Right to privacy (original) (raw)
- الحق في الخصوصية عبارة عن حق من حقوق الإنسان وعنصر في العديد من التقاليد القانونية التي يمكن أن تحظر على الحكومة والقطاع الخاص اتخاذ إجراءات يمكن أن تهدد خصوصية الأفراد. منذ كشف التصنت العالمي في 2013 والذي بدأه موظف وكالة الأمن القومي الأمريكية إدوارد سنودن، أصبح حق الإنسان في الخصوصية غير القابل للتصرف فيه موضوعا للنقاش العالمي. في مجابهة الإرهاب العالمي، تقوم الوكالات الحكومية مثل وكالة الأمن القومي الأمريكية ووكالة المخابرات المركزية ومكاتب الإتصالات الحكومية البريطانية، تقوم بأعمال مراقبة الجمهور والتخابر العالمي. هذا السؤال مطروح حاليا ما إذا كان يمكن لحق الخصوصية أن يوجد جنبا إلى جنب مع مراقبة الجمهور من قبل أجهزة المخابرات للوصول إلى وتحليل كل تفصيلة من حياة الفرد. السؤال الرئيسي هو ما إذا كان حق الخصوصية يحتاج إلى المزيد من التحصينات كجزء من العقد الاجتماعي لدعم الدفاع ضد التهديدات الإرهابية المحتملة. يمكن أن يشكل ممثلو القطاع الخاص أيضا تهديدا لحق الخصوصية. ظهرت أسئلة بخصوص استخدام المعلومات الشخصية في الإعلانات الموجهة ومشاركة البيانات مع أطراف خارجية وإعادة استخدام المعلومات الشخصية داخل بيانات ضخمة من خلال عمالقة التكنولوجيا مثل أمازون وأبل وفيسبوك وجوجل وياهو. تم تدعيم هذه المخاوف من خلال الفضائح، والتي أظهرت أن التخطيط الشخصي لشركة كامبريدج أناليتيكا كانت تستخدم معلومات شخصية حصلت عليها بصورة غير شرعية من خلال الفيسبوك، للتأثير في والتلاعب بمجموعة كبيرة من الناس، بما في ذلك أثناء انتخابات الرئاسة الأمريكية 2016. (ar)
- El derecho a la intimidad consiste en la defensa de la persona en su totalidad a través de un muro que prohíbe publicar o dar a conocer datos sobre temas como la religión, la política o la vida íntima. Todo el ser humano tiene derecho absoluto a mantener su vida privada y bajo ningún concepto, esto no puede ser revelado ni siquiera a una persona muy cercana, ni al tutor legal, en caso de que sea menor de edad.[cita requerida] (es)
- Intimitaterako eskubidea, pertsona batek ezkutuan edo gainerako gizakiengandik gordeta geratzen den eremua atxikitzeko duen eskubidea da, gizartean duintasunez eta bizitza kalitate gutxiengo batez bizitzeko beharrezkoa dena. Horrela definitzen du intimitatea Espainiako Konstituzio Auzitegiak hainbat epaitan (AKEE 197/1991, 20/1992, 219/1992, 142/1993, 117/1994, 143/1994, 186/2000). Eskubide honen izaera dela eta, pertsona fisikoek bakarrik dute pribatutasunerako eskubide hori. Pertsona juridikoaren barneko informazioa sekretu profesionalak eta bestelako arauek gordetzen dute, ez ordea intimitateak. Bestalde, intimitatearen kontzeptuaren osagai da gorputz-intimitatea. Horren barruan sartzen dira, esate baterako, pertsonaren gorputzaren gainean egiten diren miaketak. (eu)
- Le droit à la vie privée est un élément juridique qui vise à protéger le respect de la vie privée des individus. Plus de 150 constitutions nationales mentionnent le droit à la vie privée. Le 10 décembre 1948, l'assemblée générale des Nations Unies adopte la Déclaration universelle des droits de l'homme (DUDH) rédigée à l'origine pour garantir les droits individuels de chacun, en tout lieu. Les mots « droit à la vie privée » ne sont pas clairement mentionnés dans le document, cependant, la notion peut être interprétée à travers l'article 12, qui indique : « Nul ne sera l'objet d'immixtions arbitraires dans sa vie privée, sa famille, son domicile ou sa correspondance, ni d'atteintes à son honneur et à sa réputation. Toute personne a droit à la protection de la loi contre de telles ingérences ou attaques. » Depuis les révélations d'Edward Snoweden en 2013, le droit à la vie privée fait l'objet d'un débat international. Les agences gouvernementales, telles que la NSA, la CIA, le R&AW et le service de renseignement britannique, se sont engagées dans une surveillance mondiale à grande échelle. Certains débats actuels autour du droit à la vie privée portent sur la question de savoir si la vie privée peut coexister avec les capacités actuelles des agences de renseignement à accéder et à analyser en masse les détails de la vie d'un individu. Mais également à savoir si oui ou non le droit à la vie privée peut être limitée dans le cadre de la défense contre les menaces terroristes, et donc, si les menaces de terrorisme sont une excuse valable pour surveiller la population. Les acteurs privés peuvent également menacer le droit à la vie privée, en particulier les entreprises du secteur des nouvelles technologies telles qu'Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google et Yahoo qui utilisent et collectent des données personnelles . Ces inquiétudes ont été renforcées par des scandales, notamment le scandale des données Facebook-Cambridge Analytica. La société d'analyse de données Cambridge Analytica avait alors utilisé des données personnelles de Facebook pour influencer les utilisateurs. (fr)
- The right to privacy is an element of various legal traditions that intends to restrain governmental and private actions that threaten the privacy of individuals. Over 150 national constitutions mention the right to privacy. On 10 December 1948, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), originally written to guarantee individual rights of everyone everywhere; while right to privacy does not appear in the document, many interpret this through Article 12, which states: "No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks." Since the global surveillance disclosures of 2013, initiated by ex-NSA employee Edward Snowden, the right to privacy has been a subject of international debate. Government agencies, such as the NSA, FBI, CIA, R&AW and GCHQ, have engaged in mass, global surveillance. Some current debates around the right to privacy include whether privacy can co-exist with the current capabilities of intelligence agencies to access and analyze many details of an individual's life; whether or not the right to privacy is forfeited as part of the social contract to bolster defense against supposed terrorist threats; and whether threats of terrorism are a valid excuse to spy on the general population. Private sector actors can also threaten the right to privacy – particularly technology companies, such as Amazon, Apple, Meta, Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo that use and collect personal data. These concerns have been strengthened by scandals, including the Facebook–Cambridge Analytica data scandal, which focused on psychographic company Cambridge Analytica which used personal data from Facebook to influence large groups of people. (en)
- Hak atas privasi merupakan konsep kontemporer dari hak atas kebebasan individu. Seperti halnya karakter umur atau sifat dari hak asasi manusia yang tidak dapat terbagi, saling berkaitan dan bergantung dengan hak yang lain, hak atas privasi juga berkaitan erat dengan hak atas kebebasan berbicara salah satunya. Kedua hak tersebut memiliki kaitan yang sangat erat, memberikan hak atas privasi berarti juga memberikan perlindungan atas hak kebebasan berbicara. (in)
- 사생활권 또는 프라이버시권은 개인의 프라이버시를 위협하는 정부 및 민간 행위를 억제하기 위한 다양한 법적 전통의 한 요소다. 150개 이상의 국가 헌법이 사생활에 대한 권리를 언급하고 있다. 1948년 세계인권선언 제12조에 유엔은 다음과 같이 명시하고 있다 : * 그 누구도 사생활, 가족, 가정 또는 통신에 대한 자의적인 간섭을 받지 않으며, 명예와 평판에 대한 공격도 받지 않는다. 모든 사람은 그러한 간섭이나 공격에 대해 법의 보호를 받을 권리가 있다. NSA 전 직원 에드워드 스노든이 시작한 2013년 글로벌 감시 공개 이후 프라이버시 권리는 국제적인 논쟁의 대상이 되어 왔다. NSA, CIA, R&AW, GCHQ와 같은 정부 기관들은 대량, 세계적인 감시 활동을 해 왔다. 프라이버시 권리를 둘러싼 최근의 논쟁 중에는 프라이버시가 개인의 삶의 많은 세부사항에 접근하고 분석하는 정보기관의 현재 능력과 공존할 수 있는지 여부, 추측되는 테러 위협에 대한 방어를 강화하기 위한 사회적 계약의 일환으로 프라이버시 권리가 상실되는지 여부, 그리고 그러한 능력이 공존하는지 여부 등이 있다.테러리즘의 반복은 일반 대중을 염탐하기 위한 유효한 구실이다. 민간 부문 행위자들은 개인 데이터를 사용하고 수집하는 아마존, 애플, 페이스북, 구글, 야후와 같은 기술 회사들, 특히 개인 정보 보호 권리를 위협할 수도 있다. 이러한 우려는 심리학 회사인 케임브리지 애널리티카가 페이스북의 개인 데이터를 사용하여 많은 사람들에게 영향을 미치는 페이스북-캠브리지 애널리티카 데이터 스캔들을 포함한 스캔들로 인해 강화되었다. (ko)
- Personlig integritet är en aspekt av människans värdighet som avser rätten för varje människa att få ha sin egenart och inre sfär respekterad samt att inte utsättas för störande ingrepp. Kränkningar av den personliga integriteten kan ske dels fysiskt (våld, tvång) och dels psykiskt (förnedring, utlämnande av information av privat natur, diskriminering, indoktrinering). Personlig integritet är ett rättsligt begrepp. Den är skyddad genom lag och kränkning av den ses således som ett brott. Individens rätt till integritet faller inom ramarna för mänskliga rättigheterna och åtnjuter ett grundlagsskydd i den svenska regeringsformen 2 kapitlet 6 paragrafen. Även i Europakonventionens artikel 8.1. finns ett rättsligt skydd. Men såväl regeringsformen som Europakonventionen lämnar utrymme för inskränkningar under vissa förutsättningar, exempelvis vid brottsbekämpning. Individens förmåga att undandra sig insyn från omgivningen, att ha kontroll över och tilltro till sina konfidentiella kommunikationer, är kopplat till både utvecklandet av självständiga åsikter och den fria åsiktsbildningen. Hela samhället bygger på olika former av integritet och det är av vikt att det upprätthålls. Ett samhälleligt exempel är möjlighet att hålla hemligt vilka vi röstar på i politiska val och därigenom kan upprätthålla ett demokratiskt system där befolkningen kan välja politiska företrädare utan otillbörlig påverkan från andra. (sv)
- O direito à privacidade é um direito humano desenvolvido a partir do pensamento liberal. Desde o ano de 2013, quando agencias governamentais, sob o pretexto de combater atos terroristas, como a NSA, CIA, e outras envolvidas no escândalo internacional, foi-se descoberto que as pessoas estavam sob vigilância de órgãos do governo do mundo todo, o inabalável direito humano à privacidade foi prejudicado e foi tema de debate internacional. Está em questão se o direito à privacidade pode coexistir com a capacidade atual das agencias governamentais de descobrir, acessar e analisar todos os detalhes da vida de uma pessoa em qualquer lugar no mundo. Uma grande questão atualmente diz respeito a se o direito a privacidade deve ser revogado ou não, como parte do contrato social, para reforçar a defesa contra ataques ou atos terroristas. (pt)
- 隱私權,指個人人格上的利益不受不法僭用或侵害,個人與大眾無合法關聯的私事,亦不得妄予發布公開,而其私人活動,不得以可能造成一般人的精神痛苦或感覺羞辱之方式非法侵入的權利。是为众多法律系统所支持的一种人身基本权利。由于它的存在,政府和民间团体的某些活动受到一定的限制。 隱私權是指個人或群體隔離自己或有關自己的信息的權利。在商業世界,人們可能會自願提供個人詳細信息,包括廣告信息,以便獲得某種利益。公眾人物可能受制於公共規則。 (zh)
- http://www.privacilla.org/business/privacytorts.html
- http://www.psupress.org/books/titles/978-0-271-03685-4.html
- http://www.privacilla.org/about/whatis.html
- https://web.archive.org/web/20120925124156/http:/www.minerva.mic.ul.ie/vol9/Feminism.html
- https://web.archive.org/web/20160304074050/http:/www.privacilla.org/about/whatis.html
- https://web.archive.org/web/20170908230758/http:/www.privacilla.org/business/privacytorts.html
- https://books.google.com/books%3Fid=yxNgXs3TkJYC
- https://sk.sagepub.com/reference/libertarianism/n242.xml%7Curl=
- dbr:Cambridge_Analytica
- dbr:Privacy
- dbr:Psychographics
- dbr:Roe_v._Wade
- dbr:FTC_Fair_Information_Practice
- dbr:Morbid_curiosity
- dbr:MAINWAY
- dbr:Bologna
- dbr:Detroit_Free_Press
- dbr:Human_rights
- dbr:Richard_Posner
- dbr:Right_to_Privacy_verdict
- dbr:US_Constitution
- dbr:United_States_Bill_of_Rights
- dbr:Universal_Declaration_of_Human_Rights
- dbr:Decretum_Gratiani
- dbr:Initiative
- dbr:Intelligence_agency
- dbr:Internet_privacy
- dbr:The_Right_to_Privacy_(article)
- dbc:Human_rights
- dbr:Commonwealth_of_Australia
- dbr:Constitution_of_the_United_States
- dbr:Council_of_Europe
- dbr:Medicare_(United_States)
- dbr:SAGE_Publishing
- dbr:Nothing_to_hide_argument
- dbr:Switchboard_operator
- dbr:Edward_Snowden
- dbr:Freedom_of_speech
- dbr:Freedom_of_the_press
- dbr:GCHQ
- dbr:General_Data_Protection_Regulation
- dbr:Global_surveillance_disclosures_(2013–present)
- dbr:NATO
- dbr:NSA
- dbr:Constitutional_law
- dbr:Convention_for_the_Protection_of_Indiv...Automatic_Processing_of_Personal_Data
- dbr:Apple_Inc.
- dbr:Louis_Brandeis
- dbr:MYSTIC_(surveillance_program)
- dbr:California_Consumer_Privacy_Act
- dbr:Closed-circuit_television
- dbr:Commonwealth_Law_Reports
- dbr:Penumbra_(law)
- dbr:Privacy_and_Civil_Liberties_Oversight_Board
- dbr:Stakeholder_theory
- dbr:Mass_surveillance
- dbr:Mass_surveillance_in_China
- dbr:Bank_Secrecy_Act
- dbr:CIA
- dbr:COPPA
- dbr:COVID-19_pandemic
- dbr:Cato_Institute
- dbr:Tort
- dbr:Data_sharing
- dbr:Dissenting_opinion
- dbr:Collectivism_and_individualism
- dbr:Harvard_Law_Review
- dbr:Lawsuit
- dbr:Yellow_journalism
- dbr:Alan_Westin
- dbr:Amazon_(company)
- dbr:Cyber-bullying
- dbr:FBI
- dbr:Federal_Bureau_of_Investigation
- dbr:Global_surveillance
- dbr:Doxxing
- dbr:Social_contract
- dbr:Privacy_Act_1988
- dbr:Griswold_v._Connecticut
- dbr:Health_Insurance_Portability_and_Accountability_Act
- dbr:High_Court_of_Australia
- dbr:AdWords
- dbr:Invasion_of_privacy
- dbr:Jagdish_Singh_Khehar
- dbr:James_Clapper
- dbr:Texas
- dbr:Samuel_D._Warren_II
- dbr:Surveillance_state
- dbc:Digital_rights
- dbr:Charter_of_Fundamental_Rights_of_the_European_Union
- dbr:Katz_v._United_States
- dbr:Khiara_Bridges
- dbr:Lawrence_Lessig
- dbr:Lawrence_v._Texas
- dbr:Supreme_Court_of_India
- dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
- dbr:Sodomy_law
- dbr:Director_of_National_Intelligence
- dbr:Dobbs_v._Jackson_Women's_Health_Organization
- dbc:Privacy_law
- dbr:Marc_Rotenberg
- dbr:Pierce_v._Society_of_Sisters
- dbr:Sodomy
- dbr:Springer_Science+Business_Media
- dbr:Civil_liberties
- dbr:Freedom_of_association
- dbr:Independent_Press_Standards_Organisation
- dbr:Information_privacy
- dbr:Meta_Platforms
- dbr:Microsoft
- dbr:National_Security_Agency
- dbr:Olmstead_v._United_States
- dbr:Oregon
- dbr:Case_law
- dbr:R&AW
- dbr:September_11_attacks
- dbr:Sexual_orientation
- dbr:Xinjiang
- dbr:Yahoo
- dbr:News_media
- dbr:Facebook–Cambridge_Analytica_data_scandal
- dbr:Governmental
- dbr:State_school
- dbr:PRISM_(surveillance_program)
- dbr:Privacy_law
- dbr:Personal_data
- dbr:Personally_identifiable_information
- dbr:Right_to_be_forgotten
- dbr:Personal_identifying_information
- dbr:Human_rights_law
- dbr:Digital_Media_Law_Project
- dbr:File:The_artist's_face_behind_his_hand.jpg
- dbr:Australian_Broadcasting_Corporation_v_Lenah_Game_Meats_Pty_Ltd
- Source addresses particular development in US law, lacking the universal perspective expressed in intro (en)
- dbt:Authority_control
- dbt:Cite_encyclopedia
- dbt:Doi
- dbt:Expand_section
- dbt:Failed_verification
- dbt:Further
- dbt:Globalize
- dbt:ISBN
- dbt:ISSN
- dbt:Main
- dbt:Main_article
- dbt:Portal
- dbt:Redirect
- dbt:Reflist
- dbt:See_also
- dbt:Short_description
- dbt:Snd
- dbt:Unreferenced_section
- dbt:Use_dmy_dates
- dbt:Webarchive
- dbt:Privacy
- dbt:Cite_court
- El derecho a la intimidad consiste en la defensa de la persona en su totalidad a través de un muro que prohíbe publicar o dar a conocer datos sobre temas como la religión, la política o la vida íntima. Todo el ser humano tiene derecho absoluto a mantener su vida privada y bajo ningún concepto, esto no puede ser revelado ni siquiera a una persona muy cercana, ni al tutor legal, en caso de que sea menor de edad.[cita requerida] (es)
- Hak atas privasi merupakan konsep kontemporer dari hak atas kebebasan individu. Seperti halnya karakter umur atau sifat dari hak asasi manusia yang tidak dapat terbagi, saling berkaitan dan bergantung dengan hak yang lain, hak atas privasi juga berkaitan erat dengan hak atas kebebasan berbicara salah satunya. Kedua hak tersebut memiliki kaitan yang sangat erat, memberikan hak atas privasi berarti juga memberikan perlindungan atas hak kebebasan berbicara. (in)
- 隱私權,指個人人格上的利益不受不法僭用或侵害,個人與大眾無合法關聯的私事,亦不得妄予發布公開,而其私人活動,不得以可能造成一般人的精神痛苦或感覺羞辱之方式非法侵入的權利。是为众多法律系统所支持的一种人身基本权利。由于它的存在,政府和民间团体的某些活动受到一定的限制。 隱私權是指個人或群體隔離自己或有關自己的信息的權利。在商業世界,人們可能會自願提供個人詳細信息,包括廣告信息,以便獲得某種利益。公眾人物可能受制於公共規則。 (zh)
- الحق في الخصوصية عبارة عن حق من حقوق الإنسان وعنصر في العديد من التقاليد القانونية التي يمكن أن تحظر على الحكومة والقطاع الخاص اتخاذ إجراءات يمكن أن تهدد خصوصية الأفراد. منذ كشف التصنت العالمي في 2013 والذي بدأه موظف وكالة الأمن القومي الأمريكية إدوارد سنودن، أصبح حق الإنسان في الخصوصية غير القابل للتصرف فيه موضوعا للنقاش العالمي. في مجابهة الإرهاب العالمي، تقوم الوكالات الحكومية مثل وكالة الأمن القومي الأمريكية ووكالة المخابرات المركزية ومكاتب الإتصالات الحكومية البريطانية، تقوم بأعمال مراقبة الجمهور والتخابر العالمي. (ar)
- Intimitaterako eskubidea, pertsona batek ezkutuan edo gainerako gizakiengandik gordeta geratzen den eremua atxikitzeko duen eskubidea da, gizartean duintasunez eta bizitza kalitate gutxiengo batez bizitzeko beharrezkoa dena. Horrela definitzen du intimitatea Espainiako Konstituzio Auzitegiak hainbat epaitan (AKEE 197/1991, 20/1992, 219/1992, 142/1993, 117/1994, 143/1994, 186/2000). (eu)
- Le droit à la vie privée est un élément juridique qui vise à protéger le respect de la vie privée des individus. Plus de 150 constitutions nationales mentionnent le droit à la vie privée. Le 10 décembre 1948, l'assemblée générale des Nations Unies adopte la Déclaration universelle des droits de l'homme (DUDH) rédigée à l'origine pour garantir les droits individuels de chacun, en tout lieu. Les mots « droit à la vie privée » ne sont pas clairement mentionnés dans le document, cependant, la notion peut être interprétée à travers l'article 12, qui indique : (fr)
- The right to privacy is an element of various legal traditions that intends to restrain governmental and private actions that threaten the privacy of individuals. Over 150 national constitutions mention the right to privacy. On 10 December 1948, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), originally written to guarantee individual rights of everyone everywhere; while right to privacy does not appear in the document, many interpret this through Article 12, which states: "No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks." (en)
- 사생활권 또는 프라이버시권은 개인의 프라이버시를 위협하는 정부 및 민간 행위를 억제하기 위한 다양한 법적 전통의 한 요소다. 150개 이상의 국가 헌법이 사생활에 대한 권리를 언급하고 있다. 1948년 세계인권선언 제12조에 유엔은 다음과 같이 명시하고 있다 : * 그 누구도 사생활, 가족, 가정 또는 통신에 대한 자의적인 간섭을 받지 않으며, 명예와 평판에 대한 공격도 받지 않는다. 모든 사람은 그러한 간섭이나 공격에 대해 법의 보호를 받을 권리가 있다. NSA 전 직원 에드워드 스노든이 시작한 2013년 글로벌 감시 공개 이후 프라이버시 권리는 국제적인 논쟁의 대상이 되어 왔다. NSA, CIA, R&AW, GCHQ와 같은 정부 기관들은 대량, 세계적인 감시 활동을 해 왔다. 프라이버시 권리를 둘러싼 최근의 논쟁 중에는 프라이버시가 개인의 삶의 많은 세부사항에 접근하고 분석하는 정보기관의 현재 능력과 공존할 수 있는지 여부, 추측되는 테러 위협에 대한 방어를 강화하기 위한 사회적 계약의 일환으로 프라이버시 권리가 상실되는지 여부, 그리고 그러한 능력이 공존하는지 여부 등이 있다.테러리즘의 반복은 일반 대중을 염탐하기 위한 유효한 구실이다. (ko)
- O direito à privacidade é um direito humano desenvolvido a partir do pensamento liberal. Desde o ano de 2013, quando agencias governamentais, sob o pretexto de combater atos terroristas, como a NSA, CIA, e outras envolvidas no escândalo internacional, foi-se descoberto que as pessoas estavam sob vigilância de órgãos do governo do mundo todo, o inabalável direito humano à privacidade foi prejudicado e foi tema de debate internacional. Está em questão se o direito à privacidade pode coexistir com a capacidade atual das agencias governamentais de descobrir, acessar e analisar todos os detalhes da vida de uma pessoa em qualquer lugar no mundo. Uma grande questão atualmente diz respeito a se o direito a privacidade deve ser revogado ou não, como parte do contrato social, para reforçar a defesa (pt)
- Personlig integritet är en aspekt av människans värdighet som avser rätten för varje människa att få ha sin egenart och inre sfär respekterad samt att inte utsättas för störande ingrepp. Kränkningar av den personliga integriteten kan ske dels fysiskt (våld, tvång) och dels psykiskt (förnedring, utlämnande av information av privat natur, diskriminering, indoktrinering). Personlig integritet är ett rättsligt begrepp. Den är skyddad genom lag och kränkning av den ses således som ett brott. (sv)
is dbo:wikiPageWikiLink of
- dbr:Canada_Border_Services_Agency
- dbr:Ben_Wizner
- dbr:Privacy
- dbr:Privacy_International
- dbr:Privacy_laws_of_the_United_States
- dbr:Roe_v._Wade
- dbr:Roger_M._Milgrim
- dbr:Sam_Brownback
- dbr:Satellite_phone
- dbr:Electronic_Frontier_Canada
- dbr:MAINWAY
- dbr:Mere_evidence_rule
- dbr:Moral_rights_in_United_Kingdom_law
- dbr:Photography_and_the_law
- dbr:Title_2_of_the_Swiss_Federal_Constitution
- dbr:Online_shaming
- dbr:Patient_Information_Advisory_Group
- dbr:Prisoner_rights_in_the_United_States
- dbr:Privacy_and_the_US_government
- dbr:Privacy_in_English_law
- dbr:Privacy_in_education
- dbr:Privacy_settings
- dbr:20th-century_history_of_the_Catholic_Church_in_the_United_States
- dbr:Billy_Douglas_(One_Life_to_Live)
- dbr:Brian_Walden
- dbr:David_Eady
- dbr:David_Kato
- dbr:Democratic_Party_(United_States)
- dbr:Der_Standard
- dbr:Anti-pornography_movement_in_the_United_States
- dbr:Hugo_Black
- dbr:Human_rights_and_encryption
- dbr:Joyce_Karlin_Fahey
- dbr:List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_by_the_Warren_Court
- dbr:Perry_v._Louisiana
- dbr:Personal_Data_Protection_Bill_2018
- dbr:Personality_rights
- dbr:Richard_Dreyfuss
- dbr:Robert_Bork
- dbr:Chapter_Two_of_the_Constitution_of_South_Africa
- dbr:Cyberspace
- dbr:Unauthorized_biography
- dbr:Unified_Multi-Purpose_ID
- dbr:United_States_Bill_of_Rights
- dbr:United_States_Department_of_Justice_v....rs_Committee_for_Freedom_of_the_Press
- dbr:United_States_v._Extreme_Associates,_Inc.
- dbr:Unmasking_by_U.S._intelligence_agencies
- dbr:Village_of_Belle_Terre_v._Boraas
- dbr:Violence_Against_Women_Act
- dbr:Debates_within_libertarianism
- dbr:Douez_v._Facebook
- dbr:Incest
- dbr:Income_tax_audit
- dbr:Index_of_law_articles
- dbr:Indiscriminate_monitoring
- dbr:Information_privacy_law
- dbr:Informational_self-determination
- dbr:Intellectual_freedom
- dbr:International_Principles_on_the_Applic...Rights_to_Communications_Surveillance
- dbr:Internet_Governance_Forum
- dbr:Internet_censorship
- dbr:Internet_censorship_in_South_Africa
- dbr:Intersex_human_rights
- dbr:Ley_Orgánica_de_Protección_de_Datos_de_Carácter_Personal
- dbr:Liberal_Reform
- dbr:List_of_landmark_court_decisions_in_India
- dbr:List_of_political_scandals_in_Argentina
- dbr:Obergefell_v._Hodges
- dbr:Pavesich_v._New_England_Life_Insurance_Company
- dbr:Post-mortem_privacy
- dbr:United_Kingdom_labour_law
- dbr:Protecting_the_Right_to_Organize_Act
- dbr:Protection_of_Personal_Information_Act,_2013
- dbr:Norris_v._Ireland
- dbr:Timeline_of_disability_rights_in_the_United_States
- dbr:Communication_rights
- dbr:Constitution
- dbr:Constitution_of_Japan
- dbr:Constitution_of_Puerto_Rico
- dbr:Constitution_of_the_Philippines
- dbr:Consumers_Council_of_Canada
- dbr:Cox_Broadcasting_Corp._v._Cohn
- dbr:Criminalization_of_homosexuality
- dbr:Cristina_Fernández_de_Kirchner
- dbr:Max_Schrems
- dbr:Mbuyiseli_Madlanga
- dbr:Salinger_v._Random_House,_Inc.
- dbr:Child_Rights_Act_in_Nigeria
- dbr:Gene_theft
- dbr:Generally_Accepted_Privacy_Principles
- dbr:Noble_siblings_case
- dbr:Outing
- dbr:Queers_Read_This
- dbr:R_v_Duarte
- dbr:R_v_Rodgers
- dbr:R_v_Sharpe
- dbr:Seattle_Privacy_Coalition
- dbr:1990_Alaska_Measure_2
- dbr:1998_Alaska_Measure_2
- dbr:Church_of_Hakeem
- dbr:City_of_Ontario_v._Quon
- dbr:Civil_liberties_in_the_United_States
- dbr:Clarence_Thomas
- dbr:Enrique_Fernando
- dbr:Freedom_of_religion_in_the_United_States
- dbr:Freedom_of_speech
- dbr:Glenn_Greenwald
- dbr:Greek_case
- dbr:Mobilisa,_Inc._v._Doe
- dbr:Model_(art)
- dbr:Confidential_birth
- dbr:Constitution_of_Andorra
- dbr:Constitution_of_Cyprus
- dbr:Constitution_of_Queensland
- dbr:Constitution_of_South_Africa
- dbr:Constitution_of_the_Netherlands
- dbr:Controversial_Ohio_database_searches_of_Joe_Wurzelbacher
- dbr:Convention_for_the_Protection_of_Indiv...Automatic_Processing_of_Personal_Data
- dbr:The_Pirates_Center_of_Belarus
- dbr:1963_request_for_a_state_of_exception_in_Brazil
- dbr:1978_Hawaii_State_Constitutional_Convention
- dbr:2019_British_prorogation_controversy
- dbr:2020
- dbr:Anti-Conspiracy_Bill
- dbr:Anti-Counterfeiting_Trade_Agreement
- dbr:Liberal_Libertarian_Party
- dbr:Libertarian_Party_of_Illinois
- dbr:Lina_Murr_Nehmé
- dbr:Living_Constitution
- dbr:Louis_Brandeis
- dbr:Bodily_integrity
- dbr:Cairo_Declaration_on_Human_Rights_in_Islam
- dbr:Call_centre
- dbr:Social_Credit_System
- dbr:State_of_Hawaii_Organization_of_Police_Officers
- dbr:Student_rights_in_higher_education
- dbr:Suicide_of_Tyler_Clementi
- dbr:Closed-circuit_television
- dbr:Colombian_Constitution_of_1991
- dbr:Common_court_(Poland)
- dbr:Zehut
- dbr:Emergency_contraception
- dbr:Employee_monitoring
- dbr:Employee_monitoring_software
- dbr:Fundamental_Rights_and_Duties_in_Nepal
- dbr:Fundamental_rights
- dbr:Fundamental_rights_in_India
- dbr:Funke_v._France
- dbr:House_Bill_5414
- dbr:PJS_v_News_Group_Newspapers_Ltd
- dbr:Panopticon
- dbr:Pen_register
- dbr:Penumbra_(law)
- dbr:Permanent_Record_(autobiography)
- dbr:Pirate_Party
- dbr:Police_dog
- dbr:Pornography_in_the_United_States
- dbr:Privacy_policy
- dbr:Magajane_v_Chairperson,_North_West_Gambling_Board
- dbr:Mass_surveillance
- dbr:Maternal-fetal_conflict
- dbr:McNally_v_R
- dbr:Media_freedom_in_the_European_Union
- dbr:Tort_law_in_India
- dbr:Australian_Health_Practitioner_Regulation_Agency
- dbr:A,_B_and_C_v_Ireland
- dbr:COVID-19_pandemic_in_Israel
- dbr:Adolescence
- dbr:Agreement_for_Democracy
- dbr:Thurgood_Marshall
- dbr:Titicut_Follies
- dbr:Tort
- dbr:Trial_of_Arne_Cheyenne_Johnson
- dbr:Data_retention
- dbr:Warren_Court
- dbr:Warren_E._Burger
- dbr:White_Terror_(Taiwan)
- dbr:Wikipedia
- dbr:William_E._Woods
- dbr:William_O._Douglas
- dbr:Habeas_data
- dbr:Health_policy
- dbr:Irish_Family_Planning_Association
- dbr:Larry_N._Jordan
- dbr:Law_of_Administration_for_the_State_of_Iraq_for_the_Transitional_Period
- dbr:Law_of_Papua_New_Guinea
- dbr:Link_analysis
- dbr:List_of_Alaska_ballot_measures
- dbr:Minimally_invasive_warrantless_search
- dbr:Street_photography
- dbr:No_Contact_Apprehension_Policy
- dbr:Unenumerated_rights
- dbr:Unreasonable_search_and_seizure_in_New_Zealand
- dbr:Robert_Bork_Supreme_Court_nomination
- dbr:2022_California_Proposition_1
- dbr:A_Dangerous_Life
- dbr:Aadhaar
- dbr:Abortion_in_Florida
- dbr:Abortion_law_in_the_United_States_by_state
- dbr:Alex_Kozinski
- dbr:Alvaro_Bedoya
- dbr:Amy_Peikoff
- dbr:Database_Nation
- dbr:Dow_Chemical_Co._v._United_States
- dbr:Earl_Warren
- dbr:Estelle_Griswold
- dbr:European_Court_of_Human_Rights
- dbr:Factions_in_the_Republican_Party_(United_States)
- dbr:Family_Educational_Rights_and_Privacy_Act
- dbr:Federal_government_of_the_United_States
- dbr:Florida_v._Jardines
- dbr:Fourteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
- dbr:Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution
- dbr:Franc_Rode
- dbr:Digital_citizen
- dbr:Digital_privacy
- dbr:Digital_rights
- dbr:Education_in_the_United_States
- dbr:Educational_assessment
- dbr:False_light
- dbr:False_statements_of_fact
- dbr:Forward_intelligence_team
- dbr:Global_surveillance
- dbr:Graduated_response
- dbr:History_of_human_rights
- dbr:History_of_the_Catholic_Church_in_the_United_States
- dbr:Italian_intelligence_agencies
- dbr:Judicial_activism
- dbr:Legal_aspects_of_file_sharing
- dbr:Legal_debate
- dbr:Legal_history_of_cannabis_in_the_United_States
- dbr:Legalization_of_non-medical_cannabis_in_the_United_States
- dbr:Military_discharge
- dbr:R._Michael_Ferrall
- dbr:Nemo_dat_quod_non_habet
- dbr:Radio-frequency_identification
- dbr:Refugee_Status_Appeals_Authority
- dbr:Rennie_v._Klein
- dbr:Reproductive_justice
- dbr:2004_California_Proposition_59
- dbr:2004_Constitution_of_Afghanistan
- dbr:Günther_Jauch
- dbr:Hard_Copy_(TV_program)
- dbr:Harry_Blackmun
- dbr:International_Covenant_on_Civil_and_Political_Rights
- dbr:International_Narcotics_Control_Board
- dbr:Invasion_of_privacy
- dbr:Islam_and_humanity
- dbr:Islamic_criminal_law_in_Aceh
- dbr:Counterintelligence_Field_Activity
- dbr:Reproductive_rights
- dbr:Association_of_Women_for_Action_and_Research
- dbr:ABC_v._The_State_(NCT_of_Delhi)
- dbr:Abortion_in_Connecticut
- dbr:Abortion_in_the_Republic_of_Ireland
- dbr:Abuse
- dbr:Access_to_public_information_in_Ukraine
- dbr:Jesse_Jackson
- dbr:Jimmy_Wales
- dbr:John_Hart_Ely
- dbr:LGBT_rights_in_the_United_States
- dbr:Landlord_harassment
- dbr:Lawrence_v._Texas
- dbr:Big_Brother_Watch
- dbr:Biobank_ethics
- dbr:Supernanny
- dbr:Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States
- dbr:High_Tech_Gays_v._Defense_Industrial_Security_Clearance_Office
- dbr:Homophobia
- dbr:Toonen_v._Australia
- dbr:Whistleblower
- dbr:Xenon_(program)
- dbr:Dobbs_v._Jackson_Women's_Health_Organization
- dbr:Doe_v._Bolton
- dbr:Dog_Day_Afternoon
- dbr:Arthur_Branch
- dbr:Article_8_of_the_European_Convention_on_Human_Rights
- dbr:Martin_Scheinin
- dbr:Pirate_Party_(Sweden)
- dbr:Pirate_Party_Australia
- dbr:Civil_and_political_rights
- dbr:Civil_liberties
- dbr:Freedom_of_information
- dbr:Human_Life_Protection_Act
- dbr:Human_Rights_Act_1998
- dbr:Human_Rights_Foundation_(New_Zealand)
- dbr:Human_rights_in_Equatorial_Guinea
- dbr:Human_rights_in_Hong_Kong
- dbr:Human_rights_in_Malaysia
- dbr:Human_rights_in_Singapore
- dbr:Human_rights_in_Solomon_Islands
- dbr:Human_rights_in_the_Netherlands
- dbr:US_Senate_career_of_Joe_Biden
- dbr:Illinois_Freedom_of_Information_Act
- dbr:Information_Technology_Act,_2000
- dbr:Information_warfare
- dbr:Microsoft_Product_Activation
- dbr:National_Coalition_for_Gay_and_Lesbian_Equality_v_Minister_of_Justice
- dbr:New_York_Civil_Liberties_Union
- dbr:Newton_Ogilvie_Thompson