A guide to membraneless organelles and their various roles in gene regulation (original) (raw)
Antifeeva, I. A. et al. Liquid–liquid phase separation as an organizing principle of intracellular space: overview of the evolution of the cell compartmentalization concept. Cell Mol. Life Sci.79, 251 (2022). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Ramón y Cajal, S. Un sencillo método de coloracion selectiva del reticulo protoplasmatico y sus efectos en los diversos organos nerviosos de vertebrados e invertebrados. Trad. Lab. Invest. Biol.2, 129–221 (1903). Google Scholar
Riggs, C. L., Kedersha, N., Ivanov, P. & Anderson, P. Mammalian stress granules and P bodies at a glance. J. Cell Sci.133, jcs242487 (2020). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Arias Escayola, D. & Neugebauer, K. M. Dynamics and function of nuclear bodies during embryogenesis. Biochemistry57, 2462–2469 (2018). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Alberti, S. & Hyman, A. A. Biomolecular condensates at the nexus of cellular stress, protein aggregation disease and ageing. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.22, 196–213 (2021). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Ivanov, P., Kedersha, N. & Anderson, P. Stress granules and processing bodies in translational control. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.11, a032813 (2019). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Nizami, Z., Deryusheva, S. & Gall, J. G. The Cajal body and histone locus body. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.2, a000653 (2010). ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Shin, Y. & Brangwynne, C. P. Liquid phase condensation in cell physiology and disease. Science357, eaaf4382 (2017). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Banani, S. F., Lee, H. O., Hyman, A. A. & Rosen, M. K. Biomolecular condensates: organizers of cellular biochemistry. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.18, 285–298 (2017). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Kato, M. et al. Cell-free formation of RNA granules: low complexity sequence domains form dynamic fibers within hydrogels. Cell149, 753–767 (2012). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Lafontaine, D. L. J., Riback, J. A., Bascetin, R. & Brangwynne, C. P. The nucleolus as a multiphase liquid condensate. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.22, 165–182 (2021). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Naganuma, T. et al. Alternative 3′-end processing of long noncoding RNA initiates construction of nuclear paraspeckles. EMBO J.31, 4020–4034 (2012). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Sanders, D. W. et al. Competing protein–RNA interaction networks control multiphase intracellular organization. Cell181, 306–324.e28 (2020). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Yasuda, S. et al. Stress- and ubiquitylation-dependent phase separation of the proteasome. Nature578, 296–300 (2020). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Yamazaki, T., Nakagawa, S. & Hirose, T. Architectural RNAs for membraneless nuclear body formation. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol.84, 227–237 (2019). ArticlePubMed Google Scholar
Yamazaki, T. et al. Functional domains of NEAT1 architectural lncRNA induce paraspeckle assembly through phase separation. Mol. Cell70, 1038–1053.e7 (2018). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Lallemand-Breitenbach, V. & de The, H. PML nuclear bodies: from architecture to function. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.52, 154–161 (2018). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Ma, W. & Mayr, C. A membraneless organelle associated with the endoplasmic reticulum enables 3′ UTR-mediated protein–protein interactions. Cell175, 1492–1506.e19 (2018). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Ninomiya, K. et al. LncRNA-dependent nuclear stress bodies promote intron retention through SR protein phosphorylation. EMBO J.39, e102729 (2020). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Hirose, T. et al. NEAT1 long noncoding RNA regulates transcription via protein sequestration within subnuclear bodies. Mol. Biol. Cell25, 169–183 (2014). ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Imamura, K. et al. Long noncoding RNA NEAT1-dependent SFPQ relocation from promoter region to paraspeckle mediates IL8 expression upon immune stimuli. Mol. Cell53, 393–406 (2014). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Phair, R. D. & Misteli, T. High mobility of proteins in the mammalian cell nucleus. Nature404, 604–609 (2000). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Zhu, L. et al. Controlling the material properties and rRNA processing function of the nucleolus using light. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA116, 17330–17335 (2019). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Ahmad, Y., Boisvert, F. M., Gregor, P., Cobley, A. & Lamond, A. I. NOPdb: nucleolar proteome database — 2008 update. Nucleic Acids Res.37, D181–D184 (2009). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Smith, K. P., Carter, K. C., Johnson, C. V. & Lawrence, J. B. U2 and U1 snRNA gene loci associate with coiled bodies. J. Cell Biochem.59, 473–485 (1995). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Hebert, M. D., Szymczyk, P. W., Shpargel, K. B. & Matera, A. G. Coilin forms the bridge between Cajal bodies and SMN, the spinal muscular atrophy protein. Genes Dev.15, 2720–2729 (2001). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Jady, B. E. et al. Modification of Sm small nuclear RNAs occurs in the nucleoplasmic Cajal body following import from the cytoplasm. EMBO J.22, 1878–1888 (2003). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Schaffert, N., Hossbach, M., Heintzmann, R., Achsel, T. & Luhrmann, R. RNAi knockdown of hPrp31 leads to an accumulation of U4/U6 di-snRNPs in Cajal bodies. EMBO J.23, 3000–3009 (2004). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Nesic, D., Tanackovic, G. & Kramer, A. A role for Cajal bodies in the final steps of U2 snRNP biogenesis. J. Cell Sci.117, 4423–4433 (2004). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Stanek, D. et al. Spliceosomal small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles repeatedly cycle through Cajal bodies. Mol. Biol. Cell19, 2534–2543 (2008). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Machyna, M. et al. The coilin interactome identifies hundreds of small noncoding RNAs that traffic through Cajal bodies. Mol. Cell56, 389–399 (2014). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Stanek, D. & Neugebauer, K. M. The Cajal body: a meeting place for spliceosomal snRNPs in the nuclear maze. Chromosoma115, 343–354 (2006). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Thiry, M. Differential location of nucleic acids within interchromatin granule clusters. Eur. J. Cell Biol.62, 259–269 (1993). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Fei, J. et al. Quantitative analysis of multilayer organization of proteins and RNA in nuclear speckles at super resolution. J. Cell Sci.130, 4180–4192 (2017). CASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Kim, J., Han, K. Y., Khanna, N., Ha, T. & Belmont, A. S. Nuclear speckle fusion via long-range directional motion regulates speckle morphology after transcriptional inhibition. J. Cell Sci.132, jcs226563 (2019). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Smith, K. P., Moen, P. T., Wydner, K. L., Coleman, J. R. & Lawrence, J. B. Processing of endogenous pre-mRNAs in association with SC-35 domains is gene specific. J. Cell Biol.144, 617–629 (1999). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Khanna, N., Hu, Y. & Belmont, A. S. HSP70 transgene directed motion to nuclear speckles facilitates heat shock activation. Curr. Biol.24, 1138–1144 (2014). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Johnson, C. et al. Tracking COL1A1 RNA in osteogenesis imperfecta. splice-defective transcripts initiate transport from the gene but are retained within the SC35 domain. J. Cell Biol.150, 417–432 (2000). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Chang, F. T. et al. PML bodies provide an important platform for the maintenance of telomeric chromatin integrity in embryonic stem cells. Nucleic Acids Res.41, 4447–4458 (2013). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Kurihara, M. et al. Genomic profiling by ALaP-Seq reveals transcriptional regulation by PML bodies through DNMT3A exclusion. Mol. Cell78, 493–505.e8 (2020). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Ulbricht, T. et al. PML promotes MHC class II gene expression by stabilizing the class II transactivator. J. Cell Biol.199, 49–63 (2012). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Salzler, H. R. et al. A sequence in the Drosophila H3–H4 promoter triggers histone locus body assembly and biosynthesis of replication-coupled histone mRNAs. Dev. Cell24, 623–634 (2013). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Bongiorno-Borbone, L. et al. FLASH degradation in response to UV-C results in histone locus bodies disruption and cell-cycle arrest. Oncogene29, 802–810 (2010). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Tatomer, D. C. et al. Concentrating pre-mRNA processing factors in the histone locus body facilitates efficient histone mRNA biogenesis. J. Cell Biol.213, 557–570 (2016). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Bashkirov, V. I., Scherthan, H., Solinger, J. A., Buerstedde, J. M. & Heyer, W. D. A mouse cytoplasmic exoribonuclease (mXRN1p) with preference for G4 tetraplex substrates. J. Cell Biol.136, 761–773 (1997). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Sen, G. L. & Blau, H. M. Argonaute 2/RISC resides in sites of mammalian mRNA decay known as cytoplasmic bodies. Nat. Cell Biol.7, 633–636 (2005). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Hubstenberger, A. et al. P-body purification reveals the condensation of repressed mRNA regulons. Mol. Cell68, 144–157.e5 (2017). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Ferraiuolo, M. A. et al. A role for the eIF4E-binding protein 4E-T in P-body formation and mRNA decay. J. Cell Biol.170, 913–924 (2005). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Eulalio, A., Behm-Ansmant, I., Schweizer, D. & Izaurralde, E. P-body formation is a consequence, not the cause, of RNA-mediated gene silencing. Mol. Cell Biol.27, 3970–3981 (2007). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Pitchiaya, S. et al. Dynamic recruitment of single RNAs to processing bodies depends on RNA functionality. Mol. Cell74, 521–533.e6 (2019). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Ma, W., Zheng, G., Xie, W. & Mayr, C. In vivo reconstitution finds multivalent RNA–RNA interactions as drivers of mesh-like condensates. eLife10, e64252 (2021). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
So, C., Cheng, S. & Schuh, M. Phase separation during germline development. Trends Cell Biol.31, 254–268 (2021). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Fernandopulle, M. S., Lippincott-Schwartz, J. & Ward, M. E. RNA transport and local translation in neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disease. Nat. Neurosci.24, 622–632 (2021). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Huber, K. M., Kayser, M. S. & Bear, M. F. Role for rapid dendritic protein synthesis in hippocampal mGluR-dependent long-term depression. Science288, 1254–1257 (2000). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Sundby, A. E., Molnar, R. I. & Claycomb, J. M. Connecting the dots: linking Caenorhabditis elegans small RNA pathways and germ granules. Trends Cell Biol.31, 387–401 (2021). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Brangwynne, C. P. et al. Germline P granules are liquid droplets that localize by controlled dissolution/condensation. Science324, 1729–1732 (2009). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Kawasaki, I. et al. PGL-1, a predicted RNA-binding component of germ granules, is essential for fertility in C. elegans. Cell94, 635–645 (1998). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Wang, J. T. et al. Regulation of RNA granule dynamics by phosphorylation of serine-rich, intrinsically disordered proteins in C. elegans. eLife3, e04591 (2014). ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Putnam, A., Cassani, M., Smith, J. & Seydoux, G. A gel phase promotes condensation of liquid P granules in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.26, 220–226 (2019). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Hanazawa, M., Yonetani, M. & Sugimoto, A. PGL proteins self associate and bind RNPs to mediate germ granule assembly in C. elegans. J. Cell Biol.192, 929–937 (2011). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Gallo, C. M., Wang, J. T., Motegi, F. & Seydoux, G. Cytoplasmic partitioning of P granule components is not required to specify the germline in C. elegans. Science330, 1685–1689 (2010). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Visa, N., Puvion-Dutilleul, F., Bachellerie, J. P. & Puvion, E. Intranuclear distribution of U1 and U2 snRNAs visualized by high resolution in situ hybridization: revelation of a novel compartment containing U1 but not U2 snRNA in HeLa cells. Eur. J. Cell Biol.60, 308–321 (1993). CASPubMed Google Scholar
Sasaki, Y. T., Ideue, T., Sano, M., Mituyama, T. & Hirose, T. MENε/β noncoding RNAs are essential for structural integrity of nuclear paraspeckles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA106, 2525–2530 (2009). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Hennig, S. et al. Prion-like domains in RNA binding proteins are essential for building subnuclear paraspeckles. J. Cell Biol.210, 529–539 (2015). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
West, J. A. et al. Structural, super-resolution microscopy analysis of paraspeckle nuclear body organization. J. Cell Biol.214, 817–830 (2016). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Chen, L. L. & Carmichael, G. G. Altered nuclear retention of mRNAs containing inverted repeats in human embryonic stem cells: functional role of a nuclear noncoding RNA. Mol. Cell35, 467–478 (2009). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Wang, C. et al. Stress induces dynamic, cytotoxicity-antagonizing TDP-43 nuclear bodies via paraspeckle LncRNA NEAT1-mediated liquid–liquid phase separation. Mol. Cell79, 443–458.e7 (2020). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Modic, M. et al. Cross-regulation between TDP-43 and paraspeckles promotes pluripotency-differentiation transition. Mol. Cell74, 951–965.e13 (2019). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Mahl, P., Lutz, Y., Puvion, E. & Fuchs, J. P. Rapid effect of heat shock on two heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein-associated antigens in HeLa cells. J. Cell Biol.109, 1921–1935 (1989). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Denegri, M. et al. Human chromosomes 9, 12, and 15 contain the nucleation sites of stress-induced nuclear bodies. Mol. Biol. Cell13, 2069–2079 (2002). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Markmiller, S. et al. Context-dependent and disease-specific diversity in protein interactions within stress granules. Cell172, 590–604.e13 (2018). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Stoecklin, G. et al. MK2-induced tristetraprolin:14–3–3 complexes prevent stress granule association and ARE-mRNA decay. EMBO J.23, 1313–1324 (2004). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Mazroui, R. et al. Trapping of messenger RNA by fragile X mental retardation protein into cytoplasmic granules induces translation repression. Hum. Mol. Genet.11, 3007–3017 (2002). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Solomon, S. et al. Distinct structural features of caprin-1 mediate its interaction with G3BP-1 and its induction of phosphorylation of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α, entry to cytoplasmic stress granules, and selective interaction with a subset of mRNAs. Mol. Cell Biol.27, 2324–2342 (2007). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Khong, A. et al. The stress granule transcriptome reveals principles of mRNA accumulation in stress granules. Mol. Cell68, 808–820.e5 (2017). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Van Treeck, B. et al. RNA self-assembly contributes to stress granule formation and defining the stress granule transcriptome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA115, 2734–2739 (2018). ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Kedersha, N. et al. Dynamic shuttling of TIA-1 accompanies the recruitment of mRNA to mammalian stress granules. J. Cell Biol.151, 1257–1268 (2000). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Mateju, D. et al. Single-molecule imaging reveals translation of mRNAs localized to stress granules. Cell183, 1801–1812.e13 (2020). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Kedersha, N. et al. Stress granules and processing bodies are dynamically linked sites of mRNP remodeling. J. Cell Biol.169, 871–884 (2005). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Mollet, S. et al. Translationally repressed mRNA transiently cycles through stress granules during stress. Mol. Biol. Cell19, 4469–4479 (2008). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Patel, A. et al. A liquid-to-solid phase transition of the ALS protein FUS accelerated by disease mutation. Cell162, 1066–1077 (2015). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Shav-Tal, Y. et al. Dynamic sorting of nuclear components into distinct nucleolar caps during transcriptional inhibition. Mol. Biol. Cell16, 2395–2413 (2005). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Sun, J., Xu, H., Subramony, S. H. & Hebert, M. D. Interactions between coilin and PIASy partially link Cajal bodies to PML bodies. J. Cell Sci.118, 4995–5003 (2005). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Liu, Q., Fischer, U., Wang, F. & Dreyfuss, G. The spinal muscular atrophy disease gene product, SMN, and its associated protein SIP1 are in a complex with spliceosomal snRNP proteins. Cell90, 1013–1021 (1997). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Mannen, T., Yamashita, S., Tomita, K., Goshima, N. & Hirose, T. The Sam68 nuclear body is composed of two RNase-sensitive substructures joined by the adaptor HNRNPL. J. Cell Biol.214, 45–59 (2016). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
An, H., Tan, J. T. & Shelkovnikova, T. A. Stress granules regulate stress-induced paraspeckle assembly. J. Cell Biol.218, 4127–4140 (2019). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Hondele, M. et al. DEAD-box ATPases are global regulators of phase-separated organelles. Nature573, 144–148 (2019). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Zink, D., Fischer, A. H. & Nickerson, J. A. Nuclear structure in cancer cells. Nat. Rev. Cancer4, 677–687 (2004). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Farley-Barnes, K. I., Ogawa, L. M. & Baserga, S. J. Ribosomopathies: old concepts, new controversies. Trends Genet.35, 754–767 (2019). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Banani, S. F. et al. Genetic variation associated with condensate dysregulation in disease. Dev. Cell57, 1776–1788.e8 (2022). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Chong, S. et al. Imaging dynamic and selective low-complexity domain interactions that control gene transcription. Science361, eaar2555 (2018). ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Wan, L. et al. Impaired cell fate through gain-of-function mutations in a chromatin reader. Nature577, 121–126 (2020). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Spannl, S., Tereshchenko, M., Mastromarco, G. J., Ihn, S. J. & Lee, H. O. Biomolecular condensates in neurodegeneration and cancer. Traffic20, 890–911 (2019). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Wang, J. et al. A molecular grammar governing the driving forces for phase separation of prion-like RNA binding proteins. Cell174, 688–699.e16 (2018). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Henninger, J. E. et al. RNA-mediated feedback control of transcriptional condensates. Cell184, 207–225.e24 (2021). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Wu, M. et al. lncRNA SLERT controls phase separation of FC/DFCs to facilitate Pol I transcription. Science373, 547–555 (2021). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Sankaranarayanan, M. et al. Adaptable P body physical states differentially regulate bicoid mRNA storage during early Drosophila development. Dev. Cell56, 2886–2901.e6 (2021). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Statello, L., Guo, C. J., Chen, L. L. & Huarte, M. Gene regulation by long non-coding RNAs and its biological functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.22, 96–118 (2021). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Shi, Y. Mechanistic insights into precursor messenger RNA splicing by the spliceosome. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.18, 655–670 (2017). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Spitz, F. & Furlong, E. E. Transcription factors: from enhancer binding to developmental control. Nat. Rev. Genet.13, 613–626 (2012). ArticleCASPubMed Google Scholar
Hnisz, D., Shrinivas, K., Young, R. A., Chakraborty, A. K. & Sharp, P. A. A phase separation model for transcriptional control. Cell169, 13–2 (2017). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Sabari, B. R. et al. Coactivator condensation at super-enhancers links phase separation and gene control. Science361, eaar3958 (2018). ArticlePubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar
Cho, W. K. et al. Mediator and RNA polymerase II clusters associate in transcription-dependent condensates. Science361, 412–415 (2018). ArticleCASPubMedPubMed Central Google Scholar