Blum, B. & Benvenisty, N. The tumorigenicity of human embryonic stem cells. Adv. Cancer Res.100, 133–158 (2008).References 2 and 3 are recent reviews on the tumorigenicity of HESCs and possible coping strategies. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Amit, M. et al. Clonally derived human embryonic stem cell lines maintain pluripotency and proliferative potential for prolonged periods of culture. Dev. Biol.227, 271–278 (2000). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Thomson, J. A. et al. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science282, 1145–1147 (1998). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Baker, D. E. et al. Adaptation to culture of human embryonic stem cells and oncogenesis in vivo. Nature Biotech.25, 207–215 (2007). Thorough overview of the chromosomal aberrations observed in HESCs in culture. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Harrison, N. J., Baker, D. & Andrews, P. W. Culture adaptation of embryonic stem cells echoes germ cell malignancy. Int. J. Androl.30, 275–281 (2007). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Evans, P. M. & Liu, C. Roles of Krupel-like factor 4 in normal homeostasis, cancer and stem cells. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin.40, 554–564 (2008). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Sperger, J. M. et al. Gene expression patterns in human embryonic stem cells and human pluripotent germ cell tumors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA100, 13350–13355 (2003). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Ben-Porath, I. et al. An embryonic stem cell-like gene expression signature in poorly differentiated aggressive human tumors. Nature Genet.40, 499–507 (2008). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Neveu, P. et al. MicroRNA profiling reveals two distinct p53-related human pluripotent stem cell states. Cell Stem Cell7, 671–681 (2010). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Bjorklund, L. M. et al. Embryonic stem cells develop into functional dopaminergic neurons after transplantation in a Parkinson rat model. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA99, 2344–2349 (2002). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Herszfeld, D. et al. CD30 is a survival factor and a biomarker for transformed human pluripotent stem cells. Nature Biotech.24, 351–357 (2006). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Yang, S. et al. Tumor progression of culture-adapted human embryonic stem cells during long-term culture. Genes Chromosomes Cancer47, 665–679 (2008). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Werbowetski-Ogilvie, T. E. et al. Characterization of human embryonic stem cells with features of neoplastic progression. Nature Biotech.27, 91–97 (2009). First demonstration of altered proliferation and differentiation capacities in adapted HESC lines with subkaryotypic genetic abnormalities. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Blum, B. & Benvenisty, N. The tumorigenicity of diploid and aneuploid human pluripotent stem cells. Cell Cycle8, 3822–3830 (2009). Recent perspective of the tumorigenicity of HESCs and its relationship with genomic instability of HESCs in culture. ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Martin, G. R. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA78, 7634–7638 (1981). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Shih, C. C., Forman, S. J., Chu, P. & Slovak, M. Human embryonic stem cells are prone to generate primitive, undifferentiated tumors in engrafted human fetal tissues in severe combined immunodeficient mice. Stem Cells Dev.16, 893–902 (2007). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Takahashi, K. & Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell126, 663–676 (2006). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Takahashi, K. et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell131, 861–872 (2007). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Yu, J. et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science318, 1917–1920 (2007). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Chin, M. H. et al. Induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells are distinguished by gene expression signatures. Cell Stem Cell5, 111–123 (2009). First study describing global gene expression differences between HESCs and HiPSCs. ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Urbach, A., Bar-Nur, O., Daley, G. Q. & Benvenisty, N. Differential modeling of fragile X syndrome by human embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell6, 407–411 (2010). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Polo, J. M. et al. Cell type of origin influences the molecular and functional properties of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature Biotech.28, 848–855 (2010). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Kim, K. et al. Epigenetic memory in induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature467, 285–290 (2010). References 28 and 29 are comprehensive studies describing epigenetic memory in mouse iPSCs. ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Pick, M. et al. Clone- and gene-specific aberrations of parental imprinting in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells27, 2686–2690 (2009). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Albihn, A., Johnsen, J. I. & Henriksson, M. A. MYC in oncogenesis and as a target for cancer therapies. Adv. Cancer Res.107, 163–224 (2010). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Tian, Y. et al. MicroRNA-10b promotes migration and invasion through KLF4 in human esophageal cancer cell lines. J. Biol. Chem.285, 7986–7994 (2010). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Lambertini, C., Pantano, S. & Dotto, G. P. Differential control of Notch1 gene transcription by Klf4 and Sp3 transcription factors in normal versus cancer-derived keratinocytes. PLoS ONE5, e10369 (2010). ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCAS Google Scholar
Asadi, M. H. et al. OCT4B1, a novel spliced variant of OCT4, is highly expressed in gastric cancer and acts as an anti-apoptotic factor. Int. J. Cancer 3 Nov 2010 (doi:10.1002/ijc.25643).
Wang, Y. et al. Oct-4B isoform is differentially expressed in breast cancer cells: hypermethylation of regulatory elements of Oct-4A suggests an alternative promoter and transcriptional start site for Oct-4B transcription. Biosci. Rep.31, 109–115 (2010). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Peng, S., Maihle, N. J. & Huang, Y. Pluripotency factors Lin28 and Oct4 identify a sub-population of stem cell-like cells in ovarian cancer. Oncogene29, 2153–2159 (2010). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Sholl, L. M., Barletta, J. A., Yeap, B. Y., Chirieac, L. R. & Hornick, J. L. Sox2 protein expression is an independent poor prognostic indicator in stage I lung adenocarcinoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol.34, 1193–1198 (2010). ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Ji, J. & Zheng, P. S. Expression of Sox2 in human cervical carcinogenesis. Hum. Pathol.41, 1438–1447 (2010). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Schoenhals, M. et al. Embryonic stem cell markers expression in cancers. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.383, 157–162 (2009). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Ramos-Mejia, V., Munoz-Lopez, M., Garcia-Perez, J. L. & Menendez, P. iPSC lines that do not silence the expression of the ectopic reprogramming factors may display enhanced propensity to genomic instability. Cell Res.20, 1092–1095 (2010). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Nakagawa, M. et al. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells without Myc from mouse and human fibroblasts. Nature Biotech.26, 101–106 (2008). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Nakagawa, M., Takizawa, N., Narita, M., Ichisaka, T. & Yamanaka, S. Promotion of direct reprogramming by transformation-deficient Myc. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA107, 14152–14157 (2010). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Li, W. et al. Generation of human-induced pluripotent stem cells in the absence of exogenous Sox2. Stem Cells27, 2992–3000 (2009). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Li, W. et al. Generation of rat and human induced pluripotent stem cells by combining genetic reprogramming and chemical inhibitors. Cell Stem Cell4, 16–19 (2009). ArticlePubMedCAS Google Scholar
Huangfu, D. et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from primary human fibroblasts with only Oct4 and Sox2. Nature Biotech.26, 1269–1275 (2008). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Zhu, S. et al. Reprogramming of human primary somatic cells by OCT4 and chemical compounds. Cell Stem Cell7, 651–655 (2010). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Marion, R. M. et al. A p53-mediated DNA damage response limits reprogramming to ensure iPS cell genomic integrity. Nature460, 1149–1153 (2009). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Menendez, S., Camus, S. & Belmonte, J. C. p53: guardian of reprogramming. Cell Cycle9, 3887–3891 (2010). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Marion, R. M. et al. Telomeres acquire embryonic stem cell characteristics in induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell4, 141–154 (2009). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Yehezkel, S. et al. Reprogramming of telomeric regions during the generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells and subsequent differentiation into fibroblast-like derivatives. Epigenetics6, 63–75 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Vera, E., Canela, A., Fraga, M. F., Esteller, M. & Blasco, M. A. Epigenetic regulation of telomeres in human cancer. Oncogene27, 6817–6833 (2008). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Doi, A. et al. Differential methylation of tissue- and cancer-specific CpG island shores distinguishes human induced pluripotent stem cells, embryonic stem cells and fibroblasts. Nature Genet.41, 1350–1353 (2009). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Aoi, T. et al. Generation of pluripotent stem cells from adult mouse liver and stomach cells. Science321, 699–702 (2008). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Stadtfeld, M., Nagaya, M., Utikal, J., Weir, G. & Hochedlinger, K. Induced pluripotent stem cells generated without viral integration. Science322, 945–949 (2008). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Okita, K., Nakagawa, M., Hyenjong, H., Ichisaka, T. & Yamanaka, S. Generation of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells without viral vectors. Science322, 949–953 (2008). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Soldner, F. et al. Parkinson's disease patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells free of viral reprogramming factors. Cell136, 964–977 (2009). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhou, H. et al. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells using recombinant proteins. Cell Stem Cell4, 381–384 (2009). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Kim, D. et al. Generation of human induced pluripotent stem cells by direct delivery of reprogramming proteins. Cell Stem Cell4, 472–476 (2009). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Warren, L. et al. Highly efficient reprogramming to pluripotency and directed differentiation of human cells with synthetic modified mRNA. Cell Stem Cell7, 618–630 (2010). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Mayshar, Y. et al. Identification and classification of chromosomal aberrations in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell7, 521–531 (2010). First comprehensive study of chromosomal aberrations observed in HiPSCs in culture. ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Draper, J. S., Moore, H. D., Ruban, L. N., Gokhale, P. J. & Andrews, P. W. Culture and characterization of human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells Dev.13, 325–336 (2004). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Maitra, A. et al. Genomic alterations in cultured human embryonic stem cells. Nature Genet.37, 1099–1103 (2005). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Lefort, N. et al. Human embryonic stem cells reveal recurrent genomic instability at 20q11.21. Nature Biotech.26, 1364–1366 (2008). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Spits, C. et al. Recurrent chromosomal abnormalities in human embryonic stem cells. Nature Biotech.26, 1361–1363 (2008). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Inzunza, J. et al. Comparative genomic hybridization and karyotyping of human embryonic stem cells reveals the occurrence of an isodicentric X chromosome after long-term cultivation. Mol. Hum. Reprod.10, 461–466 (2004). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Lefort, N., Perrier, A. L., Laabi, Y., Varela, C. & Peschanski, M. Human embryonic stem cells and genomic instability. Regen. Med.4, 899–909 (2009). Recent review on the genomic instability of HESCs. ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Narva, E. et al. High-resolution DNA analysis of human embryonic stem cell lines reveals culture-induced copy number changes and loss of heterozygosity. Nature Biotech.28, 371–377 (2010). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Gertow, K. et al. Trisomy 12 in HESC leads to no selective in vivo growth advantage in teratomas, but induces an increased abundance of renal development. J. Cell. Biochem.100, 1518–1525 (2007). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Moon, S. H. et al. Effect of chromosome instability on the maintenance and differentiation of human embryonic stem cells in vitro and in vivo. Stem Cell Res.6, 50–59 (2011). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Laurent, L. C. et al. Dynamic changes in the copy number of pluripotency and cell proliferation genes in human ESCs and iPSCs during reprogramming and time in culture. Cell Stem Cell8, 106–118 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Moriguchi, H., Chung, R. T. & Sato, C. Tumorigenicity of human induced pluripotent stem cells depends on the balance of gene expression between p21 and p53. Hepatology51, 1088–1089 (2010). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Ben-David, U., Benvenisty, N. & Mayshar, Y. Genetic instability in human induced pluripotent stem cells: classification of causes and possible safeguards. Cell Cycle9, 4603–4604 (2010). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Chin, M. H., Pellegrini, M., Plath, K. & Lowry, W. E. Molecular analyses of human induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell7, 263–269 (2010). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Guenther, M. G. et al. Chromatin structure and gene expression programs of human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell7, 249–257 (2010). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Newman, A. M. & Cooper, J. B. Lab-specific gene expression signatures in pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell7, 258–262 (2010). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Ohm, J. E. et al. Cancer-related epigenome changes associated with reprogramming to induced pluripotent stem cells. Cancer Res.70, 7662–7673 (2010). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Hu, Q., Friedrich, A. M., Johnson, L. V. & Clegg, D. O. Memory in induced pluripotent stem cells: reprogrammed human retinal pigmented epithelial cells show tendency for spontaneous redifferentiation. Stem Cells28, 1981–1991 (2010). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Ghosh, Z. et al. Persistent donor cell gene expression among human induced pluripotent stem cells contributes to differences with human embryonic stem cells. PLoS ONE5, e8975 (2010). ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralCAS Google Scholar
Ron-Bigger, S. et al. Aberrant epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressor genes is reversed by direct reprogramming. Stem Cells28, 1349–1354 (2010). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Lim, D. H. & Maher, E. R. Genomic imprinting syndromes and cancer. Adv. Genet.70, 145–175 (2010). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Stadtfeld, M. et al. Aberrant silencing of imprinted genes on chromosome 12qF1 in mouse induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature465, 175–181 (2010). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Rugg-Gunn, P. J., Ferguson-Smith, A. C. & Pedersen, R. A. Epigenetic status of human embryonic stem cells. Nature Genet.37, 585–587 (2005). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Rugg-Gunn, P. J., Ferguson-Smith, A. C. & Pedersen, R. A. Status of genomic imprinting in human embryonic stem cells as revealed by a large cohort of independently derived and maintained lines. Hum. Mol. Genet.16, R243–R251 (2007). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Adewumi, O. et al. Characterization of human embryonic stem cell lines by the International Stem CellInitiative. Nature Biotech.25, 803–816 (2007). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Frost, J. M. et al. The effects of culture on genomic imprinting profiles in human embryonic and fetal mesenchymal stem cells. Epigenetics6, 52–62 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Ghule, P. N. et al. Reprogramming the pluripotent cell cycle: restoration of an abbreviated G1 phase in human induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 13 Oct 2010 (doi:10.1002/jcp.22440).
Singh, A. M. & Dalton, S. The cell cycle and Myc intersect with mechanisms that regulate pluripotency and reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell5, 141–149 (2009). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Neganova, I., Zhang, X., Atkinson, S. & Lako, M. Expression and functional analysis of G1 to S. regulatory components reveals an important role for CDK2 in cell cycle regulation in human embryonic stem cells. Oncogene28, 20–30 (2009). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Edel, M. J. et al. Rem2 GTPase maintains survival of human embryonic stem cells as well as enhancing reprogramming by regulating p53 and cyclin D1. Genes Dev.24, 561–573 (2010). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Holubcova, Z. et al. Human embryonic stem cells suffer from centrosomal amplification. Stem Cells29, 46–56 (2011). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Okita, K., Ichisaka, T. & Yamanaka, S. Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature448, 313–317 (2007). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Wernig, M., Meissner, A., Cassady, J. P. & Jaenisch, R. c-Myc is dispensable for direct reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts. Cell Stem Cell2, 10–12 (2008). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Mali, P. et al. Improved efficiency and pace of generating induced pluripotent stem cells from human adult and fetal fibroblasts. Stem Cells26, 1998–2005 (2008). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Miura, K. et al. Variation in the safety of induced pluripotent stem cell lines. Nature Biotech.27, 743–745 (2009). First comparison of the tumorigenicity of mouse iPSCs from different somatic origins. ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Moriguchi, H., Chung, R. T. & Sato, C. An indicator for evaluating the risk of cancerous transformations of human induced pluripotent stem cells. Hepatology51, 1085–1086 (2010). PubMed Google Scholar
Gutierrez-Aranda, I. et al. Human induced pluripotent stem cells develop teratoma more efficiently and faster than human embryonic stem cells regardless the site of injection. Stem Cells28, 1568–1570 (2010). Along with reference 86, this is one of the studies directly comparing the tumorigenicity of HESCs and HiPSCs. ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Hentze, H., Graichen, R. & Colman, A. Cell therapy and the safety of embryonic stem cell-derived grafts. Trends Biotechnol.25, 24–32 (2007). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Lee, A. S. et al. Effects of cell number on teratoma formation by human embryonic stem cells. Cell Cycle8, 2608–2612 (2009). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Hentze, H. et al. Teratoma formation by human embryonic stem cells: evaluation of essential parameters for future safety studies. Stem Cell Res.2, 198–210 (2009). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Eiges, R. et al. Establishment of human embryonic stem cell-transfected clones carrying a marker for undifferentiated cells. Curr. Biol.11, 514–518 (2001). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Choo, A. B. et al. Selection against undifferentiated human embryonic stem cells by a cytotoxic antibody recognizing podocalyxin-like protein-1. Stem Cells26, 1454–1463 (2008). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Tan, H. L., Fong, W. J., Lee, E. H., Yap, M. & Choo, A. mAb 84, a cytotoxic antibody that kills undifferentiated human embryonic stem cells via oncosis. Stem Cells27, 1792–1801 (2009). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Fong, C. Y., Peh, G. S., Gauthaman, K. & Bongso, A. Separation of SSEA-4 and TRA-1-60 labelled undifferentiated human embryonic stem cells from a heterogeneous cell population using magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). Stem Cell Rev.5, 72–80 (2009). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Blum, B., Bar-Nur, O., Golan-Lev, T. & Benvenisty, N. The anti-apoptotic gene survivin contributes to teratoma formation by human embryonic stem cells. Nature Biotech.27, 281–287 (2009). ArticleCAS Google Scholar
Smith, K. N., Singh, A. M. & Dalton, S. Myc represses primitive endoderm differentiation in pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell7, 343–354 (2010). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Smith, K. & Dalton, S. Myc transcription factors: key regulators behind establishment and maintenance of pluripotency. Regen. Med.5, 947–959 (2010). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Kim, J. et al. A Myc network accounts for similarities between embryonic stem and cancer cell transcription programs. Cell143, 313–324 (2010). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Schuldiner, M., Itskovitz-Eldor, J. & Benvenisty, N. Selective ablation of human embryonic stem cells expressing a “suicide” gene. Stem Cells21, 257–265 (2003). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Krishna, K. A., Rao, G. V. & Rao, K. S. Stem cell-based therapy for the treatment of Type 1 diabetes mellitus. Regen. Med.2, 171–177 (2007). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Korsgren, O. & Nilsson, B. Improving islet transplantation: a road map for a widespread application for the cure of persons with type I diabetes. Curr. Opin. Organ Transplant.14, 683–687 (2009). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Dean, S. K., Yulyana, Y., Williams, G., Sidhu, K. S. & Tuch, B. E. Differentiation of encapsulated embryonic stem cells after transplantation. Transplantation82, 1175–1184 (2006). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Giorgetti, A. et al. Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from human cord blood using OCT4 and SOX2. Cell Stem Cell5, 353–357 (2009). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Kim, J. B. et al. Direct reprogramming of human neural stem cells by OCT4. Nature461, 649–653 (2009). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar