Synonymous but not the same: the causes and consequences of codon bias (original) (raw)
Zuckerkandl, E. & Pauling, L. Molecules as documents of evolutionary history. J. Theor. Biol.8, 357–366 (1965). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Gustafsson, C., Govindarajan, S. & Minshull, J. Codon bias and heterologous protein expression. Trends Biotechnol.22, 346–353 (2004). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Hershberg, R. & Petrov, D. A. Selection on codon bias. Annu. Rev. Genet.42, 287–299 (2008). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Chamary, J. V., Parmley, J. L. & Hurst, L. D. Hearing silence: non-neutral evolution at synonymous sites in mammals. Nature Rev. Genet.7, 98–108 (2006). An excellent Review of the many surprisingly strong effects of synonymous mutations on splicing. CASPubMed Google Scholar
Duret, L. Evolution of synonymous codon usage in metazoans. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.12, 640–649 (2002). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Sharp, P. M., Averof, M., Lloyd, A. T., Matassi, G. & Peden, J. F. DNA sequence evolution: the sounds of silence. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B349, 241–247 (1995). CAS Google Scholar
Andersson, S. G. & Kurland, C. G. Codon preferences in free-living microorganisms. Microbiol. Rev.54, 198–210 (1990). A classic, must-read paper that has framed the field of codon-usage adaptation. CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Kimura, M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol.16, 111–120 (1980). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Bulmer, M. The selection–mutation–drift theory of synonymous codon usage. Genetics129, 897–907 (1991). A foundational study of both the population genetics that underlie codon bias and the biophysics of translation. This paper emphasizes that, for endogenous genes, elongation speed will not generally influence protein yield per mRNA. CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Chen, S. L., Lee, W., Hottes, A. K., Shapiro, L. & McAdams, H. H. Codon usage between genomes is constrained by genome-wide mutational processes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA101, 3480–3485 (2004). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Hurst, L. D. & Merchant, A. R. High guanine–cytosine content is not an adaptation to high temperature: a comparative analysis amongst prokaryotes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B268, 493–497 (2001). CAS Google Scholar
Fedorov, A., Saxonov, S. & Gilbert, W. Regularities of context-dependent codon bias in eukaryotic genes. Nucleic Acids Res.30, 1192–1197 (2002). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Hildebrand, F., Meyer, A. & Eyre-Walker, A. Evidence of selection upon genomic GC-content in bacteria. PLoS Genet.6, e1001107 (2010). PubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Morton, B. R. Selection at the amino acid level can influence synonymous codon usage: implications for the study of codon adaptation in plastid genes. Genetics159, 347–358 (2001). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Cambray, G. & Mazel, D. Synonymous genes explore different evolutionary landscapes. PLoS Genet.4, e1000256 (2008). PubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Plotkin, J. B. & Dushoff, J. Codon bias and frequency-dependent selection on the hemagglutinin epitopes of influenza A virus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA100, 7152–7157 (2003). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Sharp, P. M. & Li, W. H. The rate of synonymous substitution in enterobacterial genes is inversely related to codon usage bias. Mol. Biol. Evol.4, 222–230 (1987). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Francino, M. P. & Ochman, H. Deamination as the basis of strand-asymmetric evolution in transcribed Escherichia coli sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol.18, 1147–1150 (2001). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Majewski, J. Dependence of mutational asymmetry on gene-expression levels in the human genome. Am. J. Hum. Genet.73, 688–692 (2003). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Duret, L. & Mouchiroud, D. Expression pattern and, surprisingly, gene length shape codon usage in Caenorhabditis, Drosophila, and Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA96, 4482–4487 (1999). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Akashi, H. Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy. Genetics136, 927–935 (1994). By quantifying the rates of synonymous substitutions at conserved and non-conserved positions in proteins, Akashi shows that such mutations influence translational accuracy inD. melanogaster. CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Akashi, H. & Schaeffer, S. W. Natural selection and the frequency distributions of “silent” DNA polymorphism in Drosophila. Genetics146, 295–307 (1997). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Eyre-Walker, A. Synonymous codon bias is related to gene length in Escherichia coli: selection for translational accuracy? Mol. Biol. Evol.13, 864–872 (1996). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Stoletzki, N. & Eyre-Walker, A. Synonymous codon usage in Escherichia coli: selection for translational accuracy. Mol. Biol. Evol.24, 374–381 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Drummond, D. A. & Wilke, C. O. Mistranslation-induced protein misfolding as a dominant constraint on coding-sequence evolution. Cell134, 341–352 (2008). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhou, T., Weems, M. & Wilke, C. O. Translationally optimal codons associate with structurally sensitive sites in proteins. Mol. Biol. Evol.26, 1571–1580 (2009). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Ikemura, T. Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes: a proposal for a synonymous codon choice that is optimal for the E. coli translational system. J. Mol. Biol.151, 389–409 (1981). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Ikemura, T. Correlation between the abundance of yeast transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in protein genes. Differences in synonymous codon choice patterns of yeast and Escherichia coli with reference to the abundance of isoaccepting transfer RNAs. J. Mol. Biol.158, 573–597 (1982). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Post, L. E. & Nomura, M. Nucleotide sequence of the intercistronic region preceding the gene for RNA polymerase subunit α in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem.254, 10604–10606 (1979). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Moriyama, E. N. & Powell, J. R. Codon usage bias and tRNA abundance in Drosophila. J. Mol. Evol.45, 514–523 (1997). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Duret, L. tRNA gene number and codon usage in the C. elegans genome are co-adapted for optimal translation of highly expressed genes. Trends Genet.16, 287–289 (2000). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Kanaya, S., Yamada, Y., Kinouchi, M., Kudo, Y. & Ikemura, T. Codon usage and tRNA genes in eukaryotes: correlation of codon usage diversity with translation efficiency and with CG-dinucleotide usage as assessed by multivariate analysis. J. Mol. Evol.53, 290–298 (2001). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Sharp, P. M., Bailes, E., Grocock, R. J., Peden, J. F. & Sockett, R. E. Variation in the strength of selected codon usage bias among bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res.33, 1141–1153 (2005). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Sharp, P. M. & Li, W. H. The codon Adaptation Index — a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Res.15, 1281–1295 (1987). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Lavner, Y. & Kotlar, D. Codon bias as a factor in regulating expression via translation rate in the human genome. Gene345, 127–138 (2005). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Tuller, T., Waldman, Y. Y., Kupiec, M. & Ruppin, E. Translation efficiency is determined by both codon bias and folding energy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA107, 3645–3650 (2010). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Bergmann, J. E. & Lodish, H. F. A kinetic model of protein synthesis. Application to hemoglobin synthesis and translational control. J. Biol. Chem.254, 11927–11937 (1979). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Mathews, M. B., Sonenberg, N. & Hershey, J. W. B. (eds) Translational Control in BiologyandMedicine (CHSL Press, New York, 2007). Google Scholar
Ozbudak, E. M., Thattai, M., Kurtser, I., Grossman, A. D. & van Oudenaarden, A. Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene. Nature Genet.31, 69–73 (2002). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Fraser, H. B., Hirsh, A. E., Giaever, G., Kumm, J. & Eisen, M. B. Noise minimization in eukaryotic gene expression. PLoS Biol.2, e137 (2004). PubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Lawrence, J. G. & Ochman, H. Molecular archaeology of the Escherichia coli genome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA95, 9413–9417 (1998). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Karlin, S., Campbell, A. M. & Mrazek, J. Comparative DNA analysis across diverse genomes. Annu. Rev. Genet.32, 185–225 (1998). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, F., Saha, S., Shabalina, S. A. & Kashina, A. Differential arginylation of actin isoforms is regulated by coding sequence-dependent degradation. Science329, 1534–1537 (2010). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Thanaraj, T. A. & Argos, P. Ribosome-mediated translational pause and protein domain organization. Protein Sci.5, 1594–1612 (1996). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Watts, J. M. et al. Architecture and secondary structure of an entire HIV-1 RNA genome. Nature460, 711–716 (2009). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Warnecke, T., Batada, N. N. & Hurst, L. D. The impact of the nucleosome code on protein-coding sequence evolution in yeast. PLoS Genet.4, e1000250 (2008). PubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Eskesen, S. T., Eskesen, F. N. & Ruvinsky, A. Natural selection affects frequencies of AG and GT dinucleotides at the 5′ and 3′ ends of exons. Genetics167, 543–550 (2004). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Chamary, J. V. & Hurst, L. D. Biased codon usage near intron-exon junctions: selection on splicing enhancers, splice-site recognition or something else? Trends Genet.21, 256–259 (2005). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Orban, T. I. & Olah, E. Purifying selection on silent sites — a constraint from splicing regulation? Trends Genet.17, 252–253 (2001). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Warnecke, T. & Hurst, L. D. Evidence for a trade-off between translational efficiency and splicing regulation in determining synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Biol. Evol.24, 2755–2762 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Bettany, A. J. et al. 5′-secondary structure formation, in contrast to a short string of non-preferred codons, inhibits the translation of the pyruvate kinase mRNA in yeast. Yeast5, 187–198 (1989). CASPubMed Google Scholar
de Smit, M. H. & van Duin, J. Secondary structure of the ribosome binding site determines translational efficiency: a quantitative analysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA87, 7668–7672 (1990). A thorough study, supported by a convincing theoretical model, of how mRNA folding affects translation initiation. CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Eyre-Walker, A. & Bulmer, M. Reduced synonymous substitution rate at the start of enterobacterial genes. Nucleic Acids Res.21, 4599–4603 (1993). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Kudla, G., Murray, A. W., Tollervey, D. & Plotkin, J. B. Coding-sequence determinants of gene expression in Escherichia coli. Science324, 255–258 (2009). Uses libraries of synthetic genes to isolate the effects of synonymous mutations on expression. See also references 81 and 97. CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Gu, W., Zhou, T. & Wilke, C. O. A universal trend of reduced mRNA stability near the translation-initiation site in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. PLoS Comput. Biol.6, e1000664 (2010). PubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Tuller, T. et al. An evolutionarily conserved mechanism for controlling the efficiency of protein translation. Cell141, 344–354 (2010). Shows that rare codons at the beginning of genes could help prevent 'ribosomal traffic jams'. See references 9, 58 and 59 for an alternative interpretation. CASPubMed Google Scholar
Bulmer, M. Codon usage and intragenic position. J. Theor. Biol.133, 67–71 (1988). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Qin, H., Wu, W. B., Comeron, J. M., Kreitman, M. & Li, W. H. Intragenic spatial patterns of codon usage bias in prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes. Genetics168, 2245–2260 (2004). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang, S., Goldman, E. & Zubay, G. Clustering of low usage codons and ribosome movement. J. Theor. Biol.170, 339–354 (1994). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Cannarozzi, G. et al. A role for codon order in translation dynamics. Cell141, 355–367 (2010). PubMed Google Scholar
Zouridis, H. & Hatzimanikatis, V. Effects of codon distributions and tRNA competition on protein translation. Biophys. J.95, 1018–1033 (2008). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Huh, W. K. et al. Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature425, 686–691 (2003). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Lu, P., Vogel, C., Wang, R., Yao, X. & Marcotte, E. M. Absolute protein expression profiling estimates the relative contributions of transcriptional and translational regulation. Nature Biotech.25, 117–124 (2007). CAS Google Scholar
Vogel, C. et al. Sequence signatures and mRNA concentration can explain two-thirds of protein abundance variation in a human cell line. Mol. Syst. Biol.6, 400 (2010). References 65 and 66 describe a quantitative proteomics approach that promises new insights into the coding-sequence determinants of protein levels. PubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Ingolia, N. T., Ghaemmaghami, S., Newman, J. R. & Weissman, J. S. Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling. Science324, 218–223 (2009). A clever method for mapping the positions of ribosomes on messages with unprecedented accuracy; an essential tool for the study of translation kinetics. CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Uemura, S. et al. Real-time tRNA transit on single translating ribosomes at codon resolution. Nature464, 1012–1017 (2010). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Futcher, B., Latter, G. I., Monardo, P., McLaughlin, C. S. & Garrels, J. I. A sampling of the yeast proteome. Mol. Cell. Biol.19, 7357–7368 (1999). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Schrimpf, S. P. et al. Comparative functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster proteomes. PLoS Biol.7, e48 (2009). PubMed Google Scholar
Taniguchi, Y. et al. Quantifying E. coli proteome and transcriptome with single-molecule sensitivity in single cells. Science329, 533–538. CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Feng, L. & Niu, D. K. Relationship between mRNA stability and length: an old question with a new twist. Biochem. Genet.45, 131–137 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Arava, Y., Boas, F. E., Brown, P. O. & Herschlag, D. Dissecting eukaryotic translation and its control by ribosome density mapping. Nucleic Acids Res.33, 2421–2432 (2005). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Welch, M., Villalobos, A., Gustafsson, C. & Minshull, J. You're one in a googol: optimizing genes for protein expression. J. R. Soc. Interface6 (Suppl. 4), S467–S476 (2009). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Gouy, M. & Gautier, C. Codon usage in bacteria: correlation with gene expressivity. Nucleic Acids Res.10, 7055–7074 (1982). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Kertesz, M. et al. Genome-wide measurement of RNA secondary structure in yeast. Nature467, 103–107 (2010). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Takyar, S., Hickerson, R. P. & Noller, H. F. mRNA helicase activity of the ribosome. Cell120, 49–58 (2005). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Dittmar, K. A., Sorensen, M. A., Elf, J., Ehrenberg, M. & Pan, T. Selective charging of tRNA isoacceptors induced by amino-acid starvation. EMBO Rep.6, 151–157 (2005). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Elf, J., Nilsson, D., Tenson, T. & Ehrenberg, M. Selective charging of tRNA isoacceptors explains patterns of codon usage. Science300, 1718–1722 (2003). A detailed theoretical model of what happens to tRNA in cells under starvation conditions. CASPubMed Google Scholar
Ghaemmaghami, S. et al. Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature425, 737–741 (2003). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Welch, M. et al. Design parameters to control synthetic gene expression in Escherichia coli. PLoS ONE4, e7002 (2009). PubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Kudla, G., Lipinski, L., Caffin, F., Helwak, A. & Zylicz, M. High guanine and cytosine content increases mRNA levels in mammalian cells. PLoS Biol.4, e180 (2006). PubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Han, J. S., Szak, S. T. & Boeke, J. D. Transcriptional disruption by the L1 retrotransposon and implications for mammalian transcriptomes. Nature429, 268–274 (2004). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Nackley, A. G. et al. Human catechol-O-methyltransferase haplotypes modulate protein expression by altering mRNA secondary structure. Science314, 1930–1933 (2006). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Coleman, J. R. et al. Virus attenuation by genome-scale changes in codon pair bias. Science320, 1784–1787 (2008). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Hayes, C. S., Bose, B. & Sauer, R. T. Stop codons preceded by rare arginine codons are efficient determinants of SsrA tagging in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA99, 3440–3445 (2002). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Spanjaard, R. A. & van Duin, J. Translation of the sequence AGG-AGG yields 50% ribosomal frameshift. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA85, 7967–7971 (1988). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Kramer, E. B. & Farabaugh, P. J. The frequency of translational misreading errors in E. coli is largely determined by tRNA competition. RNA13, 87–96 (2007). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Sorensen, M. A., Kurland, C. G. & Pedersen, S. Codon usage determines translation rate in Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol.207, 365–377 (1989). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Chen, G. F. & Inouye, M. Suppression of the negative effect of minor arginine codons on gene expression; preferential usage of minor codons within the first 25 codons of the Escherichia coli genes. Nucleic Acids Res.18, 1465–1473 (1990). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Angov, E., Hillier, C. J., Kincaid, R. L. & Lyon, J. A. Heterologous protein expression is enhanced by harmonizing the codon usage frequencies of the target gene with those of the expression host. PLoS ONE3, e2189 (2008). PubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Rosenberg, A. H., Goldman, E., Dunn, J. J., Studier, F. W. & Zubay, G. Effects of consecutive AGG codons on translation in Escherichia coli, demonstrated with a versatile codon test system. J. Bacteriol.175, 716–722 (1993). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Gursky, Y. G. & Beabealashvilli, R. The increase in gene expression induced by introduction of rare codons into the C terminus of the template. Gene148, 15–21 (1994). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Burgess-Brown, N. A. et al. Codon optimization can improve expression of human genes in Escherichia coli: a multi-gene study. Protein Expr. Purif.59, 94–102 (2008). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Maertens, B. et al. Gene optimization mechanisms: a multi-gene study reveals a high success rate of full-length human proteins expressed in Escherichia coli. Protein Sci.19, 1312–1326 (2010). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Supek, F. & Smuc, T. On relevance of codon usage to expression of synthetic and natural genes in Escherichia coli. Genetics185, 1129–1134 (2010). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Voges, D., Watzele, M., Nemetz, C., Wizemann, S. & Buchberger, B. Analyzing and enhancing mRNA translational efficiency in an Escherichia coli in vitro expression system. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.318, 601–614 (2004). CASPubMed Google Scholar
El Hage, A., French, S. L., Beyer, A. L. & Tollervey, D. Loss of topoisomerase I leads to R-loop-mediated transcriptional blocks during ribosomal RNA synthesis. Genes Dev.24, 1546–1558 (2010). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
McDowall, K. J., Lin-Chao, S. & Cohen, S. N. A+U content rather than a particular nucleotide order determines the specificity of RNase E cleavage. J. Biol. Chem.269, 10790–10796 (1994). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Nguyen, K. L. et al. Codon optimization of the HIV-1 vpu and vif genes stabilizes their mRNA and allows for highly efficient Rev-independent expression. Virology319, 163–175 (2004). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Sokolowski, M., Tan, W., Jellne, M. & Schwartz, S. mRNA instability elements in the human papillomavirus type 16 L2 coding region. J. Virol.72, 1504–1515 (1998). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Bauer, A. P. et al. The impact of intragenic CpG content on gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res.38, 3891–3908 (2010). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Gutman, G. A. & Hatfield, G. W. Nonrandom utilization of codon pairs in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA86, 3699–3703 (1989). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Irwin, B., Heck, J. D. & Hatfield, G. W. Codon pair utilization biases influence translational elongation step times. J. Biol. Chem.270, 22801–22806 (1995). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Cheng, L. & Goldman, E. Absence of effect of varying Thr-Leu codon pairs on protein synthesis in a T7 system. Biochemistry40, 6102–6106 (2001). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Wang, D., Johnson, A. D., Papp, A. C., Kroetz, D. L. & Sadee, W. Multidrug resistance polypeptide 1 (MDR1, ABCB1) variant 3435C>T affects mRNA stability. Pharmacogenet. Genomics15, 3693–3704 (2005). Google Scholar
Kimchi-Sarfaty, C. et al. A “silent” polymorphism in the MDR1 gene changes substrate specificity. Science315, 525–528 (2007). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Foster, H. et al. Codon and mRNA sequence optimization of microdystrophin transgenes improves expression and physiological outcome in dystrophic mdx mice following AAV2/8 gene transfer. Mol. Ther.16, 1825–1832 (2008). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Arruda, V. R. et al. Peripheral transvenular delivery of adeno-associated viral vectors to skeletal muscle as a novel therapy for hemophilia B. Blood115, 4678–4688. CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Fuglsang, A. The relationship between palindrome avoidance and intragenic codon usage variations: a Monte Carlo study. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.316, 755–762 (2004). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Drummond, D. A. & Wilke, C. O. The evolutionary consequences of erroneous protein synthesis. Nature Rev. Genet.10, 715–724 (2009). A readable Review that summarizes the various types of errors that occur in protein synthesis, many of which are directly related to codon usage. PubMed Google Scholar
Akashi, H., Kliman, R. M. & Eyre-Walker, A. Mutation pressure, natural selection, and the evolution of base composition in Drosophila. Genetica102–103, 49–60 (1998). PubMed Google Scholar
Marais, G. & Duret, L. Synonymous codon usage, accuracy of translation, and gene length in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Mol. Evol.52, 275–280 (2001). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Higgs, P. G. & Ran, W. Coevolution of codon usage and tRNA genes leads to alternative stable states of biased codon usage. Mol. Biol. Evol.25, 2279–2291 (2008). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Shah, P. & Gilchrist, M. Effect of correlated tRNA abundances on translation errors and evolution of codon usage bias. PLoS Genet.6, e1001128 (2010). PubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Bernardi, G. et al. The mosaic genome of warm-blooded vertebrates. Science228, 953–958 (1985). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Galtier, N., Piganeau, G., Mouchiroud, D. & Duret, L. GC-content evolution in mammalian genomes: the biased gene conversion hypothesis. Genetics159, 907–911 (2001). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Urrutia, A. O. & Hurst, L. D. The signature of selection mediated by expression on human genes. Genome Res.13, 2260–2264 (2003). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Comeron, J. M. Selective and mutational patterns associated with gene expression in humans: influences on synonymous composition and intron presence. Genetics167, 1293–1304 (2004). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Karlin, S. & Mrazek, J. What drives codon choices in human genes? J. Mol. Biol.262, 459–472 (1996). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Plotkin, J. B., Robins, H. & Levine, A. J. Tissue-specific codon usage and the expression of human genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA101, 12588–12591 (2004). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Dittmar, K. A., Goodenbour, J. M. & Pan, T. Tissue-specific differences in human transfer RNA expression. PLoS Genet.2, e221 (2006). PubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Semon, M., Lobry, J. R. & Duret, L. No evidence for tissue-specific adaptation of synonymous codon usage in human. Mol. Biol. Evol.23, 523–529 (2005). PubMed Google Scholar
Chamary, J. V. & Hurst, L. D. Evidence for selection on synonymous mutations affecting stability of mRNA secondary structure in mammals. Genome Biol.6, R75 (2005). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Seffens, W. & Digby, D. mRNAs have greater negative folding free energies than shuffled or codon choice randomized sequences. Nucleic Acids Res.27, 1578–1584 (1999). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Duan, J. et al. Synonymous mutations in the human dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) affect mRNA stability and synthesis of the receptor. Hum. Mol. Genet.12, 205–216 (2003). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Sharp, P. M., Tuohy, T. M. & Mosurski, K. R. Codon usage in yeast: cluster analysis clearly differentiates highly and lowly expressed genes. Nucleic Acids Res.14, 5125–5143 (1986). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
dos Reis, M., Savva, R. & Wernisch, L. Solving the riddle of codon usage preferences: a test for translational selection. Nucleic Acids Res.32, 5036–5044 (2004). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Nivinskas, R., Malys, N., Klausa, V., Vaiskunaite, R. & Gineikiene, E. Post-transcriptional control of bacteriophage T4 gene 25 expression: mRNA secondary structure that enhances translational initiation. J. Mol. Biol.288, 291–304 (1999). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Kozak, M. Downstream secondary structure facilitates recognition of initiator codons by eukaryotic ribosomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA87, 8301–8305 (1990). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Paulus, M., Haslbeck, M. & Watzele, M. RNA stem-loop enhanced expression of previously non-expressible genes. Nucleic Acids Res.32, e78 (2004). PubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang, G., Hubalewska, M. & Ignatova, Z. Transient ribosomal attenuation coordinates protein synthesis and co-translational folding. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol.16, 274–280 (2009). CAS Google Scholar
Nakamura, Y., Gojobori, T. & Ikemura, T. Codon usage tabulated from international DNA sequence databases: status for the year 2000. Nucleic Acids Res.28, 292 (2000). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Zolotukhin, S., Potter, M., Hauswirth, W. W., Guy, J. & Muzyczka, N. A “humanized” green fluorescent protein cDNA adapted for high-level expression in mammalian cells. J. Virol.70, 4646–4654 (1996). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Markham, N. R. & Zuker, M. DINAMelt web server for nucleic acid melting prediction. Nucleic Acids Res.33, W577–W581 (2005). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Lesnik, E. A. et al. Prediction of rho-independent transcriptional terminators in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res.29, 3583–3594 (2001). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Bernstein, J. A., Khodursky, A. B., Lin, P. H., Lin-Chao, S. & Cohen, S. N. Global analysis of mRNA decay and abundance in Escherichia coli at single-gene resolution using two-color fluorescent DNA microarrays. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA99, 9697–9702 (2002). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Lewis, B. P., Shih, I. H., Jones-Rhoades, M. W., Bartel, D. P. & Burge, C. B. Prediction of mammalian microRNA targets. Cell115, 787–798 (2003). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Jacobs, G. H. et al. Transterm: a database to aid the analysis of regulatory sequences in mRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res.37, D72–D76 (2009). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Peden, J. F. Analysis of Codon Usage. Thesis, Dept of Genetics, Univ. Nottingham (1999). Google Scholar
Supek, F. & Vlahovicek, K. INCA: synonymous codon usage analysis and clustering by means of self-organizing map. Bioinformatics20, 2329–2330 (2004). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Pagani, F., Raponi, M. & Baralle, F. E. Synonymous mutations in CFTR exon 12 affect splicing and are not neutral in evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA102, 6368–6372 (2005). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Burge, C., Campbell, A. M. & Karlin, S. Over- and under-representation of short oligonucleotides in DNA sequences. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA89, 1358–1362 (1992). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Villalobos, A., Ness, J. E., Gustafsson, C., Minshull, J. & Govindarajan, S. Gene Designer: a synthetic biology tool for constructing artificial DNA segments. BMC Bioinformatics7, 285 (2006). PubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar