Advances in genome editing through control of DNA repair pathways (original) (raw)

• Cannan, W. J. & Pederson, D. S. Mechanisms and consequences of double-strand DNA break formation in chromatin. J. Cell. Physiol. 231, 3–14 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ranjha, L., Howard, S. M. & Cejka, P. Main steps in DNA double-strand break repair: an introduction to homologous recombination and related processes. Chromosoma 127, 187–214 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Doudna, J. A. & Charpentier, E. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science 346, 1258096 (2014).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Urnov, F. D., Rebar, E. J., Holmes, M. C., Zhang, H. S. & Gregory, P. D. Genome editing with engineered zinc finger nucleases. Nat. Rev. Genet. 11, 636–646 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Miller, J. C. et al. A TALE nuclease architecture for efficient genome editing. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 143–148 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA–guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816–821 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Jinek, M. et al. RNA-programmed genome editing in human cells. eLife 2, e00471 (2013).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Cong, L. et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR–Cas systems. Science 339, 819–823 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Mali, P. et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 339, 823–826 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Haber, J. E. A life investigating pathways that repair broken chromosomes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 50, 1–28 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ward, J. F. DNA damage produced by ionizing radiation in mammalian cells: identities, mechanisms of formation, and reparability. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol. 35, 95–125 (1988).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Komor, A. C., Kim, Y. B., Packer, M. S., Zuris, J. A. & Liu, D. R. Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage. Nature 533, 420–424 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Gaudelli, N. M. et al. Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature 551, 464–471 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• McConnell Smith, A. et al. Generation of a nicking enzyme that stimulates site-specific gene conversion from the I-AniI LAGLIDADG homing endonuclease. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 106, 5099–5104 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Davis, L. & Maizels, N. DNA nicks promote efficient and safe targeted gene correction. PLoS One 6, e23981 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Davis, L. & Maizels, N. Homology-directed repair of DNA nicks via pathways distinct from canonical double-strand break repair. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, E924–E932 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Davis, L. & Maizels, N. Two distinct pathways support gene correction by single-stranded donors at DNA nicks. Cell Rep. 17, 1872–1881 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ran, F. A. et al. Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity. Cell 154, 1380–1389 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Schatz, D. G. & Ji, Y. Recombination centres and the orchestration of V(D)J recombination. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 11, 251–263 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Baudat, F., Imai, Y. & de Massy, B. Meiotic recombination in mammals: localization and regulation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 794–806 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zetsche, B. et al. Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a class 2 CRISPR-Cas system. Cell 163, 759–771 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Mali, P. et al. CAS9 transcriptional activators for target specificity screening and paired nickases for cooperative genome engineering. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 833–838 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Richardson, C. D., Ray, G. J., DeWitt, M. A., Curie, G. L. & Corn, J. E. Enhancing homology-directed genome editing by catalytically active and inactive CRISPR-Cas9 using asymmetric donor DNA. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 339–344 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sternberg, S. H., Redding, S., Jinek, M., Greene, E. C. & Doudna, J. A. DNA interrogation by the CRISPR RNA-guided endonuclease Cas9. Nature 507, 62–67 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Knight, S. C. et al. Dynamics of CRISPR-Cas9 genome interrogation in living cells. Science 350, 823–826 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Clarke, R. et al. Enhanced bacterial immunity and mammalian genome editing via RNA-polymerase-mediated dislodging of Cas9 from double-strand DNA breaks. Mol. Cell 71, 42–55.e8 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• DiCarlo, J. E. et al. Genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 4336–4343 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Mao, Z., Bozzella, M., Seluanov, A. & Gorbunova, V. Comparison of nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination in human cells. DNA Repair (Amst.) 7, 1765–1771 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Chang, H. H. Y., Pannunzio, N. R., Adachi, N. & Lieber, M. R. Non-homologous DNA end joining and alternative pathways to double-strand break repair. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 495–506 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Mjelle, R. et al. Cell cycle regulation of human DNA repair and chromatin remodeling genes. DNA Repair (Amst.) 30, 53–67 (2015).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Ren, K. & Peña de Ortiz, S. Non-homologous DNA end joining in the mature rat brain. J. Neurochem. 80, 949–959 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bae, S., Kweon, J., Kim, H. S. & Kim, J.-S. Microhomology-based choice of Cas9 nuclease target sites. Nat. Methods 11, 705–706 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Shen, M. W. et al. Predictable and precise template-free CRISPR editing of pathogenic variants. Nature 563, 646–651 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Griffith, A. J., Blier, P. R., Mimori, T. & Hardin, J. A. Ku polypeptides synthesized in vitro assemble into complexes which recognize ends of double-stranded DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 267, 331–338 (1992).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Spagnolo, L., Rivera-Calzada, A., Pearl, L. H. & Llorca, O. Three-dimensional structure of the human DNA-PKcs/Ku70/Ku80 complex assembled on DNA and its implications for DNA DSB repair. Mol. Cell 22, 511–519 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Davis, A. J., Chen, B. P. C. & Chen, D. J. DNA-PK: a dynamic enzyme in a versatile DSB repair pathway. DNA Repair (Amst.) 17, 21–29 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Yang, S. et al. The SOSS1 single‐stranded DNA binding complex promotes DNA end resection in concert with Exo1. EMBO J. 32, 126–139 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Mimitou, E. P. & Symington, L. S. Ku prevents Exo1 and Sgs1‐dependent resection of DNA ends in the absence of a functional MRX complex or Sae2. EMBO J. 29, 3358–3369 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Shim, E. Y. et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 and Ku proteins regulate association of Exo1 and Dna2 with DNA breaks. EMBO J. 29, 3370–3380 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Mari, P.-O. et al. Dynamic assembly of end-joining complexes requires interaction between Ku70/80 and XRCC4. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103, 18597–18602 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bryans, M., Valenzano, M. C. & Stamato, T. D. Absence of DNA ligase IV protein in XR-1 cells: evidence for stabilization by XRCC4. Mutat. Res. 433, 53–58 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Yano, K. & Chen, D. J. Live cell imaging of XLF and XRCC4 reveals a novel view of protein assembly in the non-homologous end-joining pathway. Cell Cycle 7, 1321–1325 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Chang, H. H. Y., Watanabe, G. & Lieber, M. R. Unifying the DNA end-processing roles of the artemis nuclease: Ku-dependent artemis resection at blunt DNA ends. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 24036–24050 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Mahaney, B. L., Meek, K. & Lees-Miller, S. P. Repair of ionizing radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks by non-homologous end-joining. Biochem. J. 417, 639–650 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Riesenberg, S. & Maricic, T. Targeting repair pathways with small molecules increases precise genome editing in pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Commun. 9, 2164 (2018).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Ninomiya, Y., Suzuki, K., Ishii, C. & Inoue, H. Highly efficient gene replacements in Neurospora strains deficient for nonhomologous end-joining. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 12248–12253 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• da Silva Ferreira, M. E. et al. The akuB KU80 mutant deficient for nonhomologous end joining is a powerful tool for analyzing pathogenicity in. Aspergillus fumigatus. Eukaryot. Cell 5, 207–211 (2006).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Fattah, F. J., Lichter, N. F., Fattah, K. R., Oh, S. & Hendrickson, E. A. Ku70, an essential gene, modulates the frequency of rAAV-mediated gene targeting in human somatic cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 8703–8708 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Srivastava, M. et al. An inhibitor of nonhomologous end-joining abrogates double-strand break repair and impedes cancer progression. Cell 151, 1474–1487 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Chu, V. T. et al. Increasing the efficiency of homology-directed repair for CRISPR-Cas9-induced precise gene editing in mammalian cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 543–548 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Beumer, K. J. et al. Efficient gene targeting in Drosophila by direct embryo injection with zinc-finger nucleases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 19821–19826 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Maruyama, T. et al. Increasing the efficiency of precise genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9 by inhibition of nonhomologous end joining. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 538–542 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Robert, F., Barbeau, M., Éthier, S., Dostie, J. & Pelletier, J. Pharmacological inhibition of DNA-PK stimulates Cas9-mediated genome editing. Genome Med. 7, 93 (2015).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Singh, P., Schimenti, J. C. & Bolcun-Filas, E. A mouse geneticist’s practical guide to CRISPR applications. Genetics 199, 1–15 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hu, Z. et al. Ligase IV inhibitor SCR7 enhances gene editing directed by CRISPR-Cas9 and ssODN in human cancer cells. Cell Biosci. 8, 12 (2018).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Song, J. et al. RS-1 enhances CRISPR/Cas9- and TALEN-mediated knock-in efficiency. Nat. Commun. 7, 10548 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zhang, J.-P. et al. Efficient precise knockin with a double cut HDR donor after CRISPR/Cas9-mediated double-stranded DNA cleavage. Genome Biol. 18, 35 (2017).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Gutschner, T., Haemmerle, M., Genovese, G., Draetta, G. F. & Chin, L. Post-translational regulation of Cas9 during G1 enhances homology-directed repair. Cell Rep. 14, 1555–1566 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Yang, D. et al. Enrichment of G2/M cell cycle phase in human pluripotent stem cells enhances HDR-mediated gene repair with customizable endonucleases. Sci. Rep. 6, 21264 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Pinder, J., Salsman, J. & Dellaire, G. Nuclear domain ‘knock-in’ screen for the evaluation and identification of small molecule enhancers of CRISPR-based genome editing. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, 9379–9392 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Greco, G. E. et al. SCR7 is neither a selective nor a potent inhibitor of human DNA ligase IV. DNA Repair (Amst.) 43, 18–23 (2016).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Truong, L. N. et al. Microhomology-mediated end joining and homologous recombination share the initial end resection step to repair DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 110, 7720–7725 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Yan, C. T. et al. IgH class switching and translocations use a robust non-classical end-joining pathway. Nature 449, 478–482 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Boboila, C. et al. Alternative end-joining catalyzes class switch recombination in the absence of both Ku70 and DNA ligase 4. J. Exp. Med. 207, 417–427 (2010).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Myler, L. R. et al. Single-molecule imaging reveals how Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 initiates DNA break repair. Mol. Cell 67, 891–898.e4 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Anand, R., Ranjha, L., Cannavo, E. & Cejka, P. Phosphorylated CtIP functions as a co-factor of the MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 endonuclease in DNA end resection. Mol. Cell 64, 940–950 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sartori, A. A. et al. Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection. Nature 450, 509–514 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Shibata, A. et al. DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice is directed by distinct MRE11 nuclease activities. Mol. Cell 53, 7–18 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Garcia, V., Phelps, S. E. L., Gray, S. & Neale, M. J. Bidirectional resection of DNA double-strand breaks by Mre11 and Exo1. Nature 479, 241–244 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., Caron, P., Legube, G. & Paull, T. T. Quantitation of DNA double-strand break resection intermediates in human cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, e19 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Paull, T. T. & Gellert, M. The 3′ to 5′ exonuclease activity of Mre 11 facilitates repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell 1, 969–979 (1998).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nakade, S. et al. Microhomology-mediated end-joining-dependent integration of donor DNA in cells and animals using TALENs and CRISPR/Cas9. Nat. Commun. 5, 5560 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ahmad, A. et al. ERCC1-XPF endonuclease facilitates DNA double-strand break repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 5082–5092 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kent, T., Chandramouly, G., McDevitt, S. M., Ozdemir, A. Y. & Pomerantz, R. T. Mechanism of microhomology-mediated end-joining promoted by human DNA polymerase θ. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 22, 230–237 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Liang, L. et al. Human DNA ligases I and III, but not ligase IV, are required for microhomology-mediated end joining of DNA double-strand breaks. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 3297–3310 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Audebert, M., Salles, B. & Calsou, P. Involvement of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 and XRCC1/DNA ligase III in an alternative route for DNA double-strand breaks rejoining. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 55117–55126 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wang, M. et al. PARP-1 and Ku compete for repair of DNA double strand breaks by distinct NHEJ pathways. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 6170–6182 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Haince, J.-F. et al. PARP1-dependent kinetics of recruitment of MRE11 and NBS1 proteins to multiple DNA damage sites. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 1197–1208 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Mateos-Gomez, P. A. et al. Mammalian polymerase θ promotes alternative NHEJ and suppresses recombination. Nature 518, 254–257 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Iyer, S. et al. Precise therapeutic gene correction by a simple nuclease-induced double-stranded break. Nature 568, 561–565 (2019).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Mateos-Gomez, P. A. et al. The helicase domain of Polθ counteracts RPA to promote alt-NHEJ. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 24, 1116–1123 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Dutta, A. et al. Microhomology-mediated end joining is activated in irradiated human cells due to phosphorylation-dependent formation of the XRCC1 repair complex. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 2585–2599 (2017).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Allen, F. et al. Predicting the mutations generated by repair of Cas9-induced double-strand breaks. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 64–72 (2018).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Jiang, F. et al. Structures of a CRISPR-Cas9 R-loop complex primed for DNA cleavage. Science 351, 867–871 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Shou, J., Li, J., Liu, Y. & Wu, Q. Precise and predictable CRISPR chromosomal rearrangements reveal principles of Cas9-mediated nucleotide insertion. Mol. Cell 71, 498–509.e4 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Richardson, C. D. et al. CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing in human cells occurs via the Fanconi anemia pathway. Nat. Genet. 50, 1132–1139 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Liang, F., Han, M., Romanienko, P. J. & Jasin, M. Homology-directed repair is a major double-strand break repair pathway in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95, 5172–5177 (1998).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zhu, Z., Chung, W.-H., Shim, E. Y., Lee, S. E. & Ira, G. Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell 134, 981–994 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chen, R. & Wold, M. S. Replication protein A: single-stranded DNA’s first responder: dynamic DNA-interactions allow replication protein A to direct single-strand DNA intermediates into different pathways for synthesis or repair. BioEssays 36, 1156–1161 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Maréchal, A. & Zou, L. DNA damage sensing by the ATM and ATR kinases. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5, a012716 (2013).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Ihry, R. J. et al. p53 inhibits CRISPR-Cas9 engineering in human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Med. 24, 939–946 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Haapaniemi, E., Botla, S., Persson, J., Schmierer, B. & Taipale, J. CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing induces a p53-mediated DNA damage response. Nat. Med. 24, 927–930 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nakanishi, K. et al. Human Fanconi anemia monoubiquitination pathway promotes homologous DNA repair. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 1110–1115 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ceccaldi, R., Sarangi, P. & D’Andrea, A. D. The Fanconi anaemia pathway: new players and new functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 337–349 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Roques, C. et al. MRE11–RAD50–NBS1 is a critical regulator of FANCD2 stability and function during DNA double‐strand break repair. EMBO J. 28, 2400–2413 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Unno, J. et al. FANCD2 binds CtIP and regulates DNA-end resection during DNA interstrand crosslink repair. Cell Rep. 7, 1039–1047 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Howard, S. M., Yanez, D. A. & Stark, J. M. DNA damage response factors from diverse pathways, including DNA crosslink repair, mediate alternative end joining. PLoS Genet. 11, e1004943 (2015).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Benitez, A. et al. FANCA promotes DNA double-strand break repair by catalyzing single-strand annealing and strand exchange. Mol. Cell 71, 621–628.e4 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sugiyama, T., Zaitseva, E. M. & Kowalczykowski, S. C. A single-stranded DNA-binding protein is needed for efficient presynaptic complex formation by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad51 protein. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 7940–7945 (1997).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Renkawitz, J., Lademann, C. A., Kalocsay, M. & Jentsch, S. Monitoring homology search during DNA double-strand break repair in vivo. Mol. Cell 50, 261–272 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sugawara, N., Ira, G. & Haber, J. E. DNA length dependence of the single-strand annealing pathway and the role of Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD59 in double-strand break repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 5300–5309 (2000).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chun, J., Buechelmaier, E. S. & Powell, S. N. Rad51 paralog complexes BCDX2 and CX3 act at different stages in the BRCA1-BRCA2-dependent homologous recombination pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 33, 387–395 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zhang, S. et al. Structural basis for the functional role of the Shu complex in homologous recombination. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 13068–13079 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Doty, T., Gibson, B. & Heyer, W.-D. Human BRCA2 protein promotes RAD51 filament formation on RPA-covered single-stranded DNA. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 1260–1262 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• McVey, M., Khodaverdian, V. Y., Meyer, D., Cerqueira, P. G. & Heyer, W.-D. Eukaryotic DNA polymerases in homologous recombination. Annu. Rev. Genet. 50, 393–421 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Verma, P. & Greenberg, R. A. Noncanonical views of homology-directed DNA repair. Genes Dev. 30, 1138–1154 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Goetz, J. D.-M., Motycka, T. A., Han, M., Jasin, M. & Tomkinson, A. E. Reduced repair of DNA double-strand breaks by homologous recombination in a DNA ligase I-deficient human cell line. DNA Repair (Amst.) 4, 649–654 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Bentley, D. et al. DNA ligase I is required for fetal liver erythropoiesis but is not essential for mammalian cell viability. Nat. Genet. 13, 489–491 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bugreev, D. V., Yu, X., Egelman, E. H. & Mazin, A. V. Novel pro- and anti-recombination activities of the Bloom’s syndrome helicase. Genes Dev. 21, 3085–3094 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hu, Y. et al. RECQL5/Recql5 helicase regulates homologous recombination and suppresses tumor formation via disruption of Rad51 presynaptic filaments. Genes Dev. 21, 3073–3084 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Fugger, K. et al. Human Fbh1 helicase contributes to genome maintenance via pro- and anti-recombinase activities. J. Cell Biol. 186, 655–663 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Simandlova, J. et al. FBH1 helicase disrupts RAD51 filaments in vitro and modulates homologous recombination in mammalian cells. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 34168–34180 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chu, W. K. et al. FBH1 influences DNA replication fork stability and homologous recombination through ubiquitylation of RAD51. Nat. Commun. 6, 5931 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Jayathilaka, K. et al. A chemical compound that stimulates the human homologous recombination protein RAD51. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 15848–15853 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Huang, F., Mazina, O. M., Zentner, I. J., Cocklin, S. & Mazin, A. V. Inhibition of homologous recombination in human cells by targeting RAD51 recombinase. J. Med. Chem. 55, 3011–3020 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ren, C., Yan, Q. & Zhang, Z. Minimum length of direct repeat sequences required for efficient homologous recombination induced by zinc finger nuclease in yeast. Mol. Biol. Rep. 41, 6939–6948 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Liskay, R. M., Letsou, A. & Stachelek, J. L. Homology requirement for efficient gene conversion between duplicated chromosomal sequences in mammalian cells. Genetics 115, 161–167 (1987).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Mortensen, U. H., Bendixen, C., Sunjevaric, I. & Rothstein, R. DNA strand annealing is promoted by the yeast Rad52 protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 93, 10729–10734 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Shinohara, A., Shinohara, M., Ohta, T., Matsuda, S. & Ogawa, T. Rad52 forms ring structures and co-operates with RPA in single-strand DNA annealing. Genes Cells 3, 145–156 (1998).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Rothenberg, E., Grimme, J. M., Spies, M. & Ha, T. Human Rad52-mediated homology search and annealing occurs by continuous interactions between overlapping nucleoprotein complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 20274–20279 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Grimme, J. M. et al. Human Rad52 binds and wraps single-stranded DNA and mediates annealing via two hRad52-ssDNA complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 2917–2930 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Han, J. et al. BRCA2 antagonizes classical and alternative nonhomologous end-joining to prevent gross genomic instability. Nat. Commun. 8, 1470 (2017).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Ma, C. J., Kwon, Y., Sung, P. & Greene, E. C. Human RAD52 interactions with replication protein A and the RAD51 presynaptic complex. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 11702–11713 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Feng, Z. et al. Rad52 inactivation is synthetically lethal with BRCA2 deficiency. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 686–691 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Li, X. et al. Efficient SSA-mediated precise genome editing using CRISPR/Cas9. FEBS J. 285, 3362–3375 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• German, J. Bloom syndrome: a mendelian prototype of somatic mutational disease. Medicine (Baltimore) 72, 393–406 (1993).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Aylon, Y., Liefshitz, B. & Kupiec, M. The CDK regulates repair of double‐strand breaks by homologous recombination during the cell cycle. EMBO J. 23, 4868–4875 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ira, G. et al. DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature 431, 1011–1017 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Yun, M. H. & Hiom, K. CtIP-BRCA1 modulates the choice of DNA double-strand-break repair pathway throughout the cell cycle. Nature 459, 460–463 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Buis, J., Stoneham, T., Spehalski, E. & Ferguson, D. O. Mre11 regulates CtIP-dependent double-strand break repair by interaction with CDK2. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 19, 246–252 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Peterson, S. E. et al. Cdk1 uncouples CtIP-dependent resection and Rad51 filament formation during M-phase double-strand break repair. J. Cell Biol. 194, 705–720 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Charpentier, M. et al. CtIP fusion to Cas9 enhances transgene integration by homology-dependent repair. Nat. Commun. 9, 1133 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bunting, S. F. et al. 53BP1 inhibits homologous recombination in Brca1-deficient cells by blocking resection of DNA breaks. Cell 141, 243–254 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Escribano-Díaz, C. et al. A cell cycle-dependent regulatory circuit composed of 53BP1-RIF1 and BRCA1-CtIP controls DNA repair pathway choice. Mol. Cell 49, 872–883 (2013).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Gupta, R. et al. DNA repair network analysis reveals shieldin as a key regulator of NHEJ and PARP inhibitor sensitivity. Cell 173, 972–988.e23 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Noordermeer, S. M. et al. The shieldin complex mediates 53BP1-dependent DNA repair. Nature 560, 117–121 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Orthwein, A. et al. A mechanism for the suppression of homologous recombination in G1 cells. Nature 528, 422–426 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Paulsen, B. S. et al. Ectopic expression of RAD52 and dn53BP1 improves homology-directed repair during CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 1, 878–888 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Canny, M. D. et al. Inhibition of 53BP1 favors homology-dependent DNA repair and increases CRISPR-Cas9 genome-editing efficiency. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 95–102 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ye, L. et al. Programmable DNA repair with CRISPRa/i enhanced homology-directed repair efficiency with a single Cas9. Cell Discov. 4, 46 (2018).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Arnoult, N. et al. Regulation of DNA repair pathway choice in S and G2 phases by the NHEJ inhibitor CYREN. Nature 549, 548–552 (2017).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Hung, P. J. et al. MRI is a DNA damage response adaptor during classical non-homologous end joining. Mol. Cell 71, 332–342.e8 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lin, S., Staahl, B. T., Alla, R. K. & Doudna, J. A. Enhanced homology-directed human genome engineering by controlled timing of CRISPR/Cas9 delivery. eLife 3, e04766 (2014).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lomova, A. et al. Improving gene editing outcomes in human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells by temporal control of DNA repair. Stem Cells 37, 284–294 (2018).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Storici, F., Snipe, J. R., Chan, G. K., Gordenin, D. A. & Resnick, M. A. Conservative repair of a chromosomal double-strand break by single-strand DNA through two steps of annealing. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26, 7645–7657 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chen, F. et al. High-frequency genome editing using ssDNA oligonucleotides with zinc-finger nucleases. Nat. Methods 8, 753–755 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Yang, L. et al. Optimization of scarless human stem cell genome editing. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, 9049–9061 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• DeWitt, M. A. et al. Selection-free genome editing of the sickle mutation in human adult hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. Sci. Transl. Med. 8, 360ra134 (2016).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Kan, Y., Ruis, B., Takasugi, T. & Hendrickson, E. A. Mechanisms of precise genome editing using oligonucleotide donors. Genome Res. 27, 1099–1111 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bothmer, A. et al. Characterization of the interplay between DNA repair and CRISPR/Cas9-induced DNA lesions at an endogenous locus. Nat. Commun. 8, 13905 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Shao, S. et al. Enhancing CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homology-directed repair in mammalian cells by expressing Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad52. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 92, 43–52 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Liang, X., Potter, J., Kumar, S., Ravinder, N. & Chesnut, J. D. Enhanced CRISPR/Cas9-mediated precise genome editing by improved design and delivery of gRNA, Cas9 nuclease, and donor DNA. J. Biotechnol. 241, 136–146 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Renkawitz, J., Lademann, C. A. & Jentsch, S. Mechanisms and principles of homology search during recombination. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15, 369–383 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ünal, E. et al. DNA damage response pathway uses histone modification to assemble a double-strand break-specific cohesin domain. Mol. Cell 16, 991–1002 (2004).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Ström, L., Lindroos, H. B., Shirahige, K. & Sjögren, C. Postreplicative recruitment of cohesin to double-strand breaks is required for DNA repair. Mol. Cell 16, 1003–1015 (2004).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Miné-Hattab, J. & Rothstein, R. Increased chromosome mobility facilitates homology search during recombination. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 510–517 (2012).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Schrank, B. R. et al. Nuclear ARP2/3 drives DNA break clustering for homology-directed repair. Nature 559, 61–66 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Savic, N. et al. Covalent linkage of the DNA repair template to the CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease enhances homology-directed repair. eLife 7, e33761 (2018).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Aird, E. J., Lovendahl, K. N., St Martin, A., Harris, R. S. & Gordon, W. R. Increasing Cas9-mediated homology-directed repair efficiency through covalent tethering of DNA repair template. Commun. Biol. 1, 54 (2018).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Eckstein, F. Phosphorothioates, essential components of therapeutic oligonucleotides. Nucleic Acid Ther. 24, 374–387 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Anzalone, A. V. et al. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1711-4 (2019)
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kass, E. M., Lim, P. X., Helgadottir, H. R., Moynahan, M. E. & Jasin, M. Robust homology-directed repair within mouse mammary tissue is not specifically affected by Brca2 mutation. Nat. Commun. 7, 13241 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Stork, C. T. et al. Co-transcriptional R-loops are the main cause of estrogen-induced DNA damage. eLife 5, e17548 (2016).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Suzuki, K. et al. In vivo genome editing via CRISPR/Cas9 mediated homology-independent targeted integration. Nature 540, 144–149 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• van Overbeek, M. et al. DNA repair profiling reveals nonrandom outcomes at Cas9-mediated breaks. Mol. Cell 63, 633–646 (2016).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Taheri-Ghahfarokhi, A. et al. Decoding non-random mutational signatures at Cas9 targeted sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 8417–8434 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wang, K. et al. Efficient generation of orthologous point mutations in pigs via CRISPR-assisted ssODN-mediated homology-directed repair. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 5, e396 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Yu, C. et al. Small molecules enhance CRISPR genome editing in pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 16, 142–147 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar