RNA sequencing: the teenage years (original) (raw)

• Emrich, S. J., Barbazuk, W. B., Li, L. & Schnable, P. S. Gene discovery and annotation using LCM-454 transcriptome sequencing. Genome Res. 17, 69–73 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lister, R. et al. Highly integrated single-base resolution maps of the epigenome in Arabidopsis. Cell 133, 523–536 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Nagalakshmi, U. et al. The transcriptional landscape of the yeast genome defined by RNA sequencing. Science 320, 1344–1350 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Mortazavi, A., Williams, B. A., Mccue, K., Schaeffer, L. & Wold, B. Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat. Methods 5, 621–628 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Marioni, J. C., Mason, C. E., Mane, S. M., Stephens, M. & Gilad, Y. RNA-seq: an assessment of technical reproducibility and comparison with gene expression arrays. Genome Res. 18, 1509–1517 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Cloonan, N. et al. Stem cell transcriptome profiling via massive-scale mRNA sequencing. Nat. Methods 5, 613–619 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wang, E. T. et al. Alternative isoform regulation in human tissue transcriptomes. Nature 456, 470–476 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Djebali, S. et al. Landscape of transcription in human cells. Nature 489, 101–108 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Morris, K. V. & Mattick, J. S. The rise of regulatory RNA. Nat. Rev. Genet. 15, 423–437 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Li, W., Notani, D. & Rosenfeld, M. G. Enhancers as non-coding RNA transcription units: recent insights and future perspectives. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17, 207–223 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Illumina. For all you seq. Illumina https://emea.illumina.com/techniques/sequencing/ngs-library-prep/library-prep-methods.html (2014). A tour de force that includes a graphical abstract, a brief description and primary references for most sequencing methods.
• Garalde, D. R. et al. Highly parallel direct RNA sequencing on an array of nanopores. Nat. Methods 15, 201–206 (2018). The first report of Oxford Nanopore direct sequencing of RNA molecules without reverse transcription or amplification. It reports full-length, strand-specific RNA sequencing and detection of RNA nucleotide analogues.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Smith, A. M. Reading canonical and modified nucleotides in 16S ribosomal RNA using nanopore direct RNA sequencing. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/132274 (2017).
  Article Google Scholar
• Byrne, A. et al. Nanopore long-read RNAseq reveals widespread transcriptional variation among the surface receptors of individual B cells. Nat. Commun. 8, 16027 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sharon, D., Tilgner, H., Grubert, F. & Snyder, M. A single-molecule long-read survey of the human transcriptome. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 1009–1014 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Cartolano, M., Huettel, B., Hartwig, B., Reinhardt, R. & Schneeberger, K. cDNA library enrichment of full length transcripts for SMRT long read sequencing. PLOS ONE 11, e0157779 (2016). A paper comparing the performance of reverse transcriptases for long-read RNA-seq, using Pacific Biosciences Iso-Seq, and discussing the challenges of sequencing full-length transcripts, due to RNA degradation, shearing and incomplete cDNA synthesis.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Dard-Dascot, C. et al. Systematic comparison of small RNA library preparation protocols for next-generation sequencing. BMC Genomics 19, 118 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Giraldez, M. D. et al. Comprehensive multi-center assessment of small RNA-seq methods for quantitative miRNA profiling. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 746–757 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Creecy, J. P. & Conway, T. Quantitative bacterial transcriptomics with RNA-seq. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 23, 133–140 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hör, J., Gorski, S. A. & Vogel, J. Bacterial RNA biology on a genome scale. Mol. Cell 70, 785–799 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Saletore, Y. et al. The birth of the Epitranscriptome: deciphering the function of RNA modifications. Genome Biol. 13, 175 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Schwartz, S. & Motorin, Y. Next-generation sequencing technologies for detection of modified nucleotides in RNAs. RNA Biol. 14, 1124–1137 (2017).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Leinonen, R., Sugawara, H. & Shumway, M. The sequence read archive. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D19–D21 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Su, Z. et al. A comprehensive assessment of RNA-seq accuracy, reproducibility and information content by the Sequencing Quality Control Consortium. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 903–914 (2014). A thorough comparison of RNA-seq platforms and methods, which assesses multiple performance and quality metrics using cell line and control RNAs across multiple sequencing instruments and multiple laboratories.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Li, S. et al. Multi-platform assessment of transcriptome profiling using RNA-seq in the ABRF next-generation sequencing study. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 915–925 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Frankish, A. et al. GENCODE reference annotation for the human and mouse genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D766–D773 (2019).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Piovesan, A., Caracausi, M., Antonaros, F., Pelleri, M. C. & Vitale, L. GeneBase 1.1: a tool to summarize data from NCBI Gene datasets and its application to an update of human gene statistics. Database 2016, baw153 (2016).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Gazzoli, I. et al. Non-sequential and multi-step splicing of the dystrophin transcript. RNA Biol. 13, 290–305 (2016).
  Article PubMed Google Scholar
• Tilgner, H. et al. Microfluidic isoform sequencing shows widespread splicing coordination in the human transcriptome. Genome Res. 28, 231–242 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wu, I., Ben-yehezkel, T., Genomics, L. & Jose, S. A. Single-molecule long-read survey of human transcriptomes using LoopSeq synthetic long read sequencing. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/532135 (2019).
  Article Google Scholar
• Fu, G. K., Hu, J., Wang, P.-H. & Fodor, S. P. Counting individual DNA molecules by the stochastic attachment of diverse labels. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 9026–9031 (2011).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kivioja, T. et al. Counting absolute numbers of molecules using unique molecular identifiers. Nat. Methods 9, 72–74 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Islam, S. et al. Quantitative single-cell RNA-seq with unique molecular identifiers. Nat. Methods 11, 163–166 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Smith, G. R. & Birtwistle, M. R. A mechanistic beta-binomial probability model for mRNA sequencing data. PLOS ONE 11, e0157828 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Oikonomopoulos, S., Wang, Y. C., Djambazian, H., Badescu, D. & Ragoussis, J. Benchmarking of the Oxford Nanopore MinION sequencing for quantitative and qualitative assessment of cDNA populations. Sci. Rep. 6, 31602 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Engström, P. G. et al. Systematic evaluation of spliced alignment programs for RNA-seq data. Nat. Methods 10, 1185–1191 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Thomas, S., Underwood, J. G., Tseng, E. & Holloway, A. K. Long-read sequencing of chicken transcripts and identification of new transcript isoforms. PLOS ONE 9, e94650 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Matz, M. et al. Amplification of cDNA ends based on template-switching effect and step-out PCR. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 27, 1558–1560 (1999).
  CAS Google Scholar
• Ramsköld, D. et al. Full-length mRNA-Seq from single-cell levels of RNA and individual circulating tumor cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 777–782 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ardui, S., Ameur, A., Vermeesch, J. R. & Hestand, M. S. Single molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing comes of age: applications and utilities for medical. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 2159–2168 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bolisetty, M. T., Rajadinakaran, G. & Graveley, B. R. Determining exon connectivity in complex mRNAs by nanopore sequencing. Genome Biol. 16, 204 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Prazsák, I. et al. Long-read sequencing uncovers a complex transcriptome topology in varicella zoster virus. BMC Genomics 19, 873 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Jain, M., Olsen, H. E., Paten, B. & Akeson, M. The Oxford Nanopore MinION: delivery of nanopore sequencing to the genomics community. Genome Biol. 17, 239 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Jain, M. et al. Nanopore sequencing and assembly of a human genome with ultra-long reads. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 338–345 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Workman, R. E. et al. Nanopore native RNA sequencing of a human poly(A) transcriptome. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/459529 (2018).
  Article Google Scholar
• Weirather, J. L. et al. Comprehensive comparison of Pacific Biosciences and Oxford Nanopore Technologies and their applications to transcriptome analysis. F1000Res. 6, 100 (2017). A paper providing an assessment of the power of long-read sequencing in transcriptome analysis. It reports hybrid sequencing through the combination of Illumina short reads with Pacific Biosciences or Nanopore long reads.
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wongsurawat, T., Jenjaroenpun, P., Wassenaar, T. M. & Taylor, D. Decoding the epitranscriptional landscape from native RNA sequences. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/487819 (2018).
  Article Google Scholar
• Tilgner, H., Grubert, F., Sharon, D. & Snyder, M. P. Defining a personal, allele-specific, and single-molecule long-read transcriptome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 9869–9874 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Au, K. F. et al. Characterization of the human ESC transcriptome by hybrid sequencing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, E4821–E4830 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sahraeian, S. M. E. et al. Gaining comprehensive biological insight into the transcriptome by performing a broad-spectrum RNA-seq analysis. Nat. Commun. 8, 59 (2017). A paper that assesses RNA-seq workflows that incorporate RNA variant calling, editing and fusion detection, covering both short- and long-read RNA-seq methods, and that benchmarks 39 analysis tools.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kohli, M. et al. Androgen receptor variant AR-V9 is coexpressed with AR-V7 in prostate cancer metastases and predicts abiraterone resistance. Clin. Cancer Res. 23, 4704–4715 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Quail, M. A. et al. A tale of three next generation sequencing platforms: comparison of Ion Torrent, Pacific Biosciences and Illumina MiSeq sequencers. BMC Genomics 13, 341 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Minoche, A. E. et al. Exploiting single-molecule transcript sequencing for eukaryotic gene prediction. Genome Biol. 16, 184 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Rhoads, A. & Au, K. F. PacBio sequencing and its applications. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 13, 278–289 (2015).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Nottingham, R. M. et al. RNA-seq of human reference RNA samples using a thermostable group II intron reverse transcriptase. RNA 22, 597–613 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zhao, C., Liu, F. & Pyle, A. M. An ultra-processive, accurate reverse transcriptase encoded by a metazoan group II intron. RNA 24, 185–193 (2017).
  Google Scholar
• Antipov, D., Korobeynikov, A., McLean, J. S. & Pevzner, P. A. HybridSPAdes: an algorithm for hybrid assembly of short and long reads. Bioinformatics 32, 1009–1015 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Robert, C. & Watson, M. The incredible complexity of RNA splicing. Genome Biol. 17, 265 (2016).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Parkhomchuk, D. V. Transcriptome analysis by strand-specific sequencing of complementary DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, e123 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Levin, J. Z. et al. Comprehensive comparative analysis of strand-specific RNA sequencing methods. Nat. Methods 7, 709–715 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Morlan, J. D., Qu, K. & Sinicropi, D. V. Selective depletion of rRNA enables whole transcriptome profiling of archival fixed tissue. PLOS ONE 7, e42882 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hafner, M. et al. Identification of microRNAs and other small regulatory RNAs using cDNA library sequencing. Methods 44, 3–12 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chen, Z. & Duan, X. Ribosomal RNA depletion for massively parallel bacterial RNA-sequencing applications. Methods Mol. Biol. 733, 93–103 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Herbert, Z. T. et al. Cross-site comparison of ribosomal depletion kits for Illumina RNAseq library construction. BMC Genomics 19, 199 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zhao, W. et al. Comparison of RNA-Seq by poly (A) capture, ribosomal RNA depletion, and DNA microarray for expression profiling. BMC Genomics 15, 419 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zhao, S., Zhang, Y., Gamini, R., Zhang, B. & Von Schack, D. Evaluation of two main RNA-seq approaches for gene quantification in clinical RNA sequencing: PolyA+ selection versus rRNA depletion. Sci. Rep. 8, 4781 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Tian, B. & Manley, J. L. Alternative polyadenylation of mRNA precursors. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 18–30 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Fullwood, M. J., Wei, C., Liu, E. T. & Ruan, Y. Next-generation DNA sequencing of paired-end tags (PET) for transcriptome and genome analyses. Genome Res. 19, 521–532 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Morrissy, A. S. et al. Next-generation tag sequencing for cancer gene expression profiling. Genome Res. 19, 1825–1835 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Moll, P., Ante, M., Seitz, A. & Reda, T. Q. QuantSeq 3΄ mRNA sequencing for RNA quantification. Nat. Methods 11, 972 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Herzog, V. A. et al. Thiol-linked alkylation of RNA to assess expression dynamics. Nat. Methods 14, 1198–1204 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chen, W. et al. Alternative polyadenylation: methods, findings, and impacts. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 15, 287–300 (2017).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Shepard, P. J., Choi, E., Lu, J., Flanagan, L. A. & Hertel, K. J. Complex and dynamic landscape of RNA polyadenylation revealed by PAS-Seq. RNA 17, 761–772 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chang, H., Lim, J., Ha, M. & Kim, V. N. TAIL-seq: genome-wide determination of poly(A) tail length and 3΄ end modifications. Mol. Cell 53, 1044–1052 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Licatalosi, D. D. et al. HITS-CLIP yields genome-wide insights into brain alternative RNA processing. Nature 456, 464–469 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Murata, M. et al. Detecting expressed genes using CAGE. Methods Mol. Biol. 1164, 67–85 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Batut, P., Dobin, A., Plessy, C., Carninci, P. & Gingeras, T. R. High-fidelity promoter profiling reveals widespread alternative promoter usage and transposon-driven developmental gene expression. Genome Res. 23, 169–180 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Islam, S. et al. Highly multiplexed and strand-specific single-cell RNA 5΄ end sequencing. Nat. Protoc. 7, 813–828 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• The FANTOM Consortium & The RIKEN PMI and CLST (DGT). A promoter-level mammalian expression atlas. Nature 507, 462–470 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Adiconis, X. et al. Comprehensive comparative analysis of 5΄-end RNA-sequencing methods. Nat. Methods 15, 505–511 (2018). A primary reference for users considering CAGE or similar methods.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Parekh, S., Ziegenhain, C., Vieth, B., Enard, W. & Hellmann, I. The impact of amplification on differential expression analyses by RNA-seq. Sci. Rep. 6, 25533 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hong, J. & Gresham, D. Incorporation of unique molecular identifiers in TruSeq adapters improves the accuracy of quantitative sequencing. Biotechniques 63, 221–226 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Fu, Y., Wu, P.-H., Beane, T., Zamore, P. D. & Weng, Z. Elimination of PCR duplicates in RNA-seq and small RNA-seq using unique molecular identifiers. BMC Genomics 19, 531 (2018). A paper reporting that the majority of RNA-seq duplicates are driven by RNA input rather than sequencing depth and PCR cycles. It also shows that computational removal of duplicates can have unintended consequences on the analysis results.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ziegenhain, C. et al. Comparative analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing methods. Mol. Cell 65, 631–643 (2017). A comparison of six scRNA-seq methods that describes the pros and cons of the various approaches and is an excellent introduction to scRNA-seq.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wang, L. et al. Measure transcript integrity using RNA-seq data. BMC Bioinformatics 17, 58 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Romero, I. G., Pai, A. A., Tung, J. & Gilad, Y. RNA-seq: impact of RNA degradation on transcript quantification. BMC Biol. 12, 42 (2014).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Cieslik, M. et al. The use of exome capture RNA-seq for highly degraded RNA with application to clinical cancer sequencing. Genome Res. 25, 1372–1381 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Adiconis, X. et al. Comparative analysis of RNA sequencing methods for degraded or low-input samples. Nat. Methods 10, 623–629 (2013). A paper covering many of the factors that users with low-quality samples must consider before starting RNA-seq experiments.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Schuierer, S. et al. A comprehensive assessment of RNA-seq protocols for degraded and low-quantity samples. BMC Genomics 18, 442 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hodges, E. et al. Genome-wide in situ exon capture for selective resequencing. Nat. Genet. 39, 1522–1527 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sigurgeirsson, B., Emanuelsson, O. & Lundeberg, J. Sequencing degraded RNA addressed by 3΄ tag counting. PLOS ONE 9, e91851 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Li, W. et al. Comprehensive evaluation of AmpliSeq transcriptome, a novel targeted whole transcriptome RNA sequencing methodology for global gene expression analysis. BMC Genomics 16, 1069 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lamarre, S. et al. Optimization of an RNA-Seq differential gene expression analysis depending on biological replicate number and library size. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 108 (2018).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hansen, K. D., Wu, Z., Irizarry, R. A. & Leek, J. T. Sequencing technology does not eliminate biological variability. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 572–573 (2011). Required reading for anyone considering RNA-seq or other -omics technologies. A well-written reminder of why quantitative RNA experiments will always need replicates, even if RNA assay technologies were perfect. The authors caution users against being over-enthusiastic about new technologies and discarding lessons learned about experimental design.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Norton, S. S., Vaquero-Garcia, J., Lahens, N. F., Grant, G. R. & Barash, Y. Outlier detection for improved differential splicing quantification from RNA-Seq experiments with replicates. Bioinformatics 34, 1488–1497 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Busby, M. A., Stewart, C., Miller, C. A., Grzeda, K. R. & Marth, G. T. Scotty: a web tool for designing RNA-Seq experiments to measure differential gene expression. Bioinformatics 29, 656–657 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wu, Z. & Wu, H. in Statistical Genomics: Methods and Protocols (eds Mathé, E. & Davis, S.) 379–390 (Humana Press, 2016).
• Wu, H., Wang, C. & Wu, Z. PROPER: comprehensive power evaluation for differential expression using RNA-seq. Bioinformatics 31, 233–241 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gaye, A. Extending the R Library PROPER to enable power calculations for isoform-level analysis with EBSeq. Front. Genet. 7, 225 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Schurch, N. J. et al. How many biological replicates are needed in an RNA-seq experiment and which differential expression tool should you use? RNA 22, 1641–1641 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Montgomery, S. B. et al. Transcriptome genetics using second generation sequencing in a Caucasian population. Nature 464, 773–777 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• The ENCODE Consortium. Standards, guidelines and best practices for RNA-Seq — V1.0 (June 2011). UCSC https://genome.ucsc.edu/ENCODE/protocols/dataStandards/ENCODE_RNAseq_Standards_V1.0.pdf (2011).
• Conesa, A. et al. A survey of best practices for RNA-seq data analysis. Genome Biol. 17, 13 (2016). An overview of computational tools and methods used in RNA-seq analysis.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lei, R., Ye, K., Gu, Z. & Sun, X. Diminishing returns in next-generation sequencing (NGS) transcriptome data. Gene 557, 82–87 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Li, B. & Dewey, C. N. RSEM: Accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 323 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chhangawala, S., Rudy, G., Mason, C. E. & Rosenfeld, J. A. The impact of read length on quantification of differentially expressed genes and splice junction detection. Genome Biol. 16, 131 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Katz, Y., Wang, E. T., Airoldi, E. M. & Burge, C. B. Analysis and design of RNA sequencing experiments for identifying isoform regulation. Nat. Methods 7, 1009–1015 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Alamancos, G. P., Agirre, E. & Eyras, E. Methods to study splicing from high-throughput RNA sequencing data. Methods Mol. Biol. 1126, 357–397 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Seyednasrollah, F., Laiho, A. & Elo, L. L. Comparison of software packages for detecting differential expression in RNA-seq studies. Brief. Bioinform. 16, 59–70 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Williams, C. R., Baccarella, A., Parrish, J. Z. & Kim, C. C. Empirical assessment of analysis workflows for differential expression analysis of human samples using RNA-seq. BMC Bioinformatics 18, 38 (2017). A useful overview of several popular computational analysis tools and how they can be used in combination.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Cock, P. J. A., Fields, C. J., Goto, N., Heuer, M. L. & Rice, P. M. The Sanger FASTQ file format for sequences with quality scores, and the Solexa/Illumina FASTQ variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 1767–1771 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kim, D. et al. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 14, R36 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, (15–21 (2013).
  Google Scholar
• Kim, D., Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat. Methods 12, 357–360 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Trapnell, C. et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 511–515 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Pertea, M., Kim, D., Pertea, G., Leek, J. T. & Steven, L. Transcript-level expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with HISAT, StringTie, and Ballgown. Nat. Protoc. 11, 1650–1667 (2017).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Xie, Y. et al. SOAPdenovo-Trans: De novo transcriptome assembly with short RNA-Seq reads. Bioinformatics 30, 1660–1666 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Patro, R., Mount, S. M. & Kingsford, C. Sailfish enables alignment-free isoform quantification from RNA-seq reads using lightweight algorithms. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 462–464 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bray, N. L., Pimentel, H., Melsted, P. & Pachter, L. Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 4–8 (2016).
  Google Scholar
• Patro, R., Duggal, G., Love, M. I., Irizarry, R. A. & Kingsford, C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat. Methods 14, 417–419 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wu, D. C., Yao, J., Ho, K. S., Lambowitz, A. M. & Wilke, C. O. Limitations of alignment-free tools in total RNA-seq quantification. BMC Genomics 19, 510 (2018). A useful comparison of popular mRNA-seq analysis methods, with particular emphasis on alignment-free tools.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Yang, C., Wu, P.-Y., Tong, L., Phan, J. H. & Wang, M. D. The impact of RNA-seq aligners on gene expression estimation. ACM BMB 9, 462–471 (2016).
  Google Scholar
• Robert, C. & Watson, M. Errors in RNA-Seq quantification affect genes of relevance to human disease. Genome Biol. 16, 177 (2015). An experimental demonstration of the importance of read mapping and quantification in the computational analysis of mRNA-seq experiments. This paper clearly describes the impact that different alignments and quantification methods can have on biological conclusions.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zytnicki, M. mmquant: how to count multi-mapping reads? BMC Bioinformatics 18, 411 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• McDermaid, A. et al. A new machine learning-based framework for mapping uncertainty analysis in RNA-Seq read alignment and gene expression estimation. Front. Genet. 9, 313 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Fonseca, N. A., Marioni, J. C. & Brazma, A. RNA-Seq gene profiling — a systematic empirical comparison. PLOS ONE 9, e107026 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Teng, M. et al. A benchmark for RNA-seq quantification pipelines. Genome Biol. 17, 74 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Quinn, T. P., Crowley, T. M. & Richardson, M. F. Benchmarking differential expression analysis tools for RNA-Seq: normalization-based versus log-ratio transformation-based methods. BMC Bioinformatics 19, 274 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Vijay, N., Poelstra, J. W., Künstner, A. & Wolf, J. B. W. Challenges and strategies in transcriptome assembly and differential gene expression quantification. A comprehensive in silico assessment of RNA-seq experiments. Mol. Ecol. 22, 620–634 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Soneson, C., Love, M. I. & Robinson, M. D. Differential analyses for RNA-seq: transcript-level estimates improve gene-level inferences. F1000Res. 4, 1521 (2016).
  Article PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Trapnell, C. et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nat. Protoc. 7, 562–578 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Turro, E. et al. Haplotype and isoform specific expression estimation using multi-mapping RNA-seq reads. Genome Biol. 12, R13 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Anders, S., Pyl, P. T. & Huber, W. HTSeq — a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31, 166–169 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30, 923–930 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Risso, D., Schwartz, K., Sherlock, G. & Dudoit, S. GC-content normalization for RNA-seq data. BMC Bioinformatics 12, 480 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wagner, G. P., Kin, K. & Lynch, V. J. Measurement of mRNA abundance using RNA-seq data: RPKM measure is inconsistent among samples. Theory Biosci. 131, 281–285 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Risso, D., Ngai, J., Speed, T. P. & Dudoit, S. Normalization of RNA-seq data using factor analysis of control genes or samples. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 896–902 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bourgon, R., Gentleman, R. & Huber, W. Independent filtering increases detection power for high-throughput experiments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 9456–9551 (2010).
  Article Google Scholar
• Bullard, J. H., Purdom, E., Hansen, K. D. & Dudoit, S. Evaluation of statistical methods for normalization and differential expression in mRNA-Seq experiments. BMC 11, 94–107 (2010).
  Google Scholar
• Dillies, M. A. et al. A comprehensive evaluation of normalization methods for Illumina high-throughput RNA sequencing data analysis. Brief. Bioinform. 14, 671–683 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Li, X. et al. A comparison of per sample global scaling and per gene normalization methods for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. PLOS ONE 12, e0176185 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Robinson, M. D. & Oshlack, A. A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 11, R25 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Robinson, M. D., Mccarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Chen, K. et al. The overlooked fact: fundamental need for spike-in control for virtually all genome-wide analyses. Mol. Cell. Biol. 36, 662–667 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hardwick, S. A., Deveson, I. W. & Mercer, T. R. Reference standards for next-generation sequencing. Nat. Rev. Genet. 18, 473–484 (2017). A review of the use of spike-in controls and their associated statistical principles. It introduces readers to the concept of commutability: the ability of a spike-in control to perform comparably to experimental RNA samples.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Pine, P. S. et al. Evaluation of the External RNA Controls Consortium (ERCC) reference material using a modified Latin square design. BMC Biotechnol. 16, 54 (2016).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Paul, L. et al. SIRVs: spike-in RNA variants as external isoform controls in RNA-sequencing. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/080747 (2016).
• Hardwick, S. A. et al. Spliced synthetic genes as internal controls in RNA sequencing experiments. Nat. Methods 13, 792–798 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lovén, J. et al. Revisiting global gene expression analysis. Cell 151, 476–482 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Risso, D., Ngai, J., Speed, T. & Dudoit, S. in Statistical Analysis of Next Generation Sequencing Data (eds Datta, S. & Nettleton, D.) 169–190 (Springer, 2014).
• Qing, T., Yu, Y., Du, T. T. & Shi, L. M. mRNA enrichment protocols determine the quantification characteristics of external RNA spike-in controls in RNA-Seq studies. Sci. China Life Sci. 56, 134–142 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Leshkowitz, D. et al. Using synthetic mouse spike-in transcripts to evaluate RNA-seq analysis tools. PLOS ONE 11, e0153782 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lun, A. T. L., Calero-nieto, F. J., Haim-vilmovsky, L., Göttgens, B. & Marioni, J. C. Assessing the reliability of spike-in normalization for analyses of single-cell RNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 27, 1795–1806 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ritchie, M. E. et al. Limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e47 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Love, M. I., Huber, W. & Anders, S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 15, 550 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Law, C. W., Chen, Y., Shi, W. & Smyth, G. K. Voom: precision weights unlock linear model analysis tools for RNA-seq read counts. Genome Biol. 15, R29 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Frazee, A. et al. Ballgown bridges the gap between transcriptome assembly and expression analysis. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 243–246 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Rapaport, F. et al. Comprehensive evaluation of differential gene expression analysis methods for RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 14, R95 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Montoro, D. T. et al. A revised airway epithelial hierarchy includes CFTR-expressing ionocytes. Nature 560, 319–324 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Asp, M. et al. Spatial detection of fetal marker genes expressed at low level in adult human heart tissue. Sci. Rep. 7, 12941 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Tang, F. et al. mRNA-Seq whole-transcriptome analysis of a single cell. Nat. Methods 6, 377–382 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Stegle, O., Teichmann, S. A. & Marioni, J. C. Computational and analytical challenges in single-cell transcriptomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16, 133–145 (2015). This review provides an overview and in-depth discussion of scRNA-seq transcript quantitation methods. The authors highlight the analytical challenges that are unique to single-cell experiments.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Svensson, V., Vento-Tormo, R. & Teichmann, S. A. Exponential scaling of single-cell RNA-seq in the past decade. Nat. Protoc. 13, 599–604 (2018). This review is an excellent introduction to the full range of single-cell sequencing methods.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Leelatian, N. et al. Single cell analysis of human tissues and solid tumors with mass cytometry. Cytometry B 92, 68–78 (2018). A useful description of the pitfalls of tissue dissociation for users of single-cell sequencing to consider.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Hines, W. C., Su, Y., Kuhn, I., Polyak, K. & Bissell, M. J. Sorting out the FACS: a devil in the details. Cell Rep. 6, 779–781 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Islam, S. et al. Characterization of the single-cell transcriptional landscape by highly multiplex RNA-seq. Genome Res. 21, 1160–1167 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Brennecke, P. et al. Accounting for technical noise in single-cell RNA-seq experiments. Nat. Methods 10, 1093–1098 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Goldstein, L. D. et al. Massively parallel nanowell-based single-cell gene expression profiling. BMC Genomics 18, 519 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Macosko, E. Z. et al. Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets. Cell 161, 1202–1214 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Klein, A. M. et al. Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells. Cell 161, 1187–1201 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Cao, J. et al. Comprehensive single cell transcriptional profiling of a multicellular organism by combinatorial indexing. Science 357, 661–667 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, A. B. et al. Single cell profiling of the developing mouse brain and spinal cord with split-pool barcoding. Science 360, 176–182 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hashimshony, T. et al. CEL-Seq2: sensitive highly-multiplexed single-cell RNA-Seq. Genome Biol. 17, 77 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sena, J. A. et al. Unique molecular identifiers reveal a novel sequencing artefact with implications for RNA-Seq based gene expression analysis. Sci. Rep. 8, 13121 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Dal Molin, A. & Di Camillo, B. How to design a single-cell RNA-sequencing experiment: pitfalls, challenges and perspectives. Brief. Bioinform. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bby007 (2018).
  Article Google Scholar
• Picelli, S. et al. Full-length RNA-seq from single cells using Smart-seq2. Nat. Protoc. 9, 171–181 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hashimshony, T., Wagner, F., Sher, N. & Yanai, I. CEL-Seq: single-cell RNA-Seq by multiplexed linear amplification. Cell Rep. 2, 666–673 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• 10x Genomics. Application note. Chromium™ — transcriptional profiling of 1.3 million brain cells with the Chromium single cell 3΄ solution. 10x Genomics http://go.10xgenomics.com/l/172142/2017-06-09/bsylz/172142/31729/LIT000015_Chromium_Million_Brain_Cells_Application_Note_Digital_RevA.pdf (2018).
• Regev, A. et al. The human cell atlas. eLife 6, e27041 (2017).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Insel, T. R., Landis, S. C. & Collins, F. S. The NIH BRAIN initiative. 340, 687–689 (2013).
• Young, M. D. et al. Single-cell transcriptomes from human kidneys reveal the cellular identity of renal tumors. Science 599, 594–599 (2018).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Hui Ryu, K., Huang, L., Min Kang, H. & Schiefelbein, J. Single-cell RNA sequencing resolves molecular relationships among individual plant cells. Plant Physiol. 179, 1444–1456 (2019).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Chen, J. et al. Spatial transcriptomic analysis of cryosectioned tissue samples with Geo-seq. Nat. Protoc. 12, 566–580 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Stahl, P. L. et al. Visualization and analysis of gene expression in tissue sections by spatial transcriptomics. Science 353, 78–82 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Rodriques, S. G. et al. Slide-seq: a scalable technology for measuring genome-wide expression at high spatial resolution. Science 1467, 1463–1467 (2019).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Crosetto, N., Bienko, M. & van Oudenaarden, A. Spatially resolved transcriptomics and beyond. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16, 57–66 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Moor, A. E. & Itzkovitz, S. Spatial transcriptomics: paving the way for tissue-level systems biology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 46, 126–133 (2017). This review of spatial RNA-seq methods introduces the main methods in more detail and discusses some of the technical challenges that remain to be resolved.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lein, E., Borm, L. E. & Linnarsson, S. The promise of spatial transcriptomics for neuroscience in the era of molecular cell typing. Science 358, 64–69 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Datta, S. et al. Laser capture microdissection: big data from small samples. Histol. Histopathol. 30, 1255–1269 (2015).
  CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lovatt, D., Bell, T. & Eberwine, J. Single-neuron isolation for RNA analysis using pipette capture and laser capture microdissection. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2015, 60–68 (2015).
  Article Google Scholar
• Cubi, R. et al. Laser capture microdissection enables transcriptomic analysis of dividing and quiescent liver stages of Plasmodium relapsing species. Cell. Microbiol. 19, e12735 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Giacomello, S. et al. Spatially resolved transcriptome profiling in model plant species. Nat. Plants 3, 17061 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Moncada, R. et al. Integrating single-cell RNA-Seq with spatial transcriptomics in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using multimodal intersection analysis. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/254375 (2018).
  Article Google Scholar
• Ke, R. In situ sequencing for RNA analysis in preserved tissue and cells. Nat. Methods 10, 857–860 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Chen, K. H., Boettiger, A. N., Moffitt, J. R., Wang, S. & Zhuang, X. Spatially resolved, highly multiplexed RNA profiling in single cells. Science 348, aaa6090 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lubeck, E., Coskun, A. F., Zhiyentayev, T., Ahmad, M. & Cai, L. Single-cell in situ RNA profiling by sequential hybridization. Nat. Methods 11, 360–361 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wang, X. et al. Three-dimensional intact-tissue sequencing of single-cell transcriptional states. Science 361, eaat5691 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lee, J. H. et al. Highly multiplexed subcellular RNA sequencing in situ. Science 343, 1360–1363 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wang, G., Moffitt, J. R. & Zhuang, X. Multiplexed imaging of high-density libraries of RNAs with MERFISH and expansion microscopy. Sci. Rep. 8, 4847 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Pichon, X., Lagha, M., Mueller, F. & Bertrand, E. A. Growing toolbox to image gene expression in single cells: sensitive approaches for demanding challenges. Mol. Cell 71, 468–480 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Maniatis, S. et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of molecular pathology in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Science 93, 89–93 (2019).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Svensson, V., Teichmann, S. A. & Stegle, O. SpatialDE: identification of spatially variable genes. Nat. Methods 15, 343–346 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Edsgärd, D., Johnsson, P. & Sandberg, R. Identification of spatial expression trends in single-cell gene expression data. Nat. Methods 15, 339–342 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Core, L. J., Waterfall, J. & Lis, J. Nascent RNA sequencing reveals widespread pausing and divergent initiation at human promoters. Science 322, 1845–1848 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Core, L. J. & Lis, J. T. Transcription regulation through promoter-proximal pausing of RNA polymerase II. Science 319, 1791–1792 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Skalska, L., Beltran-nebot, M., Ule, J. & Jenner, R. G. Regulatory feedback from nascent RNA to chromatin and transcription. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18, 331–337 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tani, H. et al. Genome-wide determination of RNA stability reveals hundreds of short-lived noncoding transcripts in mammals. Genome Res. 22, 947–956 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Paulsen, M. T. et al. Coordinated regulation of synthesis and stability of RNA during the acute TNF-induced proinflammatory response. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 2240–2245 (2013).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kwak, H., Fuda, N. J., Core, L. J. & Lis, J. T. Precise maps of RNA polymerase reveal how promoters direct initiation and pausing. Science 339, 950–953 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Nojima, T., Gomes, T., Carmo-fonseca, M. & Proudfoot, N. J. Mammalian NET-seq analysis defines nascent RNA profiles and associated RNA processing genome-wide. Nat. Protoc. 11, 413–428 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Nagari, A., Murakami, S., Malladi, V. S. & Kraus, W. L. Computational approaches for mining GRO-Seq data to identify and characterize active enhancers. Methods Mol. Biol. 1468, 121–138 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kruesi, W. S., Core, L. J., Waters, C. T., Lis, J. T. & Meyer, B. J. Condensin controls recruitment of RNA polymerase II to achieve nematode X-chromosome dosage compensation. eLife 18, e00808 (2013).
  Article Google Scholar
• Scruggs, B. S. et al. Bidirectional transcription arises from two distinct hubs of transcription factor binding and active chromatin. Mol. Cell 58, 1101–1112 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Churchman, L. S. & Weissman, J. S. Nascent transcript sequencing visualizes transcription at nucleotide resolution. Nature 469, 368–373 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nojima, T. et al. Mammalian NET-Seq reveals genome-wide nascent transcription coupled to RNA processing. Cell 161, 526–540 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wallace, E. W. J. & Beggs, J. D. Extremely fast and incredibly close: cotranscriptional splicing in budding yeast. RNA 23, 601–610 (2017).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Rabani, M. et al. Metabolic labeling of RNA uncovers principles of RNA production and degradation dynamics in mammalian cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 436–442 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Schwalb, B. et al. TT-seq maps the human transient transcriptome. Science 352, 1225–1228 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Marzi, M. J. & Nicassio, F. Uncovering the stability of mature miRNAs by 4-thio-uridine metabolic labeling. Methods Mol. Biol. 1823, 141–152 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Riml, C. et al. Osmium-mediated transformation of 4-thiouridine to cytidine as key to study RNA dynamics by sequencing. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 13479–13483 (2017).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Schofield, J. A., Duffy, E. E., Kiefer, L., Sullivan, M. C. & Simon, M. D. TimeLapse-seq: adding a temporal dimension to RNA sequencing through nucleoside recoding. Nat. Methods 15, 221–225 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Muhar, M. et al. SLAM-seq defines direct gene-regulatory functions of the BRD4-MYC axis. Science 360, 800–805 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Matsushima, W. et al. SLAM-ITseq: sequencing cell type-specific transcriptomes without cell sorting. Development 145, dev164640 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Jürges, C., Dölken, L. & Erhard, F. Dissecting newly transcribed and old RNA using GRAND-SLAM. Bioinformatics 34, 218–226 (2018).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Shah, S. et al. Dynamics and spatial genomics of the nascent transcriptome by intron seqFISH. Cell 174, 363–376 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Johannes, G., Carter, M. S., Eisen, M. B., Brown, P. O. & Sarnow, P. Identification of eukaryotic mRNAs that are translated at reduced cap binding complex eIF4F concentrations using a cDNA microarray. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 13118–13123 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Yamashita, R. et al. Genome-wide characterization of transcriptional start sites in humans by integrative transcriptome analysis. Genome Res. 21, 775–789 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ingolia, N. T., Ghaemmaghami, S., Newman, J. R. S. & Weissman, J. S. Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling. Science 324, 218–223 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wang, E. T. et al. Dysregulation of mRNA localization and translation in genetic disease. J. Neurosci. 36, 11418–11426 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Parker, M. W. et al. Fibrotic extracellular matrix activates a profibrotic positive feedback loop. J. Clin. Invest. 124, 1622–1635 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Moreno, J. A. et al. Sustained translational repression by eIF2a–P mediates prion neurodegeneration. Nature 485, 507–511 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bhat, M. et al. Targeting the translation machinery in cancer. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 14, 261–278 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Leibovitch, M. & Topisirovic, I. Dysregulation of mRNA translation and energy metabolism in cancer. Adv. Biol. Regul. 67, 30–39 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Liang, S. et al. Polysome-profiling in small tissue samples. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, e3 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Picelli, S. et al. Tn5 transposase and tagmentation procedures for massively scaled sequencing projects. Genome Res. 24, 2033–2040 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Floor, S. N., Doudna, J. A., States, U. & Initiative, I. G. Tunable protein synthesis by transcript isoforms in human cells. eLife 5, e10921 (2016).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Blair, J. et al. Widespread translational remodeling during human neuronal differentiation. Cell Rep. 21, 2005–2016 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Steitz, J. Polypeptide chain initiation: nucleotide sequences of the three ribosomal binding sites in bacteriophage R17 RNA. Nature 224, 957–964 (1969).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hsu, P. Y. et al. Super-resolution ribosome profiling reveals unannotated translation events in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E7126–E7135 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• McGlincy, N. J. & Ingolia, N. T. Transcriptome-wide measurement of translation by ribosome profiling. Methods 126, 112–129 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Calviello, L. & Ohler, U. Beyond read-counts: ribo-seq data analysis to understand the functions of the transcriptome. Trends Genet. 33, 728–744 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Erhard, F. et al. Improved Ribo-seq enables identification of cryptic translation events. Nat. Methods 15, 363–366 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Li, W., Wang, W., Uren, P. J., Penalva, L. O. F. & Smith, A. D. Riborex: fast and flexible identification of differential translation from Ribo-seq data. Bioinformatics 33, 1735–1737 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zhong, Y. et al. RiboDiff: Detecting changes of mRNA translation efficiency from ribosome footprints. Bioinformatics 33, 139–141 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Paulet, D., David, A. & Rivals, E. Ribo-seq enlightens codon usage bias. DNA Res. 24, 303–310 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Gao, X. et al. Quantitative profiling of initiating ribosomes in vivo. Nat. Methods 12, 147–153 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Archer, S. K., Shirokikh, N. E., Beilharz, T. H. & Preiss, T. Dynamics of ribosome scanning and recycling revealed by translation complex profiling. Nature 535, 570–574 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Iwasaki, S. & Ingolia, N. T. The growing toolbox for protein synthesis studies. Trends Biochem. Sci. 42, 612–624 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kwok, C. K., Tang, Y., Assmann, S. M. & Bevilacqua, P. C. The RNA structurome: transcriptome-wide structure probing with next-generation sequencing. Trends Biochem. Sci. 40, 221–232 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Holley, R. W. et al. Structure of a ribonucleic acid. Science 147, 1462–1465 (1965).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Merino, E. J., Wilkinson, K. A., Coughlan, J. L. & Weeks, K. M. RNA structure analysis at single nucleotide resolution by selective 2΄-hydroxyl acylation and primer extension (SHAPE). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 4223–4231 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Strobel, E. J., Yu, A. M. & Lucks, J. B. High-throughput determination of RNA structures. Nat. Rev. Genet. 19, 615–634 (2018). A good introduction to RNA structural analysis using RNA-seq.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kertesz, M. et al. Genome-wide measurement of RNA secondary structure in yeast. Nature 467, 103–107 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Underwood, J. G. et al. FragSeq: Transcriptome-wide RNA structure probing using high-throughput sequencing. Nat. Methods 7, 995–1001 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lucks, J. B. et al. Multiplexed RNA structure characterization with selective 2΄-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension sequencing (SHAPE-Seq). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 11063–11068 (2011).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ding, Y. et al. In vivo genome-wide profiling of RNA secondary structure reveals novel regulatory features. Nature 505, 696–700 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Rouskin, S., Zubradt, M., Washietl, S., Kellis, M. & Weissman, J. S. Genome-wide probing of RNA structure reveals active unfolding of mRNA structures in vivo. Nature 505, 701–705 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Siegfried, N. A., Busan, S., Rice, G. M., Nelson, J. A. E. & Weeks, K. M. RNA motif discovery by SHAPE and mutational profiling (SHAPE-MaP). Nat. Methods 11, 959–965 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zubradt, M. et al. DMS-MaPseq for genome-wide or targeted RNA structure probing in vivo. Nat. Methods 14, 75–82 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Incarnato, D. et al. In vivo probing of nascent RNA structures reveals principles of cotranscriptional folding. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 9716–9725 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Novoa, E. M., Beaudoin, J., Giraldez, A. J., Mattick, J. S. & Kellis, M. Best practices for genome-wide RNA structure analysis: combination of mutational profiles and drop-off information. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/176883 (2017).
  Article Google Scholar
• Lee, B. et al. Comparison of SHAPE reagents for mapping RNA structures inside living cells. RNA 23, 169–174 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Tang, Y., Assmann, S. M. & Bevilacqua, P. C. Protein structure is related to RNA structural reactivity in vivo. J. Mol. Biol. 428, 758–766 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Jain, A. & Vale, R. D. RNA phase transitions in repeat expansion disorders. Nature 546, 243–247 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Warner, K. D., Hajdin, C. E. & Weeks, K. M. Principles for targeting RNA with drug-like small molecules. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 17, 547–558 (2018).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kudla, G., Granneman, S., Hahn, D., Beggs, J. D. & Tollervey, D. Cross-linking, ligation, and sequencing of hybrids reveals RNA–RNA interactions in yeast. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 10010–10015 (2011).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kretz, M. et al. Control of somatic tissue differentiation by the long non-coding RNA TINCR. Nature 493, 231–235 (2013).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Engreitz, J. M. et al. RNA-RNA interactions enable specific targeting of noncoding RNAs to nascent pre-mRNAs and chromatin sites. Cell 159, 188–199 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Lu, Z. et al. RNA duplex map in living cells reveals higher-order transcriptome structure. Cell 165, 1267–1279 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Aw, J. G. et al. In vivo mapping of eukaryotic RNA interactomes reveals principles of higher-order organization and regulation. Mol. Cell 62, 603–617 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sharma, E. et al. Global mapping of human RNA-RNA interactions. Mol. Cell 62, 618–626 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Gong, J. et al. RISE: a database of RNA interactome from sequencing experiments. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 194–201 (2018).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Zhang, X. et al. RAID: a comprehensive resource for human RNA-associated (RNA–RNA/RNA–protein) interaction. RNA 20, 989–993 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Schönberger, B., Schaal, C., Schäfer, R. & Voß, B. RNA interactomics: recent advances and remaining challenges. F1000Res. 7, 1824 (2018).
  Article Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. S., Mortazavi, A., Myers, R. M. & Wold, B. Genome-wide mapping of in vivo protein-DNA interactions. Science 316, 1497–1502 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tenenbaum, S. A., Carson, C. C., Lager, P. J. & Keene, J. D. Identifying mRNA subsets in messenger ribonucleoprotein complexes by using cDNA arrays. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 14085–14090 (2000).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Zhao, J. et al. Genome-wide Identification of Polycomb-Associated RNAs by RIP-seq. Mol. Cell 40, 939–953 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Mili, S. & Steitz, J. Evidence for reassociation of RNA-binding proteins after cell lysis: Implications for the interpretation of immunoprecipitation analyses. RNA 10, 1692–1694 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Niranjanakumari, S., Lasda, E. & Brazas, R. Reversible cross-linking combined with immunoprecipitation to study RNA–protein interactions in vivo. Methods 26, 182–190 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hendrickson, G., Kelley, D., Tenen, D., Bernstein, D. & Rinn, J. Widespread RNA binding by chromatin-associated proteins. Genome Biol. 17, 28 (2016).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Ule, J. et al. CLIP identifies Nova-regulated RNA networks in the brain. Science 302, 1212–1215 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• König, J. et al. iCLIP reveals the function of hnRNP particles in splicing at individual nucleotide resolution. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 909–915 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Hafner, M. et al. Transcriptome-wide identification of RNA-binding protein and microRNA target sites by PAR-CLIP. Cell 141, 129–141 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Garzia, A., Meyer, C., Morozov, P., Sajek, M. & Tuschl, T. Optimization of PAR-CLIP for transcriptome-wide identification of binding sites of RNA-binding proteins. Methods 118, 24–40 (2017).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Zarnegar, B. J. et al. IrCLIP platform for efficient characterization of protein-RNA interactions. Nat. Methods 13, 489–492 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Van Nostrand, E. L. et al. Robust transcriptome-wide discovery of RNA-binding protein binding sites with enhanced CLIP (eCLIP). Nat. Methods 13, 508–514 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Nostrand, E. L. Van et al. A large-scale binding and functional map of human RNA binding proteins. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/179648 (2017).
  Article Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti, A. M., Haberman, N., Praznik, A., Luscombe, N. M. & Ule, J. Data science issues in studying protein–RNA interactions with CLIP technologies. Annu. Rev. 1, 235–261 (2018).
  Google Scholar
• Lee, F. C. Y. & Ule, J. Advances in CLIP technologies for studies of protein-RNA interactions. Mol. Cell 69, 354–369 (2018). A review of RNA–protein interaction methods, with a 5-page table describing the methodological advances of each. Vital reading for anyone considering CLIP–seq analysis.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Buenrostro, J. D. et al. Quantitative analysis of RNA-protein interactions on a massively parallel array reveals biophysical and evolutionary landscapes. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 562–568 (2014).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Cook, K. B., Hughes, T. R. & Morris, Q. D. High-throughput characterization of protein-RNA interactions. Brief. Funct. Genomics 14, 74–89 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Wang, Z., Gerstein, M. & Snyder, M. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 57–63 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Doebele, R. C. et al. An oncogenic NTRK fusion in a patient with soft-tissue sarcoma with response to the tropomyosin-related kinase inhibitor. Cancer Discov. 5, 1049–1057 (2015).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Byron, S. A., Van Keuren-Jensen, K. R., Engelthaler, D. M., Carpten, J. D. & Craig, D. W. Translating RNA sequencing into clinical diagnostics: opportunities and challenges. Nat. Rev. Genet. 17, 257–271 (2016).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar