Chromatin and the genome integrity network (original) (raw)

• Ciccia, A. & Elledge, S. J. The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. Mol. Cell 40, 179–204 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Branzei, D. & Foiani, M. Maintaining genome stability at the replication fork. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 208–219 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Gordon, D. J., Resio, B. & Pellman, D. Causes and consequences of aneuploidy in cancer. Nature Rev. Genet. 13, 189–203 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Symington, L. S. & Gautier, J. Double-strand break end resection and repair pathway choice. Annu. Rev. Genet. 45, 247–271 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Green, C. M. & Almouzni, G. When repair meets chromatin. EMBO Rep. 3, 28–33 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kent, N. A., Chambers, A. L. & Downs, J. A. Dual chromatin remodeling roles for RSC during DNA double strand break induction and repair at the yeast MAT locus. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 27693–27701 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Shim, E. Y. et al. RSC mobilizes nucleosomes to improve accessibility of repair machinery to the damaged chromatin. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 1602–1613 (2007). This work demonstrates a role for the RSC complex in chromatin-remodelling nucleosomes that are proximal to a DSB.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Berkovich, E., Monnat, R. J. Jr & Kastan, M. B. Roles of ATM and NBS1 in chromatin structure modulation and DNA double-strand break repair. Nature Cell Biol. 9, 683–690 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tsukuda, T. et al. INO80-dependent chromatin remodeling regulates early and late stages of mitotic homologous recombination. DNA Repair 8, 360–369 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Shim, E. Y., Ma, J. L., Oum, J. H., Yanez, Y. & Lee, S. E. The yeast chromatin remodeler RSC complex facilitates end joining repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 3934–3944 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chai, B., Huang, J., Cairns, B. R. & Laurent, B. C. Distinct roles for the RSC and SWI/SNF ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers in DNA double-strand break repair. Genes Dev. 19, 1656–1661 (2005). In this paper, it is shown that the SWI/SNF complex is essential for homologous recombination in heterochromatin in vivo , and a late role for the RSC enzyme during homologous recombination is suggested.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Papamichos-Chronakis, M., Krebs, J. E. & Peterson, C. L. Interplay between INO80 and SWR1 chromatin remodeling enzymes regulates cell cycle checkpoint adaptation in response to DNA damage. Genes Dev. 20, 2437–2449 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Neumann, F. R. et al. Targeted INO80 enhances subnuclear chromatin movement and ectopic homologous recombination. Genes Dev. 26, 369–383 (2012). In this intriguing work, it is indicated that the INO80 chromatin-remodelling enzyme can promote large-scale chromosome movements when tethered to a DNA locus.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• van Attikum, H., Fritsch, O., Hohn, B. & Gasser, S. M. Recruitment of the INO80 complex by H2A phosphorylation links ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling with DNA double-strand break repair. Cell 119, 777–788 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Chen, X. et al. The Fun30 nucleosome remodeller promotes resection of DNA double-strand break ends. Nature 489, 576–580 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Eapen, V. V., Sugawara, N., Tsabar, M., Wu, W. H. & Haber, J. E. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromatin remodeler Fun30 regulates DNA end-resection and checkpoint deactivation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 32, 4727–4740 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Fritsch, O., Benvenuto, G., Bowler, C., Molinier, J. & Hohn, B. The INO80 protein controls homologous recombination in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Cell 16, 479–485 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• van Attikum, H., Fritsch, O. & Gasser, S. M. Distinct roles for SWR1 and INO80 chromatin remodeling complexes at chromosomal double-strand breaks. EMBO J. 26, 4113–4125 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kalocsay, M., Hiller, N. J. & Jentsch, S. Chromosome-wide Rad51 spreading and SUMO-H2A.Z-dependent chromosome fixation in response to a persistent DNA double-strand break. Mol. Cell 33, 335–343 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Xu, Y. et al. The p400 ATPase regulates nucleosome stability and chromatin ubiquitination during DNA repair. J. Cell Biol. 191, 31–43 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kruhlak, M. J. et al. Changes in chromatin structure and mobility in living cells at sites of DNA double-strand breaks. J. Cell Biol. 172, 823–834 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Nakamura, K. et al. Regulation of homologous recombination by RNF20-dependent H2B ubiquitination. Mol. Cell 41, 515–528 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Fierz, B. et al. Histone H2B ubiquitylation disrupts local and higher-order chromatin compaction. Nature Chem. Biol. 7, 113–119 (2011). This elegant biochemical study demonstrates that H2Bub disrupts chromatin higher-order folding.
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Ogiwara, H. et al. Histone acetylation by CBP and p300 at double-strand break sites facilitates SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling and the recruitment of non-homologous end joining factors. Oncogene 30, 2135–2146 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sanchez-Molina, S. et al. Role for hACF1 in the G2/M damage checkpoint. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, 8445–8456 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Moyal, L. et al. Requirement of ATM-dependent monoubiquitylation of histone H2B for timely repair of DNA double-strand breaks. Mol. Cell 41, 529–542 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Richardson, C., Moynahan, M. E. & Jasin, M. Double-strand break repair by interchromosomal recombination: suppression of chromosomal translocations. Genes Dev. 12, 3831–3842 (1998).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Inbar, O. & Kupiec, M. Homology search and choice of homologous partner during mitotic recombination. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 4134–4142 (1999).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sinha, M. & Peterson, C. L. Chromatin dynamics during repair of chromosomal DNA double-strand breaks. Epigenomics 1, 371–385 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sinha, M., Watanabe, S., Johnson, A., Moazed, D. & Peterson, C. L. Recombinational repair within heterochromatin requires ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling. Cell 138, 1109–1121 (2009). In this paper, a reconstitution of a homologous recombination reaction with heterochromatin arrays defines a new role for the SWI/SNF complex.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Mine-Hattab, J. & Rothstein, R. Increased chromosome mobility facilitates homology search during recombination. Nature Cell Biol. 14, 510–517 (2012). This outstanding study is the first to demonstrate DSB-induced chromosome mobility and its role in the homology search process.
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Dion, V., Kalck, V., Horigome, C., Towbin, B. D. & Gasser, S. M. Increased mobility of double-strand breaks requires Mec1, Rad9 and the homologous recombination machinery. Nature Cell Biol. 14, 502–509 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Soutoglou, E. et al. Positional stability of single double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Nature Cell Biol. 9, 675–682 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hewitt, S. L. et al. RAG-1 and ATM coordinate monoallelic recombination and nuclear positioning of immunoglobulin loci. Nature Immunol. 10, 655–664 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Chiolo, I. et al. Double-strand breaks in heterochromatin move outside of a dynamic HP1a domain to complete recombinational repair. Cell 144, 732–744 (2011). In this study, regulated DSB mobilization suggests a new level of regulation for recombinational repair in heterochromatin domains.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Torres-Rosell, J. et al. The Smc5–Smc6 complex and SUMO modification of Rad52 regulates recombinational repair at the ribosomal gene locus. Nature Cell Biol. 9, 923–931 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Abraham, R. T. Cell cycle checkpoint signaling through the ATM & ATR kinases. Genes Dev. 15, 2177–2196 (2001).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Durocher, D. in The DNA Damage Response: Implications on Cancer Formation and Treatment Ch. 1 (ed. Khanna, K. K., Yosef, S.) 1–24 (Springer, 2009).
  Book Google Scholar
• Zou, L. & Elledge, S. J. Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. Science 300, 1542–1548 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Bartek, J. & Lukas, J. DNA damage checkpoints: from initiation to recovery or adaptation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 19, 238–245 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• West, M. H. & Bonner, W. M. Histone 2A, a heteromorphous family of eight protein species. Biochemistry 19, 3238–3245 (1980).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Lee, H. S., Park, J. H., Kim, S. J., Kwon, S. J. & Kwon, J. A cooperative activation loop among SWI/SNF, gamma-H2AX and H3 acetylation for DNA double-strand break repair. EMBO J. 29, 1434–1445 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Shogren-Knaak, M. et al. Histone H4-K16 acetylation controls chromatin structure and protein interactions. Science 311, 844–847 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Li, X. et al. MOF and H4 K16 acetylation play important roles in DNA damage repair by modulating recruitment of DNA damage repair protein Mdc1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30, 5335–5347 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Sharma, G. G. et al. MOF and histone H4 acetylation at lysine 16 are critical for DNA damage response and double-strand break repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 30, 3582–3595 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Miller, K. M. et al. Human HDAC1 and HDAC2 function in the DNA-damage response to promote DNA nonhomologous end-joining. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 1144–1151 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Hammet, A., Magill, C., Heierhorst, J. & Jackson, S. P. Rad9 BRCT domain interaction with phosphorylated H2AX regulates the G1 checkpoint in budding yeast. EMBO Rep. 8, 851–857 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Javaheri, A. et al. Yeast G1 DNA damage checkpoint regulation by H2A phosphorylation is independent of chromatin remodeling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 13771–13776 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Xie, A. et al. Control of sister chromatid recombination by histone H2AX. Mol. Cell 16, 1017–1025 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Helmink, B. A. et al. H2AX prevents CtIP-mediated DNA end resection and aberrant repair in G1-phase lymphocytes. Nature 469, 245–249 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Celeste, A. et al. Genomic instability in mice lacking histone H2AX. Science 296, 922–927 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Huen, M. S. et al. RNF8 transduces the DNA-damage signal via histone ubiquitylation and checkpoint protein assembly. Cell 131, 901–914 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Kolas, N. K. et al. Orchestration of the DNA-damage response by the RNF8 ubiquitin ligase. Science 318, 1637–1640 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Mailand, N. et al. RNF8 ubiquitylates histones at DNA double-strand breaks and promotes assembly of repair proteins. Cell 131, 887–900 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Doil, C. et al. RNF168 binds and amplifies ubiquitin conjugates on damaged chromosomes to allow accumulation of repair proteins. Cell 136, 435–446 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Stewart, G. S. et al. The RIDDLE syndrome protein mediates a ubiquitin-dependent signaling cascade at sites of DNA damage. Cell 136, 420–434 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Luijsterburg, M. S. et al. A new non-catalytic role for ubiquitin ligase RNF8 in unfolding higher-order chromatin structure. EMBO J. 31, 2511–2527 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chou, D. M. et al. A chromatin localization screen reveals poly (ADP ribose)-regulated recruitment of the repressive polycomb and NuRD complexes to sites of DNA damage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 18475–18480 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Botuyan, M. V. et al. Structural basis for the methylation state-specific recognition of histone H4-K20 by 53BP1 and Crb2 in DNA repair. Cell 127, 1361–1373 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Huyen, Y. et al. Methylated lysine 79 of histone H3 targets 53BP1 to DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 432, 406–411 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sanders, S. L. et al. Methylation of histone H4 lysine 20 controls recruitment of Crb2 to sites of DNA damage. Cell 119, 603–614 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Pei, H. et al. MMSET regulates histone H4K20 methylation and 53BP1 accumulation at DNA damage sites. Nature 470, 124–128 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Roos, W. P. & Kaina, B. DNA damage-induced cell death by apoptosis. Trends Mol. Med. 12, 440–450 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Cook, P. J. et al. Tyrosine dephosphorylation of H2AX modulates apoptosis and survival decisions. Nature 458, 591–596 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Xiao, A. et al. WSTF regulates the H2A.X DNA damage response via a novel tyrosine kinase activity. Nature 457, 57–62 (2008).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Singh, N. et al. Dual recognition of phosphoserine and phosphotyrosine in histone variant H2A.X by DNA damage response protein MCPH1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 14381–14386 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Shanbhag, N. M., Rafalska-Metcalf, I. U., Balane-Bolivar, C., Janicki, S. M. & Greenberg, R. A. ATM-dependent chromatin changes silence transcription in cis to DNA double-strand breaks. Cell 141, 970–981 (2010). The elegant approach used here provides molecular insight into the crosstalk between DDR and transcription.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wang, H. et al. Role of histone H2A ubiquitination in Polycomb silencing. Nature 431, 873–878 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Iacovoni, J. S. et al. High-resolution profiling of γH2AX around DNA double strand breaks in the mammalian genome. EMBO J. 29, 1446–1457 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Papamichos-Chronakis, M., Watanabe, S., Rando, O. J. & Peterson, C. L. Global regulation of H2A.Z localization by the INO80 chromatin-remodeling enzyme is essential for genome integrity. Cell 144, 200–213 (2011). This paper defines a new histone variant exchange activity for INO80 and provides evidence that aberrant distribution of H2A.Z has a negative impact on genome stability.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chowdhury, D. et al. Gamma-H2AX dephosphorylation by protein phosphatase 2A facilitates DNA double-strand break repair. Mol. Cell 20, 801–809 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Nakada, S., Chen, G. I., Gingras, A. C. & Durocher, D. PP4 is a gamma H2AX phosphatase required for recovery from the DNA damage checkpoint. EMBO Rep. 9, 1019–1026 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Keogh, M. C. et al. A phosphatase complex that dephosphorylates γH2AX regulates DNA damage checkpoint recovery. Nature 439, 497–501 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Chen, C. C. et al. Acetylated lysine 56 on histone H3 drives chromatin assembly after repair and signals for the completion of repair. Cell 134, 231–243 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Branzei, D. & Foiani, M. The checkpoint response to replication stress. DNA Repair 8, 1038–1046 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• De Piccoli, G. et al. Replisome stability at defective DNA replication forks is independent of S phase checkpoint kinases. Mol. Cell 45, 696–704 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Cobb, J. A. et al. Replisome instability, fork collapse, and gross chromosomal rearrangements arise synergistically from Mec1 kinase and RecQ helicase mutations. Genes Dev. 19, 3055–3069 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Baker, S. P. et al. Histone H3 Thr 45 phosphorylation is a replication-associated post-translational modification in S. cerevisiae. Nature Cell Biol. 12, 294–298 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Levesque, N., Leung, G. P., Fok, A. K., Schmidt, T. I. & Kobor, M. S. Loss of H3 K79 trimethylation leads to suppression of Rtt107-dependent DNA damage sensitivity through the translesion synthesis pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 35113–35122 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Conde, F. & San-Segundo, P. A. Role of Dot1 in the response to alkylating DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: regulation of DNA damage tolerance by the error-prone polymerases Polzeta/Rev1. Genetics 179, 1197–1210 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wysocki, R. et al. Role of Dot1-dependent histone H3 methylation in G1 and S phase DNA damage checkpoint functions of Rad9. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 8430–8443 (2005).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Murakami-Sekimata, A., Huang, D., Piening, B. D., Bangur, C. & Paulovich, A. G. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD9, RAD17 and RAD24 genes are required for suppression of mutagenic post-replicative repair during chronic DNA damage. DNA Repair 9, 824–834 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Li, Q. et al. Acetylation of histone H3 lysine 56 regulates replication-coupled nucleosome assembly. Cell 134, 244–255 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Groth, A. et al. Regulation of replication fork progression through histone supply and demand. Science 318, 1928–1931 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Smith, D. J. & Whitehouse, I. Intrinsic coupling of lagging-strand synthesis to chromatin assembly. Nature 483, 434–438 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Burgess, R. J., Zhou, H., Han, J. & Zhang, Z. A role for Gcn5 in replication-coupled nucleosome assembly. Mol. Cell 37, 469–480 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Corpet, A. & Almouzni, G. Making copies of chromatin: the challenge of nucleosomal organization and epigenetic information. Trends Cell Biol. 19, 29–41 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Au, T. J., Rodriguez, J., Vincent, J. A. & Tsukiyama, T. ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling factors tune S phase checkpoint activity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 31, 4454–4463 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Papamichos-Chronakis, M. & Peterson, C. L. The INO80 chromatin-remodeling enzyme regulates replisome function and stability. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 338–345 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Shimada, K. et al. INO80 chromatin remodeling complex promotes recovery of stalled replication forks. Curr. Biol. 18, 566–575 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hur, S. K. et al. Roles of human INO80 chromatin remodeling enzyme in DNA replication and chromosome segregation suppress genome instability. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 67, 2283–2296 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Falbo, K. B. et al. Involvement of a chromatin remodeling complex in damage tolerance during DNA replication. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 1167–1172 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Boerkoel, C. F. et al. Mutant chromatin remodeling protein SMARCAL1 causes Schimke immuno-osseous dysplasia. Nature Genet. 30, 215–220 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Ciccia, A. et al. The SIOD disorder protein SMARCAL1 is an RPA-interacting protein involved in replication fork restart. Genes Dev. 23, 2415–2425 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Bansbach, C. E., Betous, R., Lovejoy, C. A., Glick, G. G. & Cortez, D. The annealing helicase SMARCAL1 maintains genome integrity at stalled replication forks. Genes Dev. 23, 2405–2414 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Yuan, J., Ghosal, G. & Chen, J. The annealing helicase HARP protects stalled replication forks. Genes Dev. 23, 2394–2399 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Yusufzai, T., Kong, X., Yokomori, K. & Kadonaga, J. T. The annealing helicase HARP is recruited to DNA repair sites via an interaction with RPA. Genes Dev. 23, 2400–2404 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Yusufzai, T. & Kadonaga, J. T. HARP is an ATP-driven annealing helicase. Science 322, 748–750 (2008).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Driscoll, R. & Cimprich, K. A. HARPing on about the DNA damage response during replication. Genes Dev. 23, 2359–2365 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Betous, R. et al. SMARCAL1 catalyzes fork regression and Holliday junction migration to maintain genome stability during DNA replication. Genes Dev. 26, 151–162 (2012).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Vincent, J. A., Kwong, T. J. & Tsukiyama, T. ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling shapes the DNA replication landscape. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 15, 477–484 (2008).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Collins, N. et al. An ACF1-ISWI chromatin-remodeling complex is required for DNA replication through heterochromatin. Nature Genet. 32, 627–632 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Poot, R. A. et al. The Williams syndrome transcription factor interacts with PCNA to target chromatin remodelling by ISWI to replication foci. Nature Cell Biol. 6, 1236–1244 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Whitehouse, I., Rando, O. J., Delrow, J. & Tsukiyama, T. Chromatin remodelling at promoters suppresses antisense transcription. Nature 450, 1031–1035 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Fyodorov, D. V., Blower, M. D., Karpen, G. H. & Kadonaga, J. T. Acf1 confers unique activities to ACF/CHRAC and promotes the formation rather than disruption of chromatin in vivo. Genes Dev. 18, 170–183 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Rowbotham, S. P. et al. Maintenance of silent chromatin through replication requires SWI/SNF-like chromatin remodeler SMARCAD1. Mol. Cell 42, 285–296 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Stralfors, A., Walfridsson, J., Bhuiyan, H. & Ekwall, K. The FUN30 chromatin remodeler, Fft3, protects centromeric and subtelomeric domains from euchromatin formation. PLoS Genet. 7, e1001334 (2011).
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Storchova, Z. & Pellman, D. From polyploidy to aneuploidy, genome instability and cancer. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 45–54 (2004).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Talbert, P. B. & Henikoff, S. Histone variants—ancient wrap artists of the epigenome. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 264–275 (2010).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Verdaasdonk, J. S. & Bloom, K. Centromeres: unique chromatin structures that drive chromosome segregation. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 320–332 (2011).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Kim, H. S. et al. An acetylated form of histone H2A.Z regulates chromosome architecture in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 1286–1293 (2009).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Krogan, N. J. et al. Regulation of chromosome stability by the histone H2A variant Htz1, the Swr1 chromatin remodeling complex, and the histone acetyltransferase NuA4. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 13513–13518 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Perez-Cadahia, B., Drobic, B. & Davie, J. R. H3 phosphorylation: dual role in mitosis and interphase. Biochem. Cell Biol. 87, 695–709 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kawashima, S. A., Yamagishi, Y., Honda, T., Ishiguro, K. & Watanabe, Y. Phosphorylation of H2A by Bub1 prevents chromosomal instability through localizing shugoshin. Science 327, 172–177 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Kelly, A. E. et al. Survivin reads phosphorylated histone H3 threonine 3 to activate the mitotic kinase Aurora B. Science 330, 235–239 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Yamagishi, Y., Honda, T., Tanno, Y. & Watanabe, Y. Two histone marks establish the inner centromere and chromosome bi-orientation. Science 330, 239–243 (2010).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Tada, K., Susumu, H., Sakuno, T. & Watanabe, Y. Condensin association with histone H2A shapes mitotic chromosomes. Nature 474, 477–483 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Hsu, J. M., Huang, J., Meluh, P. B. & Laurent, B. C. The yeast RSC chromatin-remodeling complex is required for kinetochore function in chromosome segregation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 3202–3215 (2003).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Ogiwara, H., Enomoto, T. & Seki, M. The INO80 chromatin remodeling complex functions in sister chromatid cohesion. Cell Cycle 6, 1090–1095 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Xue, Y. et al. The human SWI/SNF-B chromatin-remodeling complex is related to yeast RSC and localizes at kinetochores of mitotic chromosomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 13015–13020 (2000).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Gkikopoulos, T. et al. The SWI/SNF complex acts to constrain distribution of the centromeric histone variant Cse4. EMBO J. 30, 1919–1927 (2011).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Wu, S. et al. A YY1-INO80 complex regulates genomic stability through homologous recombination-based repair. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 14, 1165–1172 (2007).
  Article CAS Google Scholar
• Campsteijn, C., Wijnands-Collin, A. M. & Logie, C. Reverse genetic analysis of the yeast RSC chromatin remodeler reveals a role for RSC3 and SNF5 homolog 1 in ploidy maintenance. PLoS Genet. 3, e92 (2007). This comprehensive genetic analysis of RSC led to the discovery of new role for RSC in the control of ploidy.
  Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
• Steigemann, P. et al. Aurora B-mediated abscission checkpoint protects against tetraploidization. Cell 136, 473–484 (2009).
  Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
• Norden, C. et al. The NoCut pathway links completion of cytokinesis to spindle midzone function to prevent chromosome breakage. Cell 125, 85–98 (2006).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Baumann, C., Korner, R., Hofmann, K. & Nigg, E. A. PICH, a centromere-associated SNF2 family ATPase, is regulated by Plk1 and required for the spindle checkpoint. Cell 128, 101–114 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Chan, K. L., North, P. S. & Hickson, I. D. BLM is required for faithful chromosome segregation and its localization defines a class of ultrafine anaphase bridges. EMBO J. 26, 3397–3409 (2007).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Chan, K. L., Palmai-Pallag, T., Ying, S. & Hickson, I. D. Replication stress induces sister-chromatid bridging at fragile site loci in mitosis. Nature Cell Biol. 11, 753–760 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Sillibourne, J. E., Delaval, B., Redick, S., Sinha, M. & Doxsey, S. J. Chromatin remodeling proteins interact with pericentrin to regulate centrosome integrity. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 3667–3680 (2007). This intriguing work suggests a novel role for chromatin-remodelling enzymes in centrosome assembly and function.
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Vaze, M. B. et al. Recovery from checkpoint-mediated arrest after repair of a double-strand break requires Srs2 helicase. Mol. Cell 10, 373–385 (2002).
  Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
• Shroff, R. et al. Distribution and dynamics of chromatin modification induced by a defined DNA double-strand break. Curr. Biol. 14, 1703–1711 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Korber, P., Luckenbach, T., Blaschke, D. & Horz, W. Evidence for histone eviction in trans upon induction of the yeast PHO5 promoter. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 10965–10974 (2004).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
• Klopf, E. et al. Cooperation between the INO80 complex and histone chaperones determines adaptation of stress gene transcription in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29, 4994–5007 (2009).
  Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar