic stem cells. Mol. Cell49, 645–656 (2013). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Chen, Q., Chen, Y., Bian, C., Fujiki, R. & Yu, X. TET2 promotes histone O-GlcNAcylation during gene transcription. Nature493, 561–564 (2013). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Neri, F. et al. Genome-wide analysis identifies a functional association of Tet1 and Polycomb repressive complex 2 in mouse embryonic stem cells. Genome Biol.14, R91 (2013). ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCAS Google Scholar
Guallar, D. et al. RNA-dependent chromatin targeting of TET2 for endogenous retrovirus control in pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Genet.30, 733 (2018). Google Scholar
Leung, D. et al. Regulation of DNA methylation turnover at LTR retrotransposons and imprinted loci by the histone methyltransferase Setdb1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA111, 6690–6695 (2014). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Hashimoto, H. et al. Wilms tumor protein recognizes 5-carboxylcytosine within a specific DNA sequence. Genes Dev.28, 2304–2313 (2014). ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCAS Google Scholar
Kellinger, M. W. et al. 5-Formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine reduce the rate and substrate specificity of RNA polymerase II transcription. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.19, 831–833 (2012). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Iurlaro, M. et al. A screen for hydroxymethylcytosine and formylcytosine binding proteins suggests functions in transcription and chromatin regulation. Genome Biol.14, R119 (2013). ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Spruijt, C. G. et al. Dynamic readers for 5-(hydroxy)methylcytosine and its oxidized derivatives. Cell152, 1146–1159 (2013). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Xiong, J. et al. Cooperative action between SALL4A and TET proteins in stepwise oxidation of 5-methylcytosine. Mol. Cell64, 913–925 (2016). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Koziol, M. J. et al. Identification of methylated deoxyadenosines in vertebrates reveals diversity in DNA modifications. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.23, 24–30 (2016). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Xiao, C.-L. et al. N6-methyladenine DNA modification in the human genome. Mol. Cell71, 306–318 (2018). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Sánchez-Romero, M. A., Cota, I. & Casadesús, J. DNA methylation in bacteria: from the methyl group to the methylome. Curr. Opin. Microbiol.25, 9–16 (2015). ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Roberts, D., Hoopes, B. C., McClure, W. R. & Kleckner, N. IS10 transposition is regulated by DNA adenine methylation. Cell43, 117–130 (1985). Dam-mutantE. coliare used to show that 6mA loss results in increased transcription of the IS10 transposon and that this leads to transposition. ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Chen, X., Sheng, Y., Liu, Y. & Gao, S. N6-adenine DNA methylation is associated with the linker DNA of H2A. Z-containing well-positioned nucleosomes in Pol II-transcribed genes in Tetrahymena. Nucleic Acids Res.45, 11594–11606 (2017). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Chen, H. et al. Phytophthora methylomes are modulated by 6 mA methyltransferases and associated with adaptive genome regions. Genome Biol.19, 181 (2018). ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCAS Google Scholar
Liang, Z. et al. DNA N6-adenine methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Dev. Cell45, 406–416 (2018). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Yao, B. et al. DNA N6-methyladenine is dynamically regulated in the mouse brain following environmental stress. Nat. Commun.8, 1122 (2017). ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCAS Google Scholar
Zhu, S. et al. Mapping and characterizing N6-methyladenine in eukaryotic genomes using single-molecule real-time sequencing. Genome Res.28, 1067–1078 (2018). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Mondo, S. J. et al. Widespread adenine N6-methylation of active genes in fungi. Nat. Genet.49, 964–968 (2017). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Brocken, D. J. W., Tark-Dame, M. & Dame, R. T. dCas9: a versatile tool for epigenome editing. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol.26, 15–32 (2018). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Machnicka, M. A. et al. MODOMICS: a database of RNA modification pathways—2013 update. Nucleic Acids Res.41, D262–D267 (2013). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Zhao, B. S., Roundtree, I. A. & He, C. Post-transcriptional gene regulation by mRNA modifications. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.18, 31–42 (2017). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Wan, Y. et al. Transcriptome-wide high-throughput deep m(6)A-seq reveals unique differential m(6)A methylation patterns between three organs in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Biol.16, 272 (2015). ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCAS Google Scholar
Zhang, Z. & Xing, Y. CLIP-seq analysis of multi-mapped reads discovers novel functional RNA regulatory sites in the human transcriptome. Nucleic Acids Res.45, 9260–9271 (2017). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Huang, L., Ashraf, S., Wang, J. & Lilley, D. M. Control of box C/D snoRNP assembly by N6-methylation of adenine. EMBO Rep.18, 1631–1645 (2017). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhou, C. et al. Genome-wide maps of m6A circRNAs identify widespread and cell-type-specific methylation patterns that are distinct from mRNAs. Cell Rep.20, 2262–2276 (2017). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Horwich, M. D. et al. The Drosophila RNA methyltransferase, DmHen1, modifies germline piRNAs and single-stranded siRNAs in RISC. Curr. Biol.17, 1265–1272 (2007). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Saito, K. et al. Pimet, the Drosophila homolog of HEN1, mediates 2′-O-methylation of Piwi- interacting RNAs at their 3′ ends. Genes Dev.21, 1603–1608 (2007). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Jackman, J. E. & Alfonzo, J. D. Transfer RNA modifications: nature’s combinatorial chemistry playground. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. RNA4, 35–48 (2013). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Chou, H.-J., Donnard, E., Gustafsson, H. T., Garber, M. & Rando, O. J. Transcriptome-wide analysis of roles for tRNA modifications in translational regulation. Mol. Cell68, 978–992 (2017).
Phalke, S. et al. Retrotransposon silencing and telomere integrity in somatic cells of Drosophila depends on the cytosine-5 methyltransferase DNMT2. Nat. Genet.41, 696–702 (2009). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Kuhlmann, M. et al. Silencing of retrotransposons in Dictyostelium by DNA methylation and RNAi. Nucleic Acids Res.33, 6405–6417 (2005). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Raddatz, G. et al. Dnmt2-dependent methylomes lack defined DNA methylation patterns. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA110, 8627–8631 (2013). ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Genenncher, B. et al. Mutations in cytosine-5 tRNA methyltransferases impact mobile element expression and genome stability at specific DNA repeats. Cell Rep.22, 1861–1874 (2018). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Ibarra, C. A. et al. Active DNA demethylation in plant companion cells reinforces transposon methylation in gametes. Science337, 1360–1364 (2012). This paper provides genome-wide evidence that flowering plants use companion cells to protect their gametes from harmful transposition. ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Rowe, H. M. et al. De novo DNA methylation of endogenous retroviruses is shaped by KRAB-ZFPs/KAP1 and ESET. Development140, 519–529 (2013). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar