Hollingsworth v. Perry (original) (raw)

About DBpedia

El Cas Hollingsworth contra Perry (en anglès: Hollingsworth v. Perry) van ser una sèrie de casos dels tribunals federals dels Estats Units que van legalitzar el matrimoni entre persones del mateix sexe en l'Estat de Califòrnia. El cas va començar en 2009 en el Tribunal de Districte dels Estats Units per al Districte Nord de Califòrnia, que va determinar que la prohibició del matrimoni entre persones del mateix sexe viola la igualtat de protecció de la llei. Aquesta decisió va anul·lar la Proposició 8, que havia prohibit el matrimoni entre persones del mateix sexe. Després que l'Estat de Califòrnia es negués a defensar la Proposició 8, els promotors oficials de la mateixa van intervenir i van apel·lar a la Cort Suprema. El cas es va litigar durant els governs tant d'Arnold Schwarzenegger co

thumbnail

Property Value
dbo:abstract El Cas Hollingsworth contra Perry (en anglès: Hollingsworth v. Perry) van ser una sèrie de casos dels tribunals federals dels Estats Units que van legalitzar el matrimoni entre persones del mateix sexe en l'Estat de Califòrnia. El cas va començar en 2009 en el Tribunal de Districte dels Estats Units per al Districte Nord de Califòrnia, que va determinar que la prohibició del matrimoni entre persones del mateix sexe viola la igualtat de protecció de la llei. Aquesta decisió va anul·lar la Proposició 8, que havia prohibit el matrimoni entre persones del mateix sexe. Després que l'Estat de Califòrnia es negués a defensar la Proposició 8, els promotors oficials de la mateixa van intervenir i van apel·lar a la Cort Suprema. El cas es va litigar durant els governs tant d'Arnold Schwarzenegger com de Jerry Brown, per la qual cosa es va conèixer com a Perry contra Schwarzenegger i Perry contra Brown, respectivament. Com Hollingsworth contra Perry, va arribar finalment al Tribunal Suprem dels Estats Units, que va sostenir que, d'acord amb els precedents, els promotors oficials d'una mesura d'iniciativa de votació no tenien dret, en virtut de l'Article III, a apel·lar una sentència adversa d'un tribunal federal quan l'Estat es negava a fer-lo. L'efecte de la sentència va ser que el matrimoni homosexual a Califòrnia es va reprendre en virtut de la decisió del judici del Tribunal de Districte a partir de 2010. Altres troballes de la decisió del judici, incloent les conclusions de fet del Jutge Vaughn Walker, continuen controlant el precedent per a futurs casos rellevants. El cas va ser registrat en la Cort Suprema en 570 U.S. 693 (2013) (Expedient nº12-144). (ca) Hollingsworth v. Perry (vorher Perry v. Schwarzenegger und Perry v. Brown) ist ein Verfahren vor dem Obersten Gerichtshof der Vereinigten Staaten zur Verfassungswidrigkeit eines Verbots der gleichgeschlechtlichen Ehe in Kalifornien. Das Verfahren begann mit einer Klage vor dem Bundesbezirksgericht in San Francisco gegen Proposition 8, ein erfolgreiches Referendum, mit dem die so geändert wurde, dass nur noch Ehen zwischen einem Mann und einer Frau staatlich anerkannt würden. In ihrem Antrag behaupten die Kläger, Proposition 8 würde gegen das Rechtsstaatlichkeitsgebot und den Gleichheitsgrundsatz der Bundesverfassung verstoßen. Am 26. Juni 2013 entschied der Supreme Court, dass die Gegner der gleichgeschlechtlichen Ehe in Kalifornien nicht berechtigt waren zu klagen; damit gilt in diesem Bundesstaat wieder das ursprüngliche Urteil des erstinstanzlichen District Court und somit das Recht für Homosexuelle zu heiraten. (de) Hollingsworth v. Perry was a series of United States federal court cases that re-legalized same-sex marriage in the state of California. The case began in 2009 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, which found that banning same-sex marriage violates equal protection under the law. This decision overturned ballot initiative Proposition 8, which had banned same-sex marriage. After the State of California refused to defend Proposition 8, the official sponsors of Proposition 8 intervened and appealed to the Supreme Court. The case was litigated during the governorships of both Arnold Schwarzenegger and Jerry Brown, and was thus known as Perry v. Schwarzenegger and Perry v. Brown, respectively. As Hollingsworth v. Perry, it eventually reached the United States Supreme Court, which held that, in line with prior precedent, the official sponsors of a ballot initiative measure did not have Article III standing to appeal an adverse federal court ruling when the state refused to do so. The effect of the ruling was that same-sex marriage in California resumed under the district court trial decision from 2010. Other findings from the trial decision, including Judge Vaughn Walker's findings of fact, remain controlling precedent for future relevant cases. The case was docketed with the Supreme Court at 570 U.S. 693 (2013) (Docket No. 12-144). (en) Hollingsworth v. Perry adalah sejumlah kasus di pengadilan federal Amerika Serikat yang melegalkan pernikahan sesama jenis di negara bagian Kalifornia. Kasus ini dimulai pada tahun 2009 di pengadilan distrik utara Kalifornia yang memutuskan bahwa pelarangan pernikahan sesama jenis melanggar asas . Keputusan ini dibatalkan oleh inisiatif referendum Proposition 8 yang telah melarang pernikahan sesama jenis. Setelah negara bagian Kalifornia menolak mempertahankan Proposition 8, para pendukung resmi Proposition 8 melakukan intervensi dan mengajukan banding. Kasus ini dipertimbangkan selama masa jabatan gubernur Arnold Schwarzenegger dan Jerry Brown, sehingga kasus ini juga dikenal dengan nama Perry v. Schwarzenegger dan Perry v. Brown. Kasus Hollingsworth v. Perry pada akhirnya mencapai Mahkamah Agung Amerika Serikat, dan mahkamah tersebut memutuskan bahwa para pendukung inisiatif referendum tersebut tidak memiliki kedudukan hukum untuk mengajukan banding ketika negara bagian menolak melakukan hal tersebut, karena mereka tidak dapat menunjukkan bahwa mereka telah dirugikan oleh keputusan tersebut. Dampak keputusan ini adalah kelanjutan . (in)
dbo:thumbnail wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Hollingsworth_v._Perry.jpg?width=300
dbo:wikiPageExternalLink https://web.archive.org/web/20081010125329/http:/www.protectmarriage.com/ https://web.archive.org/web/20130302063628/http:/www.sfcityattorney.org/index.aspx%3Fpage=501 https://web.archive.org/web/20130316191210/https:/ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cand/09cv2292/files/09cv2292-ORDER.pdf http://equalityontrial.com/ http://www.arizonalawreview.org/pdf/53-3/53arizlrev913.pdf http://www.marriagetrial.com/ http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/general/2012/02/07/1016696com.pdf http://www.afer.org/our-work/legal-filings/ http://www.afer.org/our-work/our-arguments/ http://www.afer.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Doc-812-Order-re-Tapes.pdf http://www.afer.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/2012-07-31-Proponents-Petition-for-Certiorari.pdf http://www.stanfordlawreview.org/online/perry-marriage-equality https://archive.today/20130720234132/http:/www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-prop-8-lawsuit-20130707,0,3726489,full.story https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/570/12-144/ https://web.archive.org/web/20100527105245/https:/ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cand/09cv2292/ https://web.archive.org/web/20110719072732/https:/ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cand/09cv2292/evidence/index.html https://web.archive.org/web/20120207125642/http:/www.ca9.uscourts.gov/content/view.php%3Fpk_id=0000000513 https://web.archive.org/web/20120227084639/http:/www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2012/02/01/1117255.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20130630210513/http:/www.marriageequality.org/doma-prop8 https://web.archive.org/web/20130702015400/http:/cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2013/06/28/1016696o.pdf https://www.leagle.com/decision/inadvfco110328000104 https://www.leagle.com/decision/infco20120207000t https://www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20101015624 https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2012/2012_12_144%23argument https://www.oyez.org/cases/2012/12-144 https://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/02262010/watch.html https://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx%3FFileName=/docketfiles/12-144.htm https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-144_8ok0.pdf https://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv=fksOSbQ7XaA http://www.newsweek.com/id/229957 http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-candce/case_no-3:2009cv02292/case_id-215270/
dbo:wikiPageID 23541913 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageLength 135540 (xsd:nonNegativeInteger)
dbo:wikiPageRevisionID 1122564056 (xsd:integer)
dbo:wikiPageWikiLink dbr:California_Courts_of_Appeal dbr:California_Department_of_Public_Health dbr:California_Supreme_Court dbr:American_Family_Association dbr:American_Foundation_for_Equal_Rights dbr:Amicus_curiae dbr:Precedent dbr:Proposition_8 dbr:ProtectMarriage.com dbr:Public_Broadcasting_Service dbr:Question_of_fact dbr:Romer_v._Evans dbr:Same-sex_marriage dbr:Samuel_Alito dbr:San_Diego dbr:San_Francisco dbr:San_Francisco_Bay_Area dbr:En_banc dbr:Minority_group dbr:Political_movement dbr:Social_movement dbr:Proffer dbr:Bill_Clinton dbr:Bill_Moyers dbr:David_Boies dbr:Defense_of_Marriage_Act dbr:Dennis_Hollingsworth dbc:2013_in_United_States_case_law dbr:Homosexual_agenda dbr:John_Paul_Stevens dbr:John_Roberts dbr:Joyce_L._Kennard dbr:Judicial_disqualification dbr:Judicial_review dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_570 dbr:Pepperdine_University dbr:Republican_Party_(United_States) dbr:United_States_Constitution dbr:United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit dbr:United_States_District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_California dbr:United_States_v._Windsor dbr:University_of_California,_Davis dbr:University_of_Cambridge dbr:Vaughn_Walker dbr:Vikram_Amar dbr:Violence_against_LGBT_people dbr:David_Blankenhorn dbr:California_Attorney_General dbr:California_Proposition_8_(2008) dbr:Defendant dbr:Developmental_psychology dbr:Domestic_partnership dbr:Domestic_partnership_in_California dbr:Due_Process_Clause dbr:Indispensable_party dbr:Initiative dbr:Injunction dbr:Intervention_(law) dbr:Social_inequality dbr:Obergefell_v._Hodges dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbr:Courage_Campaign dbr:Court_order dbr:Cross-examination dbr:Ruth_Bader_Ginsburg dbr:George_Chauncey dbr:National_Organization_for_Marriage dbr:Opening_statement dbr:Social_networking_service dbr:Strict_scrutiny dbr:Rebuttal dbr:Question_of_law dbr:Christian_Legal_Society_v._Martinez dbr:Cinema_of_the_United_States dbr:Claremont_McKenna_College dbr:Clarence_Thomas dbr:Class_action dbr:Edward_Leavy dbr:Ellen_DeGeneres dbr:Gavin_Newsom dbr:Gender_role dbr:George_W._Bush dbr:Georgia_State_University dbr:Governor_of_California dbr:Mores dbr:N._Randy_Smith dbr:Concurring_opinion dbr:Constitutional_amendment dbr:Constitutional_law dbr:Conversion_therapy dbr:Theodore_Olson dbr:Equal_Protection_Clause dbr:Equality_before_the_law dbr:LGBT_history dbr:LGBT_parenting dbr:Marriage_license dbc:2013_in_LGBT_history dbr:Anthony_Kennedy dbr:Antonin_Scalia dbr:Antonio_Villaraigosa dbr:Appellate_court dbr:Legal_opinion dbr:Liberty_Counsel dbr:Los_Angeles_County,_California dbr:Loving_v._Virginia dbr:Loyola_Law_School dbr:Lujan_v._Defenders_of_Wildlife dbr:Maggie_Gallagher dbr:Chris_Geidner dbr:Silicon_Valley dbr:Stanford_University dbr:Stay_of_execution dbr:Stephen_Breyer dbr:Stephen_Reinhardt dbr:Steve_Inskeep dbr:Strauss_v._Horton dbr:Closing_argument dbr:Dennis_Herrera dbr:Fundamental_rights dbr:Donald_B._Verrilli,_Jr. dbr:Party_(law) dbr:Pedophilia dbr:Social_stigma dbr:Social_support dbr:Standing_(law) dbr:Stay_of_proceedings dbr:Swing_vote dbr:2000_United_States_presidential_election dbr:Barbara_Boxer dbr:8_(play) dbr:Brokeback_Mountain dbr:Brooklyn dbr:Bush_v._Gore dbr:C-SPAN dbr:CBS dbr:CNN dbc:United_States_same-sex_union_case_law dbr:Time_100 dbr:TruTV dbr:Twitter dbr:U.S._District_Court_for_the_Northern_District_of_California dbr:UCLA_School_of_Law dbr:Will_&_Grace dbr:William_Eskridge dbr:Case_or_Controversy_clause dbr:Dissenting_opinion dbr:County_Clerk dbr:Harvard_Law_Review dbr:Lea_Brilmayer dbr:Minority_stress dbr:Adam_Lambert dbr:Adrienne_Barbeau dbc:2008_California_Proposition_8 dbc:2010_in_LGBT_history dbr:Al_Gore dbr:Alameda_County,_California dbr:Allen_v._Wright dbr:American_Civil_Liberties_Union dbr:Daniel_N._Robinson dbr:Erwin_Chemerinsky dbr:Ethics_and_Public_Policy_Center dbr:Expert_witness dbr:Federal_Supplement dbr:Federalism_in_the_United_States dbr:First_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Fox_News_Channel dbr:Brian_S._Brown dbr:Brief_(law) dbr:Pacific_Justice_Institute dbr:Paris_Hilton dbr:Pasadena,_California dbr:Bishop_(Catholic_Church) dbr:Equal_protection_under_the_law dbr:Judicial_activism dbr:Judicial_interpretation dbr:Legal_doctrine dbr:Per_curiam_decision dbr:Social_equality dbr:Privilege_(evidence) dbr:Procedural_law dbr:Request_for_production dbr:Gregory_M._Herek dbr:Griswold_v._Connecticut dbr:Hearing_(law) dbr:Helen_Zia dbr:Involuntary_dismissal dbr:James_Ware_(judge) dbr:Baker_v._Nelson dbr:Tani_Cantil-Sakauye dbr:Courtroom_photography_and_broadcasting dbr:Tess_Harper dbr:The_Case_Against_8 dbr:The_Church_of_Jesus_Christ_of_Latter-day_Saints dbr:Same-sex_marriage_in_California dbr:Same-sex_marriage_in_the_United_States dbr:Arnold_Schwarzenegger dbr:Arye_Gross dbr:Aspen_Institute dbr:Associated_Press dbc:2010_in_United_States_case_law dbc:American_Civil_Liberties_Union_litigation dbr:Advice_and_consent dbr:Charles_J._Cooper dbr:Jerry_Brown dbr:Jerry_Sanders_(politician) dbr:John_C._Eastman dbr:KQED_Inc. dbr:Kamala_Harris dbr:Karcher_v._May dbr:Kenneth_P._Miller dbr:Kim_McLane_Wardlaw dbr:L._Ed._2d dbr:Lady_Gaga dbr:Lambda_Legal dbr:Lawrence_v._Texas dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States dbr:Systemic_bias dbr:Homophobia dbr:The_Advocate_(LGBT_magazine) dbr:Trial dbr:Diamond_v._Charles dbr:Dianne_Feinstein dbr:Article_Three_of_the_United_States_Constitution dbr:Marsha_Berzon dbr:Political_science dbr:Sonia_Sotomayor dbr:Civil_and_political_rights dbr:Ilan_Meyer dbr:Imperial_County,_California dbr:In_re_Marriage_Cases dbr:Michael_Daly_Hawkins dbr:Michael_Lamb_(psychologist) dbr:National_Center_for_Lesbian_Rights dbr:National_Public_Radio dbr:Oral_argument_in_the_United_States dbr:Campaign_for_California_Families dbr:Case_citation dbr:Case_or_Controversy_Clause dbr:Race_(human_classification) dbr:Raymond_C._Fisher dbr:Certified_question dbr:Certiorari dbr:Yale_University dbr:YouTube dbr:Mandamus dbr:Same-sex_relationship dbr:Stanford_Law_Review dbr:Social_history dbr:United_States_Reports dbr:United_States_district_court dbr:Verbatim_theatre dbr:Preliminary_injunction dbr:Impeachment dbr:In_camera dbr:Summary_judgment dbr:Plaintiff dbr:Video_hosting_service dbr:M._Edward_Whelan_III dbr:Standard_of_review dbr:Trial_court dbr:Sidney_Runyan_Thomas dbr:Rational_basis_review dbr:Yarmulkes dbr:Arizonans_for_Official_English dbr:California_state_elections,_November_2010 dbr:Legal_standing dbr:Alliance_Defense_Fund dbr:F.3d dbr:Nancy_Cott dbr:Theodore_B._Olson dbr:U.S._Solicitor_General dbr:We_the_People dbr:File:Kristin_Perry_and_Sandra_Stier,_San_Francisco_Pride_2013.jpg dbr:File:10-16696,_10-16751_-_Perry_v._Schwarzenegger_-_Part_1_-_Standing.webm dbr:File:10-16696,_10-16751_-_Perry_v._Schwarzenegger_-_Part_2_-_Merits.webm dbr:File:11-16577_Perry,_City_and_county_of_SF_v._Brown,_Hollingsworth_et._al..webm dbr:File:11-17255_Perry_v._Brown_et._al._and_Hollingsworth_et._al..webm dbr:File:Hollingsworth_v._Perry.jpg dbr:W:_United_States_Constitution
dbp:align right (en)
dbp:arguedate 0001-03-26 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:argueyear 2013 (xsd:integer)
dbp:case Hollingsworth v. Perry, (en)
dbp:decidedate 0001-06-26 (xsd:gMonthDay)
dbp:decideyear 2013 (xsd:integer)
dbp:dissent Kennedy (en)
dbp:docket 12 (xsd:integer)
dbp:fullname Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Petitioners v. Kristin M. Perry, et al. (en)
dbp:holding After lower courts ruled that California's ban on same-sex marriage was an unconstitutional violation of the right to equal protection under the law, the Supreme Court ruled that same-sex marriage opponents did not have standing to intervene as they could not demonstrate that they were harmed by the decision. (en)
dbp:joindissent Thomas, Alito, Sotomayor (en)
dbp:joinmajority Scalia, Ginsburg, Breyer, Kagan (en)
dbp:justia https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/570/12-144/
dbp:lawsapplied dbr:Article_Three_of_the_United_States_Constitution
dbp:litigants Hollingsworth v. Perry (en)
dbp:majority Roberts (en)
dbp:oralargument https://www.oyez.org/cases/2010-2019/2012/2012_12_144%23argument
dbp:otherSource Supreme Court (en)
dbp:otherUrl https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-144_8ok0.pdf
dbp:oyez https://www.oyez.org/cases/2012/12-144
dbp:parallelcitations 172800.0 (dbd:second)
dbp:prior 172800.0 (dbd:second) 25920.0 (dbd:second) Cert. granted, . (en) Answered, Perry v. Brown, 52 Cal.4th 1116 ; (en)
dbp:quote Today's decision is by no means California's first milestone, nor our last, on America's road to equality and freedom for all people. (en) It was still emotional to be denied [a marriage license]. But in all fairness [to the clerk], she handled it really well. [Her words] reiterated that we were denied equal rights. It made us feel that we made the right decision to be a part of this case. (en) What's at stake in the Perry case is not just the right of California voters to reaffirm the definition of marriage as only between a man and a woman, but whether marriage will be redefined in every state in the nation. (en)
dbp:source 0001-08-04 (xsd:gMonthDay) —Jeffrey Zarrillo, co-plaintiff (en) —ProtectMarriage.com, defendant-intervenor (en)
dbp:uspage 693 (xsd:integer)
dbp:usvol 570 (xsd:integer)
dbp:width 270 (xsd:integer)
dbp:wikiPageUsesTemplate dbt:Caselaw_source dbt:Cite_journal dbt:Infobox_SCOTUS_case dbt:Italic_title dbt:Quote_box dbt:Reflist dbt:Rp dbt:Use_mdy_dates dbt:Wikisource dbt:Ussc dbt:LGBT_in_California dbt:SCOTUS_oral_arguments
dct:subject dbc:2013_in_United_States_case_law dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases dbc:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Roberts_Court dbc:2013_in_LGBT_history dbc:United_States_same-sex_union_case_law dbc:2008_California_Proposition_8 dbc:2010_in_LGBT_history dbc:2010_in_United_States_case_law dbc:American_Civil_Liberties_Union_litigation
rdf:type owl:Thing dbo:Case dbo:LegalCase dbo:UnitOfWork wikidata:Q2334719 yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases yago:Abstraction100002137 yago:Case107308889 yago:Event100029378 yago:Happening107283608 yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100 yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity dbo:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
rdfs:comment El Cas Hollingsworth contra Perry (en anglès: Hollingsworth v. Perry) van ser una sèrie de casos dels tribunals federals dels Estats Units que van legalitzar el matrimoni entre persones del mateix sexe en l'Estat de Califòrnia. El cas va començar en 2009 en el Tribunal de Districte dels Estats Units per al Districte Nord de Califòrnia, que va determinar que la prohibició del matrimoni entre persones del mateix sexe viola la igualtat de protecció de la llei. Aquesta decisió va anul·lar la Proposició 8, que havia prohibit el matrimoni entre persones del mateix sexe. Després que l'Estat de Califòrnia es negués a defensar la Proposició 8, els promotors oficials de la mateixa van intervenir i van apel·lar a la Cort Suprema. El cas es va litigar durant els governs tant d'Arnold Schwarzenegger co (ca) Hollingsworth v. Perry (vorher Perry v. Schwarzenegger und Perry v. Brown) ist ein Verfahren vor dem Obersten Gerichtshof der Vereinigten Staaten zur Verfassungswidrigkeit eines Verbots der gleichgeschlechtlichen Ehe in Kalifornien. Das Verfahren begann mit einer Klage vor dem Bundesbezirksgericht in San Francisco gegen Proposition 8, ein erfolgreiches Referendum, mit dem die so geändert wurde, dass nur noch Ehen zwischen einem Mann und einer Frau staatlich anerkannt würden. In ihrem Antrag behaupten die Kläger, Proposition 8 würde gegen das Rechtsstaatlichkeitsgebot und den Gleichheitsgrundsatz der Bundesverfassung verstoßen. Am 26. Juni 2013 entschied der Supreme Court, dass die Gegner der gleichgeschlechtlichen Ehe in Kalifornien nicht berechtigt waren zu klagen; damit gilt in diesem B (de) Hollingsworth v. Perry was a series of United States federal court cases that re-legalized same-sex marriage in the state of California. The case began in 2009 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, which found that banning same-sex marriage violates equal protection under the law. This decision overturned ballot initiative Proposition 8, which had banned same-sex marriage. After the State of California refused to defend Proposition 8, the official sponsors of Proposition 8 intervened and appealed to the Supreme Court. The case was litigated during the governorships of both Arnold Schwarzenegger and Jerry Brown, and was thus known as Perry v. Schwarzenegger and Perry v. Brown, respectively. As Hollingsworth v. Perry, it eventually reached the United States Supr (en) Hollingsworth v. Perry adalah sejumlah kasus di pengadilan federal Amerika Serikat yang melegalkan pernikahan sesama jenis di negara bagian Kalifornia. Kasus ini dimulai pada tahun 2009 di pengadilan distrik utara Kalifornia yang memutuskan bahwa pelarangan pernikahan sesama jenis melanggar asas . Keputusan ini dibatalkan oleh inisiatif referendum Proposition 8 yang telah melarang pernikahan sesama jenis. Setelah negara bagian Kalifornia menolak mempertahankan Proposition 8, para pendukung resmi Proposition 8 melakukan intervensi dan mengajukan banding. Kasus ini dipertimbangkan selama masa jabatan gubernur Arnold Schwarzenegger dan Jerry Brown, sehingga kasus ini juga dikenal dengan nama Perry v. Schwarzenegger dan Perry v. Brown. Kasus Hollingsworth v. Perry pada akhirnya mencapai Mahkam (in)
rdfs:label Hollingsworth v. Perry (en) Cas Hollingsworth contra Perry (ca) Hollingsworth v. Perry (de) Hollingsworth v. Perry (in)
owl:sameAs freebase:Hollingsworth v. Perry yago-res:Hollingsworth v. Perry wikidata:Hollingsworth v. Perry dbpedia-ca:Hollingsworth v. Perry dbpedia-de:Hollingsworth v. Perry dbpedia-id:Hollingsworth v. Perry dbpedia-ms:Hollingsworth v. Perry https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4mvwD
prov:wasDerivedFrom wikipedia-en:Hollingsworth_v._Perry?oldid=1122564056&ns=0
foaf:depiction wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Kristin_Perry_and_Sandra_Stier,_San_Francisco_Pride_2013.jpg wiki-commons:Special:FilePath/Hollingsworth_v._Perry.jpg
foaf:homepage https://web.archive.org/web/20100527105245/https:/ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cand/09cv2292/
foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf wikipedia-en:Hollingsworth_v._Perry
foaf:name Dennis Hollingsworth, et al., Petitioners v. Kristin M. Perry, et al. (en)
is dbo:wikiPageDisambiguates of dbr:Hollingsworth
is dbo:wikiPageRedirects of dbr:Perry_v._schwarzenegger dbr:Perry_v_Schwarzenegger dbr:Hollingsworth_V._Perry dbr:Hollingsworth_v_Perry dbr:Perry_v._Schwarzenegger dbr:Hollingsworth_v_perry dbr:Kristin_Perry dbr:Kris_Perry dbr:Perry_et_al._v._Schwarzenegger_et_al. dbr:Perry_v._Brown dbr:Perry_v._Hollingsworth dbr:Perry_v_brown dbr:Perry_v_schwarzenegger dbr:Perry_versus_Schwarzenegger dbr:Perry_vs._Schwarzenegger
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of dbr:Carlos_Gutierrez dbr:American_Foundation_for_Equal_Rights dbr:Romer_v._Evans dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_involving_standing dbr:2008_California_Proposition_8 dbr:Benjamin_Ginsberg_(lawyer) dbr:Beth_Myers dbr:Bobby_Jindal dbr:David_Boies dbr:David_Frum dbr:Deborah_Pryce dbr:Dennis_Hollingsworth dbr:Human_Rights_Campaign dbr:John_Roberts dbr:John_Stanley_Pottinger dbr:Jon_Huntsman_Jr. dbr:Juleanna_Glover dbr:Julie_E._Cram dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Roberts_Court dbr:Patrick_Guerriero dbr:Paul_Cellucci dbr:Reuben_Jeffery_III dbr:Richard_Grenell dbr:Robert_K._Steel dbr:United_States_v._Windsor dbr:Vaughn_Walker dbr:DeBoer_v._Snyder dbr:Initiatives_and_referendums_in_the_United_States dbr:Obergefell_v._Hodges dbr:Theodore_Kassinger dbr:Timeline_of_same-sex_marriage_in_the_United_States dbr:Perry_v._schwarzenegger dbr:Perry_v_Schwarzenegger dbr:Connie_Morella dbr:Meghan_O'Sullivan dbr:Melissa_Etheridge dbr:Timeline_of_same-sex_marriage dbr:Chris_Kluwe dbr:Chris_Shays dbr:Cleve_Jones dbr:Cliff_Asness dbr:Nancy_Johnson dbr:Constitutional_Accountability_Center dbr:LGBT_culture_in_San_Francisco dbr:LGBT_history_in_California dbr:LGBT_history_in_New_York dbr:LGBT_history_in_the_United_States dbr:LGBT_rights_in_California dbr:Same-sex_marriage_in_the_Ninth_Circuit dbr:Hollingsworth_V._Perry dbr:Hollingsworth_v_Perry dbr:2010_in_the_United_States dbr:2013_in_LGBT_rights dbr:2013_in_the_United_States dbr:Andrew_Sullivan dbr:Antonin_Scalia dbr:Stephen_Hadley dbr:Strauss_v._Horton dbr:Dennis_Herrera dbr:Timothy_N._Philpot dbr:Nancy_Stiles dbr:Standing_(law) dbr:Mark_Grisanti dbr:Michele_Davis dbr:Barack_Obama dbr:8_(play) dbr:Timeline_of_LGBT_history_in_the_United_States dbr:Tom_Ridge dbr:Hawaii_Marriage_Equality_Act dbr:List_of_After_Words_interviews_first_aired_in_2015 dbr:American_Psychological_Association dbr:Dana_Rohrabacher dbr:Daniel_S._Loeb dbr:Dustin_Lance_Black dbr:Family_Research_Council dbr:Brian_Roehrkasse dbr:Pacific_Justice_Institute dbr:Faryar_Shirzad dbr:History_of_gay_men_in_the_United_States dbr:History_of_lesbianism_in_the_United_States dbr:History_of_marriage_in_California dbr:Israel_Hernandez dbr:Legal_status_of_same-sex_marriage dbr:2000_California_Proposition_22 dbr:2016_California_Proposition_60 dbr:Greg_Zoeller dbr:Harvey_S._Rosen dbr:Hilary_Rosen dbr:James_Comey dbr:Janet_Duprey dbr:Jennifer_B._Coffman dbr:Baker_v._Nelson dbr:Jennifer_Roback_Morse dbr:Same-sex_marriage_in_California dbr:Same-sex_marriage_in_Hawaii dbr:Same-sex_marriage_in_the_United_States dbr:Same-sex_marriage_legislation_in_the_United_States dbr:Social_policy_of_the_Barack_Obama_administration dbr:Charles_Bass dbr:Charles_J._Cooper dbr:Jim_Kolbe dbr:John_B._Bellinger_III dbr:John_Barrowman dbr:Kamala_Harris dbr:Kathryn_Biber dbr:Kenneth_Duberstein dbr:Kenneth_P._Miller dbr:Kevin_Martin_(FCC) dbr:LGBT_rights_in_the_United_States dbr:Larry_Pressler dbr:Susan_Molinari dbr:Hollingsworth dbr:Sevcik_v._Sandoval dbr:Douglas_Holtz-Eakin dbr:B.J._Nikkel dbr:Mark_McKinnon dbr:Mark_Schauer dbr:Mary_Bono dbr:Mary_Cheney dbr:Ileana_Ros-Lehtinen dbr:Imperial_County,_California dbr:In_re_Marriage_Cases dbr:Michael_Huffington dbr:Michael_Powell_(lobbyist) dbr:Mike_Murphy_(political_consultant) dbr:Neel_Kashkari dbr:Case_or_Controversy_Clause dbr:R._Clarke_Cooper dbr:Kitchen_v._Herbert dbr:Patrick_Ruffini dbr:Perry_v._Schwarzenegger dbr:Schwarzenegger_(disambiguation) dbr:New_Family_Structures_Study dbr:Nancy_Pfotenhauer dbr:Same-sex_marriage_in_Oklahoma dbr:Political_life_of_Clint_Eastwood dbr:Six_Californias dbr:Same-sex_marriage_in_Michigan dbr:Same-sex_union_court_cases dbr:Rich_Galen dbr:Religious_Freedom_Restoration_Act_(Indiana) dbr:Hollingsworth_v_perry dbr:Kristin_Perry dbr:Kris_Perry dbr:Perry_et_al._v._Schwarzenegger_et_al. dbr:Perry_v._Brown dbr:Perry_v._Hollingsworth dbr:Perry_v_brown dbr:Perry_v_schwarzenegger dbr:Perry_versus_Schwarzenegger dbr:Perry_vs._Schwarzenegger
is foaf:primaryTopic of wikipedia-en:Hollingsworth_v._Perry