Transcriptional enhancers: from properties to genome-wide predictions (original) (raw)

• Banerji, J., Rusconi, S. & Schaffner, W. Expression of a β-globin gene is enhanced by remote SV40 DNA sequences. Cell 27, 299–308 (1981). This paper reports the first sequence that can increase transcription levels from a given promoter, defines the term enhancer and describes many enhancer properties.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Banerji, J., Olson, L. & Schaffner, W. A lymphocyte-specific cellular enhancer is located downstream of the joining region in immunoglobulin heavy chain genes. 33, 729–740 (1983).
• Amano, T. et al. Chromosomal dynamics at the shh locus: limb bud-specific differential regulation of competence and active transcription. Dev. Cell 16, 47–57 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Arnone, M. I. & Davidson, E. H. The hardwiring of development: organization and function of genomic regulatory systems. Development 124, 1851–1864 (1997).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Dawson, M. A. & Kouzarides, T. Cancer epigenetics: from mechanism to therapy. Cell 150, 12–27 (2012).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Carroll, S. B. Evo-devo and an expanding evolutionary synthesis: a genetic theory of morphological evolution. Cell 134, 25–36 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Visel, A., Rubin, E. M. & Pennacchio, L. A. Genomic views of distant-acting enhancers. Nature 461, 199–205 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Yáñez-Cuna, J. O., Kvon, E. Z. & Stark, A. Deciphering the transcriptional _cis_-regulatory code. Trends Genet. 29, 11–22 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tomancak, P. et al. Systematic determination of patterns of gene expression during Drosophila embryogenesis. Genome Biol. 3, research0088-0088.14 (2002).
  Article Google Scholar
• Richardson, L. et al. EMAGE mouse embryo spatial gene expression database: 2010 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, D703–D709 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• International HapMap 3 Consortium. Integrating common and rare genetic variation in diverse human populations. Nature 467, 52–58 (2010).
• ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489, 57–74 (2012).
• The modENCODE Consortium. Identification of functional elements and regulatory circuits by Drosophila modENCODE. Science 330, 1787–1797 (2010).
• Tjian, R. The binding site on SV40 DNA for a T antigen-related protein. Cell 13, 165–179 (1978).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Giniger, E., Varnum, S. M. & Ptashne, M. Specific DNA binding of GAL4, a positive regulatory protein of yeast. Cell 40, 767–774 (1985).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Berman, B. P. et al. Exploiting transcription factor binding site clustering to identify _cis_-regulatory modules involved in pattern formation in the Drosophila genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 757–762 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kheradpour, P., Stark, A., Roy, S. & Kellis, M. Reliable prediction of regulator targets using 12 Drosophila genomes. Genome Res. 17, 1919–1931 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Del Bene, F. et al. In vivo validation of a computationally predicted conserved Ath5 target gene set. PLoS Genet. 3, 1661–1671 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hallikas, O. et al. Genome-wide prediction of mammalian enhancers based on analysis of transcription-factor binding affinity. Cell 124, 47–59 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sinha, S., van Nimwegen, E. & Siggia, E. D. A probabilistic method to detect regulatory modules. Bioinformatics 19, i292–i301 (2003).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Herrmann, C., Van de Sande, B., Potier, D. & Aerts, S. i-cisTarget: an integrative genomics method for the prediction of regulatory features and _cis_-regulatory modules. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, e114 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Warner, J. B. et al. Systematic identification of mammalian regulatory motifs' target genes and functions. Nature Methods 5, 347–353 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Aerts, S. Computational strategies for the genome-wide identification of _cis_-regulatory elements and transcriptional targets. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 98, 121–145 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hardison, R. C. & Taylor, J. Genomic approaches towards finding _cis_-regulatory modules in animals. Nature Rev. Genet. 13, 469–483 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wei, G.-H. et al. Genome-wide analysis of ETS-family DNA-binding in vitro and in vivo. EMBO J. 29, 2147–2160 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Jolma, A. et al. DNA-binding specificities of human transcription factors. Cell 152, 327–339 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Noyes, M. B. et al. Analysis of homeodomain specificities allows the family-wide prediction of preferred recognition sites. Cell 133, 1277–1289 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Yanez-Cuna, J. O., Dinh, H. Q., Kvon, E. Z., Shlyueva, D. & Stark, A. Uncovering _cis_-regulatory sequence requirements for context-specific transcription factor binding. Genome Res. 22, 2018–2030 (2012). This paper shows that transcription factor binding can be predicted by cell-type-specific combinations of transcription factor binding sequences for different partner transcription factors, which are shared across many binding sites.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Slattery, M. et al. Cofactor binding evokes latent differences in DNA binding specificity between Hox proteins. Cell 147, 1270–1282 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Blow, M. J. et al. ChIP–seq identification of weakly conserved heart enhancers. Nature Genet. 42, 818–822 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Meireles-Filho, A. C. A. & Stark, A. Comparative genomics of gene regulation-conservation and divergence of _cis_-regulatory information. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 19, 565–570 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kantorovitz, M. R. et al. Motif-blind, genome-wide discovery of _cis_-regulatory modules in Drosophila and mouse. Dev. Cell 17, 568–579 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Narlikar, L. et al. Genome-wide discovery of human heart enhancers. Genome Res. 20, 381–392 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Burzynski, G. M. et al. Systematic elucidation and in vivo validation of sequences enriched in hindbrain transcriptional control. Genome Res. 22, 2278–2289 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. S., Mortazavi, A., Myers, R. M. & Wold, B. Genome-wide mapping of in vivo protein–DNA interactions. Science 316, 1497–1502 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Robertson, G. et al. Genome-wide profiles of STAT1 DNA association using chromatin immunoprecipitation and massively parallel sequencing. Nature Methods 4, 651–657 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Rhee, H. S. & Pugh, B. F. Comprehensive genome-wide protein–DNA interactions detected at single-nucleotide resolution. Cell 147, 1408–1419 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• van Steensel, B. & Henikoff, S. Identification of in vivo DNA targets of chromatin proteins using tethered Dam methyltransferase. Nature Biotech. 18, 424–428 (2000).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Spitz, F. & Furlong, E. E. Transcription factors: from enhancer binding to developmental control. Nature Rev. Genet. 13, 613–626 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sandmann, T. et al. A core transcriptional network for early mesoderm development in Drosophila melanogaster. Genes Dev. 21, 436–449 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zeitlinger, J. et al. Whole-genome ChIP–chip analysis of Dorsal, Twist, and Snail suggests integration of diverse patterning processes in the Drosophila embryo. Genes Dev. 21, 385–390 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Li, X.-Y. et al. Transcription factors bind thousands of active and inactive regions in the Drosophila blastoderm. PLoS Biol. 6, e27 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kvon, E. Z., Stampfel, G., Yáñez-Cuna, J. O., Dickson, B. J. & Stark, A. HOT regions function as patterned developmental enhancers and have a distinct _cis_-regulatory signature. Genes Dev. 26, 908–913 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Fisher, W. W. et al. DNA regions bound at low occupancy by transcription factors do not drive patterned reporter gene expression in Drosophila. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 109, 21330–21335 (2012).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hammar, P. et al. The lac repressor displays facilitated diffusion in living cells. Science 336, 1595–1598 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Teytelman, L., Thurtle, D. M., Rine, J. & van Oudenaarden, A. Highly expressed loci are vulnerable to misleading ChIP localization of multiple unrelated proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 110, 18602–18607 (2013). This study shows that ChIP assays can lead to false-positive binding sites for transcription factors or even for non-DNA binding proteins (such as GFP), thus cautioning the interpretation of this widely used technique.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Poorey, K. et al. Measuring chromatin interaction dynamics on the second time scale at single-copy genes. Science 342, 369–372 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lickwar, C. R., Mueller, F., Hanlon, S. E., McNally, J. G. & Lieb, J. D. Genome-wide protein–DNA binding dynamics suggest a molecular clutch for transcription factor function. Nature 484, 251–255 (2013).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Moorman, C. et al. Hotspots of transcription factor colocalization in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 12027–12032 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Visel, A. et al. ChIP–seq accurately predicts tissue-specific activity of enhancers. Nature 457, 854–858 (2009). This paper shows that p300 binding in the murine forebrain, hindbrain and limb can predict tissue-specific enhancers.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Heintzman, N. D. et al. Distinct and predictive chromatin signatures of transcriptional promoters and enhancers in the human genome. Nature Genet. 39, 311–318 (2007). This study shows that human promoters and enhancers are marked by characteristic combinations of histone modifications that are predictive.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Rada-Iglesias, A. et al. A unique chromatin signature uncovers early developmental enhancers in humans. Nature 470, 279–283 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Visel, A. et al. A high-resolution enhancer atlas of the developing telencephalon. Cell 152, 895–908 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• May, D. et al. Large-scale discovery of enhancers from human heart tissue. Nature Genet. 44, 89–93 (2012).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Filion, G. J. et al. Systematic protein location mapping reveals five principal chromatin types in Drosophila cells. Cell 143, 212–224 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• van Bemmel, J. G. et al. A network model of the molecular organization of chromatin in Drosophila. Mol. Cell 49, 759–771 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ram, O. et al. Combinatorial patterning of chromatin regulators uncovered by genome-wide location analysis in human cells. Cell 147, 1628–1639 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Weintraub, H. & Groudine, M. Chromosomal subunits in active genes have an altered conformation. Science 193, 848–856 (1976).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Axel, R., Cedar, H. & Felsenfeld, G. Synthesis of globin ribonucleic acid from duck-reticulocyte chromatin in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 70, 2029–2032 (1973).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Boyle, A. P. et al. High-resolution mapping and characterization of open chromatin across the genome. Cell 132, 311–322 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Yuan, G.-C. et al. Genome-scale identification of nucleosome positions in S. cerevisiae. Science 309, 626–630 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Neph, S. et al. An expansive human regulatory lexicon encoded in transcription factor footprints. Nature 488, 83–90 (2012).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Giresi, P. G., Kim, J., McDaniell, R. M., Iyer, V. R. & Lieb, J. D. FAIRE (formaldehyde-assisted isolation of regulatory elements) isolates active regulatory elements from human chromatin. Genome Res. 17, 877–885 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bell, O., Tiwari, V. K., Thomä, N. H. & Schübeler, D. Determinants and dynamics of genome accessibility. Nature Rev. Genet. 12, 554–564 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zaret, K. S. & Carroll, J. S. Pioneer transcription factors: establishing competence for gene expression. Genes Dev. 25, 2227–2241 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Mirny, L. A. Nucleosome-mediated cooperativity between transcription factors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 107, 22534–22539 (2010).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Miller, J. A. & Widom, J. Collaborative competition mechanism for gene activation in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 1623–1632 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Pique-Regi, R. et al. Accurate inference of transcription factor binding from DNA sequence and chromatin accessibility data. Genome Res. 21, 447–455 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kaplan, T. et al. Quantitative models of the mechanisms that control genome-wide patterns of transcription factor binding during early Drosophila development. PLoS Genet. 7, e1001290 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Heintzman, N. D. et al. Histone modifications at human enhancers reflect global cell-type-specific gene expression. Nature 459, 108–112 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Thurman, R. E. et al. The accessible chromatin landscape of the human genome. Nature 488, 75–82 (2013).
  Google Scholar
• Arnold, C. D. et al. Genome-wide quantitative enhancer activity maps identified by STARR-seq. Science 339, 1074–1077 (2013). This paper introduces a method that allows the genome-wide identification of enhancers on the direct basis of their activity and that finds 'closed enhancers', which are silenced endogenously presumably at the chromatin level.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Xi, H. et al. Identification and characterization of cell type-specific and ubiquitous chromatin regulatory structures in the human genome. PLoS Genet. 3, e136 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Gray, S. & Levine, M. Transcriptional repression in development. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 8, 358–364 (1996).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Cochella, L. & Hobert, O. Embryonic priming of a miRNA locus predetermines postmitotic neuronal left/right asymmetry in C. elegans. Cell 151, 1229–1242 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kouzarides, T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell 128, 693–705 (2007).
  CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Roh, T.-Y., Cuddapah, S. & Zhao, K. Active chromatin domains are defined by acetylation islands revealed by genome-wide mapping. Genes Dev. 19, 542–552 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bonn, S. et al. Tissue-specific analysis of chromatin state identifies temporal signatures of enhancer activity during embryonic development. Nature Genet. 44, 148–156 (2012). This study couples ChIP–seq with nuclear sorting to allow the cell-type-specific investigation of chromatin features.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Peters, A. H. F. M. et al. Histone H3 lysine 9 methylation is an epigenetic imprint of facultative heterochromatin. Nature Genet. 30, 77–80 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Simon, J. A. & Kingston, R. E. Mechanisms of Polycomb gene silencing: knowns and unknowns. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10, 697–708 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Wamstad, J. A. et al. Dynamic and coordinated epigenetic regulation of developmental transitions in the cardiac lineage. Cell 151, 206–220 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Shen, Y. et al. A map of the _cis_-regulatory sequences in the mouse genome. Nature 488, 116–120 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kharchenko, P. V. et al. Comprehensive analysis of the chromatin landscape in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature 471, 480–485 (2012).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Ernst, J. et al. Mapping and analysis of chromatin state dynamics in nine human cell types. Nature 473, 43–49 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. E. et al. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 125, 315–326 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ostuni, R. et al. Latent enhancers activated by stimulation in differentiated cells. Cell 152, 157–171 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Barski, A. et al. High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell 129, 823–837 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hah, N. et al. A rapid, extensive, and transient transcriptional response to estrogen signaling in breast cancer cells. Cell 145, 622–634 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Core, L. J. et al. Defining the status of RNA polymerase at promoters. Cell Rep. 2, 1025–1035 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kim, T.-K. et al. Widespread transcription at neuronal activity-regulated enhancers. Nature 465, 182–187 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• De Santa, F. et al. A large fraction of extragenic RNA pol II transcription sites overlap enhancers. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000384 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lai, F. et al. Activating RNAs associate with Mediator to enhance chromatin architecture and transcription. Nature 494, 497–501 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Natoli, G. & Andrau, J.-C. Noncoding transcription at enhancers: general principles and functional models. Annu. Rev. Genet. 46, 1–19 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ebisuya, M., Yamamoto, T., Nakajima, M. & Nishida, E. Ripples from neighbouring transcription. Nature Cell Biol. 10, 1106–1113 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ponting, C. P., Oliver, P. L. & Reik, W. Evolution and functions of long noncoding RNAs. Cell 136, 629–641 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ernst, J. & Kellis, M. ChromHMM: automating chromatin-state discovery and characterization. Nature Methods 9, 215–216 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hödl, M. & Basler, K. Transcription in the absence of histone H3.2 and H3K4 methylation. Curr. Biol. 22, 2253–2257 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Pengelly, A. R., Copur, O., Jackle, H., Herzig, A. & Muller, J. A. Histone mutant reproduces the phenotype caused by loss of histone-modifying factor Polycomb. Science 339, 698–699 (2013). References 97 and 98 investigate the importance of histone modifications for gene transcription by mutating H3K4 and H3K27. H3-K27R mutants led to the derepression of Polycomb target genes but was otherwise compatible with gene transcription, as were H3K4 mutants that could not be methylated.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hathaway, N. A. et al. Dynamics and memory of heterochromatin in living cells. Cell 149, 1447–1460 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Calo, E. & Wysocka, J. Modification of enhancer chromatin: what, how, and why? Mol. Cell 49, 825–837 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kagey, M. H. et al. Mediator and cohesin connect gene expression and chromatin architecture. Nature 467, 430–435 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Schmidt, D. et al. A CTCF-independent role for cohesin in tissue-specific transcription. Genome Res. 20, 578–588 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Whyte, W. A. et al. Master transcription factors and mediator establish super-enhancers at key cell identity genes. Cell 153, 307–319 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• van Steensel, B. & Dekker, J. Genomics tools for unraveling chromosome architecture. Nature Biotech. 28, 1089–1095 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Fullwood, M. J. et al. An oestrogen-receptor-α-bound human chromatin interactome. Nature 461, 58–64 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Li, G. et al. Extensive promoter-centered chromatin interactions provide a topological basis for transcription regulation. Cell 148, 84–98 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lieberman-Aiden, E. et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289–293 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sexton, T. et al. Three-dimensional folding and functional organization principles of the Drosophila genome. Cell 148, 458–472 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Jin, F. et al. A high-resolution map of the three-dimensional chromatin interactome in human cells. Nature 503, 290–294 (2013). This paper significantly improves the resolution of Hi-C experiments and provides bulk evidence that implicates the interactions in gene expression.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Gibcus, J. H. & Dekker, J. The hierarchy of the 3D genome. Mol. Cell 49, 773–782 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• de Laat, W. & Duboule, D. Topology of mammalian developmental enhancers and their regulatory landscapes. Nature 502, 499–506 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sanyal, A., Lajoie, B. R., Jain, G. & Dekker, J. The long-range interaction landscape of gene promoters. Nature 489, 109–113 (2013).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Lettice, L. A. A long-range Shh enhancer regulates expression in the developing limb and fin and is associated with preaxial polydactyly. Hum. Mol. Genet. 12, 1725–1735 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sur, I. K. et al. Mice lacking a Myc enhancer that includes human SNP rs6983267 are resistant to intestinal tumors. Science 338, 1360–1363 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Huang, F. W. et al. Highly recurrent TERT promoter mutations in human melanoma. Science 339, 957–959 (2013). References 114 and 115 describe defined mutations in transcriptional regulatory regions (that is, promoters and enhancers) that are causally linked to the deregulation of MYC and telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT), and cancer.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zeitlinger, J. & Stark, A. Developmental gene regulation in the era of genomics. Dev. Biol. 339, 230–239 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Crocker, J. & Stern, D. L. TALE-mediated modulation of transcriptional enhancers in vivo. Nature Methods 10, 762–767 (2013). This study recruits transcriptional activators and repressors to specific enhancers in D. melanogaster using TALE fusion proteins and thereby modulate target gene expression.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. et al. Chromatin connectivity maps reveal dynamic promoter-enhancer long-range associations. Nature 504, 306–310 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kieffer-Kwon, K.-R. et al. Interactome maps of mouse gene regulatory domains reveal basic principles of transcriptional regulation. Cell 155, 1507–1520 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zinzen, R. P., Girardot, C., Gagneur, J., Braun, M. & Furlong, E. E. M. Combinatorial binding predicts spatio-temporal _cis_-regulatory activity. Nature 462, 65–70 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Manning, L. et al. A resource for manipulating gene expression and analyzing _cis_-regulatory modules in the Drosophila CNS. Cell Rep. 2, 1002–1013 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Dupuy, D. A. First version of the Caenorhabditis elegans promoterome. Genome Res. 14, 2169–2175 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Visel, A., Minovitsky, S., Dubchak, I. & Pennacchio, L. A. VISTA enhancer browser — a database of tissue-specific human enhancers. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, D88–D92 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gisselbrecht, S. S. et al. Highly parallel assays of tissue-specific enhancers in whole Drosophila embryos. Nature Methods 10, 774–780 (2013). This paper introduces enhancer-FACS-seq to parallelize in vivo enhancer testing in D. melanogaster.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Nam, J. & Davidson, E. H. Barcoded DNA-tag reporters for multiplex _cis_-regulatory analysis. PLoS ONE 7, e35934 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Melnikov, A. et al. Systematic dissection and optimization of inducible enhancers in human cells using a massively parallel reporter assay. Nature Biotech. 30, 271–277 (2012).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Patwardhan, R. P. et al. Massively parallel functional dissection of mammalian enhancers in vivo. Nature Biotech. 30, 265–270 (2012).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Kwasnieski, J. C., Mogno, I., Myers, C. A., Corbo, J. C. & Cohen, B. A. Complex effects of nucleotide variants in a mammalian _cis_-regulatory element. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 19498–19503 (2012).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sharon, E. et al. Inferring gene regulatory logic from high-throughput measurements of thousands of systematically designed promoters. Nature Biotech. 30, 521–530 (2012).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Smith, R. P. et al. Massively parallel decoding of mammalian regulatory sequences supports a flexible organizational model. Nature Genet. 45, 1021–1028 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gertz, J., Siggia, E. D. & Cohen, B. A. Analysis of combinatorial _cis_-regulation in synthetic and genomic promoters. Nature 457, 215–218 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Steiner, F. A., Talbert, P. B., Kasinathan, S., Deal, R. B. & Henikoff, S. Cell-type-specific nuclei purification from whole animals for genome-wide expression and chromatin profiling. Genome Res. 22, 766–777 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Adli, M. & Bernstein, B. E. Whole-genome chromatin profiling from limited numbers of cells using nano-ChIP–seq. Nature Protoc. 6, 1656–1668 (2011).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Nagano, T. et al. Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure. Nature 502, 59–64 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Buenrostro, J. D., Giresi, P. G., Zaba, L. C., Chang, H. Y. & Greenleaf, W. J. Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nature Methods 10, 1213–1218 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Deng, Q., Ramsköld, D., Reinius, B. & Sandberg, R. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals dynamic, random monoallelic gene expression in mammalian cells. Science 343, 193–196 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gilbert, L. A. et al. CRISPR-mediated modular RNA-guided regulation of transcription in eukaryotes. Cell 154, 442–451 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Mendenhall, E. M. et al. Locus-specific editing of histone modifications at endogenous enhancers. Nature Biotech. 31, 1133–1136 (2013).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Konermann, S. et al. Optical control of mammalian endogenous transcription and epigenetic states. Nature 500, 472–476 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Reyon, D. et al. FLASH assembly of TALENs for high-throughput genome editing. Nature Biotech. 30, 460–465 (2012).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816–821 (2012). This study shows that the bacterial Cas9 protein uses dual RNAs for sequence-specific DNA targeting and cleavage, and highlights the potential of the CRISPR–Cas9 system for genome editing.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Mali, P. et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 339, 823–826 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ruf, S. et al. Large-scale analysis of the regulatory architecture of the mouse genome with a transposon-associated sensor. Nature Genet. 43, 379–386 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Mollereau, B. et al. A green fluorescent protein enhancer trap screen in Drosophila photoreceptor cells. Mech. Dev. 93, 151–160 (2000).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Akhtar, W. et al. Chromatin position effects assayed by thousands of reporters integrated in parallel. Cell 154, 914–927 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Maurano, M. T. et al. Systematic localization of common disease-associated variation in regulatory DNA. Science 337, 1190–1195 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lovén, J. et al. Selective inhibition of tumor oncogenes by disruption of super-enhancers. Cell 153, 320–334 (2013). This paper defines super enhancers as exceptionally long genomic regions that are strongly bound by cofactors. The proximity to some oncogenes and the loss of bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4) binding upon inhibition draws the attention of a broader medical community to such enhancers.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Shi, J. et al. Role of SWI/SNF in acute leukemia maintenance and enhancer-mediated Myc regulation. Genes Dev. 27, 2648–2662 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zuber, J. et al. RNAi screen identifies Brd4 as a therapeutic target in acute myeloid leukaemia. Nature 478, 524–528 (2011). This study reports that inhibition of the broadly expressed transcriptional co-activator BRD4 has a specific effect on acute myeloid leukaemia cells.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Delmore, J. E. et al. BET bromodomain inhibition as a therapeutic strategy to target c-Myc. Cell 146, 904–917 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Knutson, S. K. et al. A selective inhibitor of EZH2 blocks H3K27 methylation and kills mutant lymphoma cells. Nature Chem. Biol. 8, 890–896 (2012).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Herrmann, H. et al. Small-molecule inhibition of BRD4 as a new potent approach to eliminate leukemic stem- and progenitor cells in acute myeloid leukemia AML. Oncotarget 3, 1588–1599 (2012).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Stormo, G. D. & Zhao, Y. Determining the specificity of protein–DNA interactions. Nature Rev. Genet. 11, 751–760 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Roth, F. P., Hughes, J. D., Estep, P. W. & Church, G. M. Finding DNA regulatory motifs within unaligned noncoding sequences clustered by whole-genome mRNA quantitation. Nature Biotech. 16, 939–945 (1998).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Kellis, M., Patterson, N., Endrizzi, M., Birren, B. & Lander, E. S. Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements. Nature 423, 241–254 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bosch, J. R., Benavides, J. A. & Cline, T. W. The TAGteam DNA motif controls the timing of Drosophila pre-blastoderm transcription. Development 133, 1967–1977 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Liang, H.-L. et al. The zinc-finger protein Zelda is a key activator of the early zygotic genome in Drosophila. Nature 456, 400–403 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bulyk, M. L., Gentalen, E., Lockhart, D. J. & Church, G. M. Quantifying DNA–protein interactions by double-stranded DNA arrays. Nature Biotech. 17, 573–577 (1999).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Tuerk, C. & Gold, L. Systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment: RNA ligands to bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase. Science 249, 505–510 (1990).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Li, J. J. & Herskowitz, I. Isolation of ORC6, a component of the yeast origin recognition complex by a one-hybrid system. Science 262, 1870–1874 (1993).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Meng, X., Brodsky, M. H. & Wolfe, S. A. A bacterial one-hybrid system for determining the DNA-binding specificity of transcription factors. Nature Biotech. 23, 988–994 (2005).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Matys, V. et al. TRANSFAC and its module TRANSCompel: transcriptional gene regulation in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, D108–D110 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Portales-Casamar, E. et al. JASPAR 2010: the greatly expanded open-access database of transcription factor binding profiles. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, D105–D110 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Newburger, D. E. & Bulyk, M. L. UniPROBE: an online database of protein binding microarray data on protein-DNA interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D77–D82 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Mogno, I., Kwasnieski, J. C. & Cohen, B. A. Massively parallel synthetic promoter assays reveal the in vivo effects of binding site variants. Genome Res. 23, 1908–1915 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar